Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fish otoliths as biological dosimeter: internal dose calculation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Otoliths are organs used by fish for hearing and keeping balance. They consist of biogenic crystals of hydroxyapatite and do not contain any living cells. Upon exposure to ionizing radiation, otolith hydroxyapatite accumulates radiation-induced stable CO2 radicals whose amount is proportional to absorbed dose. In electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) dosimetry, carbonate ions are registered and, hence, the total accumulated dose in the fish otolith can be quantified. Therefore, otoliths can be used as individual fish dosimeters to support radiobiological and radioecological studies. An important aspect of otolith-based EPR dosimetry on fish from contaminated water bodies is the potential presence of bone-seeking 90Sr. Consequently, cumulative absorbed doses measured with EPR in otoliths may reflect the superposition of internal exposure to 90Sr/90Y and external exposure due to radionuclides circulating in soft tissue of the fish as well as due to environmental contamination. The objective of the present study was to develop a method that allows for an assessment of the contribution of 90Sr to the total dose in otolith. The method has been tested using otoliths from seven fish taken from reservoirs located in the Southern Urals contaminated with radionuclides including 90Sr. It has been shown that dose to otoliths is largely determined by 90Sr in the hydroxyapatite. The internal dose component can be calculated using activity concentration-to-dose conversion factors, which vary slightly in the range of 2.0–2.8 × 10–3 Gy year−1 per Bq g−1 depending on fish species and age. Internal doses to fish from water bodies with different levels of 90Sr contamination were calculated in the range from 2 mGy to ~ 200 Gy. External dose contribution was derived for two fish only to be about 100 and 40 Gy. It is concluded that EPR dosimetry on fish otoliths is a promising tool when external exposure prevails or is comparable to internal exposure due to 90Sr.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are availible from the corresponding author upon reasonable requests.

References

  • Brown JE, Alfonso B, Avila R, Beresford NA, Copplestone D, Hosseini A (2016) A new version of the ERICA tool to facilitate impact assessments of radioactivity on wild plants and animals. J Environ Radioact 153:141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derise NL, Ritchey SJ (1974) Mineral composition of normal human enamel and dentin and relation of composition to dental caries. Dent Res 53(4):853–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driessens FCM, Verbeeck RMH (1991) The probable phase composition of the mineral is sound enamel and dentin. Bull Soc Cem Belg 91:573–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov DV, Shishkina EA, Osipov DI, Razumeev RA, Pryakhin EA (2015) Internal in vitro dosimetry for fish using hydroxyapatite-based EPR detectors. Radiat Environ Biophys 54:257–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov DV, Shishkina EA, Osipov DI, Starichenko VI, Bayankin SN, Zhukovsky MV, Pryakhin EA (2018) Otoliths as object of EPR dosimetric research. Radiat Environ Biophys 57:357–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryakhin EA, Tryapitsina GA, Deryabina LV, Atamanyuk NI, Stukalov PM, Ivanov IA, Kostyuchenko VA, Akleyev AV (2012) Status of ecosystems in radioactive waste reservoirs of the Mayak Production Association in 2009. Health Phys 103(1):61–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryakhin EA, Mokrov YuG, Tryapitsina GA, Ivanov IA, Osipov DI, Atamanyuk NI, Deryabina LV, Shaposhnikova IA, Shishkina EA, Obvintseva NA, Egoreichenkov EA, Styazhkina EV, Osipova OF, Mogilnikova NI, Andreev SS, Tarasov OV, Geras’kin SA, Trapeznikov AV, Akleyev AV (2016) Characterization of biocenoses in the storage reservoirs of liquid radioactive wastes of Mayak PA. Initial Descript Report J Environ Radioact 151:449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shagina NB, Vorobiova MI, Degteva MO, Peremyslova LM, Shishkina EA, Anspaugh LR, Napier BA (2012) Reconstruction of the contamination of the Techa River in 1949–1951 as a result of releases from the “MAYAK” Production Association. Radiat Environ Biophys 51:349–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shishkina EA, Timofeev YuS, Ivanov DV (2014) Software for evaluation of EPR-dosimetry performance. Radiat Prot Dosim 159(1–4):188–193. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncu167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shishkina EA, Pryakhin EA, Popova IY, Osipov DI, Tikhova Y, Andreyev SS, Shaposhnikova IA, Egoreichenkov EA, Styazhkina EV, Deryabina LV, Tryapitsina GA, Melnikov V, Rudolfsen G, Teien H-C, Sneve MK, Akleyev AV (2016) Evaluation of distribution coefficients and concentration ratios of 90Sr and 137Cs in the Techa River and the Miass River. J Environ Radioact 158–159:148–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shishkina EA, Pryakhin EA, Sharagin PA, Osipov DI, Tryapitsina GA, Atamanyuk NI, Egoreichenkov EA, Trapeznikov AV, Rudolfsen G, Teien HC, Sneve MK (2019) The radiation exposure of fish in the period of the Techa river peak contamination. J Environ Radioact 201:43–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soppera N, Bossant M, Dupont E (2014) JANIS 4: an improved version of the NEA Java-based nuclear data information system. Nucl Data Sheets 120:294–296

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Utkin VI, Chebotina MY, Evstigneev AV, Lyubashevsky NM (2004) Features of the radiation situation in the Urals. UrO RAN Press, Yekaterinburg (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zbarsky BI, Ivanov II, Mardashev SR (1972) Biological chemistry. Textbook for Students of Medical Institutes. Leningrad Medicine Publisher, London, p 583

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by State task “Spin” No. 122021000036-3.

Funding

The authors E.A. Shishkina, U.D. Biryukhova, E.A. Pryakhin and G.A. Tryapitsina declare that they have no financial interests. Author D.V. Ivanov has support from State task “Spin” No. 122021000036-3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EAS provided conceptualization and supervision. EAS and DVI wrote the manuscript text. DVI provided EPR measurements. UDB provided analysis and prepared the figures. EAP provided conceptualization and wrote the introduction. GAT provided biological samples and took part in discussion. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. V. Ivanov.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shishkina, E.A., Ivanov, D.V., Biryukhova, U.D. et al. Fish otoliths as biological dosimeter: internal dose calculation. Radiat Environ Biophys 62, 143–150 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-022-01007-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-022-01007-y

Keywords

Navigation