Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring of the facial nerve predicts postoperative facial palsy in parotid surgery: a prospective study

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Facial palsy (FP) is the most significant complication of parotidectomy. Currently, the use of intermittent intraoperative neuromonitoring (iIONM) in parotid surgery facilitates nerve detection, which is paramount to nerve protection. Continuous IONM (cIONM), as applied in thyroid surgery, enables real-time information on electrophysiological nerve status through continuous nerve stimulation, thereby allowing consequent amplitude analysis. To date, the application of cIONM in parotid surgery has not been noted in literature.

Methods

We performed parotidectomies with anterograde facial nerve visualization using cIONM in 32 consecutive patients in a prospective study (German Register of clinical studies—DRKS 00011051) during the period October 2016 to January 2020. After the facial trunk had been exposed, an atraumatic stimulation electrode was placed and the nerve was stimulated at 3 Hz, at a low threshold (0.62 ± 0.06 mA), for the entire duration of the preparation. Selected electrophysiological parameters were collected and compared to postoperative facial nerve function, measured by the House-Brackmann grading system.

Results

In the post hoc analysis, a significant correlation between a drop in amplitude (< 50% of the “baseline” amplitude) and postoperative FP was recorded (p = 0.001). True positive prediction of FP was noted in 14 out of 16 patients and true negative in 10 out of 16. The sensitivity was 87.5% (AUC 0.75), with a high negative predictive value of 83.3%.

Conclusion

cIONM has significant value in predicting postoperative FP in parotidectomy. Future development of an acoustic/optic warning system in IONM devices could prevent nerve injury in real time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kadletz L, Grasl S, Grasl MC, Perisanidis C, Erovic BM (2017) Extracapsular dissection versus superficial parotidectomy in benign parotid gland tumors: the Vienna Medical School experience: outcomes of parotid gland surgery. Head Neck 39(2):356–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Grosheva M, Klussmann JP, Grimminger C et al (2009) Electromyographic facial nerve monitoring during parotidectomy for benign lesions does not improve the outcome of postoperative facial nerve function: a prospective two-center trial. Laryngoscope 119(12):2299–2305. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bova R, Saylor A, Coman WB (2004) Parotidectomy: review of treatment and outcomes. ANZ J Surg 74(7):563–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2004.02988.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Prats-Golczer VE, Gonzalez-Cardero E, Exposito-Tirado JA, Montes-Latorre E, Gonzalez-Perez LM, Infante-Cossio P (2017) Impact of dysfunction of the facial nerve after superficial parotidectomy: a prospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55(8):798–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.07.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Savvas E, Hillmann S, Weiss D, Koopmann M, Rudack C, Alberty J (2016) Association between facial nerve monitoring with postoperative facial paralysis in parotidectomy. JAMA Otolaryngol Neck Surg 142(9):828. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2016.1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaillard C, Perie S, Susini B, St Guily JL (2005) Facial nerve dysfunction after parotidectomy: the role of local factors. Laryngoscope 115(2):287–291. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000154735.61775.cd

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guntinas-Lichius O, Gabriel B, Peter KJ (2006) Risk of facial palsy and severe Frey’s syndrome after conservative parotidectomy for benign disease: analysis of 610 operations. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 126(10):1104–1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480600672618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sood AJ, Houlton JJ, Nguyen SA, Gillespie MB (2015) Facial nerve monitoring during parotidectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Neck Surg 152(4):631–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599814568779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chiesa-Estomba CM, Larruscain-Sarasola E, Lechien JR et al (2021) Facial nerve monitoring during parotid gland surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278(4):933–943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06188-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schneider R, Sekulla C, Machens A, Lorenz K, Nguyen Thanh P, Dralle H (2015) Postoperative vocal fold palsy in patients undergoing thyroid surgery with continuous or intermittent nerve monitoring. Br J Surg 102(11):1380–1387. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9889

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stankovic P, Wittlinger J, Georgiew R, Dominas N, Hoch S, Wilhelm T (2020) Continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring (cIONM) in head and neck surgery—a review. HNO 68(S2):86–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-020-00824-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. House J, Brackmann D (1985) Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 93(2):146–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/019459988509300202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haring CT, Ellsperman SE, Edwards BM et al (2019) Assessment of intraoperative nerve monitoring parameters associated with facial nerve outcome in parotidectomy for benign disease. JAMA Otolaryngol Neck Surg 145(12):1137. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2019.1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eren SB, Dogan R, Ozturan O, Veyseller B, Hafiz AM (2017) How deleterious is facial nerve dissection for the facial nerve in parotid surgery: an electrophysiological evaluation. J Craniofac Surg 28(1):56–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ozturk K, Akyildiz S, Gode S, Turhal G, Gursan G, Kirazli T (2016) The effect of partial superficial parotidectomy on amplitude, latency and threshold of facial nerve stimulation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(6):1527–1531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3622-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Psychogios G, Bohr C, Constantinidis J et al (2021) Review of surgical techniques and guide for decision making in the treatment of benign parotid tumors. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278(1):15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06250-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mantsopoulos K, Koch M, Klintworth N, Zenk J, Iro H (2015) Evolution and changing trends in surgery for benign Parotid tumors: trends in surgery for benign parotid tumors. Laryngoscope 125(1):122–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grosheva M, Pick C, Granitzka T et al (2019) Impact of extent of parotidectomy on early and long-term complications: a prospective multicenter cohort trial. Head Neck 41(6):1943–1951. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.25651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schneider R, Randolph GW, Sekulla C et al (2013) Continuous intraoperative vagus nerve stimulation for identification of imminent recurrent laryngeal nerve injury: continuous IONM for Thyroid Surgery. Head Neck 35(11):1591–1598. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Amano M, Kohno M, Nagata O, Taniguchi M, Sora S, Sato H (2011) Intraoperative continuous monitoring of evoked facial nerve electromyograms in acoustic neuroma surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153(5):1059–1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0937-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ulkatan S, Waner M, Arranz-Arranz B et al (2014) New methodology for facial nerve monitoring in extracranial surgeries of vascular malformations. Clin Neurophysiol 125(4):849–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.08.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project was funded entirely by the Department of the corresponding author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petar Stanković.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have indicated that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of the Saxonian Physician’s Chamber, Germany (EK-BR-53/16-1) in September 2016.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stanković, P., Hoch, S., Stuck, B.A. et al. Continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring of the facial nerve predicts postoperative facial palsy in parotid surgery: a prospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 281, 1483–1492 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08384-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08384-0

Keywords

Navigation