Abstract
Purpose
Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) is a rare sinonasal malignancy. Curative treatment requires multidisciplinary approach, with surgical options consist of the endonasal endoscopic approach (EEA) and external surgery (EXTS). Here, we provide the post-operative and survival results from a single-center long-term follow-up.
Methods
We report long-term follow-up of 92 ITAC cases treated between 1998 and 2018, treated with EEA (n = 40) or EXTS (n = 52). Survival estimates, post-operative complications and duration of hospitalization were compared between surgical modalities.
Results
Baseline characteristics were similar. A higher number of T4b tumors (16%), and subsequently more tumoral invasion (39%), was present in patients undergoing EXTS compared to EEA (3% and 18%, respectively). No difference in Barnes histology subtypes was noticed. Patients undergoing EEA had a shorter post-operative hospitalization stay versus EXTS (4 versus 7 days). Use of EEA was associated to improved disease-specific survival (DSS; 11.4 versus 4.4 years; HREEA = 0.53), especially for patients with T3–4a tumors (11.4 versus 3.0 years; HREEA = 0.41). Patients with T3–4 stage, tumoral invasion, positive surgical margins, mucinous or mixed histology, and prolonged post-operative hospital stay showed poor local relapse-free, disease-free, overall, and DSS.
Conclusions
Long-term follow-up in locally advanced ITAC demonstrates that resection by EEA is correlated with improved DSS compared to EXTS, especially for T3–4 tumors. No significant differences between both treatment modalities was observed regarding per- and post-operative complications, although hospitalization in patients undergoing EEA was shorter than for patients treated with EXTS. These results confirm that EEA should remain the preferred surgical procedure in operable cases of sinonasal ITAC.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated and analyzed during this study cannot be shared publicly due to the European General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR). The data will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author, following approval of the data protection officer of the University Hospital Ghent.
References
Sklar EM, Pizarro JA (2003) Sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinoma involvement of the paranasal sinuses. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:1152–1155
Gallet P, Nguyen DT, Russel A, Jankowski R, Vigouroux C, Rumeau C (2018) Intestinal and non-intestinal nasal cavity adenocarcinoma: impact of wood dust exposure. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 135:383–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2018.08.012
Leivo I (2017) Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma: classification, immunophenotype, molecular features and differential diagnosis. Head Neck Pathol 11:295–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-017-0800-7
Georgel T, Jankowski R, Henrot P, Baumann C, Kacha S, Grignon B, Toussaint B, Graff P, Kaminsky MC, Geoffrois L, Vignaud JM (2009) CT assessment of woodworkers’ nasal adenocarcinomas confirms the origin in the olfactory cleft. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:1440–1444. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1648
Jankowski R, Georgel T, Vignaud JM, Hemmaoui B, Toussaint B, Graff P, Geoffrois L, Henrot P, Kaminsky MC (2007) Endoscopic surgery reveals that woodworkers’ adenocarcinomas originate in the olfactory cleft. Rhinology 45:308–314
Choussy O, Ferron C, Vedrine PO, Toussaint B, Lietin B, Marandas P, Babin E, De Raucourt D, Reyt E, Cosmidis A, Makeieff M, Dehesdin D (2010) Role of radiotherapy in the treatment of nasoethmoidal adenocarcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136:143–146. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2009.212
Rampinelli V, Ferrari M, Nicolai P (2018) Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the sinonasal tract: an update. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 26:115–121. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000445
Kennedy MT, Jordan RC, Berean KW, Perez-Ordonez B (2004) Expression pattern of CK7, CK20, CDX-2, and villin in intestinal-type sinonasal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Pathol 57:932–937. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2004.016964
Kim J, Chang H, Jeong EC (2018) Sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinoma in the frontal sinus. Arch Craniofac Surg 19:210–213. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2018.01970
Vergez S, du Mayne MD, Coste A, Gallet P, Jankowski R, Dufour X, Righini C, Reyt E, Choussy O, Serrano E, Crampette L, Debry C, de Gabory L (2014) Multicenter study to assess endoscopic resection of 159 sinonasal adenocarcinomas. Ann Surg Oncol 21:1384–1390. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3385-8
Vergez S, Martin-Dupont N, Lepage B, De Bonnecaze G, Decotte A, Serrano E (2012) Endoscopic vs transfacial resection of sinonasal adenocarcinomas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 146:848–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599811434903
Weber RK, Hosemann W (2015) Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 14:Doc08. https://doi.org/10.3205/cto000123
Suh JD, Ramakrishnan VR, Chi JJ, Palmer JN, Chiu AG (2013) Outcomes and complications of endoscopic approaches for malignancies of the paranasal sinuses and anterior skull base. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 122:54–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348941312200110
Barnes L (1986) Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Am J Surg Pathol 10:192–202. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-198603000-00006
Castelnuovo P, Turri-Zanoni M, Battaglia P, Antognoni P, Bossi P, Locatelli D (2016) Sinonasal malignancies of anterior skull base: histology-driven treatment strategies. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 49:183–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2015.09.012
Duprez F, Madani I, Morbee L, Bonte K, Deron P, Domjan V, Boterberg T, De Gersem W, De Neve W (2012) IMRT for sinonasal tumors minimizes severe late ocular toxicity and preserves disease control and survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83:252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.1977
Castelnuovo P, Lambertoni A, Sileo G, Valentini M, Karligkiotis A, Battaglia P, Turri-Zanoni M (2021) Critical review of multidisciplinary approaches for managing sinonasal tumors with orbital involvement. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 41:S76–S89. https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-41-2021-08
Kawaguchi M, Kato H, Tomita H, Mizuta K, Aoki M, Hara A, Matsuo M (2017) Imaging characteristics of malignant sinonasal tumors. J Clin Med 5:5. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm6120116
Chatelet F, Simon F, Bedarida V, Le Clerc N, Adle-Biassette H, Manivet P, Herman P, Verillaud B (2021) Surgical management of sinonasal cancers: a comprehensive review. Cancers. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13163995
Cracchiolo JR, Patel K, Migliacci JC, Morris LT, Ganly I, Roman BR, McBride SM, Tabar VS, Cohen MA (2018) Factors associated with a primary surgical approach for sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 117:756–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24923
Debacker J, Huvenne W, Bonte K, De Neve W, Deron P, Ost P, Van Zele T, Vermeersch H, Duprez F (2018) Open surgery versus primary radiotherapy in T4b sinonasal carcinoma. B-ENT 14:93–99
Lund VJ, Clarke PM, Swift AC, McGarry GW, Kerawala C, Carnell D (2016) Nose and paranasal sinus tumours: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. J Laryngol Otol 130:S111–S118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215116000530
Ganly I, Patel SG, Singh B, Kraus DH, Bridger PG, Cantu G, Cheesman A, De Sa G, Donald P, Fliss D, Gullane P, Janecka I, Kamata SE, Kowalski LP, Levine P, Medina LR, Pradhan S, Schramm V, Snyderman C, Wei WI, Shah JP (2005) Complications of craniofacial resection for malignant tumors of the skull base: report of an International Collaborative Study. Head Neck 27:445–451. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20166
Ganly I, Patel SG, Singh B, Kraus DH, Bridger PG, Cantu G, Cheesman A, De Sa G, Donald P, Fliss DM, Gullane P, Janecka I, Kamata SE, Kowalski LP, Levine PA, Medina Dos Santos LR, Pradhan S, Schramm V, Snyderman C, Wei WI, Shah JP (2005) Craniofacial resection for malignant paranasal sinus tumors: report of an international collaborative study. Head Neck 27:575–584. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20165
Kasemsiri P, Prevedello DM, Otto BA, Old M, Ditzel Filho L, Kassam AB, Carrau RL (2013) Endoscopic endonasal technique: treatment of paranasal and anterior skull base malignancies. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 79:760–779. https://doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20130138
Verillaud B, Bresson D, Sauvaget E, Mandonnet E, Georges B, Kania R, Herman P (2012) Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 129:190–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2011.09.004
Alshammari DM, Almomen A, Taha M, Albahrna H, Alshammari S (2021) Quality of life and morbidity after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgeries using the sinonasal outcomes test (SNOT): a tertiary hospital experience. Int J Otolaryngol 2021:6659221. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6659221
Nicolai P, Battaglia P, Bignami M, Bolzoni Villaret A, Delu G, Khrais T, Lombardi D, Castelnuovo P (2008) Endoscopic surgery for malignant tumors of the sinonasal tract and adjacent skull base: a 10-year experience. Am J Rhinol 22:308–316. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3170
Van Gerven L, Jorissen M, Nuyts S, Hermans R, Vander Poorten V (2011) Long-term follow-up of 44 patients with adenocarcinoma of the nasal cavity and sinuses primarily treated with endoscopic resection followed by radiotherapy. Head Neck 33:898–904. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21556
Meerwein CM, Brada MD, Soyka MB, Holzmann D, Rupp NJ (2022) Reappraisal of grading in intestinal-type sinonasal adenocarcinoma: tumor budding as an independent prognostic parameter. Head Neck Pathol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-022-01410-3
Meccariello G, Deganello A, Choussy O, Gallo O, Vitali D, De Raucourt D, Georgalas C (2016) Endoscopic nasal versus open approach for the management of sinonasal adenocarcinoma: a pooled-analysis of 1826 patients. Head Neck 38(Suppl 1):E2267-2274. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24182
Van Gerven L, Vander Poorten V, Jorissen M (2011) Adenocarcinomas of the sinonasal tract: current opinion. B-ENT 7(Suppl 17):15–20
Franchi A, Miligi L, Palomba A, Giovannetti L, Santucci M (2011) Sinonasal carcinomas: recent advances in molecular and phenotypic characterization and their clinical implications. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 79:265–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.08.002
Llorente JL, Lopez F, Suarez C, Hermsen MA (2014) Sinonasal carcinoma: clinical, pathological, genetic and therapeutic advances. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 11:460–472. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.97
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: TZ; methodology: TZ, FD; investigation and data accumulation: TV, SK, MS, WH, PD, SR, CB, FD, TZ; formal analysis: TV, SK, MS, SH, JD, DC, LF; writing–original draft preparation: TV, SK; writing–review and editing: all authors; resources: TZ, CB; supervision: TZ, CB.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. No funding was acquired for this research.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
This research study was conducted retrospectively from data obtained for clinical purposes. in the period 1998 – 2018. The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Ghent (Belgian registration number: B670201938932).
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Vermassen, T., De Keukeleire, S., Saerens, M. et al. Choice of surgery in intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the sinonasal tract: a long-term comparative study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 281, 2993–3004 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08447-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08447-w