Skip to main content

Very late-onset neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder beyond the age of 75

Abstract

Aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-Ab)-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare but often severe autoimmune disease with median onset around 40 years of age. We report characteristics of three very-late-onset NMOSD (including complete NMO) patients >75 years of age, in whom this diagnosis initially seemed unlikely because of their age and age-associated concomitant diseases, and briefly review the literature. All three patients, aged 79, 82 and 88 years, presented with a spinal cord syndrome as the first clinical manifestation of AQP4-Ab-positive NMOSD. They all had severe relapses unless immunosuppressive therapy was initiated, and one untreated patient died of a fatal NMOSD course. Two patients developed side effects of immunosuppression. We conclude that a first manifestation of NMOSD should be considered even in patients beyond the age of 75 years with a compatible syndrome, especially longitudinally extensive myelitis. Early diagnosis and treatment are feasible and highly relevant. Special attention is warranted in the elderly to recognize adverse effects of immunosuppressive therapies as early as possible.

Background

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is a rare but often severely disabling autoimmune disease of the central nervous system affecting predominantly women, most frequently in their 30s to 40s [1, 2]. Aquaporin-4 antibodies (AQP4-Ab) are present in about 80 % of NMO patients and in a subset of patients with isolated longitudinally extensive myelitis or isolated optic neuritis, who are then considered to have formes frustes of NMO. NMO and its incomplete forms are referred to as NMO spectrum disorders (NMOSD) [3]. AQP4-Ab are highly specific for NMOSD, even in the elderly [4].

Case series

Case 1

A 79-year-old man was admitted to a municipal hospital with a bilateral sensory level below T3 and gait ataxia since the last month (EDSS 6.5). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed spinal cord lesions at vertebra C1-4, at T3/4, and brain microangiopathy. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis showed mildly increased albumin, but normal immunoglobulin G (IgG), negative oligoclonal bands (OCB), and a normal cell count. Autoimmune myelitis was suspected, and symptoms improved after intravenous glucocorticoids (EDSS 5.0).

Four months later, a second attack occurred with severe left-sided optic neuritis and worsening of sensorimotor symptoms (EDSS 9.0). MRI revealed an enlarged myelon lesion (medulla oblongata to vertebra C5, partially gadolinium-enhancing). CSF analysis showed pleocytosis (32/µl). Symptoms improved after intravenous steroids (EDSS 8.0).

After another month, a third attack occurred with dysphagia, a high-cervical transverse spinal cord syndrome with marked tetraparesis, and another severe optic neuritis (blindness in left eye; EDSS 9.0). He was admitted to a university hospital. MRI revealed a lesion extending over the entire myelon and brainstem involvement (Fig. 1a). CSF analysis showed 43 cells/µl including granulocytes. AQP4-Ab were positive in serum and CSF (ΔMFI 816 and 181, respectively, FACS-based assay), and diagnosis of AQP4-Ab positive NMO [5] as part of NMOSD [3] was established. Intravenous steroids were given, followed by plasma exchange, without improvement. After further deterioration with respiratory insufficiency because of high cervical myelon involvement (EDSS 9.5) and pneumonia, he required intensive care and died shortly thereafter.

Fig. 1
figure 1

MRI scans of case 1–3 showing longitudinally extensive spinal cord lesions. Yellow solid arrows indicate extensions of lesions. The lesion extended throughout the entire myelon and there were also lesions in the brainstem in case 1 (a) (upper inset in a). Blue dashed lines in the sagittal images indicate the levels of related axial scans. med. obl. axial scan at level of medulla oblongata, C and T indicate the respective cervical and thoracic vertebrae; T2 T2 weighed MRI sequence, T1 T1 weighed MRI sequence, +Gd gadolinium-enhanced sequence

Case 2

An 88-year-old woman experienced numbness in her legs and moderate paraparesis with impaired gait since 2 days. Spinal MRI demonstrated a myelon lesion from vertebra T6-9 (Fig. 1b-c), which was initially attributed to compression myelopathy because of concomitant vertebral disc protrusions. Without specific treatment, she recovered partially and was able to walk with a crutch for >100 m (EDSS 6.0). Her previous medical history was negative for prior potential attacks, but included a transient ischemic attack with dysarthria for <24 h 1.5 years before; cerebral MRI had not shown inflammatory lesions.

Eight months later, she was re-admitted with an anew gait impairment and sensorimotor paraparesis (MRC grade 2–3, EDSS 8.5). MRI demonstrated a new T2 hyperintense myelon lesion from vertebra T10–T12 with central gadolinium enhancement (Fig. 1d–f). Visual evoked potentials had low amplitudes bilaterally and normal latencies. CSF showed mild lymphomonocytic pleocytosis and positive OCB. Serum AQP4-Ab were positive (1:3200, cell-based immunofluorescence assay), as were antibodies against dsDNA and cardiolipin. Diagnosis of AQP4-Ab positive NMOSD was established, and the first myelon lesion was retrospectively attributed also to NMOSD. Treatment included methylprednisolone 5 × 1 g, a second cycle of 5 × 2 g, and then plasma exchange. She recovered partially (EDSS 7.0). Azathioprine was given up to 150 mg/d (2.2 mg/kg); thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity was normal. After 5 months of therapy, regular blood testing revealed pancytopenia. Azathioprine was stopped, but thrombocytopenia persisted and she died of intestinal bleeding. In addition to azathioprine as a likely cause for bone marrow suppression and thrombocytopenia, she had also developed anti-platelet antibodies.

Case 3

A woman was admitted shortly before her 83rd birthday with numbness and weakness in her right arm, impaired sensation below T10 bilaterally, and high-graded paraparesis since 2 days (EDSS 8.0). Her previous medical history and family history was unremarkable, in particular, for previous attack-like clinical events or immunological disease. Infectious myelitis was suspected, and antimicrobial treatment started.

MRI demonstrated two longitudinally extensive myelon lesions (foramen magnum to vertebra C4, T6-9), both with dorsal gadolinium enhancement (Fig. 1g–i), but no inflammatory brain lesions. CSF analysis showed mild pleocytosis (10 cells/µl, 3 % neutrophils) with one CSF-restricted band, negative MRZ reaction, and normal IgG and albumin ratios. An extensive search for microbial pathogens in serum and CSF was negative. She reported no visual symptoms, but visual evoked potentials demonstrated delayed P100 latencies bilaterally with normal amplitudes. Screening for rheumatic disease showed high titers for antinuclear antibodies (1:12,800, negative for standard ENA panel) without further clinical or laboratory evidence of rheumatologic disease.

Autoimmune myelitis being suspected, she received methylprednisolone (5 × 500 mg i.v.). Serum AQP4-Ab turned out positive (1:320, immunofluorescence assay), and diagnosis of AQP4-Ab positive NMOSD was established. Since there was no improvement and the patient refused plasma exchange, she received a second cycle of methylprednisolone (5 × 2 g i.v. with oral taper), and azathioprine was started (up to 125 mg/d). She improved continuously and was able to walk with a walking frame and lived independently again (EDSS 6.5).

Three months later, she developed cytomegalovirus pneumonia and hepatopathy, probably related to azathioprine. At the time of admission, she had normal leukocyte counts and moderate lymphopenia (11 % ≙ 570/µl). Azathioprine was discontinued. She recovered completely after receiving ganciclovir. Immunosuppression was switched to mycophenolate mofetil which is well tolerated (1.5 g/d). Until now, she has remained relapse-free for 2 years.

Conclusions

According to independent cohorts, the mean onset of NMO is around 40 years [1, 2]. We report three patients who were much older at the time of first manifestation, so that initially NMOSD was considered unlikely. Patients with very late-onset NMOSD (>75 years) have hitherto only rarely been reported in detail, and case 2 is, to our knowledge, the oldest patient described so far (Table 1).

Table 1 Screening Pubmed for NMOSD cohorts and case reports with at least 1 patient with onset >60 years did not reveal patients at least as old as our NMOSD patient with very late-onset at 88 years. Onset >50 years is usually defined already as late-onset

Of note, all our patients initially presented with myelitis. More frequent myelitis (vs. optic neuritis) as initial presentation is consistent with recent reports for patients with late-onset (>50–60 years) from Europe, USA and Japan [69] (see also Table 1). Interestingly, also multiple sclerosis late-onset patients had more often spinal cord lesions compared to young-onset (<50 years) patients [10].

Both patients (case 1 and 2) who did not receive immunosuppression after their first attack experienced one or more subsequent relapses shortly afterwards, and case 1 who never received immunosuppression had a fulminant course and died of NMO sequelae within 1 year from disease onset. An older age at onset was associated with earlier death due to myelitis and infection [6]. Unlike in multiple sclerosis, relapse activity in NMO does not seem to decrease with age; even very old patients are at risk of further disabling attacks (our cases, ref [11], and Table 1). This suggests that also patients with late-onset need long-term prophylactic treatment to prevent subsequent relapses.

The benefits of an immunosuppressive therapy have to be weighed against an increased risk of adverse effects in the elderly. Clearly, attention and alertness is warranted especially in older individuals to recognize adverse effects as early as possible. Further NMOSD treatment studies should pay special attention to patients with late-onset.

In all three cases, NMOSD initially was not considered as the first-line diagnosis, mainly because of the old age and past medical history. In this age group, seemingly competing explanations of myelon lesions are common, including vascular, infectious, and orthopedic causes, as initially falsely suspected also here. However, delayed diagnosis and treatment can lead to subsequent relapses and fatal outcome. Therefore, it is mandatory to consider NMOSD irrespective of age and past medical history in patients with a compatible syndrome, especially longitudinally extensive myelitis. The diagnostic workup should include MRI, CSF investigations including differential cell count, serum AQP4-Ab testing using recombinant cell-based assays, and electrophysiology to detect and treat NMOSD as early as possible.

Abbreviations

AQP4:

Aquaporin 4

AQP4-Ab:

Aquaporin-4 antibodies

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

EDSS:

Expanded disability status scale (0–10 points, 0 = normal, 10 = death due to MS)

IgG:

Immunoglobulin G

MRC:

Medical Research Council (scale for muscle strength 0–5, 5 = full strength)

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

NEMOS:

Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group

NMO:

Neuromyelitis optica

NMOSD:

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

OCB:

Oligoclonal bands

References

  1. Jarius S, Ruprecht K, Wildemann B, Kuempfel T, Ringelstein M, Geis C, Kleiter I, Kleinschnitz C, Berthele A, Brettschneider J, Hellwig K, Hemmer B, Linker R, Lauda F, Mayer C, Tumani H, Melms A, Trebst C, Stangel M, Marziniak M, Hoffmann F, Schippling S, Faiss J, Neuhaus O, Ettrich B, Zentner C, Guthke K, Hofstadt-van Oy U, Reuss R, Pellkofer H, Ziemann U, Kern P, Wandinger KP, Then Bergh F, Boettcher T, Langel S, Liebetrau M, Rommer PS, Niehaus S, Münch C, Winkelmann A, Zettl UK, Metz I, Veauthier C, Sieb JP, Christian Wilke, Hartung HP, Aktas O, Paul F (2012) Contrasting disease patterns in seropositive and seronegative neuromyelitis optica: a multicentre study of 175 patients. J Neuroinflammation 9(1):14

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mealy MA, Wingerchuk DM, Greenberg BM, Levy M (2012) Epidemiology of neuromyelitis optica in the United States: a multicenter analysis. Arch Neurol 69(9):1176–1180. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2012.314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Lucchinetti CF, Pittock SJ, Weinshenker BG (2007) The spectrum of neuromyelitis optica. Lancet Neurol 6(9):805–815. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70216-8

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dahm L, Ott C, Steiner J, Stepniak B, Teegen B, Saschenbrecker S, Hammer C, Borowski K, Begemann M, Lemke S, Rentzsch K, Probst C, Martens H, Wienands J, Spalletta G, Weissenborn K, Stöcker W, Ehrenreich H (2014) Seroprevalence of autoantibodies against brain antigens in health and disease. Ann Neurol 76(1):82–94. doi:10.1002/ana.24189

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG (2006) Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 66(10):1485–1489. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000216139.44259.74

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Collongues N, Marignier R, Jacob A, Leite M, Siva A, Paul F, Zephir H, Akman-Demir G, Elsone L, Jarius S, Papeix C, Mutch K, Saip S, Wildemann B, Kitley J, Karabudak R, Aktas O, Kuscu D, Altintas A, Palace J, Confavreux C, De Seze J (2013) Characterization of neuromyelitis optica and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder patients with a late onset. Mult Scler J. doi:10.1177/1352458513515085

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ahn SW, Min JH, Kim BJ, Lee KH, Cho JY, Kim BJ, Kim HJ, An JY, Park MS, Kim NH, Shin HY, Kwon KH, Son EH, Kim JK (2011) Clinical characteristics of late-onset neuromyelitis optica. In: 5th Joint triennial congress of the European and Americas Committees for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  8. Nagaishi A, Takagi M, Umemura A, Tanaka M, Kitagawa Y, Matsui M, Nishizawa M, Sakimura K, Tanaka K (2011) Clinical features of neuromyelitis optica in a large Japanese cohort: comparison between phenotypes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 82(12):1360–1364. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2011-300403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aboul-Enein F, Seifert-Held T, Mader S, Kuenz B, Lutterotti A, Rauschka H, Rommer P, Leutmezer F, Vass K, Flamm-Horak A, Stepansky R, Lang W, Fertl E, Schlager T, Heller T, Eggers C, Safoschnik G, Fuchs S, Kraus J, Assar H, Guggenberger S, Reisz M, Schnabl P, Komposch M, Simschitz P, Skrobal A, Moser A, Jeschow M, Stadlbauer D, Freimüller M, Guger M, Schmidegg S, Franta C, Weiser V, Koppi S, Niederkorn-Duft M, Raber B, Schmeissner I, Jecel J, Tinchon A, Storch MK, Reindl M, Berger T, Kristoferitsch W (2013) Neuromyelitis Optica in Austria in 2011: to bridge the gap between neuroepidemiological research and practice in a study population of 8.4 million people. PLoS One 8(11):e79649. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079649

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kis B, Rumberg B, Berlit P (2008) Clinical characteristics of patients with late-onset multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 255(5):697–702. doi:10.1007/s00415-008-0778-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bourre B, Lefaucheur R, Girault C (2013) Treatment of NMO relapse in the elderly: rituximab when plasma exchange fails? Acta Neurol Belg 113(3):335–336. doi:10.1007/s13760-013-0178-6

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Collongues N, Marignier R, Zephir H, Papeix C, Blanc F, Ritleng C, Tchikviladze M, Outteryck O, Vukusic S, Fleury M, Fontaine B, Brassat D, Clanet M, Milh M, Pelletier J, Audoin B, Ruet A, Lebrun-Frenay C, Thouvenot E, Camu W, Debouverie M, Creange A, Moreau T, Labauge P, Castelnovo G, Edan G, Le Page E, Defer G, Barroso B, Heinzlef O, Gout O, Rodriguez D, Wiertlewski S, Laplaud D, Borgel F, Tourniaire P, Grimaud J, Brochet B, Vermersch P, Confavreux C, de Seze J (2010) Neuromyelitis optica in France: a multicenter study of 125 patients. Neurology 74(9):736–742. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181d31e35

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mandler RN, Davis LE, Jeffery DR, Kornfeld M (1993) Devic’s neuromyelitis optica: a clinicopathological study of 8 patients. Ann Neurol 34(2):162–168. doi:10.1002/ana.410340211

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ghezzi M, Giansanti M, Malentacchi GM, Barontini F (1987) Neuromyelitis optica in the old age: a clinico-pathological contribution. Ital J Neurol Sci 8(6):613–616

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Filley CM, Sternberg PE, Norenberg MD (1984) Neuromyelitis optica in the elderly. Arch Neurol 41(6):670–672

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lefaucheur R, Bourre B, Ahtoy P, Ozkul O, Tollard E, Hannequin D, Maltête D (2011) Neuromyelitis optica with very late onset. J Am Geriatr Soc 59(6):1138–1140. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03435.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Staugaitis SM, Roberts JK, Sacco RL, Miller JR, Dwork AJ (1998) Devic type multiple sclerosis in an 81 year old woman. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 64(3):417–418

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Loh KP, Brennan MJ (2015) Elderly-Onset Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders. J Am Geriatr Soc 63(2):411–412. doi:10.1111/jgs.13266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Tim Wesemann for expert technical assistance.

Conflicts of interest

No specific funding was obtained for this study. M. K. received grant support, traveling expenses and scientific advisory board honoraria from Novartis, the Novartis foundation and Genzyme. U. H.-v. O reports no conflict of interest. K. A. received support for patient education und travel expenses from Bayer Schering, Biogen-Idec, Teva, Merck/Serono, and Novartis. I. K. received travel expenses and personal compensations from Bayer Healthcare, Biogen-Idec, and Chugai, as well as research support from Bayer Healthcare, Novartis Pharma, and Biogen-Idec. S. J. was directly supported by a research grant from the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) and indirectly by research grants from the Dietmar Hopp Foundation and from Merck Serono to the Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. P. F. received research support from the Guthy Jackson Charitable Foundation and serves on the steering committee of MedImmune for an NMO trial. O. A. received grants by the German Research Foundation (DFG), Eugène Devic European Network (EDEN/EU-FP7), German Ministry for Education and Research, Schaufler Foundation, honoraria for lectures by Novartis, Bayer Schering, Teva, Biogen-Idec, and he holds patents and received travel/accommodations/meeting expenses by Novartis, Bayer Schering, and Merck Serono with permission by the Rector of Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf. G. B., P. K., and A. S. report no conflict of interest. T. K. received travel expenses and personal compensations from Bayer Healthcare, Teva Pharma, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme and Biogen-Idec as well as grant support from Bayer-Schering AG and Novartis.

Patient consent

Written informed consent was obtained from patient 3. Patient 2 had repeatedly given oral consent, but died before she could give written consent. Attempts to find next of kin were not successful. The attending physician, who had discussed potential publication of this case with the patient, documented her oral consent in writing. Patient 1 was not able to give his consent to the publication as he experienced a fulminant course and died several years ago. Attempts to contact his custodian and his family were not successful. Therefore, we have anonymized the description as much as possible. Also, the responsible ethics committee of the University of Regensburg does not require patient’s consent in case of anonymous publication of retrospective data (see http://www.uni-regensburg.de/medizin/ethikkommission/antragstellung/index.html).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Krumbholz.

Additional information

Appendix

Appendix

Members of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS) in alphabetical order: P. Albrecht, University of Düsseldorf; O. Aktas, University of Düsseldorf; K. Angstwurm, University of Regensburg; A. Berthele, Technische University of München; N. Borisow, Charite Berlin; T. Böttcher, Bonhoeffer Klinikum Neubrandenburg; J. Brettschneider, University of Ulm; B. Ettrich, University of Leipzig; J. Faiss, Asklepios Klinik Teupitz; A. Gass, University Hospital Mannheim; C. Geis, University of Würzburg; K. Guthke, Klinikum Görlitz; H-P. Hartung, University of Düsseldorf, K. Hellwig, Ruhr-University Bochum; B. Hemmer, Technical University Munich; F. Hoffmann, Krankenhaus Martha-Maria Halle; M. Kaste, Nordwest-Krankenhaus Sanderbusch, Sande; U. Hofstadt-van Oy, Klinikum Bayreuth; S. Jarius, University of Heidelberg; P. Kermer, Nordwest-Krankenhaus Sanderbusch, Sande; P. Kern, Asklepios Klinik Teupitz; C. Kleinschnitz, University of Würzburg; I. Kleiter, Ruhr-University Bochum; W. Köhler, Fachkrankenhaus Hubertusburg; E. Kolesilova, Asklepios Klinik Teupitz; M. Krumbholz, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich; T. Kümpfel, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich; S. Langel, Landeskrankenhaus Rheinhessen; F. Lauda, University of Ulm; M. Liebetrau, Evangelische Bathildiskrankenhaus Bad Pyrmont gGmbH; R. Linker, University of Erlangen; W. Marouf, Heliosklinik Stralsund; M. Marziniak, Isar-Amper Klinik Ost Munich; I. Metz, University of Göttingen; C. Mayer, University of Frankfurt; A. Melms, University of Erlangen; C. Münch, Charité University Medicine Berlin; O. Neuhaus, Kreiskrankenhaus Sigmaringen; S. Niehaus, Klinikum Dortmund; F. Pache, Charité University Medicine Berlin; F. Paul, Charité University Medicine Berlin, H. Pellkofer, University of Göttingen; R. Reuss, Bezirkskrankenhaus Bayreuth; A. Riedlinger, Asklepios Klinik Teupitz; M. Ringelstein, University of Düsseldorf; S.P. Rommer, University of Rostock; K. Ruprecht, Charité University Medicine Berlin; S. Schippling, University of Zürich (Switzerland); S. Schuster, University of Tübingen; M. Schwab, University of Jena; M. Stangel, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, J. Stellmann, University of Hamburg; F. Then-Bergh, University of Leipzig; C. Trebst, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover; H. Tumani, University of Ulm; C. Veauthier, Heliosklinik Stralsund; KP. Wandinger, University of Schleswig–Holstein; R. Weissert, University of Regensburg; B. Wildemann, University of Heidelberg; C. Wilke, Nervenzentrum Potsdam; A. Winkelmann, University of Rostock; L. Zeltner, University of Tübingen; C. Zentner, Martha Maria, University of Halle; U. Zettl, University of Rostock; U. Ziemann, University of Tübingen.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krumbholz, M., Hofstadt-van Oy, U., Angstwurm, K. et al. Very late-onset neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder beyond the age of 75. J Neurol 262, 1379–1384 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-015-7766-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-015-7766-8

Keywords

  • Neuromyelitis optica (Devic syndrome)
  • Myelitis
  • Aquaporin 4 antibodies
  • Very late-onset
  • Elderly/old-age
  • Therapy/immunosuppression