Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quality-of-life evaluation for patients submitted to nasal endoscopic surgery for resection of pituitary tumours

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the pre- and post-operative quality-of-life of patients submitted to the resection of pituitary adenoma via endoscopic transsphenoidal.

Methods

This was a prospective study on patients submitted to endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery with the harvest of a nasoseptal flap who responded to the questionnaires FV-36 and SNOT-22 in the pre-operative and in months 1, 3 and 6 following the surgical procedure.

Results

A total of 42 patients submitted to pituitary adenoma resection surgery via endoscopic transsphenoidal with a nasoseptal flap were recruited. In all of the physical and mental domains (SF-36) evaluated, there was an improvement in the long-term evaluation (6 months), compared to the pre-operative, as well as in the site-specific evaluation (SNOT-22).

Conclusion

The global and site-specific questionnaires in the 6th post-operative month follow-up presented an important improvement in all the physical and mental domains evaluated, as well as in nasal function in the perception of the patients submitted to pituitary adenoma resection via endoscopic transsphenoidal, demonstrating the safety and efficiency of the procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization WHOQOL: Measuring quality of life. In: 1993. https://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/whoqol-qualityoflife/en/. Accessed 23 May 2020

  2. Abergel A, Cavel O, Margalit N et al (2012) Comparison of quality of life after transnasal endoscopic vs open skull base tumor resection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138:142–147. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2011.1146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lima MG, de Barros MBA, César CLG et al (2009) Health related quality of life among the elderly: A population-based study using sf-36 survey. Cad Saude Publica 25:2159–2167. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2009001000007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lang DA, Neil-Dwyer G, Garfield J (1999) Outcome after complex neurosurgery: the caregiver’s burden is forgotten. J Neurosurg 91:359–363. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1999.91.3.0359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pant H, Bhatki AM, Snyderman CH et al (2010) Quality of life following endonasal skull base surgery. Skull Base 20:35–40. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1242983

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. McCoul ED, Anand VK, Bedrosian JC, Schwartz TH (2012) Endoscopic skull base surgery and its impact on sinonasal-related quality of life. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2:174–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McCoul ED, Anand VK, Schwartz TH (2012) Improvements in site-specific quality of life 6 months after endoscopic anterior skull base surgery: a prospective study—clinical article. J Neurosurg 117:498–506. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.6.JNS111066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bedrosian JC, Mccoul ED, Raithatha R et al (2013) A prospective study of postoperative symptoms in sinonasal quality-of-life following endoscopic skull-base surgery: dissociations based on specific symptoms. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 3:664–669. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McCoul ED, Bedrosian JC, Akselrod O, Anand VKST (2015) Preservation of multidimensional quality-of-life after endoscopic resection of pituitary adenoma. J Neurosurg 73:813–820. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.11.JNS14559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gil Z, Abergel A, Spektor S et al (2004) Development of a cancer-specific anterior skull base quality-of-life questionnaire. J Neurosurg 100:813–819. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2004.100.5.0813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Almeida JR, Vescan AD, Gullane PJ et al (2012) Development of a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for anterior and central skull base pathology—the skull base inventory. Laryngoscope 122:1933–1942. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Servelhere KR, Fernandes YB, Ramina R, Borges G (2011) Aplicação da escala SF-36 empacientesoperados de tumores da base do crânio. Arq Bras Neurocir Brazil Neurosurg 30:69–75. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1626496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Martinez TY, Pereira CAC, do Santos ML et al (2000) Evaluation of the short-form 36-item questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 117:1627–1632. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.117.6.1627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Alonso J, Ferrer M, Gandek B et al (2004) Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: results from the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Qual Life Res 13:283–298. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000018472.46236.05

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hopkins C, Gillett S, Slack R et al (2009) Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. ClinOtolaryngol 34:447–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01995.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Castle-Kirszbaum M, Wang YY, King J et al (2020) Patient Wellbeing and Quality of Life After Nasoseptal Flap Closure for Endoscopic Skull Base Reconstruction. J ClinNeurosci 74:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2020.01.072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Alobid I, Enseñat J, Mariño-Sánchez F et al (2013) Expanded endonasal approach using vascularized septal flap reconstruction for skull base tumors has a negative impact on sinonasal symptoms and quality of life. Am J Rhinol Allergy 27:426–431. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3932

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ransom ER, Doghramji L, Palmer JN, Chiu AG (2012) Global and disease-specific health-related quality of life after complete endoscopic resection of anterior skull base neoplasms. Am J Rhinol Allergy 26:76–79. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zimmer LA, Shah O, Theodosopoulos PV (2014) Short-term quality-of-life changes after endoscopic pituitary surgery rated with SNOT-22. J NeurolSurg Part B Skull Base 75:288–292. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1372464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jalessi M, Jahanbakhshi A, Amini E et al (2016) Impact of nasoseptal flap elevation on sinonasal quality of life in endoscopic endonasal approach to pituitary adenomas. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 273:1199–1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3729-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Riley CA, Tabaee A, Conley L et al (2019) Long-term sinonasal outcomes after endoscopic skull base surgery with nasoseptal flap reconstruction. Laryngoscope 129:1035–1040. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Choi KJ, Ackall FY, Truong T et al (2019) Sinonasal quality of life outcomes after extended endonasal approaches to the skull base. J NeurolSurg Part B Skull Base 80:416–423. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chaudhry S, Chaudhry S, Qureshi T, Batra PS (2017) Evolution of sinonasal symptoms and mucosal healing after minimally invasive pituitary surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 31:117–121. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2017.31.4407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Harvey RJ, Winder M, Davidson A et al (2015) The olfactory strip and its preservation in endoscopic pituitary surgery maintains smell and sinonasal function. J NeurolSurg Part B Skull Base 76:464–470. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1554905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sowerby LJ, Gross M, Broad R, Wright ED (2013) Olfactory and sinonasal outcomes in endoscopic transsphenoidal skull-base surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 3:217–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bhenswala PN, Schlosser RJ, Nguyen SA et al (2019) Sinonasal quality-of-life outcomes after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 9:1105–1118. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Little AS, Jahnke H, Nakaji P et al (2012) The anterior skull base nasal inventory (ASK nasal inventory): a clinical tool for evaluating rhinological outcomes after endonasal surgery for pituitary and cranial base lesions. Pituitary 15:513–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-011-0358-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Little AS, Kelly D, Milligan J et al (2013) Prospective validation of a patient-reported nasal quality-of-life tool for endonasal skull base surgery: the anterior skull base nasal inventory-12. J Neurosurg 119:1068–1074. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.3.JNS122032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. ten Dam E, Korsten-Meijer AGW, Hoving EW et al (2019) Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the endoscopic endonasal sinus and skull base surgery questionnaire (EES-Q) in a prospective cohort study. ClinOtolaryngol 44:565–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wagner A, Shiban Y, Kammermeier V et al (2019) Quality of life and emotional burden after transnasal and transcranial anterior skull base surgery. ActaNeurochir (Wien) 161:2527–2537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04062-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lindsay JR, Nansel T, Baid S et al (2006) Long-term impaired quality of life in Cushing’s syndrome despite initial improvement after surgical remission. J ClinEndocrinolMetab 91:447–453. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-1058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Johnson MD, Woodburn CJ, Lee Vance M (2003) Quality of life in patients with a pituitary adenoma. Pituitary 6:81–87. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PITU.0000004798.27230.ed

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Page RCL, Hammersley MS, Burke CW, Wass JAH (1997) An account of the quality of life of patients after treatment for non-functioning pituitary tumours. ClinEndocrinol (Oxf) 46:401–406. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2265.1997.1400957.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Rioja E, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Enriquez K et al (2016) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic endonasal approach for skull base surgery: a prospective study. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 273:1809–1817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3853-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kuan EC, Yoo F, Chyu J et al (2018) Quality of life before and after endoscopic pituitary surgery as measured by the short-form-36. J NeurolSurg Part B Skull Base 79:314–318. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1608648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wolf A, Coros A, Bierer J et al (2017) Quantitative evaluation of vision-related and health-related quality of life after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma. J Neurosurg 127:409–416. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.7.JNS16200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. van der Meulen M, ZamanipoorNajafabadi AH, Lobatto DJ et al (2020) SF-12 or SF-36 in pituitary disease? Toward concise and comprehensive patient-reported outcomes measurements. Endocrine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02384-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ishikawa T, Takeuchi K, Nagatani T et al (2019) Quality of life changes before and after transsphenoidal surgery for sellar and parasellar lesions. World Neurosurg 122:e1202–e1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang S, Chen Y, Li J et al (2015) Olfactory function and quality of life following microscopic endonasaltranssphenoidal pituitary surgery. Medicine (United States) 94:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Schreiber A, Bertazzoni G, Ferrari M et al (2019) Nasal morbidity and quality of life after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery: a single-center prospective study. World Neurosurg 123:e557–e565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Little AS, Kelly DF, Milligan J et al (2015) Comparison of sinonasal quality of life and health status in patients undergoing microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary lesions: a prospective cohort study. J Neurosurg 123:799–807. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.10.JNS14921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo Landini Lutaif Dolci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dolci, R.L.L., de Moraes, L.T., de Carvalho, A.C.M. et al. Quality-of-life evaluation for patients submitted to nasal endoscopic surgery for resection of pituitary tumours. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278, 1411–1418 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06381-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06381-1

Keywords

Navigation