Skip to main content
Log in

Abdominal ultrasound in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma staging: yes or no?

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Abdominal ultrasound is a diagnostic staging procedure for distant metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, currently performed abdominal staging procedures do not follow consistent standards. Therefore, this retrospective study on 498 patients aimed at investigating on abdominal ultrasound as a staging procedure in HNSCC.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis of 498 head and neck cancer patients treated in our Department of Head and Neck Surgery between 2008 and 2015 was performed. Disease-related data were collected over a mean follow-up time of 30.3 months, and results of abdominal ultrasound were analyzed.

Results

426 patients received abdominal ultrasound as a staging procedure. 7% (29) were suspicious for metastases. In 19 cases (66%), the detected abnormalities were masses of the liver. In four patients, abdominal metastases were confirmed at the time of initial diagnosis. 16 patients developed abdominal metastases in the course of the disease (on average 623 days after initial diagnosis). 19 out of 20 patients with abdominal metastases had an N2/N3 cervical lymph node status. In this study, the negative predictive value of abdominal ultrasound for HNSCC staging was 99.03%, while the positive predictive value yielded 5.88% (N2/N3-patients).

Conclusion

Only in patients with locally advanced lymph-node-status (N2/N3), abdominal ultrasound can be useful as a staging investigation to exclude abdominal metastasis in HNSCC patients. For N0/N1 patients, abdominal ultrasound might be dispensed. Of note, in case of a positive result, further diagnostic procedures are mandatory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. RobertKochInstitute (2018) Cancer in Germany 2013/2014. https://edoc.rki.de/handle/176904/5931

  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70(1):7–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferlito A, Shaha AR, Silver CE, Rinaldo A, Mondin V (2001) Incidence and sites of distant metastases from head and neck cancer. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 63(4):202–207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. de Bree R, Deurloo EE, Snow GB, Leemans CR (2000) Screening for distant metastases in patients with head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope 110(3 Pt 1):397–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Duprez F, Berwouts D, De Neve W, Bonte K, Boterberg T, Deron P, Huvenne W, Rottey S et al (2017) Distant metastases in head and neck cancer. Head Neck 39(9):1733–1743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson JT (2001) Proposal of standardization on screening tests for detection of distant metastases from head and neck cancer. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 63(4):256–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brouwer J, Bree R, Hoekstra OS, Langendijk JA, Castelijns JA, Leemans CR (2005) Screening for distant metastases in patients with head and neck cancer: what is the current clinical practice? Clin Otolaryngol 30(5):438–443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Andrle J, Schartinger VH, Schwentner I, Deibl M, Sprinzl GM (2009) Initial staging examinations for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: are they appropriate? J Laryngol Otol 123(8):885–888

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. GuidelinesProgrammeOncology (2012) S3 Guideline Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity

  11. GuidelinesProgrammeOncology (2019) S3 Guideline Laryngeal Carcinoma

  12. NCCN (2019) National comprehensive cancer network: clinical practice guidelines in oncology: head and neck cancers. NCCN, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reiser M, Kuhn F-P, Debus J (2017) Radiologie. Thieme, Stuttgart, p 4

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cantisani V, Grazhdani H, Fioravanti C, Rosignuolo M, Calliada F, Messineo D, Bernieri MG, Redler A et al (2014) Liver metastases: contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography and magnetic resonance. World J Gastroenterol 20(29):9998–10007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1471–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Garavello W, Ciardo A, Spreafico R, Gaini RM (2006) Risk factors for distant metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132(7):762–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lang S, Wollenberg B, Dellian M, Steuer-Vogt MK, Schwenzer K, Sautier W, Chucholowski M, Eckel R et al (2002) Clinical and epidemiological data of patients with malignomas of the head and neck. Laryngorhinootologie 81(7):499–508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Merino OR, Lindberg RD, Fletcher GH (1977) An analysis of distant metastases from squamous cell carcinoma of the upper respiratory and digestive tracts. Cancer 40(1):145–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kotwall C, Sako K, Razack MS, Rao U, Bakamjian V, Shedd DP (1987) Metastatic patterns in squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. Am J Surg 154(4):439–442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuperman DI, Auethavekiat V, Adkins DR, Nussenbaum B, Collins S, Boonchalermvichian C, Trinkaus K, Chen L et al (2011) Squamous cell cancer of the head and neck with distant metastasis at presentation. Head Neck 33(5):714–718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ng SH, Chan SC, Liao CT, Chang JT, Ko SF, Wang HM, Chin SC, Lin CY et al (2008) Distant metastases and synchronous second primary tumors in patients with newly diagnosed oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas: evaluation of (18)F-FDG PET and extended-field multi-detector row CT. Neuroradiology 50(11):969–979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Senft A, de Bree R, Hoekstra OS, Kuik DJ, Golding RP, Oyen WJ, Pruim J, van den Hoogen FJ et al (2008) Screening for distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients by chest CT or whole body FDG-PET: a prospective multicenter trial. Radiother Oncol 87(2):221–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nelson RC (1994) Radiological evaluation of metastases to the liver: The Emory experience. Cancer Treat Res 69:129–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen PG, Schoeff SS, Watts CA, Reibel JF, Levine PA, Shonka DC Jr, Jameson MJ (2014) Utility of abdominal imaging to assess for liver metastasis in patients with head and neck cancer and abnormal liver function tests. Am J Otolaryngol 35(2):137–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Herman CR, Gill HK, Eng J, Fajardo LL (2002) Screening for preclinical disease: test and disease characteristics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(4):825–831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Peters TT, Senft A, Hoekstra OS, Castelijns JA, Witte BI, Leemans CR, de Bree R (2015) Pretreatment screening on distant metastases and head and neck cancer patients: validation of risk factors and influence on survival. Oral Oncol 51(3):267–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brouwer J, Senft A, de Bree R, Comans EF, Golding RP, Castelijns JA, Hoekstra OS, Leemans CR (2006) Screening for distant metastases in patients with head and neck cancer: is there a role for (18)FDG-PET? Oral Oncol 42(3):275–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benedikt Höing.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Höing, B., Wittig, L., Weber, L. et al. Abdominal ultrasound in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma staging: yes or no?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280, 1885–1891 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07723-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07723-x

Keywords

Navigation