Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of different computed tomography post-processing modalities in assessment of various middle ear disorders

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several anatomic structures of the middle ear are not optimally depicted in the standard axial and coronal planes. Several 2D and 3D image-processing modalities are currently available for CT examinations in clinical radiology departments. Till now 3D reconstructions of the temporal bone have not been widely used yet, and attracted only academic interest. The aim of this study was to compare axial (source images), 2D and 3DCT post-processing modalities, and to evaluate the value of 3D reconstructed images/virtual endoscopy (VE) in assessment of various middle ear disorders for identification of the best modality/view for assessment of a particular middle ear structure or pathology. 40 patients with various middle ear disorders, planned for surgical intervention were included in prospective study. Multi-slice CT was performed for all patients. Scans were acquired in the axial plane. The axial source datasets were utilized for generation of 2D reformations and 3D reconstructed images. All studied images were divided into three categories: axial (source images), 2D reformations (MPR and sliding-thin-slab MIP) and 3D reconstruction (virtual endoscopy). The visibility of middle ear structures and pathologies with each modality were scored qualitatively using three-point scoring system in reference to operative findings. Stapes superstructure and footplate, incudostapedial joint, oval and round windows, tympanic segment of the facial nerve and tegmen were not optimally depicted in the axial plane. Sinus tympani and facial recess were best visualized with axial images or VE. 3D reconstruction/VE allowed good visualization of all parts of ossicular chain except stapes superstructure. Regarding pathologic changes, 2D reformations and 3D reconstructed images allowed better visualization of erosion of ossicles and tegmen. 3D reconstruction/VE did not allow detection of foci of otospongiosis. 2D reformations can be considered the mainstay in assessment of most middle ear structures and pathologies. 3D reconstruction/VE seems to provide a useful method for a preoperative general overview of the middle ear anatomy, particularly for the ossicular chain, round window and retrotympanum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neri E, Caramella D, Panconi M et al (2001) Virtual endoscopy of the middle ear. Eur Radiol 11(1):41–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aydil U, Koksal A, Tuncay O et al (2010) Comparison of reformatted 2D images with three-dimensional reconstructions based on Images from multi-detector computed tomography of the temporal bone in surgical candidates of chronic otitis media patients. Int Adv Otol 6(3):337–341

    Google Scholar 

  3. Veillon F, Riehm S, Roedlich MN et al (2000) Imaging of middle ear pathology. Semin Roentgenol 35(1):2–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maroldi R, Farina D, Palvarini L et al (2001) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of pathologic conditions of the middle ear. Eur J Radiol 40(2):78–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Klingebiel R, Bauknecht HC, Rogalla P et al (2001) High-resolution petrous bone imaging using multi-slice computerized tomography. Acta Otolaryngol 121(5):632–636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lane JI, Lindell EP, Witte RJ et al (2006) Middle and inner ear: improved depiction with multiplanar reconstruction of volumetric CT data. Radiographics 26(1):115–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cody DD (2002) AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT. Image processing in CT. Radiographics 22(5):1255–1268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Howard JD, Elster AD, May JS (1990) Temporal bone: 3D CT. Part I. Normal anatomy, techniques, and limitations. Radiology 177(2):421–425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ali QM, Ulrich C, Becker H (1993) Three-dimensional CT of the middle ear and adjacent structures. Neuroradiology 35(3):238–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Howard JD, Elster AD, May JS (1990) Temporal bone: 3D CT. Part II. Pathologic alterations. Radiology 177(2):427–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schubert O, Sartor K, Forsting M et al (1996) 3D computed display of otosurgical operation sites by spiral CT. Neuroradiology 38(7):663–668

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reisser C, Schubert O, Forsting M et al (1996) Anatomy of the temporal bone: detailed three-dimensional display based on image data from high-resolution helical CT: a preliminary report. Amer J Otol 17(3):473–479

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rodt T, Ratiu P, Becker H et al (2002) 3D visualisation of the middle ear and adjacent structures using reconstructed multi-slice CT datasets, correlating 3D images and virtual endoscopy to the 2D cross-sectional images. Neuroradiology 44(9):783–790

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fatterpekar GM, Doshi AH, Dugar M et al (2006) Role of 3D CT in the evaluation of the temporal bone. Radiographics 26(Suppl 1):S117–S132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Karhuketo TS, Dastidar PS, Ryymin PS et al (2002) Virtual endoscopy imaging of the middle ear cavity and ossicles. Europ Archiv Otorhinolaryngol 259(2):77–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pandey AK, Bapuraj JR, Gupta AK et al (2009) Is there a role for virtual otoscopy in the preoperative assessment of the ossicular chain in chronic suppurative otitis media? Comparison of HRCT and virtual otoscopy with surgical findings. Eur Radiol 19(6):1408–1416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Trojanowska A, Trojanowski P, Olszanski W et al (2007) How to reliably evaluate middle ear diseases? Comparison of different methods of post-processing based on multislice computed tomography examination. Acta Otolaryngol 127(3):258–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jingzhen H, Cheng L, Bin Z et al (2008) Value of sliding-thin-slab maximum intensity projections in imaging of the auditory ossicles. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32(1):141–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Berrettini S, Neri E, Ravecca F et al (2002) Correlations between virtual endoscopy and otoendoscopy of the retrotympanum. Acta Otolaryngol 122(5):474–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Neri E, Caramella D, Bartolozzi C (2008) Image processing in radiology current applications. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The author and all contributors of this work declare that there is no conflict of interest and they all did not receive any financial reward for doing this work. This study was done at the otolaryngology and radiology department in Alexandria University Hospital, which is a governmental hospital providing free health care. There is no organization that sponsored this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Mohamed Mehanna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehanna, A.M., Baki, F.A., Eid, M. et al. Comparison of different computed tomography post-processing modalities in assessment of various middle ear disorders. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272, 1357–1370 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-2920-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-2920-y

Keywords

Navigation