Skip to main content
Log in

Primary Nasal Tip Surgery: A Conservative Approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 26 January 2013

Abstract

Background

Rhinoplasty and rhinoseptoplasty are very important and complex surgical procedures because the nose plays a pivotal aesthetic role in the face and an important functional role in breathing. Mild bulbous, plunging, undefined tips are very common, and tip refining and repositioning often are required surgical procedures.

Methods

For 97 selected patients, the authors performed their personal technique consisting of a transcartilaginous approach, incomplete vertical interruption, and retrograde undermining of the lower lateral cartilages to improve tip projection and definition. The five aspects analyzed were nasal tip symmetry, nostril symmetry, tip projection, tip definition, and appearance of the nasal tip only. Each parameter was assessed using pre- and postoperative quantification according to a visual analog scale. Postoperative evaluation was performed during a mean follow-up period of 1 year.

Results

The results at 1 year showed high rates of improvement in tip definition (mean, 7.9 ± 2.4) and nasal tip only evaluation (mean, 6.5 ± 3.1). The patients reported an improvement in nasal tip symmetry (mean, 4.2 ± 3.2), nostril symmetry (mean, 4.5 ± 4.1), and tip projection (mean, 5.8 ± 2.9).

Conclusions

This simple, safe, and effective technique is proposed for mild bulbous, plunging, undefined, and hypoprojected tips.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adam MN, Teimourian B (1999) Treatment of alar cartilage malposition using the cartilage disc graft technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:1118–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adam WP Jr, Rohrich RJ, Hollier LH, Minoli J, Thornton LK, Gyimesi I (1999) Anatomic basis and clinical implications for nasal tip support in open versus closed rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adamson PA, Litner JA (2006) Applications of the M-arch model in nasal tip refinement. Facial Plast Surg 22:42–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Adamson PA, Litner JA, Dahia R (2006) The M-arch model of nasal tip dynamics. Arch Facial Plast Surg 8:16–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arregui JS, Elejalde MV, Regalado J, Ezquera F, Berrazueta M (2000) Dynamic rhinoplasty for plunging nasal tip: functional unit of the inferior third of the nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1624–1629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baker SR (2000) Suture contouring of the nasal tip. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2:34–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Behmand RA, Ghavami A, Guyuron B (2000) Nasal tip sutures. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1125–1149

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bloom DC, Cupp CL (2003) The percutaneous columellar strut. Am J Rhinol 17:357–361

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boccieri A (2005) Mini spreader graft: a new technique associated with reshaping of the nasal tip. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:1525–1526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cetinkale O, Tulunay S (1998) Augmentation of the columella-labial angle to prevent the “smiling deformity” in rhinoplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 22:106–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Conrad K, Solomon P, Chapnik JS (2000) Impact of vertical dome division on nasal airflow. J Otolaryngol 29:162–165

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Costantian MB (2005) The boxy nasal tip, the ball tip, and alar cartilage malposition: variants on a theme: a study in 200 consecutive primary and secondary rhinoplasty patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Costantian MB (2004) The two essential elements for planning tip surgery in primary and secondary rhinoplasty: observations based on review of 100 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1571–1585

    Google Scholar 

  14. Costantinides M, Liu ES, Miller PJ, Adamson PA (2001) Vertical lobule division in rhinoplasty: maintaining an intact strip. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3:258–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Davis AM, Simons RL, Rhee JS (2004) Evaluation of the Goldman tip procedure in modern-day rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg 6:301–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Farrior EH (1999) Dramatic refinement of the nasal tip. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 32:621–636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Klinger M (2009) Guidarelli P: Rinoplastica. Piccin, Padova

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Klinger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klinger, M., Caviggioli, F., Forcellini, D. et al. Primary Nasal Tip Surgery: A Conservative Approach. Aesth Plast Surg 36, 485–490 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9839-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9839-0

Keywords

Navigation