Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating neurodegenerative disease of the CNS that requires long-term treatment. The identification of patient characteristics that can help predict disease outcomes could improve care for patients with MS. The objective of this study is to identify predictors of disease activity in patients from the BEYOND trial. This regression analysis of patients with relapsing–remitting MS from BEYOND examined the predictive value of patient characteristics at baseline and after 1 year of treatment with interferon beta-1b 250 μg every other day for clinical and MRI outcomes after year 1 of the study. 857 and 765 patients were included in the analyses of clinical and MRI outcomes, respectively. In multivariate analyses of age, a higher number of relapses in the past 2 years, ≥3 new MRI lesions in the first year, and, especially, a higher number of relapses in year 1 predicted the future occurrence of relapses. By contrast, age, MRI activity, and the presence of neutralizing antibodies in the first year were principally predictive of future MRI activity. In patients with continued clinical disease activity or substantial MRI activity on therapy, an alternative therapeutic approach should be strongly considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
MS is a chronic demyelinating disease of the CNS which often causes significant disability [1]. Many patients with MS will require treatment with disease-modifying therapies for the rest of their lives after diagnosis, and, therefore, the identification of predictors of disease course, both at the start of therapy and early in the course of treatment, might be helpful in planning the course of further therapy.
Interferon beta-1b (IFNβ-1b; Betaferon®/Betaseron®, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Whippany, New Jersey, United States) has been shown to be effective for the treatment of patients with relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) in several clinical trials [2, 3]. Nevertheless, some patients may still have an unfavorable disease course despite treatment. Consequently, determining predictors of future disease course, especially those that take place during therapy with interferon beta-1b, may help guide management decisions [4]. To this end, we undertook a subgroup analysis of the BEYOND trial [3], which explored the value of using various clinical, MRI, and laboratory parameters as predictors of the future disease course in patients with RRMS treated with the standard dose of interferon beta-1b.
Materials and methods
In the BEYOND study, patients were randomized to receive interferon beta-1b 250 µg or 500 µg sc every other day or glatiramer acetate 20 mg sc every day and were observed for a minimum of 2 years and for a maximum of 3.5 years. For the present analysis, only the data for patients who received the approved 250 µg dose of IFNβ-1b and who had been observed for ≥1 year were included. Clinical outcomes were assessed quarterly, and the presence of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) was determined every 6 months using the MxA induction assay [5]. MRI assessment was done at screening and then annually thereafter. For a full description of the methods of the BEYOND study, see O’Connor et al. [3].
The prediction of post-year 1 disease course was evaluated using overdispersed Poisson regression models with relapse rate and MRI activity rate serving as the dependent variables. This method appropriately accounts for the different follow-up times for different patients. In univariate models, each predictor was examined separately. By contrast, for the multivariate models all predictors were incorporated simultaneously and a stepwise procedure (based on the Akaike information criterion) was used to select those with a significant and independent contribution to the model. The baseline predictors of age, EDSS score, number of relapses in the 2 years before study entry, disease duration, T2 volume, and T1 hypointensity (black hole) volume were analyzed as continuous variables. The baseline predictors of sex and the presence of any T1 gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions (yes or no) were analyzed as dichotomous variables. The categorical predictors based on year 1 disease activity were the number of new MRI lesions (0, 1–2, ≥3), NAb titer at year 1 (0, 20–400, ≥400 NU/mL), the occurrence of relapses (yes or no) within the first year of IFNβ-1b therapy, and the EDSS progression as assessed by a sustained change of ≥1.0 point, confirmed after 12 months.
Results
For the analysis of relapse data, there were 857 patients who had a mean time on study of 2.4 years. As shown in Table 1, for the univariate analysis, the baseline variables of a younger age (Fig. 1a), the presence of any Gd+ lesions, a higher number of relapses in the 2 years prior to trial enrollment, a higher T2 lesion volume, and a higher black hole lesion volume were each associated with a higher post-year 1 relapse rate. After 1 year of treatment, the variables of a higher number of new lesions on MRI and the occurrence of relapses predicted a higher post-year 1 relapse rate (Fig. 1b). By contrast, higher NAb titers were not significantly associated with the post-year 1 relapse rate and, in fact, those trends which did exist were for higher NAb titers to be associated with lower relapse rates (Table 1). EDSS progression was not significantly associated although the trend was for EDSS progression to be associated with a higher post-year 1 relapse rate (Table 1). In the multivariate analysis, the only variables that remained as significant independent predictors of a higher relapse rate in the final regression equation were younger age at baseline, higher number of relapses in the 2 years prior to trial onset, higher number of new MRI lesions in year 1, and the occurrence of relapses in year 1. Nevertheless, the contribution to the final regression equation by relapses prior to the randomized trial was only marginal and much reduced from its apparent contribution in the univariate analysis (Table 1).
Impact of age and number of new lesions in year 1 on post-year 1 relapse and new lesion rates. Relationship between categorized age and number of new lesions in year 1 that significantly predicted post-year 1 relapse rates (a, b) and rates of new lesions (c, d) in both univariate and multivariate models
765 patients were available for the analysis of the MRI data. As demonstrated in Table 1, for the univariate analysis, the baseline variables of younger age (Fig. 1c), the presence of any baseline Gd+ lesions, and higher baseline T2 lesion volume were each associated with a higher post-year 1 relapse rate. After 1 year of treatment, the variables of higher number of new MRI lesions in year 1 (Fig. 1d) and higher NAb titer at year 1 predicted a higher MRI activity rate. EDSS progression and relapses in the first year were not significantly associated although the trends were for higher relapses and non-occurrence of EDSS progression to be associated with higher MRI activity. In the multivariate analysis, the only variables that remained as significant independent predictors of a higher MRI activity rate in the final regression equation were younger age at baseline, higher baseline T2 volume, higher number of new MRI lesions in year 1, and higher NAb titer at year 1.
Interestingly, it seems that relapses during therapy were better predictors of future relapses than they were of future MRI activity (Table 1). Similarly, MRI activity seemed to have been a better predictor of future MRI activity than it was of future relapses (Table 1).
Discussion
The introduction of new drugs as MS therapeutics has been accompanied by the prospect of both improved efficacy and increased toxicity [6]. In such a circumstance, physicians require guidance about the optimal time to switch a patient from a first-line therapy to a new therapy that is potentially more effective but also potentially more risky. There is some evidence that brain MRI could be used to indicate treatment response for IFNβ formulations [7]; however, this issue is highly controversial. To help address this question, we undertook a subgroup analysis of the BEYOND study of those patients treated with the standard dose of IFNβ-1b to search for factors that may be indicative of an insufficient response to treatment. Because IFNβ-1b treatment unequivocally reduces (on average) both clinical and MRI evidence of disease activity [2, 8], the identification of those factors (while on therapy), which predict a poor post-treatment outcome, might be very helpful to clinicians in identifying those patients who are in need of more aggressive management.
In the present study, several clinical and brain MRI predictors (both at baseline and during treatment) were identified by univariate analysis as being associated with higher levels of disease activity during the subsequent period of observation. By contrast, the number of variables was greatly reduced when we used a multivariate approach to look for independent contributors. Thus, both the relapse activity before treatment and, to a much greater extent, the relapses during the first year of treatment were significantly associated with higher post-year 1 relapse rates. However, none of these predictors were selected in the multivariate model for prediction of MRI lesion rates. Similarly, both the baseline T2 hyperintense lesion volume and, especially, increasing MRI activity during the first year of therapy were significant independent predictors of future MRI activity. However, although the highest category of MRI activity (≥3 new lesions) was weakly predictive of future relapses, none of the other MRI variables were significantly associated with future relapses. Also, the presence of NAbs during the first year of therapy was a significant predictor of future MRI activity. Nevertheless, consistent with previously published observations from BEYOND and from other studies [9, 10], there was not even a hint of an impact of NAbs on future relapse activity (Table 1).
These findings are similar to, but distinct from, those reported previously [11–13]. In a study of 222 patients, the authors reported that the combination of relapses together with the finding of new active MRI lesions was particularly important prognostically [12]. In the present study, also, both relapses and MRI activity were important for prognosis but seemed to predict different outcomes (i.e., relapses predicted future relapses and MRI predicted future MRI activity). This kind of disconnect between the clinical state and MRI has been noted previously and has been referred to as the clinico-radiological paradox [14]. It is also similar to the disconnect, which has been observed with respect to the correlation between the short-term outcome measures and long-term disability [15]. Thus, in the 16-year follow-up of the pivotal IFNβ-1b trial, the only significant on-study predictors of disability outcomes were the clinical measures of attack rate and short-term disability [15]. By contrast, all of the on-study MRI variables were not correlated with outcome [15].
In this context, because in the present study the occurrence of relapses on therapy was strongly predictive of future relapses, and because relapses seem to be predictive of future disability [16], the results of the present study suggest that clinicians, faced with a patient who continues to experience clinical activity, should seriously consider an alteration in their therapeutic approach to that patient. MRI activity might contribute to this decision only if the activity is substantial. Nevertheless, at the moment, such a conclusion must be considered only tentative. The observation period of the BEYOND study was short and the disease activity (observed in this study) was quite low. Both of these factors limit the generalizability of these observations to long-term disability progression. Moreover, the relationship of clinical relapses and/or MRI activity to long-term disability progression is controversial and requires further study [4, 17, 18].
References
Compston A, Coles A (2008) Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 25(372):1502–1517
The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group (1993) Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis I. Clinical results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 43:655–661
O’Connor P, Filippi M, Arnason B et al (2009) 250 microg or 500 microg interferon beta-1b versus 20 mg glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet Neurol 8:889–897
Langer-Gould A, Popat RA, Huang SM et al (2006) Clinical and demographic predictors of long-term disability in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. Arch Neurol 63:1686–1691
Pungor E Jr, Files JG, Gabe JD et al (1998) A novel bioassay for the determination of neutralizing antibodies to IFN-beta1b. J Interferon Cytokine Res 18:1025–1030
Damal K, Stoker E, Foley JF (2013) Optimizing therapeutics in the management of patients with multiple sclerosis: a review of drug efficacy, dosing, and mechanisms of action. Biologics 7:247–258
Moraal B, Pohl C, Uitdehaag BM et al (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging predictors of conversion to multiple sclerosis in the BENEFIT study. Arch Neurol 66:1345–1352
Kappos L, Polman CH, Freedman MS et al (2006) Treatment with interferon beta-1b delays conversion to clinically definite and McDonald MS in patients with clinically isolated syndromes. Neurology 67:1242–1249
Goodin DS, Hartung HP, O’Connor P et al (2012) Neutralizing antibodies to interferon beta-1b multiple sclerosis: a clinico-radiographic paradox in the BEYOND trial. Mult Scler 18:181–195
Hartung HP, Freedman MS, Polman CH et al (2011) Interferon beta-1b-neutralizing antibodies 5 years after clinically isolated syndrome. Neurology 77:835–843
Dobson R, Rudick RA, Turner B et al (2014) Assessing treatment response to interferon-beta: is there a role for MRI? Neurology 82:248–254
Rio J, Castillo J, Rovira A et al (2009) Measures in the first year of therapy predict the response to interferon beta in MS. Mult Scler 15:848–853
Sormani MP, De SN (2013) Defining and scoring response to IFN-beta in multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 9:504–512
Barkhof F (2002) The clinico-radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis revisited. Curr Opin Neurol 15:239–245
Goodin DS, Traboulsee A, Knappertz V et al (2012) Relationship between early clinical characteristics and long term disability outcomes: 16 year cohort study (follow-up) of the pivotal interferon beta-1b trial in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 83:282–287
Scalfari A, Neuhaus A, Degenhardt A et al (2010) The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study 10: relapses and long-term disability. Brain 133:1914–1929
Rudick RA, Cutter GR, Baier M, Fisher E et al (2005) Estimating long-term effects of disease-modifying drug therapy in multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 11:626–634
Sormani MP, Li DK, Bruzzi P et al (2011) Combined MRI lesions and relapses as a surrogate for disability in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 77:1684–1690
Acknowledgments
We thank the patients and investigators in the BEYOND study for their contribution to this research. Medical writing assistance funded by Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals was provided by Robert C. Ristuccia, PhD (Precept Medical Communications). This work was supported by Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical standards
The study was conducted according to good clinical practice and the International Conference on Harmonisation guidelines with institutional review board approval from all participating centers. Informed consent was collected from all participants at study entry.
Conflicts of interest
H-P Hartung has received honoraria for consulting and speaking at symposia from Bayer Schering Pharma, Biogen Idec, GeNeuro, Genzyme, MedImmune, Merck Serono, Novartis, Octapharma, Opexa, Roche, Teva, and Sanofi-Aventis, with approval by the rector of Heinrich Heine University. The MS center at the Department of Neurology is supported by the Walter und Ilse Rose Stiftung and the Ilselore-Luckow Stiftung. It is a member of the German Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis (KKNMS).
Ludwig Kappos’ Institution (University Hospital Basel) received in the last 3 years and used exclusively for research support: steering committee, advisory board, and consultancy fees (Actelion, Addex, Bayer Health Care, Biogen, Biotica, Genzyme, Lilly, Merck, Mitsubishi, Novartis, Ono Pharma, Pfizer, Receptos, Sanofi-Aventis, Santhera, Siemens, Teva, UCB, Xenoport); speaker fees (Bayer Health Care, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Teva); support of educational activities (Bayer Health Care, Biogen, CSL Behring, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva); royalties (Neurostatus Systems GmbH); and grants (Bayer Health Care, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Swiss MS Society, the Swiss National Research Foundation, the European Union, Roche Research Foundations).
DS Goodin has participated (or is currently participating) in several industry-sponsored clinical trials in MS; the sponsoring pharmaceutical companies for these trials have included (or do include): Ares-Serono, Merck Serono, Novartis, Berlex Laboratories, Bayer Schering HealthCare, Biogen Idec, Schering AG, and Teva Neuroscience. He has also lectured at both medical conferences and in public on various aspects of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of MS, and in many cases these talks have been sponsored directly or indirectly by one or another of the above-listed companies. He has served as a temporary ad hoc consultant to several of these organizations on several occasions.
P O’Connor has received either personal compensation (for consultation, service on a scientific advisory board, or from speaking) or financial support for scholarly activities from pharmaceutical companies that develop products for MS, including Biogen Idec, Sanofi-Aventis, EMD, Serono, Abbott Labs, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Bio-MS, Genentech, Genzyme, Roche, and Novartis.
M Filippi is Editor-in-Chief of Journal of Neurology; serves on scientific advisory boards for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries; has received compensation for consulting services and/or speaking activities from Bayer Schering Pharma, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries; and receives research support from Bayer Schering Pharma, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Italian Ministry of Health, Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla, Cure PSP, Alzheimer’s and Drug Discovery Foundation, and the Jacques and Gloria Gossweiler Foundation (Switzerland).
B Arnason has served as a consultant for Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals.
G Comi has received personal compensation for activities with Teva Neuroscience, Merck Serono, Bayer-Schering, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceuticals, and Biogen-Dompé as a consultant.
S Cook has received honoraria from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and from other pharmaceutical companies (Genmab, Merck, and Merck Serono) for speaking and consulting.
D Jeffery has received honoraria for speaking and consulting from and funded research with Bayer, Serono, Pfizer, Teva, Novartis, Biogen, and GlaxoSmithKline.
J Petkau has received research funds from Bayer Pharma and consulting fees and/or fees for service on Data Safety Monitoring Boards from Bayer Canada, Bayer Pharma, Bayhill Therapeutics, BTG International, Merck-Serono, and Novartis.
R White has served as a consultant for and received financial compensation from Bayer Schering Pharma.
T Bogumil is a salaried employee of Bayer Pharma AG/Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and owns stock in Bayer AG, the owner of Bayer Pharma AG/Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals.
K Beckmann is a salaried employee of Bayer Pharma AG/Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals.
B Stemper is a salaried employee of Bayer Pharma AG/Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and owns stock in Bayer AG, the owner of Bayer Pharma AG/Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals.
G Suarez is a salaried employee of Bayer Pharma AG/Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals.
C Pohl is a salaried employee of Bayer Pharma AG/Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and owns stock in Bayer AG, the owner of Bayer Pharma AG/Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals.
Additional information
On behalf of the BEYOND Study Group.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Hartung, HP., Kappos, L., Goodin, D.S. et al. Predictors of disease activity in 857 patients with MS treated with interferon beta-1b. J Neurol 262, 2466–2471 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-015-7862-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-015-7862-9