Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Otoliths as object of EPR dosimetric research

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Otoliths are the organs which fish use for hearing and keeping balance. Otoliths are the most calcified tissues in the fish body. In contrast to bones, otoliths are not affected by remodeling and, therefore, they are expected to accumulate any dose from ionizing radiation during lifetime. Therefore, EPR dosimetry with fish otoliths could be an important tool for dose reconstruction in radiobiology and radioecology. It could also provide useful information remediation actions to de-contaminate waterbodies. Consequently, in the present study, otoliths of three contaminated fish species (roach (Rutilus rutilus), pike (Esox lucius) and perch (Perca Fluviatilis)) were examined with Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. The fish were caught at storage reservoirs of liquid radioactive waste from Mayak PA and from the upper reach of the Techa River, which have been contaminated with different levels of radionuclide activity concentrations. It is shown that the radiation-induced EPR signal of otolith is stable and characterized by a linear dose response. However, the slope of the calibration curve (corresponding to the radiation sensitivity of the material) is not the same for different species; this may be caused by differences in mineralization. The reconstructed doses were found to be in the range from undetectable (in fish from the upper stream of the Techa River) up to 265 Gy (in roach from the most contaminated waterbody). In parallel, otoliths were measured with β-counter to detect 90Sr/90Y. Samples were also tested on the presence of alpha-emitters, but no alpha activity above background could be detected. However, a significant activity concentration of 90Sr was detected (from 1 × 101 to 2 × 104 Bq/g). The EPR doses measured correlated with the 90Sr activity concentration measured in the otolith samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexandrov AP, Mishenkov GV, Tarasenko NYu, Zaitsev BA, Shtukkenberg YuM, Letavet AA, Ilyin DI (1951) Report on the contamination of the territory adjacent to the Mendeleyev Plant. Mayak Production Association, Ozersk (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Campana SE (1999) Chemistry and composition of fish otoliths: pathways, mechanisms and applications. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 188:263–297

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Committee of Age Reading Experts (C.A.R.E) (2006) Manual on generalized age determination procedures for groundfish. Prepared for the Technical Subcommittee of the Canada/US Groundfish committee http://care.psmfc.org/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=19

  • Degteva MO, Shagina NB, Vorobiova MI, Shishkina EA, Tolstykh EI, Akleyev AV (2016) Contemporary understanding of radioactive contamination of the Techa River in 1949–1956. Radiat Biol Radioecol 85(5):532–534 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Empis JMA, Silva HA, Nunes ML, Andrade EM (1995) Detection of irradiated fish using EPR of fish bone; signal intensity and stability. Fish Res 21:471–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov DV, Shishkina EA, Osipov DI, Razumeev RA, Pryakhin EA (2015) Internal in vitro dosimetry for fish using hydroxyapatite-based EPR detectors. Radiat Environ Biophys 54:257–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malyshev SV, Vakulovsky SM, Drozhko EG, Romanov GN, Glagolenko YV, Mokrov YuG, Westerlund EA, Amundsen I, Strand P, Salbu B, Oughton DH, Christensen GC, Bergan T, Osteras S (1997) Sources contributing to radioactive contamination of the Techa River and areas surrounding the “Mayak” production association, Urals, Russia Programme of the Joint Norwegian–Russian Investigations of possible impacts of the Mayak PA activities on radioactive contamination of the Barents and Kara Seas Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority; Østerås, Norway

  • Mokrov YG (2003) Reconstruction of the radionuclide spectrum of liquid radioactive waste released into the Techa River in 1949–1951. Radiat Environ Biophys 42:7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokrov YuG, Glagolenko YuV, Drozhko EG, Rovny SI (2008) The techa reservoir cascade: safety and regulation problems. In: Sneve MK, Kiselev MF (eds) Challenges in radiation protection and nuclear safety regulation of the nuclear legacy. Environmental security. Springer, NATO Science for Peace, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (1998) Minimum detectable concentrations with typical radiation survey instruments for various contaminants and field conditions. NUREG-1507, U.S., Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Priakhin EA, Bogdanov GO, Traipitsyna GA, Deriabina LV, Stukalov PM, Aleksandrova OA, Akleev AV (2010) Ecotoxicological value of sediments state from reservoir R-11 of Techa River reservoir cascade. Radiat Biol Radioecol 50(2):217–225 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryakhin EA, Tryapitsina GA, Deryabina LV, Atamanyuk NI, Stukalov PM, Ivanov IA, Kostyuchenko VA, Akleyev AV (2012) Status of ecosystems in radioactive waste reservoirs of the Mayak Production Association in 2009. Health Phys 103(1):61–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryakhin EA, Mokrov YuG, Tryapitsina GA, Ivanov IA, Osipov DI, Atamanyuk NI, Deryabina LV, Shaposhnikova IA, Shishkina EA, Obvintseva NA, Egoreichenkov EA, Styazhkina EV, Osipova OF, Mogilnikova NI, Andreev SS, Tarasov OV, Geras’kin SA, Trapeznikov AV, Akleyev AV (2016) Characterization of biocenoses in the storage reservoirs of liquid radioactive wastes of Mayak PA. Initial descriptive report. J Environ Radioact 151:449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Report on ecological safety FSUE (2012) “Mayak” PA for the Year 2011. Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Mayak” PA. Chelyabinsk Publishing House, Ozyorsk, p 48

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey C, Combes C, Drouet C, Glimcher MJ (2009) Bone mineral: update on chemical composition and structure. Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 20(6):1013–1021

  • Shagina NB, Vorobiova MI, Degteva MO, Peremyslova LM, Shishkina EA, Anspaugh LR, Napier BA (2012) Reconstruction of the contamination of the Techa River in 1949–1951 as a result of releases from the “MAYAK” production association. Radiat Environ Biophys 51(4):349–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shishkina EA, Degteva MO, Tolstykh EI, Volchkova A, Ivanov DV, Wieser A, Della Monaca S, Fattibene P (2011) Extra-high doses detected in the enamel of human teeth in the Techa riverside region. Radiat Meas 46:760–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starichenko VI, Liubashevskii NM (1998) The individual characteristics of 90Sr accumulation in the body of 2 species of the common vole inhabiting the territory of the Eastern Urals Radioactive Trace. Radiat Biol Radioecol 38(3):375–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas J, Geffen AJ (2003) Morphometry and composition of aragonite and vaterite otoliths of deformed laboratory reared juvenile herring from two populations. J Fish Biol 63:1383–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triapitsyna GA, Andreev SS, Osipov DI, Stukalov PM, Ivanov IA, Kostiuchenko AV, Priakhin EA, Alexandrova ON, Akleev AV (2012) Assessment of radiation exposure level for hydrobionts in some special industrial ponds at the “Mayak” PA. Radiat Biol Radioecol 52(2):207–214 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was carried out within the state assignment of FASO of Russia (theme “Spin” No. АААА-А18-118020290104-2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. M. N. Miheev Institute of Metal Physics, Urals Division of Russian Academy of Sciences, 18, S. Kovalevskaya Str., 620108, Yekaterinburg, Russia

    D. V. Ivanov

  2. Ural Federal University, 19, Mira Str., 620002, Yekaterinburg, Russia

    D. V. Ivanov & M. V. Zhukovsky

  3. Urals Research Center for Radiation Medicine, 68A, Vorovsky Str., 454076, Chelyabinsk, Russia

    E. A. Shishkina, D. I. Osipov & E. A. Pryakhin

  4. Chelyabinsk State University, 129, Bratiev Kashirinykh Str., 454001, Chelyabinsk, Russia

    E. A. Shishkina

  5. Institute of Plants and Animals Ecology, Urals Division of Russian Academy of Sciences, 202, 8 Marta Str., 620144, Yekaterinburg, Russia

    V. I. Starichenko

  6. Sverdlovsk Regional Oncology Clinic, 29, Soboleva Str., 620036, Yekaterinburg, Russia

    S. N. Bayankin

  7. Institute of Industrial Ecology, Urals Division of Russian Academy of Sciences, 20a, S. Kovalevskaya Str., 620219, Yekaterinburg, Russia

    M. V. Zhukovsky

Authors
  1. D. V. Ivanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. A. Shishkina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. I. Osipov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. V. I. Starichenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. N. Bayankin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. V. Zhukovsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. E. A. Pryakhin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. V. Ivanov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ivanov, D.V., Shishkina, E.A., Osipov, D.I. et al. Otoliths as object of EPR dosimetric research. Radiat Environ Biophys 57, 357–363 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-018-0758-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-018-0758-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation