Skip to main content
Log in

Cutting crime: the analysis of the “uniqueness” of saw marks on bone

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Witness marks produced on bone by the use of saws have traditionally been examined using stereomicroscopy. The marks are typically found on the kerf wall or floor and give important information about the implement that made them. This paper describes a new approach to the analysis of witness marks left on kerf walls and floors from crimes involving dismemberment. Previously, two types of marks have been identified: deep furrows formed during the pull stroke and fine striations formed on the push stroke. These types of striation allow the class of saw to be identified, but not an individual saw. With the advent of environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM), insulating materials can now be examined without the need for conductive coatings to be applied. This allows materials to be examined at higher magnifications than those available with stereomicroscopy. Here we report on a new, third type of striation that is visible at higher magnifications on ESEM images. These striations are formed from the imperfections on the cutting teeth of saws and give real possibilities of uniquely identifying whether or not a particular saw was used to cause the mark. In blind trials conducted on sawing of nylon 6.6, different individual saws could be successfully identified even if different people used the saw. We discuss ways in which these results can be extended to bone and how this may assist in the investigation of the act of dismemberment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reichs KJ (1998) Postmortem dismemberment: recovery, analysis and interpretation. In: Reichs KJ (ed) Forensic osteology-advances in the identification of human remains. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, pp 353–388

    Google Scholar 

  2. Symes S (1998) Morphology of saw marks in human bone: introduction and examination of residual kerf contour. In: Reichs KJ (ed) Forensic osteology, advances in the identification of human remains. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, pp 389–409

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andahl RO (1978) The examination of saw marks. J Forensic Sci Soc 18:31–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonte W (1975) Tool marks in bones and cartilage. J Forensic Sci 20:315–323

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weaver JK (1966) The microscopic hardness of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 48(2):273–288

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zysset PK, Guo XE, Hoffler CE, Moore KE, Goldstein SA (1999) Elastic modulus and hardness of cortical and trabecular bone lamellae measured by nanoindentation in the human femur. J Biomech 32(10):1005–1012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Katterwe H (1996) Modern approaches for the examination of toolmarks and other surface marks. Forensic Sci Rev 8(1):46–72

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reilly D, Burstein AH (1974) The mechanical properties of cortical bone, a review article. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56(5):1001–1022

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rho JY, Kuhn-Spearing L, Zioupos P (1998) Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Med Eng Phys 20(2):92–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Burd DQ, Kirk PL (1942) Tool marks, factors involved in their comparison and use as evidence. J Crim Law Criminol 32:679–686

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Mr. Graham Clark is thanked for his assistance with the ESEM.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. N. Rutty.

Additional information

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saville, P.A., Hainsworth, S.V. & Rutty, G.N. Cutting crime: the analysis of the “uniqueness” of saw marks on bone. Int J Legal Med 121, 349–357 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-006-0120-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-006-0120-z

Keywords

Navigation