Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Auditory perception skills in children receiving simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants: early speech-discrimination results

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of the present study is to evaluate early speech-perception abilities using VRISD in toddlers who received simultaneous bilateral CIs between 12 and 36 months of age and to compare them with the findings in NH infants and to monitor the development of speech-perception skills within 6 months after cochlear implantation.

Methods

The VRISD test was performed using video visual reinforcement to assess speech-discrimination ability in the CI and NH groups. Four stimuli were used for testing in the present study: /a/, /i/, /ba/, and /da/. The two contrasts used for the research were /a-i/ and /ba-da/. Auditory and listening skills in the CI group were assessed using the IT-MAIS.

Results

The responses to the /a-i/ and /ba-da/ phoneme contrast were found to be similar in the NH and CI groups. No statistically significant difference was found between the groups (p > 0.05). VRISD test result and the IT-MAIS score were highly correlated in CI group (p = 0.001, r = 0.822).

Conclusion

The VRISD test can be effectively used to evaluate the development of speech-discrimination skills in hearing-impaired babies before and after CI. This research suggests that the development of speech-perception ability with CI is seriously influenced by environmental exposure and sound access. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the speech-perception skills in toddlers with simultaneous bilateral CI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Organization WH (2018) Addressing the rising prevalence of hearing loss

  2. Kurz A et al (2019) The impact of etiology and duration of deafness on speech perception outcomes in SSD patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276(12):3317–3325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nikolopoulos TP, O’Donoghue GM, Archbold S (1999) Age at implantation: its importance in pediatric cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 109(4):595–599

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Osberger MJ et al (1991) Independent evaluation of the speech perception abilities of children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system. Ear Hear 12(4 Suppl):66S-80S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Staller SJ et al (1991) Perceptual abilities of children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant. Ear Hear 12(4):34S-47S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fryauf-Bertschy H et al (1992) Performance over time of congenitally deaf and postlingually deafened children using a multichannel cochlear implant. J Speech Hear Res 35(4):913–920

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Geers A, Brenner C (1994) Speech perception results: audition and lipreading enhancement. Volta Rev 96(5):97–108

    Google Scholar 

  8. Miyamoto RT et al (1995) Comparison of multichannel tactile aids and multichannel cochlear implants in children with profound hearing impairments. Otol Neurotol 16(1):8–13

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Svirsky MA, Teoh S-W, Neuburger H (2004) Development of language and speech perception in congenitally, profoundly deaf children as a function of age at cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurotol 9(4):224–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mesallam TA, Yousef M, Almasaad A (2019) Auditory and language skills development after cochlear implantation in children with multiple disabilities. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276(1):49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zimmerman-Phillips S, Robbins AM, Osberger MJ (2000) Assessing cochlear implant benefit in very young children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 109(12):42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lisker L, Abramson ASJW (1964) A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word 20(3):384–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eimas PD et al (1971) Speech perception in infants. Science 171(3968):303–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Eilers RE, Gavin W, Wilson WR (1979) Linguistic experience and phonemic perception in infancy: a crosslinguistic study. Child Dev 50(1):14–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nozza RJ, Wilson WR (1984) Masked and unmasked pure-tone thresholds of infants and adults: development of auditory frequency selectivity and sensitivity. J Speech Hear Res 27(4):613–622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Werker JF, Tees RC (1984) Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behav Dev 7(1):49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grieser D, Kuhl PK (1989) Categorization of speech by infants: support for speech-sound prototypes. Dev Psychol 25(4):577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuhl PK (1991) Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Percept Psychophys 50(2):93–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nozza RJ et al (1991) Reliability and validity of infant speech-sound discrimination-in-noise thresholds. J Speech Hear Res 34(3):643–650

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nozza RJ (2000) Thresholds are not enough: understanding how infants process speech has a role in how we manage hearing loss. In: A sound foundation through early amplification: Proceedings of an international conference. Stäfa, Switzerland: Phonak AG

  21. Uhler KM et al (2015) Refining stimulus parameters in assessing infant speech perception using visual reinforcement infant speech discrimination: sensation level. J Am Acad Audiol 26(10):807–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nozza RJ (1987) Infant speech-sound discrimination testing: effects of stimulus intensity and procedural model on measures of performance. J Acoust Soc Am 81(6):1928–1939

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Moore JM, Thompson G, Thompson M (1975) Auditory localization of infants as a function of reinforcement conditions. J Speech Hear Disord 40(1):29–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Uhler K (2008) Longitudinal study of infant speech perception in young cochlear implant candidates: Three case studies, University of Colorado at Boulder

  25. Muse C et al (2013) Supplement to the JCIH 2007 position statement: principles and guidelines for early intervention after confirmation that a child is deaf or hard of hearing. Pediatrics 131(4):e1324–e1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Robbins AM et al (2004) Effect of age at cochlear implantation on auditory skill development in infants and toddlers. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(5):570–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Epir S, Yalaz K (1984) Urban Turkish children’s performance on the Denver developmental screening test. Dev Med Child Neurol 26(5):632–643

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Frankenburg WK, Dodds JB (1967) The Denver developmental screening test. J Pediatr 71(2):181–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Eilers RE, Wilson WR, Moore JM (1977) Developmental changes in speech discrimination in infants. J Speech Hear Res 20(4):766–780

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Boothroyd A (1984) Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 27(1):134–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Martinez A et al (2008) Assessing speech pattern contrast perception in infants: early results on VRASPAC. J Otol Neurotol 29(2):183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Eilers RE et al (1981) Discrimination of voice onset time in infancy. J Acoust Soc Am 70(4):955–965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Van Wieringen A, Wouters J (1999) Natural vowel and consonant recognition by Laura cochlear implantees. J Ear Hear 20(2):89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Uhler K et al (2011) Longitudinal infant speech perception in young cochlear implant users. J Am Acad Audiol 22(3):129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Govaerts P et al (2006) Auditory speech sounds evaluation (A § E®): a new test to assess detection, discrimination and identification in hearing impairment. Cochlear Implants Int 7(2):92–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Martinez A et al (2008) Assessing speech pattern contrast perception in infants: early results on VRASPAC. Otol Neurotol 29(2):183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Prathosh A, Ramakrishnan A, Ananthapadmanabha T (2014) Estimation of voice-onset time in continuous speech using temporal measures. J Acoust Soc Am 136(2):EL122–EL128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Batuk IT, Kayikci MEK (2020) Evaluation of the voice onset time in Turkish-speaking schoolchildren. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 137:110243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Digeser FM et al (2012) Melody identification for cochlear implant users and normal hearers using expanded pitch contours. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(11):2317–2326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dempster FN (1981) Memory span: sources of individual and developmental differences. J Psychol Bull 89(1):63

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Prof.Christine Yoshinago Itano and Kristin Uhler, PhD for technical support during the study. The authors also thank Aud. Ebru Zeren and Aud. Soner Türüdü for support during the recording stimulus.

Funding

No funding was received for this study

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Audiology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

    Selvet Akkaplan, Merve Ozbal Batuk & Gonca Sennaroglu

Authors
  1. Selvet Akkaplan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Merve Ozbal Batuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gonca Sennaroglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selvet Akkaplan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval

The study was authorized by the local ethics committee of the Hacettepe University NonInterventional Clinical Research Ethics Board (GO 18/152-20).

Consent to participate

The consent was received by participator’s parents.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akkaplan, S., Batuk, M.O. & Sennaroglu, G. Auditory perception skills in children receiving simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants: early speech-discrimination results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278, 4689–4696 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06579-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06579-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation