Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of false starts by saw created on flesh and dry bones; as close as possible to the real conditions of criminal dismemberment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In most experimental protocols, false starts are produced on dry bones obtained through a maceration process for anthropological analyses, for the sake of reproducibility. Although this allows for controlled experimental conditions, the absence of soft parts when experimentally creating false starts does not correspond to the real conditions of criminal dismemberment. The main objective of this study was to determine if the results of experimental work on the characteristics of false starts were valid under medico-legal conditions. In this experimental study, a hand saw (rip saw, wavy set, TPI 32) was used. 240 false starts were produced on human and pig bones. Randomly, the false starts were either produced on a dry bone or on a flesh bone. The criteria for microscopic analysis included the shape of the walls, the shape and visibility of striae on the floor, the shape of the profile, and the minimum width of the false start. On human bone, 100% of the false starts produced on a bone that had previously undergone a maceration process for anthropological analyses (dry bone) allowed the definition of all the blade characteristics. This was the case for 78.3% on bone in the presence of soft tissue (flesh bone). The striae on the floor of the false start are in some cases less visible with flesh bones, implying that it may be more difficult to conclude on the characteristics of a saw under medico-legal conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilke-Schalhorst N, Schröder AS, Püschel K, Edler C (2019) Criminal corpse dismemberment in Hamburg, Germany from 1959 to 2016. Forensic Sci Int 300:145–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Saville PA, Hainsworth, Rutty GN (2007) Cutting crime: the analysis of the uniqueness of saw marks on bone. Int J Legal Med 131:349–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rajs I, Lundström M, Broberg M, Lidberg L, Lindquist O (1998) Criminal mutilation of the human body in Sweden – A thirty-year medico-legal and forensic psychiatric study. J Forensic Sci 43(3):563–580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Konopka T, Strona M, Bolechala F, Kunz J (2007) Corpse dismemberment in the material collected by the Department of Forensic Medicine, Cracow, Poland. Leg Med (Tokyo) 9(1):1–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bailey JA, Wang Y (2011) Statistical analysis of kerf mark measurements in bone. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 7:53–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Symes SA (1992) Morphology of saw marks in human bone: identification of class characteristics. Dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville

  7. Nogueira L, Quatrehomme G, Rallon C, Adalian P, Alunni V (2016) Saw marks in bones: a study of 170 experimental false start lesions. Forensic Sci Int 268:123–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Norman DG, Watson DG, Burnett B, Fenne PM, Williams MA (2018) The cutting edge - Micro-CT for quantitative toolmark analysis of sharp force trauma to bone. Forensic Sci Int 283:156–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nogueira L, Alunni V, Bernardi C, Quatrehomme G (2018) Saw marks in bones: a study of secondary features of false start lesions. Forensic Sci Int 290:157–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Martlin B, Rando C (2020) Reflectance Transformation Imaging (RTI) for the documentation of saw Mark Characteristics. J Forensic Sci 65(5):1692–1697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berger JM, Pokines JT, Moore TL (2018) Analysis of class characteristics of reciprocating saws. J Forensic Sci 63(6):1661–1672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Capuani C, Guilbeau-Frugier C, Delisle MB, Rougé D, Telmon N (2014) Epifluorescence analysis of hacksaw marks in bone: highlighting unique individual characteristics. Forensic Sci Int 241:195–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Alsop K, Baier W, Norman D, Burnett B, Williams MA (2021) Accurate prediction of saw blade thicknesses from false start measurements. Forensic Sci Int 318:110602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Baier W, Norman DG, Warnett JM, Payne M, Harrison NP, Hunt NCA et al (2017) Novel application of three-dimensional technologies in a case of dismember. Forensic Sci Int 270:139–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Porta D, Amadasi A, Cappella A, Mazzarelli D, Magli F, Gibelli D, Rizzi A, Picozzi M, Gentilomo A, Cattaneo C (2016) Dismemberment and disarticulation: a forensic anthropological approach. J Forensic Legal Med 38:50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Öhman C, Zwierzak I, Baleani M, Viceconti M (2013) Human bone hardness seems to depend on tissue type but not on anatomical site in the long bones of an old subject. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 227(2):200–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bernardi C, Nogueira L, Alunni V, Quatrehomme G (2020) Analysis of false start bone lesions produced by an electrical oscillating autopsy saw. Int J Legal Med 134(2):543–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pelletti G, Viel G, Fais P, Viero A, Visentin S, Miotto D, Montisci M, Cecchetto G, Giraudo C (2017) Micro-computed tomography of false starts produced on bone by different hand-saws. Leg Med 26:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Freas LE (2010) Assessment of wear-related features of the kerf wall from saw marks in bone. J Forensic Sci 55(6):1561–1569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bonney H, Goodman A (2021) Validity of the use of porcine bone in forensic cut mark studies. J Forensic Sci 66(1):278–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Weaver JK (1966) The microscopic hardness of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 48(2):273–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Boivin G, Bala Y, Doublier A, Farlay D, Ste-Marie LG, Meunier PJ et al (2008) The role of mineralization and organic matrix in the microhardness of bone tissue from controls and osteoporotic patients. Bone 43:532–538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu WW, Zhu Y, Chen W, Li S, Yin B, Wang J et al (2019) Bone hardness of different anatomical regions of human radius and its impact on the pullout strength of screws. Orthop Surg 11(2):270–276

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Waltenberger L, Schutkowski H (2017) Effects of heat on cut mark characteristics. Forensic Sci Int 271:49–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Prat N, Rongieras F, de Freminville H, Magnan P, Debord E, Fusai T, Destombe C, Sarron JC, Voiglio EJ (2012) Comparison of thoracic wall behavior in large animals and human cadavers submitted to an identical ballistic blunt thoracic trauma. Forensic Sci Int 222(1–3):179–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Steadman DW, DiAntonio LL, Wilson JJ, Sheridan KE, Tammariello SP (2006) The effects of chemical and heat maceration techniques on the recovery of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA from bone. J Forensic Sci 51:11–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Husch C, Berner M, Goldammer H, Lichtscheidl-Schultz I (2021) Technical note: a novel method for gentle and non-destructive removal of flesh from bones. Forensic Sci Int 9(323):110778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. King C, Birch W (2015) Assessment of maceration techniques used to remove soft tissue from bone in cut mark analysis. J Forensic Sci 60:124–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Triaca A, Mahon TJ, Myburgh J (2022) A comparison of different maceration techniques on burnt remains. J Forensic Sci 67(2):676–682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pelletti G, Cecchetto G, Viero A, Fais P, Weber P, Miotto D, Montisci M, Viel G, Giraudo C (2017) Acuracy, precison and inter – rater reability of micro CT analysis of false start bones. A preliminary validation study. Leg Med 29:38–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Bernardi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Accordance with the ethical standards.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bernardi, C., Nogueira, L., Amoretti, N. et al. Comparison of false starts by saw created on flesh and dry bones; as close as possible to the real conditions of criminal dismemberment. Int J Legal Med (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-024-03256-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-024-03256-6

Keywords

Navigation