Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of patient-reported nasal symptoms on quality of life after endoscopic pituitary surgery: a prospective cohort study

  • Published:
Pituitary Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery causes nasal morbidity and negatively affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Knowledge on actionable symptoms that could improve postoperative HRQoL is therefore important. This study assessed the impact of nasal symptoms on postoperative HRQoL.

Methods

This perioperative cohort study included 103 adult patients undergoing endoscopic pituitary adenoma resection (August 2016–December 2018), with measurements preoperatively, and 5 days, 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Nasal symptoms were measured with the Anterior Skull base nasal inventory-12, and HRQoL with the Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical (PCS) and mental component scores (MCS). Linear regression analysis was used to assess (1) determinants of postoperative nasal morbidity, (2) associations between number of symptoms or (3) individual symptoms and HRQoL, and (4) the percentage of variance of HRQoL explained by nasal symptoms.

Results

The number of nasal symptoms transiently increased after surgery. No significant treatment- or disease-related determinants of nasal morbidity were identified. The number of nasal symptoms was significantly associated with a lower PCS (β = − 1.0; 95%CI − 1.5, − 0.4), but not with MCS at 6 weeks. Similar results were observed at 6 months. Headaches (42.2%), problems with smell (42.0%), and taste (36.0%) were the most prevalent symptoms, while sense of smell and taste, and nasal discharge showed the strongest associations with HRQoL.

Conclusions

Postoperative nasal symptoms, in particular problems with smell and taste, significantly affect pituitary patients’ physical HRQoL. Monitoring of these symptoms may aid in determining which patients may benefit from intensified follow-up and treatment, aiming to optimize HRQoL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data requests can be directed to DJL: d.j.lobatto@lumc.nl.

References

  1. Andela CD, Scharloo M, Pereira AM, Kaptein AA, Biermasz NR (2015) Quality of life (QoL) impairments in patients with a pituitary adenoma: a systematic review of QoL studies. Pituitary 18(5):752–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-015-0636-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Andela CD, Niemeijer ND, Scharloo M, Tiemensma J, Kanagasabapathy S, Pereira AM, Kamminga NG, Kaptein AA, Biermasz NR (2015) Towards a better quality of life (QoL) for patients with pituitary diseases: results from a focus group study exploring QoL. Pituitary 18(1):86–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-014-0561-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Katznelson L, Laws ER Jr, Melmed S, Molitch ME, Murad MH, Utz A, Wass JA (2014) Acromegaly: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(11):3933–3951. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-2700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Freda PU, Beckers AM, Katznelson L, Molitch ME, Montori VM, Post KD, Vance ML (2011) Pituitary incidentaloma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96(4):894–904. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-1048

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, Murad MH, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, Tabarin A (2015) Treatment of cushing’s syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100(8):2807–2831. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-1818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Zamanipoor Najafabadi AH, Zandbergen IM, de Vries F, Broersen LHA, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Pereira AM, Peul WC, Dekkers OM, van Furth WR, Biermasz NR (2020) Surgery as a viable alternative first-line treatment for prolactinoma patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105(3):e32-41. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgz144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hondronikos N, Alomari A, Schrader M, Knappe UJ (2020) Rhinological consequences of microsurgical endonasal-transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1155-6269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Davies BM, Tirr E, Wang YY, Gnanalingham KK (2017) Transient exacerbation of nasal symptoms following endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors: a prospective study. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 78(3):266–272. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1597814

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Awad AJ, Mohyeldin A, El-Sayed IH, Aghi MK (2015) Sinonasal morbidity following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 130:162–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.01.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jang MK, Oh EG, Lee H, Kim EH, Kim S (2020) Postoperative symptoms and quality of life in pituitary macroadenomas patients. J Neurosci Nurs 52(1):30–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/jnn.0000000000000483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolf A, Goncalves S, Salehi F, Bird J, Cooper P, Van Uum S, Lee DH, Rotenberg BW, Duggal N (2016) Quantitative evaluation of headache severity before and after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma. J Neurosurg 124(6):1627–1633. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.5.Jns1576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pereira-Neto A, Borba AM, Mello PA, Naves LA, Araújo AS Jr, Casulari LA (2010) Mean intrasellar pressure, visual field, headache intensity and quality of life of patients with pituitary adenoma. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 68(3):350–354. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-282x2010000300004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhenswala PN, Schlosser RJ, Nguyen SA, Munawar S, Rowan NR (2019) Sinonasal quality-of-life outcomes after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 9(10):1105–1118. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kirkman MA, Borg A, Al-Mousa A, Haliasos N, Choi D (2014) Quality-of-life after anterior skull base surgery: a systematic review. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 75(2):73–89. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1359303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lobatto DJ, Zamanipoor Najafabadi AH, de Vries F, Andela CD, van den Hout WB, Pereira AM, Peul WC, Vliet Vlieland TPM, van Furth WR, Biermasz NR (2019) Toward value based health care in pituitary surgery: application of a comprehensive outcome set in perioperative care. Eur J Endocrinol 181(4):375–387. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje-19-0344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van Furth WR, de Vries F, Lobatto DJ, Kleijwegt MC, Schutte PJ, Pereira AM, Biermasz NR, Verstegen MJT (2020) Endoscopic surgery for pituitary tumors. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 49(3):487–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2020.05.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PD, Essink-Bot ML, Fekkes M, Sanderman R, Sprangers MA, te Velde A, Verrips E (1998) Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 health survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol 51(11):1055–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00097-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Little AS, Jahnke H, Nakaji P, Milligan J, Chapple K, White WL (2012) The anterior skull base nasal inventory (ASK nasal inventory): a clinical tool for evaluating rhinological outcomes after endonasal surgery for pituitary and cranial base lesions. Pituitary 15(4):513–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-011-0358-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Little AS, Kelly D, Milligan J, Griffiths C, Rosseau G, Prevedello DM, Carrau R, Jahnke H, Chaloner C, O’Leary J, Chapple K, Nakaji P, White WL (2013) Prospective validation of a patient-reported nasal quality-of-life tool for endonasal skull base surgery: the anterior skull base nasal inventory-12. J Neurosurg 119(4):1068–1074. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.3.Jns122032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Badhiwala JH, Witiw CD, Nassiri F, Akbar MA, Jaja B, Wilson JR, Fehlings MG (2018) Minimum clinically important difference in SF-36 scores for use in degenerative cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43(21):E1260-e1266. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Witt S, Krauss E, Barbero MAN, Müller V, Bonniaud P, Vancheri C, Wells AU, Vasakova M, Pesci A, Klepetko W, Seeger W, Crestani B, Leidl R, Holle R, Schwarzkopf L, Guenther A (2019) Psychometric properties and minimal important differences of SF-36 in Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Res 20(1):47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-1010-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. van der Meulen M, Zamanipoor Najafabadi AH, Lobatto DJ, Andela CD, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Pereira AM, van Furth WR, Biermasz NR (2020) SF-12 or SF-36 in pituitary disease? Toward concise and comprehensive patient-reported outcomes measurements. Endocrine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02384-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW (2003) Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41(5):582–592. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.Mlr.0000062554.74615.4c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yan CH, Rathor A, Krook K, Ma Y, Rotella MR, Dodd RL, Hwang PH, Nayak JV, Oyesiku NM, DelGaudio JM, Levy JM, Wise J, Wise SK, Patel ZM (2020) Effect of omega-3 supplementation in patients with smell dysfunction following endoscopic sellar and parasellar tumor resection: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz559

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Cho J, Grayson JW, Christensen J, Winder MJ, Sheehy J, Steel T, Bentivoglio P, Barham HP, McCormack A, Harvey RJ (2020) Long-term sinonasal function following transnasal pituitary surgery: a comparison of surgical approach. Am J Rhinol Allergy 34(3):361–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/1945892419896788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rioja E, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Enriquez K, Enseñat J, Valero R, de Notaris M, Mullol J, Alobid I (2016) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic endonasal approach for skull base surgery: a prospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(7):1809–1817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3853-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. de Almeida JR, Witterick IJ, Gullane PJ, Gentili F, Lohfeld L, Ringash J, Thoma A, Vescan AD (2013) Physical morbidity by surgical approach and tumor location in skull base surgery. Head Neck 35(4):493–499. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Little AS, Kelly D, Milligan J, Griffiths C, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL, Rosseau G, Barkhoudarian G, Otto BA, Jahnke H, Chaloner C, Jelinek KL, Chapple K, White WL (2015) Predictors of sinonasal quality of life and nasal morbidity after fully endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg 122(6):1458–1465. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.10.Jns141624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang YY, Srirathan V, Tirr E, Kearney T, Gnanalingham KK (2011) Nasal symptoms following endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: assessment using the general nasal patient inventory. Neurosurg Focus 30(4):E12. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.1.Focus10319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jalessi M, Jahanbakhshi A, Amini E, Kamrava SK, Farhadi M (2016) Impact of nasoseptal flap elevation on sinonasal quality of life in endoscopic endonasal approach to pituitary adenomas. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(5):1199–1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3729-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Little AS, Kelly DF, Milligan J, Griffiths C, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL, Rosseau G, Barkhoudarian G, Jahnke H, Chaloner C, Jelinek KL, Chapple K, White WL (2015) Comparison of sinonasal quality of life and health status in patients undergoing microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary lesions: a prospective cohort study. J Neurosurg 123(3):799–807. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.10.Jns14921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kahilogullari G, Beton S, Al-Beyati ES, Kantarcioglu O, Bozkurt M, Kantarcioglu E, Comert A, Unlu MA, Meco C (2013) Olfactory functions after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: endoscopic versus microscopic approach. Laryngoscope 123(9):2112–2119. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Castle-Kirszbaum M, Wang YY, King J, Uren B, Dixon B, Zhao YC, Lim KZ, Goldschlager T (2020) Patient wellbeing and quality of life after nasoseptal flap closure for endoscopic skull base reconstruction. J Clin Neurosci 74:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2020.01.072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wu V, Cusimano MD, Lee JM (2018) Extent of surgery in endoscopic transsphenoidal skull base approaches and the effects on sinonasal morbidity. Am J Rhinol Allergy 32(1):52–56. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2018.32.4499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Harvey RJ, Malek J, Winder M, Davidson A, Steel T, Mrad N, Barham H, Knisely A, Teo C (2015) Sinonasal morbidity following tumour resection with and without nasoseptal flap reconstruction. Rhinology 53(2):122–128. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin14.247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shay A, Sturgis M, Ritz EM, Beer-Furlan A, Muñoz L, Byrne R, Tajudeen BA, Batra PS (2020) Prior smoking and nasoseptal flap usage adversely impact quality of life and healing after endoscopic pituitary surgery. Neurosurg Focus 48(6):E17. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.3.Focus2050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yan Y, Gordon WM, Wang DY (2013) Nasal epithelial repair and remodeling in physical injury, infection, and inflammatory diseases. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 21(3):263–270. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0b013e32835f80a0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Croy I, Nordin S, Hummel T (2014) Olfactory disorders and quality of life–an updated review. Chem Senses 39(3):185–194. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjt072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Thorne T, Olson K, Wismer W (2015) A state-of-the-art review of the management and treatment of taste and smell alterations in adult oncology patients. Support Care Cancer 23(9):2843–2851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2827-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sorokowska A, Drechsler E, Karwowski M, Hummel T (2017) Effects of olfactory training: a meta-analysis. Rhinology 55(1):17–26. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin16.195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chen XZ, Feng SY, Chang LH, Lai XP, Chen XH, Li X, Zhang GH (2018) The effects of nasal irrigation with various solutions after endoscopic sinus surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laryngol Otol 132(8):673–679. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215118000919

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Siegel S, Weber Carneiro R, Maubach JM, Harbeck B, Brabant G (2013) Headache and pituitary disease: a systematic review. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 79(6):760–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.12314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Stovner LJ, Andree C (2010) Prevalence of headache in Europe: a review for the eurolight project. J Headache Pain 11(4):289–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10194-010-0217-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Donovan LE, Welch MR (2018) Headaches in patients with pituitary tumors: a clinical conundrum. Curr Pain Headache Rep 22(8):57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-018-0709-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Uvelius E, Castelo N, Kahlon B, Svensson C, Cervin A, Höglund P, Valdemarsson S, Siesjö P (2017) Quality of life and work capacity are unrelated to approach or complications after pituitary surgery. World Neurosurg 108:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Alzhrani G, Sivakumar W, Park MS, Taussky P, Couldwell WT (2018) Delayed complications after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas. World Neurosurg 109:233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Anath N.V. Steffens for her assistance with the collection of the data, Ewout W. Steyerberg for his advice regarding the statistical analysis, and Cornelie D. Andela and Thea P.M. Vliet Vlieland for their input regarding the design of the original study.

Funding

This study was performed with financial support of the MD/PhD grant of the Leiden University Medical Center, and of an ASPIRE young investigator research grant (Grant No. WI219567, Pfizer, New York, USA). Pfizer, however, was not involved in the project; the views expressed in this paper are those of the authors only and are not attributable to Pfizer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NRB, WRF, DJL, contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection was performed by DJL. Data analysis was performed by MM. The first draft of the manuscript was written by MM and AHZN and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors provided input on the interpretation of the analyses and results, and read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merel van der Meulen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Leiden University Medical Center (No. p12.067).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 926 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van der Meulen, M., Verstegen, M.J.T., Lobatto, D.J. et al. Impact of patient-reported nasal symptoms on quality of life after endoscopic pituitary surgery: a prospective cohort study. Pituitary 25, 308–320 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-021-01199-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-021-01199-4

Keywords

Navigation