Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sub-threshold cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: the association with cognitive reserve

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with high premorbid intellect have the advantage of cognitive reserve that may mitigate the effects of cognitive decline. A fall-off in cognition may nevertheless still occur, even should it fail to meet global impairment thresholds. The present cross-sectional study explores the neurologic and behavioral characteristics of this little known group of patients. A consecutive sample of 144 MS patients underwent neuropsychological testing with the minimal assessment of cognitive function in the MS (MACFIMS) battery. Premorbid IQ was assessed with the ANART reading test. A validated algorithm based on ANART errors and verbal fluency scores was used to predict whether current cognitive function matched premorbid estimates. Three MS groups were thus defined: cognitively intact (n = 53), impaired (n = 46) and cognitively intact on the MACFIMS, but falling short of premorbid predictions (n = 45). Patients who were cognitively intact on the MACFIMS but fell short of verbal fluency predictions had higher premorbid IQ (p = 0.007) and lower EDSS (p = 0.002) than cognitively impaired, but not intact patients. They outperformed impaired patients on every MACFIMS variable, but were more impaired than intact patients on the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test-3 (PASAT-3) (p = 0.009). They were more likely to be employed (48.9 %) than the impaired (26.1 %) group (p = 0.025). We defined a group of MS patients deemed cognitively intact on conventional neuropsychological testing, but who, nevertheless, had deficits relative to premorbid intellectual abilities. The high premorbid IQ in this group does not prevent, but ‘softens’ the impact of cognitive decline. These findings provide novel evidence supporting cognitive reserve as a protective factor in relation to cognitive dysfunction in MS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rao SM, Leo GJ, Bernardin L et al (1991) Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology 41(5):685–691

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Benedict RH, Wahlig E, Bakshi R et al (2005) Predicting quality of life in multiple sclerosis: accounting for physical disability, fatigue, cognition, mood disorder, personality and behavior change. J Neurol Sci 231(1–2):29–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sumowski JF, Chiaravalloti N, DeLuca J (2009) Cognitive reserve protects against cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 31(8):913–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Benedict RHB, Zivadinov R (2011) Risk factors for and management of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 7:332–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Benedict RHB (2009) Standards for sample composition and impairment classification in neuropsychological studies of multiple sclerosis: Editorial. Mult Scler 15:777–778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan GE et al (2005) Diagnostic criteria: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”. Ann Neurol 58:840–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kurtzke JF (1983) Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33(11):1444–1452

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Benedict RH, Fischer JS, Archibald CJ et al (2002) Minimal neuropsychological assessment of MS patients: a consensus approach. Clin Neuropsychol 16(3):381–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gronwall DMA (1977) Paced auditory serial addition task: a measure of recovery from concussion. Percept Mot Skills 44:367–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith A (1982) Symbol Digit Modalities Test: manual. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  11. Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Ober BA (2000) California Verbal Learning Test manual: second edition, adult version. Psychological Corporation, San Antonio

    Google Scholar 

  12. Benedict RHB, Schretlen D, Groninger L et al (1996) Revision of the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test: studies of normal performance, reliability, and validity. Psychol Assess 8:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Benedict RHB (1997) Brief Visuospatial Memory Test—revised: professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa

    Google Scholar 

  14. Delis DC, Kaplan E, Kramer JH (2001) California Sorting Test. Psychological Corporation, San Antonio

    Google Scholar 

  15. Benton AL, Sivan AB, Hamsher K et al (1994) Contributions to neuropsychological assessment, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Benton AL, Hamsher K (1989) Multilingual aphasia examination. AJA Associates, Iowa City

    Google Scholar 

  17. Benedict RHB, Cookfair D, Gavett R et al (2006) Validity of the minimal assessment of cognitive function in multiple sclerosis (MACFIMS). J Int Neuropsychol Soc 12:549–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grober E, Sliwinski M (1991) Development and validation of a model for estimating premorbid verbal intelligence in the elderly. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 13:933–949

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Crawford JR, Parker DM, Besson JAO (1988) Estimation of premorbid intelligence in organic conditions. Br J Psychiatry 153:178–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Crawford JR, Moore JW, Cameron IM (1992) Verbal fluency: a NART-based equation for the estimation of premorbid performance. Br J Clin Psychol 31(Pt 3):327–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jacobs LD, Wende KE, Brownscheindle CM et al (1999) A profile of multiple sclerosis: the New York State Multiple Sclerosis Consortium. Mult Scler 5:369–376

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Patti F, Amato MP, Trojano M et al (2009) Cognitive impairment and its relation with disease measures in mildly disabled patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: baseline results from the Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis (COGIMUS) study. Mult Scler 15:779–788

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sumowski JF, Wylie GR, Chiaravalloti N et al (2010) Intellectual enrichment lessens the effect of brain atrophy on learning and memory in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 74:1942–1945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sumowski JF, Wylie GR, Gonnella A et al (2010) Premorbid cognitive leisure independently contributes to cognitive reserve in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 75:1428–1431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Benedict RHB, Morrow SA, Weinstock Guttman B et al (2010) Cognitive reserve moderates decline in information processing speed in multiple sclerosis patients. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 16:829–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Green RE, Colella B, Christensen B et al (2008) Examining moderators of cognitive recovery trajectories after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89(12 Suppl 2):S16–S24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kesler SR, Adams HF, Blasey CM et al (2003) Premorbid intellectual functioning, education, and brain size in traumatic brain injury: an investigation of the cognitive reserve hypothesis. Appl Neuropsychol 10(3):153–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Elkins JS, Longstreth WT Jr, Manolio TA et al (2006) Education and the cognitive decline associated with MRI-defined brain infarct. Neurology 67:435–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Stern Y (2006) Cognitive reserve and Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Discord 20:S69–S74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stern RA, Silva SG, Chaisson N et al (1996) Influence of cognitive reserve on neuropsychological functioning in asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection. Arch Neurol 53:148–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dufouil C, Alpérovitch A, Tzourio C (2003) Influence of education on the relationship between white matter lesions and cognition. Neurology 60(5):831–836

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sumowski JF, Chiaravalloti N, Wylie G et al (2009) Cognitive reserve moderates the negative effect of brain atrophy on cognitive efficiency in multiple sclerosis. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 15(4):606–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sumowski JF, Wylie GR, DeLuca J et al (2010) Intellectual enrichment is linked to cerebral efficiency in multiple sclerosis: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for cognitive reserve. Brain 133:362–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Liesly Lee, MD (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre), Kathleen Carr, RN (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre), and Sheryl Clarke, RN, BSN, M.Ed. (St. Michael’s Hospital) for assisting with recruitment and Kimia Honarmand for assisting with data collection. This study was funded by the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada.

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Feinstein has served on scientific advisory boards for Merck Serono and Avanir Pharmaceuticals; has received speaker honoraria from Merck Serono, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Bayer Schering Pharma, and Biogen Idec; serves on the editorial boards of Multiple Sclerosis and the African Journal of Psychiatry; receives publishing royalties for The Clinical Neuropsychiatry of Multiple Sclerosis (Cambridge University Press, 2007); chairs the Medical Advisory Committee for the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada; conducts neuropsychiatric evaluation, cognitive testing, brain imaging in neuropsychiatry in his clinical practice; and receives research support from the Canadian Institute of Health Research, the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

H. Lapshin has received support from an Ontario Graduate Scholarship grant.

Dr. O’Connor serves on scientific advisory boards for Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Bayer Schering Pharma, Genentech, Inc., and Roche; has received speaker honoraria from Biogen Idec, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Novartis, and Sanofi-Aventis; has served as a consultant for Biogen Idec, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Bayer Schering Pharma, EMD Serono, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Genentech Inc., and Warburg Pincus; has received research support from Abbott, Bayer Schering Pharma, Novartis, BioMS Medical, Sanofi-Aventis, CIS Pharma, Genmab A/S, Cognosci, Inc., Wyeth, Daiichi Sankyo, and Roche; and serves as the National Scientific and Clinical Advisor to the MS Society of Canada.

Dr. Lanctôt has received research support and/or speaker’s honoraria from Abbott Laboratories, Lundbeck Canada Inc., Pfizer Canada Inc., Janssen Ortho, MedImmune, and Wyeth.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony Feinstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feinstein, A., Lapshin, H., O’Connor, P. et al. Sub-threshold cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: the association with cognitive reserve. J Neurol 260, 2256–2261 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-6952-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-6952-9

Keywords

Navigation