Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A practical method for assessing nasal skin quality

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nasal skin quality is an essential indicator of rhinoplasty outcomes. The objective of this study was to collect data on the nasal skin thickness of randomly selected Turkish men and women. The study involved 50 male and 50 female subjects. We measured the nasal dorsal skin thickness by pinching the sides of the nose upwards to produce a skinfold and then measuring the thickness of this skinfold with a Castroviejo caliper [A&A, Almecon Instruments]. We also measured the thickness of the right and left alar walls with the same caliper. In the male subjects, the mean nasal dorsal thickness and the mean overall, right, and left alar wall thicknesses were 4.02 ± 0.71, 3.99 ± 0.69, 3.98 ± 0.69, and 4.00 ± 0.69 mm, respectively. The corresponding values in the female subjects were 3.38 ± 0.56, 3.45 ± 0.66, 3.43 ± 0.67, and 3.46 ± 0.65 mm. In Turkish men, a nasal dorsum measuring greater than 4 mm can be considered “thick.” In Turkish women, the mean nasal dorsal and alar wall thicknesses were 3.38 and 3.45 mm, respectively. Values greater than these are considered “thick.” Either nasal dorsal thickness or alar wall thickness may be measured in men, but both must be measured in women scheduled to undergo rhinoplasty. Dark nasal skin and oily nasal skin tend to be thicker.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tardy ME Jr, Thomas R (2010) Rhinoplasty. In: Flint PW, Haughey BH, Harker LA, Schuller DE, Richardson MA, Robbins KT, Thomas JR (eds) Cummings Otolaryngology, 4th edn. Mosby, New York, pp 1028–1031

    Google Scholar 

  2. Karaaltin MV, Orhan KS, Demirel T (2009) Fascia lata graft for nasal dorsal contouring in rhinoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:1255–1260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jang YJ, Wang JH, Sinha V, Song HM, Lee BJ (2007) Tutoplast-processed fascia lata for dorsal augmentation in rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137(1):88–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fanous N, Brousseau VJ, Karsan N, Fanous A (2008) Predicting the results of rhinoplasty before surgery: Easy noses versus difficult noses. Can J Plast Surg 16(2):69–75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rahman M, Jefferson N, Stewart DA et al (2010) The histology of facial aesthetic subunits: implications for common nasal reconstructive procedures. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:753–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Powell N, Humphreys B (1984) Proportions of the Aesthetic Face. Theme-Stratton, New York, pp 21–32

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cochran CS, Marin VP (2007) Cosmetic Surgery: A systematic approach to open rhinoplasty. Oper Techn Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 18:166–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Klinger M, Caviggioli F, Forcellini D et al (2012) Primary nasal tip surgery: a conservative approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(3):485–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Farrior EH, Ballert JA (2012) Nuances of the nasal tip: rhinoplasty of the thin-skinned nose. Facial Plast Surg 28(2):171–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Patrocínio LG, Patrocínio JA (2007) Open rhinoplasty for African-American noses. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45(7):561–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson KJ, Henneberg M, Norris RM (2008) Anatomy of the nasal profile. J Anat 213(2):210–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brenner MJ, Hilger PA (2009) Grafting in rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 17(1):91–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Sedat Ziyade, MD, for their assistance with the statistical analyses and Ozlem Su Kucuk, MD, for the dermatological assessments.

Conflict of interest

We have no financial relationship with any organization that sponsored the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hasan Huseyin Balıkcı.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Özkul, M.H., Kocagöz, D.G., Balıkcı, H.H. et al. A practical method for assessing nasal skin quality. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270, 1839–1842 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2293-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2293-z

Keywords

Navigation