Abstract
Background
Lung fibrosis is a chronic lung disease with a high mortality rate with only two approved drugs (pirfenidone and nintedanib) to attenuate its progression. To date, there are no reliable biomarkers to assess fibrosis development and/or treatment effects for these two drugs. Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is used as a serum marker to diagnose liver fibrosis and we have previously shown it associates with lung fibrosis as well.
Methods
Here we used murine and human precision-cut lung slices to investigate the regulation of OPG in lung tissue to elucidate whether it tracks with (early) fibrosis development and responds to antifibrotic treatment to assess its potential use as a biomarker.
Results
OPG mRNA expression in murine lung slices was higher after treatment with profibrotic cytokines TGFβ1 or IL13, and closely correlated with Fn and PAI1 mRNA expression. More OPG protein was released from fibrotic human lung slices than from the control human slices and from TGFβ1 and IL13-stimulated murine lung slices compared to control murine slices. This OPG release was inhibited when murine slices were treated with pirfenidone or nintedanib. OPG release from human fibrotic lung slices was inhibited by pirfenidone treatment.
Conclusion
OPG can already be detected during the early stages of fibrosis development and responds, both in early- and late-stage fibrosis, to treatment with antifibrotic drugs currently on the market for lung fibrosis. Therefore, OPG should be further investigated as a potential biomarker for lung fibrosis and a potential surrogate marker for treatment effect.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Lung fibrosis is a chronic lung disease that is characterized by deposition of excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) in lung parenchyma, leading to disruption of gas exchange, organ malfunction, and ultimately death from respiratory failure [1, 2]. It has a high mortality rate with an average survival after diagnosis of about 2–3 years [3, 4]. The etiology of lung fibrosis remains unclear but likely involves repeated injury to, and therefore loss of, epithelial cells, followed by a dysregulated wound repair response involving fibroblasts and macrophages [2, 3, 5]. To date, there are no effective drugs to stop or reverse fibrosis development, but two drugs have been approved by the FDA that can attenuate progression of the disease: pirfenidone and nintedanib [6,7,8]. Unfortunately, the development of more and better drugs is hampered by the lack of easy-to-assess early markers of fibrosis development and treatment responses.
We recently described a novel marker called osteoprotegerin (OPG) that is highly upregulated in lung tissue of patients with lung fibrosis and appears to be involved in regulating alveolar epithelial regeneration [9, 10]. A large multicenter cohort study also found OPG to be a biomarker of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease [11]. OPG is also known as tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 11B (TNFRSF11B) and is a decoy receptor for receptor activator for nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) [12]. The canonical function of OPG is to regulate osteogenesis and is produced by osteoblasts to control osteoclast activity [13]. However, we have additionally shown that OPG is produced and secreted by lung fibroblasts under the influence of the key profibrotic mediator transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFβ1) [14]. Interestingly, our recent studies indicate that through its capturing of RANKL it can also inhibit alveolar epithelial repair [9, 10]. However, it is unknown if other fibrosis-associated cytokines like interleukin-13 (IL13) can induce OPG expression in lung tissue and how OPG secretion is affected by treatment with the two antifibrotic drugs currently on the market. We therefore investigated the regulation of OPG early in the process of fibrosis development with either TGFβ1 or IL13 to elucidate whether it tracks with fibrosis development and responds to antifibrotic treatments to assess its potential use as a biomarker.
Materials and Methods
Full Experimental Details are Available in the Data Supplement
Mice
Eight- to twelve-weeks old C57BL/6 male mice from Harlan (Horst, The Netherlands) were kept in cages with 12 h of light/dark cycle and received food and water ad libitum. The experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Groningen (DEC6416AA).
Murine Precision-Cut Lung Slices
Precision-cut lung slices were prepared according to previously published methods [15, 16]. After slicing, slices were incubated in a pre-warmed 12-well plate filled with DMEM + Glutamax medium containing 4.5 g/L D-glucose and pyruvate (Gibco® by Life Technologies, Grand Island, New York, USA) supplemented with non-essential amino acid mixture (1:100), penicillin–streptomycin, 45 µg/ml gentamycin (Gibco® by Life Technologies, Grand Island, New York, USA) and 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). After 1 h of pre-incubation at 37 °C medium was refreshed. Slices were then incubated with or without 5 ng/ml TGFβ1 or 10 ng/ml IL13 and/or 1 mM pirfenidone or 0.5 µM nintedanib. After 48 h of incubation, culture medium and slices were snap frozen into liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until analysis.
Human Lung Tissue
Fibrotic lung tissue was collected with informed consent from patients undergoing transplantation for lung fibrosis at the University Medical Center Groningen and Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Diagnosis of the type of lung fibrosis was made in a multidisciplinary team according to current international guidelines [17]. Control tissue came from leftover material from a patient with normal lung function post-tumor resection at UMCG. Sections of lung tissue of this patient were stained with a standard haematoxylin and eosin staining and checked for abnormalities by a lung pathologist before tissue was used. The study adhered to ethical guidelines, including the UMCG Research Code and national Code of Conduct for Health Research. The use of leftover lung tissue was exempt from consent under Dutch laws, as confirmed by the Medical Ethical Committee of UMCG. All donor materials were deidentified, ensuring anonymity. The Rotterdam protocols were approved by their Medical Ethical Committee. Patient characteristics are presented in Table 1.
Human Precision-Cut Lung Slices
Five mm cores of lung tissue of were embedded in agarose. Slices of 200–300 μm thickness were then prepared from these cores with a Krumdieck tissue slicer and were incubated in supplemented DMEM medium, as described for murine slices with or without 2.5 mM Pirfenidone. After 48 h of incubation, culture medium and slices were snap frozen into liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until analysis.
ELISA
Murine and human OPG levels in slice incubation medium were measured using ELISA (R&D Systems) according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer.
Quantitative Real-Time PCR
Total mRNA was isolated from slices using a Maxwell® LEV simply RNA Cells/Tissue kit (Promega, Madison, WI). RNA was converted into cDNA by using a reverse transcriptase kit (Promega, Leiden, The Netherlands). Transcription levels of OPG, fibrosis-associated genes (collagen 1α1 (Col1α1), fibronectin (Fn), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI1)) were measured using a SensiMix™ SYBR kit (Bioline, Luckenwalde, Germany) for murine samples, or Taqman (Eurogentech, Maastricht, The Netherlands) for human samples. All primers, as listed in Table 2, were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands). Murine mRNA expression was normalized against 18s as housekeeping gene, while human mRNA was normalized against GAPDH.
Statistics
Experiments with n ≥ 8 were tested with a D’Agostino & Pearson test for normality. Non-normal data were log-transformed or analyzed like smaller datasets (n ≤ 8) using Wilcoxon or Mann Whitney tests. Normal data were tested with a Student’s t-test. Multiple group comparisons were performed using a one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak correction or a Friedman test with Dunn’s correction, based on data normality. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to determine correlations. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
More Osteoprotegerin as well as other Fibrosis-Associated Markers after TGFβ1 Stimulation as Compared to Control
To study OPG production in the early onset of fibrosis development, we incubated murine lung slices for 48 h with and without TGFβ1 and quantified OPG mRNA and protein expression levels in addition to Col1α1, Fn, and PAI1 to determine the effects of 48-h incubation and TGFβ1. We found that OPG mRNA levels in murine lung slices were significantly higher after 48 h of incubation (Fig. 1a) compared to freshly cut slices and this was accompanied by measurable levels of OPG protein excretion (Fig. 1b). Furthermore, Col1α1 and Fn mRNA levels were also higher compared to fresh lung slices, while PAI1 expression was not (Fig. 1c–e). These observations suggests that the slice model intrinsically exhibits activated wound healing processes.
When giving a profibrotic stimulus by incubating slices with TGFβ1 for 48 h, we found even higher OPG mRNA levels (Fig. 2a) and protein excretion (Fig. 2b) and this corresponded with significantly higher expression of Fn (Fig. 2c) and PAI1 (Fig. 2d) compared to vehicle-treated control slices, but not of Col1α1 (Fig. 2e).
More Osteoprotegerin after IL13 Stimulation as Compared to Control
In addition to TGFβ1, we also investigated the effect of IL13, another profibrotic cytokine, on murine lung slices. OPG mRNA and protein levels were higher after 48 h of IL13 stimulation as compared to vehicle-treated lung slices, similar to the effect of TGFβ1 on murine lung slices (Fig. 2a, b). IL13 did not induce expression of the three other fibrosis markers tested in this study, i.e. Fn, PAI1, and Col1α1 (Fig. 2c–e).
To investigate the mechanism behind IL13-stimulated OPG production, we also measured mRNA expression of TGFβ1 and interleukin 13 receptor alpha 2 (IL13Rα2) in IL13-stimulated murine lung slices. We found that IL13 treatment did not lead to higher TGFβ1 mRNA expression (Fig. 3a) but did significantly induce IL13Rα2 mRNA expression (Fig. 3b).
To investigate if TGFβ1 could potentially play a role, we further treated IL13-stimulated murine lung slices with galunisertib, an inhibitor of TGFβ receptor 1 kinase. TGFβ1-stimulated slices were added as a positive control for the effect of galunisertib. We found significantly lower OPG mRNA expression and a trend towards lower OPG protein excretion compared to nontreated IL13-stimulated murine lung slices (Fig. 3c, d), in addition to lower expression of Fn, PAI1, and Col1α1 (Fig. 3e–g). Incidentally, when treating unstimulated slices with galunisertib for 48 h, we also found significant lower expression of most fibrotic markers, again indicating the intrinsically activated wound healing in slices (supplemental Figure S1a–e).
Osteoprotegerin Expression Strongly Correlates with Fn and PAI1 Expression in TGFβ1-Stimulated Murine Lung Slices and Less so in IL13-Stimulated Slices
To investigate whether expression of OPG correlates with other fibrosis markers, we compared OPG mRNA expression with its protein secretion and expression of each of the other fibrosis marker from the same experiments.
For both TGFβ1 and IL13, we found strong positive correlations between OPG mRNA expression and secreted OPG protein in culture medium (Table 3, Supplemental Figure S2a, e), while for Fn (S2b, f) and PAI (S2c, g) only TGFβ1-induced OPG mRNA correlated significantly. Col1α1 mRNA expression did not correlate with OPG mRNA after either treatment (S2d, h).
More Osteoprotegerin was Released from Slices of Human Fibrotic Lung than from Control Lung Tissue, and its Release Responds to Antifibrotic Treatment
Similar to our findings in murine lung slices, more OPG was released from control human lung slices that were incubated with TGFβ1 for 48 h than from untreated slices (Fig. 4a). In addition, slices made from fibrotic human lung tissue released more OPG during 48 h of incubation than slices made from control lung tissue (Fig. 4b). We also found that incubating human fibrotic lung slices with 2.5 mM pirfenidone resulted in a trend towards lower OPG protein excretion into culture medium (Fig. 4c). Interestingly, lower OPG protein excretion from pirfenidone-treated human lung slices was not accompanied by lower mRNA expression of Fn, PAI1, or Col1α1 as compared to untreated slices (Fig. 4d–f). We also investigated whether expression of OPG mRNA correlated with expression of fibrosis markers Fn, PAI1, or Col1α1 and found only a trend towards a positive correlation with Fn (r = 0.53, p = 0.07) and Col1α1 (r = 0.51, p = 0.09, Supplemental Figure S3a–c).
Osteoprotegerin Release Responds to Pirfenidone or Nintedanib Treatment in Murine Lung Slices
Next, we investigated whether OPG release from TGFβ1-stimulated murine lung slices would also respond to antifibrotic treatment and found that treatment with either pirfenidone or nintedanib resulted in a trend towards lower OPG expression (Fig. 5a, b). Lower mRNA expression of OPG (Fig. 5a) was accompanied by lower levels of OPG protein released from pirfenidone/nintedanib-treated murine lung slices. Fn mRNA expression also showed a trend towards lower levels as compared to lung slices only stimulated with TGFβ1, but only after nintedanib treatment (Fig. 5c). Levels of PAI1 or Col1α1 mRNA expression were not affected by the antifibrotics (Fig. 5d, e).
Discussion
Our study investigated if OPG expression would associate with fibrotic responses induced by profibrotic cytokines TGFβ1 or IL13 in lung tissue and whether it would respond to antifibrotic treatment. OPG was initially recognized for its role in bone turnover in which it prevents bone resorption and stimulates production of extracellular matrix in cartilage [18]. However, in recent years, an increasing number of studies have shown correlations between OPG and several fibrotic conditions including liver, vascular, cardiac, kidney and intestinal fibrosis [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. This study, and our own previous studies [9, 10] have now shown that this also appears to be the case for fibrosis in lung tissue and even wound healing. Our data shows that after the slicing procedure a repair or regenerative response was induced, with higher Col1α1 and Fn mRNA expression, which was accompanied by higher production of OPG. Inducing a more fibrotic response by treating with TGFβ1 magnified this inherent repair response induced by slicing.
How OPG actually influences wound repair and fibrosis is still an open question, but a study by Hao et al. suggests an interaction between TRAIL, OPG, and collagen-producing cells [30]. Using OPG-deficient mice, they showed lower collagen deposition in heart tissue, accompanied by increased expression of TRAIL and a higher level of apoptosis in heart tissue, which suggesting an association between TRAIL, OPG, and collagen production. We have previously shown fibroblasts and myofibroblasts to be important producers of OPG [9, 14] and these cells are also key cells in collagen production [31, 32]. These combined findings indicate that OPG, as a decoy receptor for TRAIL, may protect (myo)fibroblasts from TRAIL-induced apoptosis and can thereby contribute to both physiological wound healing and fibrosis. Alternatively, OPG, serving as a decoy receptor for RANKL, might also play a role in hindering RANKL-induced epithelial repair, as previously demonstrated by us [10]. Coupled with the suppression of TRAIL-induced apoptosis of myofibroblasts, this mechanism could potentially contribute to the development of fibrosis. Future studies should be designed to investigate these interactions in more detail in the context of lung fibrosis.
Interestingly, there appears to be no close connection between OPG and collagen production as OPG mRNA expression did not correlate with Col1α1 mRNA expression, while OPG did correlate with Fn and PAI1 in our model of early-stage fibrosis. Little is known about interactions between Fn, PAI1 and OPG, however, a study by Vial et al. showed that PAI1 stimulates Fn matrix assembly by disrupting the interaction between αvβ5 and vitronectin that then stimulates activation of α5β1 integrin, which increases the rate of Fn polymerization [33]. OPG has been shown to bind to αv integrins as well and may therefore enhance production of other fibrotic markers [34].
As we have shown before, OPG expression in lung tissue can clearly be promoted by TGFβ1, [24, 29, 35, 36]. To get more insight into the regulation of OPG expression, we also studied the effect of IL13, a fibrosis-associated cytokine known to be able to increase TGFβ1 expression [14, 37]. Indeed, previous studies have shown that IL13 plays an important role in the development of lung fibrosis [38, 39]. However, unlike TGFβ1, IL13 stimulation of murine lung slices did not induce mRNA expression of Col1α1, Fn and PAI1, while it did induce production of OPG mRNA and protein. This induction appeared to be directly dependent on TGFβ1 as co-treatment with galunisertib, a TGFβ receptor-I kinase inhibitor, could completely block the OPG-inducing effect of IL13. We previously showed a similar phenomenon in liver slices, in which IL13 induced OPG expression through IL13 receptor α2 (IL13Rα2)-induced TGFβ production [14]. In the present study we did find higher expression of IL13Rα2 after treatment with IL13, but not a concomitant increase in TGFβ1 expression. This may have been caused by a difference in the kinetics of different mRNA transcripts studied. However, these results do suggest that OPG is responsive towards small changes in fibrogenesis and may thus serve as sensitive marker to observe fibrosis initiation and/or progression. Indeed, a recent multicenter cohort study by Bowman et al. showed that OPG particularly associated with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease, reinforcing this view [11].
Importantly, we found that OPG was also released by both slices from lung tissue of a patient with normal lung function as well as slices from lung tissue of patients with lung fibrosis, with the latter releasing far more than slices of control lung tissue. The OPG production by control lung tissue could also be increased by stimulating with TGFβ1, suggesting similar pathways in mice and men. Due to limited availability of lung tissue from patients with normal lung function, we only obtained one sample for this study and these studies should therefore be extended for definite conclusions. Our results, however, do confirm the possibility of studying OPG as a marker of lung fibrosis in a clinical setting. The advantage of using OPG as marker of remodeling and fibrosis over other tissue proteins is that OPG is a soluble protein that can easily be measured in blood or culture media. Serum OPG should therefore be further investigated as a marker for progression of fibrotic disease in clinical practice.
In the interest of clinical applicability of OPG as a marker for treatment effects, we further investigated whether OPG production is affected by treatment with antifibrotic drugs. We found that OPG production was indeed inhibited by both drugs, even though expression of fibrosis-associated markers were not (yet) affected. The reason for this discrepancy is unclear but as many in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies have shown pirfenidone and nintendanib can inhibit extracellular matrix production [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48], our results reinforce the notion that OPG may be an early marker of treatment effect before any other markers are affected.
Concluding, our study has shown that OPG is upregulated in early stages of lung fibrosis and wound repair and responds to antifibrotic treatment. As OPG can easily be measured in serum, it is an interesting candidate to further investigate as a potential biomarker for fibrotic disorders of the lung and a potential marker for treatment effect of novel antifibrotics.
References
Wilson MS, Wynn TA (2009) Pulmonary fibrosis: pathogenesis, etiology and regulation. Mucosal Immunol 2(2):103–121. https://doi.org/10.1038/mi.2008.85
Wynn TA (2011) Integrating mechanisms of pulmonary fibrosis. J Exp Med 208(7):1339–1350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jms.2009.08.013
Rafii R, Juarez MM, Albertson TE, Chan AL (2013) A review of current and novel therapies for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J Thorac Dis 5(1):48–73. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2012.12.07
Raghu G, Weycker D, Edelsberg J, Bradford WZ, Oster G (2006) Incidence and prevalence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 174(7):810–816. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200602-163OC
Chua F, Gauldie J, Laurent GJ (2005) Pulmonary fibrosis: searching for model answers. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 33(1):9–13. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2005-0062TR
Karimi-Shah BA, Chowdhury BA (2015) Forced vital capacity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis — FDA review of pirfenidone and nintedanib. N Engl J Med 372(13):1189–1191. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1500526
Costabel U et al (2016) Efficacy of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis across prespecified subgroups in INPULSIS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 193(2):178–185. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201503-0562OC
Keating GM (2015) Nintedanib: a review of its use in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Drugs 75(10):1131–1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-015-0418-6
Ruigrok MJR, Roest MAP, Frijlink HW, Olinga P, Hinrichs WLJ, Melgert BN (2022) RANKL confers protection against cell death in precision-cut lung slices. Front Physiol 13:1029697. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPHYS.2022.1029697/BIBTEX
H Habibie et al. 2023 Role of RANKL in alveolar epithelial cell regeneration: potential novel contributor to lung tissue repair. bioRxiv. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.11.561640.
Bowman WS et al (2022) Proteomic biomarkers of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease: a multicentre cohort analysis. Lancet Respir Med 10(6):593–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00503-8
Reid P, Holen I (2009) Pathophysiological roles of osteoprotegerin (OPG). Eur J Cell Biol 88(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2008.06.004
Harada S, Rodan GA (2003) Control of osteoblast function and regulation of bone mass. Nature 423:6937
Adhyatmika A et al (2022) Osteoprotegerin expression in liver is Induced by IL13 through TGFβ which in turn activates AP1 and induces production of TGFβ and subsequent production of OPG. Cell Physiol Biochem 56:28–38. https://doi.org/10.33594/000000492
Oenema TA, Maarsingh H, Smit M, Groothuis GMM, Meurs H, Gosens R (2013) Bronchoconstriction induces TGF-β release and airway remodelling in guinea pig lung slices. PLoS ONE 8(6):e65580. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065580
Westra IM, Oosterhuis D, Groothuis GMM, Olinga P (2014) Precision-cut liver slices as a model for the early onset of liver fibrosis to test antifibrotic drugs. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 274(2):328–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2013.11.017
Raghu G et al (2018) Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 198(5):e44–e68. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201807-1255ST
Kostenuik P, Shalhoub V (2001) Osteoprotegerin a physiological and pharmacological inhibitor of bone resorption. Curr Pharm Des 7(8):613–635. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612013397807
Yilmaz Y et al (2010) Serum levels of osteoprotegerin in the spectrum of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 70(8):541–546. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365513.2010.524933
García-Valdecasas-Campelo E et al (2006) Serum osteoprotegerin and rankl levels in chronic alcoholic liver disease. Alcohol Alcohol 41(3):261–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agl004
Bosselut N et al (2013) Including osteoprotegerin and collagen IV in a score-based blood test for liver fibrosis increases diagnostic accuracy. Clin Chim Acta 415:63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2012.09.020
McGrath EE et al (2012) Deficiency of tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand exacerbates lung injury and fibrosis. Thorax 67(9):796–803. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200863
Sen O et al (2005) The relation between serum levels of osteoprotegerin and postoperative epidural fibrosis in patients who underwent surgery for lumbar disc herniation. Neurol Res 27(4):452–455. https://doi.org/10.1179/016164105X15631
Toffoli B et al (2011) Osteoprotegerin promotes vascular fibrosis via a TGF-β1 autocrine loop. Atherosclerosis 218(1):61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.05.019
Ambroszkiewicz J, Sands D, Gajewska J, Chelchowska M, Laskowska-Klita T (2013) Bone turnover markers, osteoprotegerin and RANKL cytokines in children with cystic fibrosis. Adv Med Sci 58(2):338–343. https://doi.org/10.2478/ams-2013-0011
Jiang JQ, Lin S, Xu PC, Zheng ZF, Jia YJ (2011) Serum osteoprotegerin measurement for early diagnosis of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder. Nephrology 16(6):588–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1797.2011.01481.x
Montañez-Barragán A, Gómez-Barrera I, Sanchez-Niño MD, Ucero AC, González-Espinoza L, Ortiz A (2014) Osteoprotegerin and kidney disease. J Nephrol 27(6):607–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-014-0092-x
Sylvester FA, Draghi A, Bausero MA, Fernandez ML, Vella AT (2012) Osteoprotegerin expression is upregulated in the colon of children with active inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 142(5):S-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(12)60782-3
Adhyatmika A et al (2020) Osteoprotegerin is more than a possible serum marker in liver fibrosis: a study into its function in human and murine liver. Pharmaceutics 12(5):471. https://doi.org/10.3390/PHARMACEUTICS12050471
Hao Y et al (2016) Cardiac hypertrophy is exacerbated in aged mice lacking the osteoprotegerin gene. Cardiovasc Res 110(1):62–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvw025
McAnulty RJ (2006) Fibroblasts and myofibroblasts: their source, function and role in disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 39(4):666–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2006.11.005
Wynn T (2008) Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. J Pathol 214(2):199–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.2277
Vial D, KcKeown-Longo PJ (2008) PAI1 stimulates assembly of the fibronectin matrix in osteosarcoma cells through crosstalk between the αvβ5 and α5β1 integrins. J Cell Sci 121(10):1661–1670. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.020149
Jia D et al (2017) Osteoprotegerin disruption attenuates HySu-induced pulmonary hypertension through integrinvβ3/FAK/AKT pathway suppression. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 10(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.116.001591
Sime PJ, Xing Z, Graham FL, Csaky KG, Gauldie J (1997) Adenovector-mediated gene transfer to activate transforming growth factor beta1 induces prolonged severe fibrosis in lung. J Clin Invest 100(4):768–776. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI119590
Habibie A, Adhyatmika A, Schaafsma D, Melgert BN (2021) The role of osteoprotegerin (OPG) in fibrosis: its potential as a biomarker and/or biological target for the treatment of fibrotic diseases. Pharmacol Ther 228:107941. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PHARMTHERA.2021.107941
Lee CG et al (2001) Interleukin-13 induces tissue fibrosis by selectively stimulating and activating transforming growth factor β1. J Exp Med 194(6):809–822. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.194.6.809
Jakubzick C et al (2003) Therapeutic attenuation of pulmonary fibrosis via targeting of IL-4- and IL-13-responsive cells. J Immunol 171(5):2684–2693. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.171.5.2684
Belperio JA et al (2002) Interaction of IL-13 and C10 in the pathogenesis of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 27(4):419–427. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2002-0009OC
Rubin J et al (2002) IGF-I regulates osteoprotegerin (OPG) and receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand in vitro and OPG in vivo. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87(9):4273–4279. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002-020656
Stefanovic B (2013) RNA protein interactions governing expression of the most abundant protein in human body, type I collagen. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 4(5):535–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrna.1177
Inomata M et al (2014) Pirfenidone inhibits fibrocyte accumulation in the lungs in bleomycin-induced murine pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Res 15(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-15-16
Hisatomi K et al (2012) Pirfenidone inhibits TGF-β1-induced over-expression of collagen type I and heat shock protein 47 in A549 cells. BMC Pulm Med 12:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-12-24
Schaefer CJ, Ruhrmund DW, Pan L, Seiwert SD, Kossen K (2011) Antifibrotic activities of pirfenidone in animal models. Eur Respir Rev 20(120):85–97. https://doi.org/10.1183/09059180.00001111
Azuma A et al (2011) Exploratory analysis of a phase III trial of pirfenidone identifies a subpopulation of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis as benefiting from treatment. Respir Res 12:143. https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-12-143
Conte E, Gili E, Fagone E, Fruciano M, Iemmolo M, Vancheri C (2014) Effect of pirfenidone on proliferation, TGF-β-induced myofibroblast differentiation and fibrogenic activity of primary human lung fibroblasts. Eur J Pharm Sci 58(1):13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2014.02.014
Wollin L, Maillet I, Quesniaux V, Holweg H, Ryffel B (2014) Antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory activity of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor nintedanib in experimental models of lung fibrosis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 349(2):209–220. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.113.208223
Wollin L et al (2015) Mode of action of nintedanib in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J 45:1434–1445. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00174914
Acknowledgements
Kurnia S.S. Putri received Ubbo Emius Scholarship, Adhyatmika and Habibie received LPDP Scholarship (The Indonesian Endowment Funds for Education, Ministry of Finance, Republic of Indonesia) for their Ph.D education in University of Groningen, The Netherlands. This was also supported by World Class Professor Program Funding from Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology, Republic of Indonesia.
Funding
Kurnia S.S. Putri received Ubbo Emius Scholarship, Adhyatmika and Habibie received LPDP Scholarship (The Indonesian Endowment Funds for Education, Ministry of Finance, Republic of Indonesia) for their Ph.D education in University of Groningen, The Netherlands. This was also supported by World Class Professor Program Funding from Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology, Republic of Indonesia (BN Melgert and Adhyatmika).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Kurnia S.S. Putri and Adhyatmika performed experiments and data analysis & interpretation and wrote the manuscript. Marina H. de Jager performed experiments. Carian E. Boorsma, Habibie, Mitchel J.R. Ruigrok and Wim Timens critically revised the manuscript. Peter Heukels collected human lung samples in Rotterdam. Wouter L.J. Hinrichs, Peter Olinga, and Barbro N. Melgert designed and supervised the study, and critically revised the manuscript. Peter Olinga, and Barbro N. Melgert gave final approval for the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Kurnia S.S. Putri and Adhyatmika contributed equally on this work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Putri, K.S.S., Adhyatmika, A., Boorsma, C.E. et al. Osteoprotegerin is an Early Marker of the Fibrotic Process and of Antifibrotic Treatment Responses in Ex Vivo Lung Fibrosis. Lung 202, 331–342 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-024-00691-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-024-00691-5