Abstract
Background
It is rare to find pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia (PEH) on the auricle. PEH should be differentiated from squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Diagnosis is made after surgery as a biopsy is often inconclusive. A free or pedicled skin flap is needed to avoid deformation of the auricle.
Methods
Adjacent pedicled skin flap is a good option for reconstruction. Moreover, it was shown how to repair the wound in the following two cases.
Results
The flaps grew well after surgery, and the wound healed well.
Conclusion
PEH is a benign lesion. Adjacent pedicled skin flap is a good option for reconstruction, which can avoid deformation of the auricle.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zayour M, Lazova R (2011) Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia: a review. Am J Dermatopathol 33:112
Morrissey KA et al (2014) Pseudocarcinomatous hyperplasia involving the ear from gout: a diagnostic pitfall. J Cutan Pathol 41:42–44
Gacek MR, Gacek RR, Gantz B et al (1998) Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia versus squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory canal. Laryngoscope 108:620–623
El-Khoury J, Kibbi AG, Abbas O (2012) Mucocutaneous pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia: a review. Am J Dermatopathol 34(2):165–175
Raposo A, García-Purriños F, Albaladejo C et al (2018) Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia of the larynx requiring total laryngectomy. Am J Case Rep 19:634–637
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Dr. Peng Li for supporting and proofreading this manuscript.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YC presented and revised article. XZ analyzed data and wrote article. LY collected data and wrote article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, X., Yang, L. & Chen, Y. Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia of the auricle: two case reports and experiences of reconstruction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 279, 4207–4211 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07453-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07453-0