Advertisement

Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology

, Volume 165, Issue 2, pp 349–372 | Cite as

Timescales of crustal melting in the Higher Himalayan Crystallines (Sikkim, Eastern Himalaya) inferred from trace element-constrained monazite and zircon chronology

  • Daniela Rubatto
  • Sumit Chakraborty
  • Somnath Dasgupta
Original Paper

Abstract

The petrology and timing of crustal melting has been investigated in the migmatites of the Higher Himalayan Crystalline (HHC) exposed in Sikkim, India. The metapelites underwent pervasive partial melting through hydrous as well as dehydration melting reactions involving muscovite and biotite to produce a main assemblage of quartz, K-feldspar, plagioclase, biotite, garnet ± sillimanite. Peak metamorphic conditions were 8–9 kbar and ~800 °C. Monazite and zircon crystals in several migmatites collected along a N–S transect show multiple growth domains. The domains were analyzed by microbeam techniques for age (SHRIMP) and trace element composition (LA-ICP-MS) to relate ages to conditions of formation. Monazite preserves the best record of metamorphism with domains that have different zoning pattern, composition and age. Zircon was generally less reactive than monazite, with metamorphic growth zones preserved in only a few samples. The growth of accessory minerals in the presence of melt was episodic in the interval between 31 and 17 Ma, but widespread and diachronous across samples. Systematic variations in the chemical composition of the dated mineral zones (HREE content and negative Eu anomaly) are related to the variation in garnet and K-feldspar abundances, respectively, and thus to metamorphic reactions and P–T stages. In turn, this allows prograde versus decompressional and retrograde melt production to be timed. A hierarchy of timescales characterizes melting which occurred over a period of ~15 Ma (31–17 Ma): a given block within this region traversed the field of melting in 5–7 Ma, whereas individual melting reactions lasted for time durations below, or approaching, the resolution of microbeam dating techniques (~0.6 Ma). An older ~36 Ma high-grade event is recorded in an allocthonous relict related to mafic lenses. We identify two sections of the HHC in Sikkim that traversed similar P–T conditions at different times, separated by a tectonic discontinuity. The higher structural levels reached melting and peak conditions later (~26–23 Ma) than the lower structural levels (~31–27 Ma). Diachronicity across the HHC cannot be reconciled with channel flow models in their simplest form, as it requires two similar high-grade sections to move independently during collision.

Keywords

U–Pb geochronology Migmatites Trace elements Himalaya Melting reactions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Field work in Sikkim and data interpretation benefited from constructive and animated discussions with Robert Anczkiewicz and Dilip Mukhopadhyay. Michaela Flanigan and Mike Jolland (ANU) are thanked for compiling chemical data and petrographic observations, respectively. The review of C Warren and B Bingen is kindly acknowledged. D Rubatto was financially supported by the Australian Research Council, QEII fellowships, DP0556700 and DP110101599. The research of S Chakraborty is supported by funds from the DFG and the Ruhr Universitaet Bochum. S Dasgupta acknowledges the financial support of the DST, Government of India, through the J.C. Bose Fellowship.

Supplementary material

410_2012_812_MOESM1_ESM.xls (88 kb)
e1. SHRIMP U–Pb analyses of monazite (XLS 88 kb)
410_2012_812_MOESM2_ESM.xls (82 kb)
e2. SHRIMP U–Pb analyses of zircon (XLS 82 kb)
410_2012_812_MOESM3_ESM.xls (88 kb)
e3. LA-ICPMS analyses of monazite (XLS 87 kb)
410_2012_812_MOESM4_ESM.xls (77 kb)
e4. LA-ICPMS analyses of zircon (XLS 77 kb)
410_2012_812_MOESM5_ESM.tif (7.2 mb)
Photographs of rock samples. The cut is perpendicular to the main foliation (TIFF 7390 kb)
410_2012_812_MOESM6_ESM.eps (3.6 mb)
Probability diagrams with superimposed histograms of monazite U–Pb ages (left) and Tera-Wasserburg diagrams for monazite U–Pb analyses (right). Ellipses in the Tera-Wasserburg diagrams represent 2 sigma errors. Only filled gray ellipses are used for average age calculation. See text for details (EPS 3677 kb)
410_2012_812_MOESM7_ESM.eps (2.9 mb)
Probability diagrams with superimposed histograms of monazite U–Pb ages (left) and Tera-Wasserburg diagrams for monazite U–Pb analyses (right). Ellipses in the Tera-Wasserburg diagrams represent 2 sigma errors. Only filled gray ellipses are used for average age calculation. See text for details (EPS 2935 kb)
410_2012_812_MOESM8_ESM.eps (2.7 mb)
Probability diagrams with superimposed histograms of zircon U–Pb ages (left) and Tera-Wasserburg diagrams for zircon U–Pb analyses (right). Ellipses in the Tera-Wasserburg diagrams represent 2 sigma errors. Only filled gray ellipses are used for average age calculation. See text for details (EPS 2807 kb)
410_2012_812_MOESM9_ESM.eps (329 kb)
Ti-in-zircon temperatures plotted against average age of dated domains. Gray bars illustrate the spread of temperatures obtained from multiple domains of identical age. Black circles indicate the average temperature for each group. Thin lines link zircon domains from the same sample (EPS 328 kb)

References

  1. Acharryya SK, Ray KK (1977) Geology of the Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalaya, guide to excursion no. 4, International Gondwana Symposium. Geological Survey of India, p 25Google Scholar
  2. Aleinikoff JN, Schenck WS, Plank MO, Srogi L, Fanning CM, Kamo SL, Howell B (2006) Deciphering igneous and metamorphic events in high-grade rocks of the Wilmington Complex, Delaware: morphology, cathodoluminescence and backscattered electron zoning, and SHRIMP U-Pb geochronology of zircon and monazite. Geol Soc Am Bull 118(1/2):39–64Google Scholar
  3. Bea F, Pereira MD, Stroh A (1994) Mineral/leucosome trace-element partitioning in a peraluminous migmatite (a laser ablation-ICP-MS study). Chem Geol 117:291–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaumont C, Jamieson RA, Nguyen MH, Medvedev S (2004) Crustal channel flows: 1. Numerical models with applications to the tectonics of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen. J Geophys Res 109:B06406. doi: 10.1029/2003JB002809 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Black LP, Kamo SL, Allen CM, Aleinikoff JM, Davis DW, Korsch RJ, Foudoulis C (2003) TEMORA 1: a new zircon standard for Phanerozoic U-Pb geochronology. Chem Geol 200:155–170Google Scholar
  6. Buick IS, Clark C, Rubatto D, Hermann J, Pandit M, Hand M (2010) Constraints on the proterozoic evolution of the Aravalli-Delhi Orogenic belt (NW India) from monazite geochronology and mineral trace element geochemistry. Lithos (in press)Google Scholar
  7. Butera KM, Williams IS, Blevin PL, Simpson CJ (2004) Zircon U-Pb dating of early palaeozoic monzonitic intrusives from the Goonumbla area, New South Wales. Aust J Earth Sci 48:457–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carosi R, Montomoli C, Rubatto D, Visona’ D (2010) Late oligocene high-temperature shear zones in the core of the Higher Himalayan crystallines (Lower Dolpo, western Nepal). Tectonics 29:TC4029. doi: 10.1029/2008TC002400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Catlos EJ, Harrison TM, Manning CE, Grove M, Rai SM, Hubbard MS, Upreti BN (2002) Records of the evolution of the Himalayan orogen from in situ Th-Pb ion microprobe dating of monazite: Eastern Nepal and western Garhwal. J Asian Earth Sci 20(5):459–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Catlos EJ, Dubey CS, Harrison TM, Edwards MA (2004) Late Miocene movement within the Himalayan Main Central Thrust shear zone, Sikkim, north-east India. J Metamorphic Geol 22:207–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cherniak DJ (2010) Diffusion in accessory minerals: zircon, titanite, apatite, monazite and xenotime. Rev Mineral Geochem 72:827–869Google Scholar
  12. Corfu F, Hanchar JM, Hoskin PWO, Kinny P (2003) Atlas of zircon textures. In: Hanchar JM, Hoskin PWO (eds) Zircon, vol 53. Reviews in Mineralogy, 1st edn. Mineralogical Society of America, Washington DC, pp 469–500Google Scholar
  13. Cottle JM, Jessup MJ, Newell DL, Horstwood MSA, Noble SR, Parrish RR, Waters DJ, Searle MP (2009a) Geochronology of granulitized eclogite from the Ama Drime Massif: implications for the tectonic evolution of the South Tibetan Himalaya. Tectonics 28(1):TC1002Google Scholar
  14. Cottle JM, Searle MP, Horstwood M, Waters DJ (2009b) Midcrustal metamorphism, melting, and deformation in the Mount Everest region of Southern Tibet revealed by U(-Th)-Pb geochronology. J Geol 117(6):643–664. doi: 10.1086/605994 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dasgupta S, Ganguly J, Neogi S (2004) Crystallization history, P-T gradient, and implications. J Metamorphic Geol 22:395–412. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2004.00522.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dasgupta S, Chakraborty S, Neogi S (2009) Petrology of an inverted Barrovian sequence of metapelites in Sikkim Himalaya, India: constraints on the tectonic inversion. Am J Sci 309:43–84. doi: 10.2475/01.2009.02 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eggins SM, Rudnick RL, McDonough WF (1998) The composition of peridotites and their minerals: a laser ablation ICP-MS study. Earth Planet Sci Lett 154:53–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Faak K, Chakraborty S, Dasgupta S (2012) Petrology and tectonic significance of metabasic slivers in the lesser- and higher Himalayan sections of Sikkim, India. J Metamorphic Geol (in press)Google Scholar
  19. Faccenda M, Gerya TV, Chakraborty S (2008) Styles of post-subduction collisional orogeny: influence of convergence velocity, crustal rheology and radiogenic heat production. Lithos 103(1–2):257–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fletcher IR, McNaughton NJ, Davis WJ, Rasmussen B (2010) Matrix effects and calibration limitations in ion probe U-Pb and Th–Pb dating of monazite. Chem Geol 270:31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foster G, Kinny P, Vance D, Prince C, Harris N (2000) The significance of monazite U-Th-Pb age data in metamorphic assemblages; a combined study of monazite and garnet chronometry. Earth Planet Sci Lett 181(3):327–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Foster G, Gibson HD, Parrish RR, Horstwood M, Fraser J, Tindle A (2002) Textural, chemical and isotopic insight into the nature and behaviour of metamorphic monazite. Chem Geol 191(1–3):183–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ganguly J, Dasgupta S, Cheng W, Neogi S (2000) Exhumation history of a section of the Sikkim Himalayas, India: records in the metamorphic mineral equilibria and compositional zoning of garnet. Earth Planet Sci Lett 183:471–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ghosh A (1956) Recent advances in the geology and structure of the eastern Himalaya. Indian Sci Congr 44:85–99Google Scholar
  25. Godin L, Parrish RR, Brown RL, Hodges KV (2001) Crustal thickening leading to exhumation of the Himalayan metamorphic core of Central Nepal: insight from U-Pb geochronology and 40Ar/39Ar thermochronology. Tectonics 20(5):729–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Godin L, Grujic D, Law RD, Searle MP (2006) Channel flow, ductile extrusion and exhumation in continental collision zones: an introduction. In: Law RD, Searle MP, Godin L (eds) Channel flow, ductile extrusion and exhumation in continental collision zones, vol 268. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, pp 1–23Google Scholar
  27. Groppo C, Rubatto D, Rolfo F, Lombardo B (2010) Early Oligocene partial melting in the main central thrust zone (Arun Valley, Eastern Nepal, Himalaya). Lithos 118:287–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grujic D, Warren CJ, Wooden JL (2011) Rapid synconvergent exhumation of Miocene-aged lower orogenic crust in the eastern Himalaya. Lithosphere 3(5):346–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harris NBW, Caddick M, Kosler J, Goswami S, Vance D, Tindle AG (2004) The pressure-temperature-time path of migmatites from the Sikkim Himalaya. J Metamorphic Geol 22(3):249–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harrison TM, Ryerson FJ, Le Fort P, Yin A, Lovera OM, Catlos EJ (1997) A late miocene-pliocene origin for the Central Himalayan inverted metamorphism. Earth Planet Sci Lett 146(1–2):E1–E7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hermann J, Rubatto D (2003) Relating zircon and monazite domains to garnet growth zones: age and duration of granulite facies metamorphism in the Val Malenco lower crust. J Metamorphic Geol 21:833–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hermann J, Rubatto D, Trommsdorff V (2006) Sub-solidus oligocene zircon formation in garnet peridotite during fast decompression and fluid infiltration (Duria, Central Alps). Mineral Petrol 88:181–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holland TJB, Powell R (2001) Calculation of phase relations involving haplogranitic melts using an internally consistent thermodynamic dataset. J Petrol 42:673–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoskin PWO, Black LP (2000) Metamorphic zircon formation by solid-state recrystallization of protolith igneous zircon. J Metamorphic Geol 18:423–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Imayama T, Takeshita T, Yi K, Cho D-L, Kitajima K, Tsutsumi Y, Kayama M, Nishido H, Okumura T, Yagi K, Itaya T, Sano Y (2012) Two-stage partial melting and contrasting cooling history within the Higher Himalayan Crystalline Sequence in the far-eastern Nepal Himalaya. Lithos 134:1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2011.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jamieson RA, Beaumont C, Medvedev S, Nguyen MH (2004) Crustal channel flows: 2. Numerical models with implications for metamorphism in the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen. J Geophys Res B: Solid Earth 109:B06407:1–B06407:24. doi: 10.1029/2003JB002811
  37. Janots E, Engi M, Berger A, Allaz J, Schwarz JO, Spandler C (2008) Prograde metamorphic sequence of REE minerals in pelitic rocks of the Central Alps: implications for allanite-monazite-xenotime phase relations from 250 to 610∞C. J Metamorphic Geol 26(5):509–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jessup MJ, Cottle JM, Searle MP, Law RD, Newell DL, Tracy RJ, Waters DJ (2008) P-T-t-D paths of Everest series schist, Nepal. J Metamorphic Geol 26(7):717–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kellett DA, Grujic D, Warren C, Cottle J, Jamieson R, Tenzin T (2010) Metamorphic history of a syn-convergent orogen-parallel detachment: the South Tibet detachment, Buthan Himalaya. J Metamorphic Geol 28(8):785–808. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2010.00893.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kelsey DE, Clark C, Hand M (2008) Thermobarometric modelling of zircon and monazite growth in melt-bearing systems: examples using model metapelitic and metapsammitic granulites. J Metamorphic Geol 26(2):199–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kohn MJ, Corrie SL (2012) Preserved Zr-temperatures and U–Pb ages in high-grade metamorphic titanite: evidence for a static hot channel in the Himalayan orogen. Earth Planet Sci Lett (in press)Google Scholar
  42. Kohn MJ, Wieland MS, Parkinson CD, Upreti BN (2005) Five generations of monazite in Langtang gneisses: implications for chronology of the Himalayan metamorphic core. J Metamorphic Geol 23:399–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2005.00584.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kretz R (1983) Symbols for rock-forming minerals. Am Mineral 68:277–279Google Scholar
  44. Lal RK, Mukherji S, Ackermand D (1981) Deformation and Barrovian metamorphismat Takdah, Darjeeling (eastern Sikkim). In: Saklani PS (ed) Metamorphic tectonics of the Himalaya. Today and Tomorrow Publishers, Delhi, pp 231–278Google Scholar
  45. Liu R, Zhou H, Zhang L, Zhong Z, Zeng W, Xiang H, Jin S, Lu X, Li C (2010) Zircon U-Pb ages and Hf isotope compositions of the Mayuan migmatite complex, NW Fujian Province, Southeast China: constraints on the timing and nature of a regional tectonothermal event associated with the Caledonian orogeny. Lithos 119(3–4):163–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ludwig KR (2003) Isoplot/Ex version 3.0. A geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Berkeley Geochronological Centre Spec. Pub., BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  47. Martin AJ, Gehrels GE, DeCelles PG (2007) The tectonic significance of (U, Th)/Pb ages of monazite inclusions in garnet from the Himalaya of central Nepal. Chem Geol 244:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Martin AJ, Ganguly J, DeCelles PG (2010) Metamorphism of greater and lesser himalayan rocks exposed in the Modi Khola valley, central Nepal. Contrib Mineral Petrol 159(2):203–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McDonough WF, Sun S (1995) The composition of the earth. Chem Geol 120:223–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oliver NHS, Bodorkos S, Nemchin AA, Kinny PD, Watt GR (1999) Relationships between zircon U-Pb SHRIMP ages and leucosome type in migmatites of the Halls Creek Orogen, Western Australia. J Petrol 40(10):1553–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pyle JM, Spear FS (2003) Four generations of accessory-phase growth in low-pressure migmatites from SW New Hampshire. Am Mineral 88(2–3):338–351Google Scholar
  52. Ray SK (2000) Culmination zones in eastern Himalaya. Geological Survey of India Special publication, vol 55Google Scholar
  53. Rubatto D (2002) Zircon trace element geochemistry: distribution coefficients and the link between U-Pb ages and metamorphism. Chem Geol 184:123–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rubatto D, Gebauer D (2000) Use of cathodoluminescence for U-Pb zircon dating by ion microprobe: some examples from the Western Alps. In: Pagel M, Barbin V, Blanc P, Ohnenstetter D (eds) Cathodoluminescence in geosciences. Springer, Berlin, pp 373–400Google Scholar
  55. Rubatto D, Williams IS, Buick IS (2001) Zircon and monazite response to prograde metamorphism in the Reynolds Range, central Australia. Contrib Mineral Petrol 140:458–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rubatto D, Hermann J, Buick IS (2006) Temperature and bulk composition control on the growth of monazite and zircon during low-pressure anatexis (Mount Stafford, central Australia). J Petrol 47(10):1973–1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rubatto D, Müntener O, Barnhorn A, Gregory C (2008) Dissolution-reprecipitation of zircon at low-temperature, high-pressure conditions (Lanzo Massif, Italy). Am Mineral 93:1519–1529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rubatto D, Hermann J, Berger A, Engi M (2009) Protracted fluid-induced melting during Barrovian metamorphism in the Central Alps. Contrib Mineral Petrol 158:703–722. doi: 10.1007/s00410-009-0406-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schaltegger U, Fanning M, Günther D, Maurin JC, Schulmann K, Gebauer D (1999) Growth, annealing and recrystallization of zircon and preservation of monazite in high-grade metamorphism: conventional and in situ U-Pb isotope, cathodoluminescence and microchemical evidence. Contrib Mineral Petrol 134:186–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schärer U (1984) The effect of initial 230Th disequilibrium on young U-Pb ages: the Makalu case, Himalaya. Earth Planet Sci Lett 67:191–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Simpson RL, Parrish RR, Searle MP, Waters DJ (2000) Two episodes of monazite crystallization during metamorphism and crustal melting in the Everest region of the Nepalese Himalaya. Geology 28(5):403–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Spear FS (2010) Monazite–allanite phase relations in metapelites. Chem Geol 279:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Spear FS, Pyle JM (2002) Apatite, monazite, and xenotime in Metamorphic Rocks. In: Kohn MJ, Rakovan J, Hughes JM (eds) Phosphates: geochemical, geobiological, and materials importance vol 48. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Mineralogical Society of America, Washington DC, pp 293–335Google Scholar
  64. Spear FS, Kohn MJ, Cheney JT (1999) P –T paths from anatectic pelites. Contrib Mineral Petrol 134:17–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stacey JS, Kramers JD (1975) Approximation of terrestrial lead evolution by a two-stage model. Earth Planet Sci Lett 26:207–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stepanov AS, Hermann J, Rubatto D, Rapp RP (2012) Experimental study of monazite/melt partitioning with implications for the REE, Th and U geochemistry of crustal rocks. Chem Geol 300–301:200–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tomaschek F, Kennedy AK, Villa IM, Lagos M, Ballhaus C (2003) Zircons from Syros, Cyclades, Greece—recrystallization and mobilization of zircon during high-pressure metamorphism. J Petrol 44:1977–2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Townsend KJ, Miller CF, D’Andrea JL, Ayers JC, Harrison TM, Coath CD (2000) Low temperature replacement of monazite in the Ireteba granite, Southern Nevada: geochronological implications. Chem Geol 172:95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vance D, Harris N (1999) Timing of prograde metamorphism in the Zanskar Himalaya. Geology 27(5):395–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vavra G, Schmidt R, Gebauer D (1999) Internal morphology, habit and U-Th-Pb microanalysis of amphibolite-to-granulite facies zircons: geochronology of the Ivrea Zone (Southern Alps). Contrib Mineral Petrol 134:380–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Viskupic K, Hodges KV, Bowring SA (2005) Timescales of melt generation and the thermal evolution of the Himalayan metamorphic core, Everest region, eastern Nepal. Contrib Mineral Petrol 149(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Warren C, Grujic D, Kellett DA, Cottle J, Jamieson R, Ghalley KS (2011) Probing the depth of the Indian-Asia collision: U-Th-Pb monazite chronology of granulites from NW Buthan. Tectonics 30:1–24. doi: 10.1029/2010TC002738 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Watson EB, Wark DA, Thomas JB (2006) Crystallization thermometers for zircon and rutile. Contrib Mineral Petrol 151:413–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. White RW, Powell R, Clarke GL (2003) Prograde metamorphic assemblage evolution during partial melting of metasedimentary rocks at low pressures: migmatites from Mt Stafford, Central Australia. J Metamorphic Geol 44(11):1937–1960Google Scholar
  75. Williams IS (1998) U-Th-Pb geochronology by ion microprobe. In: McKibben MA, Shanks III WC, Ridley WI (eds) Application of microanalytical techniques to understanding mineralizing processes, vol 7. Reviews in Economic Geology, Society of Economic Geologists, pp 1–35Google Scholar
  76. Williams IS (2001) Response of detrital zircon and monazite, and their U-Pb isotopic systems, to regional metamorphism and host-rock partial melting, Cooma Complex, southeastern Australia. Aust J Earth Sci 48:557–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Williams ML, Jercinovic MJ, Harlov DE, Budzyn B, Hetherington CJ (2011) Resetting monazite ages during fluid-related alteration. Chem Geol 283:218–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wing BN, Ferry JM, Harrison TM (2003) Prograde destruction and formation of monazite and allanite during contact and regional metamorphism of pelites: petrology and geochronology. Contrib Mineral Petrol 145(2):228–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniela Rubatto
    • 1
  • Sumit Chakraborty
    • 2
  • Somnath Dasgupta
    • 3
  1. 1.Research School of Earth SciencesAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Institut fuer Geologie, Mineralogie und GeophysikRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany
  3. 3.Department of Earth SciencesIndian Institute of Science Education and ResearchSalt Lake, KolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations