Abstract
Purpose
To report our experience in performing cochlear implantation under local anesthesia in a group of patients who were deemed unfit for general anesthesia.
Methods
A retrospective chart review was performed to analyze undesirable events and any other discomfort complained by patients during cochlear implantation. Analysis of patient’s satisfaction was performed by means of a survey instrument. We have also compared the duration of surgery and hospitalization time with a control group that was implanted under general anesthesia.
Result
Twenty-one cochlear implantation in 20 patients were performed under local anesthesia. Age of patients ranged from 38 to 85 years. All interventions were successfully completed without any conversions to general anesthesia. Discomfort during surgery was reported in five cases: vertigo triggered by electrode insertion in two patients, pain during the round window approach in two patients and distress during the use of drill in one case; no patient experienced agitation. During the postoperative period, no complications or unpleasant experiences were reported. Only two patients stated that they would not perform cochlear implantation again under local anesthesia. Lower duration surgery and hospitalization time were found in the local anesthesia group.
Conclusion
Local anesthesia with conscious sedation is a safe and effective alternative for cochlear implant candidates considered unfit for general anesthesia. Fundamental for a successful procedure are preoperative counselling, accurate selection of the patients and constant intraoperative assistance. Unfeasibility of facial nerve monitoring and minor detrimental effect on training are the principal disadvantages in performing cochlear implantation under local anesthesia.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Forli F, Arslan E, Bellelli S, Burdo S, Mancini P, Martini A, Miccoli M, Quaranta N, Berrettini S (2011) Systematic review of the literature on the clinical effectiveness of the cochlear implant procedure in paediatric patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 31(5):281–298 (PMID: 22287820; PMCID: PMC3262414)
Berrettini S, Baggiani A, Bruschini L, Cassandro E, Cuda D, Filipo R, Palla I, Quaranta N, Forli F (2011) Systematic review of the literature on the clinical effectiveness of the cochlear implant procedure in adults patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 31(5):299–310 (PMID:22287821; PMCID:PMC3262411)
Vincenti V, Di Lella F, Falcioni M, Negri M, Zanetti D (2018) Cochlear implantation in children with CHARGE syndrome: a report of eight cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275(8):1987–1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5053-x
Vincenti V, Bacciu A, Guida M, Marra F, Bertoldi B, Bacciu S, Pasanisi E (2014) Pediatric cochlear implantation: an update. Ital J Pediatrics 40:72–78
Skarzynski H, Matusiak M, Furmanek M, Pilka A, Wlodarczyk E, Oldak M, Skarzynski PH (2018) Radiologic measurement of cochlea and hearing preservation rate using slim straight electrode (CI422) and round window approach. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 38:468–475
Chen DS, Clarrett DM, Li L, Bowditch SP, Niparko JK, Lin FR (2013) Cochlear implantation in older adults: long-term analysis of complications and device survival in a consecutive series. Otol Neurotol 34:1272–1277
Toner F, Jackson CP, Toner JG (2013) How we do it: local anaesthetic cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int 14:232–235
Dietz A, Wustefeld M, Niskanen M, Lopponen H (2016) Cochlear implant surgery in the elderly: the feasibility of a modified suprameatal approach under local anesthesia. Otol Neurotol 37:487–491
Pateron B, Bakhos D, Lelouarn A et al (2016) Local anesthesia and conscious sedation for cochlear implantation: experience with 20 patients. J Laryngol Otol 130:151–156
Shabashev S, Fouad Y, Huncke TK, Roland JT (2017) Cochlear implantation under conscious sedation with local anesthesia: safety, efficacy, costs and satisfaction. Cochlear Implants Int 18:297–303
Hamerschmidt R, Mocellin M, Gasperin AC, Faria JL, Trevizan G, Wiemes GR, Kutianski V (2010) Local anesthesia for cochlear implant surgery: a possible alternative. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 76(5):561–564. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942010000500005(English, Portuguese. PMID: 20963337)
Hamerschmidt R, Moreira AT, Wiemes GR, Tenorio SB, Tambara EM (2012) Cochlear implant surgery with local anesthesia and sedation: comparison with general anesthesia. Otol Neurotol 34:75–78
Toner JG, John G, McNaboe EJ (1998) Cochlear implantation under local anaesthesia, the Belfast experience. J Laryngol Otol 112:533–536
Djalilian HR, Roy S, Benson AG, Regala C, Mc Donald TB, Leman T (2005) Transcanal cochlear implantation under monitored anesthesia care. Otol Neurotol 26:674–677
Alzahrani M, Martin F, Bobillier C, Robier A, Lescanne E (2014) Combined local anesthesia and monitored anesthesia care for cochlear implantation. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 131:261–262
Svrakic M, Pollack A, Huncke TK, Roland JT Jr (2014) Conscious sedation and local anesthesia for patients undergoing neurotologic and complex otologic procedures. Otol Neurotol 35:277–285
Bajwa S, Kulshrestha A (2013) Dexmedetomidine: an adjuvant making large inroads into clinical practice. Ann Med Health Sci Res 3:475–483
Gessler EM, Hart AK, Dunlevy TM, Greinwald JH Jr (2001) Optimal concentration of epinephrine for vasoconstriction in ear surgery. Laryngoscope 111:1687–1690
Yung MW (1996) Local anaesthesia in middle ear surgery: survey of patients and surgeons. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 21(5):404–408. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2273.1996.00814.x(PMID: 8932943)
Vincenti V, Pasanisi E, Bacciu A, Bacciu S, Zini C (2014) Cochlear implantation in chronic otitis media and previous middle ear surgery: 20 years of experience. Acta otorhinolaryngol Ital 34:272–277
Vincenti V, Pasanisi E, Bacciu A, Bacciu S (2014) Long-term results of external auditory canal closure and mastoid obliteration in cochlear implantation after radical mastoidectomy: a clinical and radiological study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271:2127–2130
Cristofari E, Cuda D, Martini A et al (2017) A multicenter clinical evaluation of data logging in cochlear implant recipients using automated scene classification technologies. Audiol Neurootol 22(4–5):226–235. https://doi.org/10.1159/000484078
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. No animals are involved.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vincenti, V., Plantone, F., Ciavarro, G. et al. Cochlear implantation under local anesthesia and conscious sedation: an Italian experience. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278, 3667–3672 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06419-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06419-4