Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of effects of spreader grafts and flaring sutures on nasal airway resistance in rhinoplasty

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cephalic resection of the lateral crura of the alar cartilages, lateral osteotomies, and removal of the nasal hump during rhinoplasty may cause collapse of the internal nasal valve angle. This study was performed to compare preventive effects of two techniques (spreader grafts and flaring sutures) on rhinoplasty by rhinomanometry. Two hundred and forty-eight patients participated in this semi-experimental study. The patients were assigned into two groups. 28 of them were not available for follow-up. All patients had a straight nose in the midline and no severe septal deviations. 87 of 220 patients underwent the spreader grafts technique and the flaring sutures technique was performed in 133 patients. The nasal airway resistance was calculated by active anterior rhinomanometry on admission to hospital and again between 3 and 6 months following surgery. The mean of follow-up was 20.9 ± 2.9 weeks. After rhinoplasty, nasal airway resistance decreased in 46 patients (52.9 percent) of spreader grafts group and in 84 patients (63.2 percent) of flaring sutures group. The median nasal airway resistance difference (before–after surgery) of spreader grafts and flaring sutures groups was 0.027 Pa/ml/s (range −110 to 130) and 0.017 Pa/ml/s (range −0.690 to 0.790), respectively. The difference of nasal airway resistance between before and after rhinoplasty in two groups was insignificance (Mann–Whitney U test, P = 0.5). The spreader grafts and flaring sutures move the dorsal border of the upper lateral cartilage in a lateral direction and had similar preventive effect on nasal airway resistance after rhinoplasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schlosser RJ, Park SS (1999) Surgery for the dysfunctional nasal valve. cadaveric analysis and clinical outcomes. Arch Facial Plast Surg 1(2):105–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Toriumi DM (1995) Management of the middle nasal vault in rhinoplasty. Operat Tech Plast Reconstr Surg 2:16–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Teller DC (1997) Anatomy of a rhinoplasty: emphasis on the middle third of the nose. Facial Plast Surg 13:241–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Omranifard M, Abdali H, Rasti Ardakani M, Ahmadnia AY (2013) Comparison of the effects of spreader graft and overlapping lateralcrural technique on rhinoplasty by rhinomanometry. World J Plast Surg 2(2):99–103

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sheen JH (1984) Spreader graft: a method of reconstructing the roof of the middle nasal vault following rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:230–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boccieri A, Macro C, Pascali M (2005) The use of spreader grafts in primary rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 55:127–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Constantian MB (2000) Four common anatomic variants that predispose to unfavorable rhinoplasty results: a study based on 150 consecutive secondary rhinoplasties. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zijlker TD, Quaedvlieg PC (1994) Lateral augmentation of the middle third of the nose with autologous cartilage in nasal valve insufficiency. Rhinology 32:34–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park SS (1998) The flaring suture to augment the repair of the dysfunctional nasal valve. Plast Reconstr Surg 101:1120–1122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bermüller C, Kirsche H, Rettinger G, Riechelmann H (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of peak nasal inspiratory flow and rhinomanometry in functional rhinosurgery. Laryngoscope 118(4):605–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schumacher MJ (2002) Nasal congestion and airway obstruction: the validity of available objective and subjective measures. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2(3):245–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chandra RK, Patadia MO, Raviv J (2009) Diagnosis of nasal airway obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 42(2):207–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clement PAR, Gordts F (2005) Consensus report on acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry. Rhinology 43:169–179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Crouse U, Laine-Alava MT (1999) Effects of age, body mass index, and gender on nasal airflow rate and pressures. Laryngoscope 109(9):1503–1508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jessen M, Jacobsson S, Malm L (1988) On rhinomanometry in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 81(4):506–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gordon AS, McCaffrey TV, Kern EB, Pallanch JF (1989) Rhinomanometry for preoperative and postoperative assessment of nasal obstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 101:20–26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gassner HG, Friedman O, Sherris DA, Kern EB (2006) An alternative method of middle vault reconstruction. Arch Facial Plast Surg 8(6):432–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bloching MB (2007) Disorders of the nasal valve area. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 6:Doc07 (Epub 2008 Mar 14)

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank the patients for their participation in this study.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mir Mohammad Jalali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jalali, M.M. Comparison of effects of spreader grafts and flaring sutures on nasal airway resistance in rhinoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272, 2299–2303 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3327-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3327-5

Keywords

Navigation