Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The diagnostic performance of antimullerian hormone for polycystic ovarian syndrome and polycystic ovarian morphology

  • Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) remains a challenge to clinicians due to heterogeneous clinical presentation and diagnostic criteria. This study investigated the utilization of Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) alone or replacing polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM) in the PCOS diagnostic criteria.

Methods

A total of 401 women were categorised as PCOS (n:154), nonPCOS with polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM) (n:105), and nonPCOS with normal ovarian morphology (NOM) (n:142). First, the diagnostic performance of AMH for PCOS diagnosis in Rotterdam, Androgen Excess Society, and National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria was analyzed. Second, AMH was used instead of PCOM in Rotterdam criteria and we searched diagnostic performance for PCOS phenotypes.

Results

AMH levels were positively correlated with LH, testosterone, hirsutism score, menstrual cycle length, and antral follicle count (p < 0.05). AMH alone had specificity and sensitivity for PCOS diagnosis were 84.9% and 72.4% in Rotterdam (AUC: 0.866); 84.4% and 72% in Androgen Excess Society (AUC: 0.857); 83.3% and 66.4% in National Institute of Health criteria (AUC: 0.825). AMH alone had satisfactory diagnostic potential for phenotype A, but not other phenotypes. The replacement of PCOM with AMH in Rotterdam criteria had a high diagnostic potential for PCOS (AUC: 0.934, sensitivity:97.4%, specificity: 90.67%). Phenotype A and phenotype D were diagnosed with 100% sensitivity and 94.5% specificity. Phenotype C was recognised with 96.15% sensitivity and 94.5% specificity.

Conclusion

AMH may be used with high diagnostic accuracy instead of PCOM in the Rotterdam PCOS criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig.3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets created and/or analyzed during the current study are subject to the permission of the relevant hospital and are therefore not available to the public, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Spritzer PM (2014) Polycystic ovary syndrome. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab 58:182–187. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-2730000003051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moran LJ, Misso ML, Wild RA, Norman RJ (2010) Impaired glucose tolerance, type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum reprod update 16:347–363. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmq001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Azziz R, Adashi EY (2016) Stein and Leventhal: 80 years on. Am J Obstet Gynecol 214(2):247.e1-247.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zawadski JF, Dunaif A (1992) Diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: towards a rational approach. In: Dunaif A, Givens JR, Haseltuine F (eds) Polycystic ovary syndrome. Blackwell Scientific, Boston, pp 377–384

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group (2004) Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 71:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Azziz R, Carmina E, Dewailly D, Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Escobar-Morreale HF, Futterweit W, Janssen OE et al (2009) The androgen excess and PCOS Society criteria for the polycystic ovary syndrome: the complete task force report. Fertil Steril 91:456–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.06.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lizneva D, Suturina L, Walker W, Brakta S, Gavrilova-Jordan L, Aziz R (2016) Criteria, prevalence, and phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 106:6–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.05.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saxena U, Ramani M, Singh P (2018) Role of AMH as diagnostic tool for polycystic ovarian syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol India 68:117–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-017-1066-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sahmay S, Atakul N, Aydogan B, Aydin Y, Imamoglu M, Seyisoglu (2013) Elevated serum levels of anti-müllerian hormone can be introduced as a new diagnostic marker for polycystic ovary syndrome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92:1369–1374. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kristensen SL, Ramlau-Hansen CH, Ernst E, Oslen F, Bonde JP, Vested A, Toft G (2010) A very large proportion of young Danish women have polycystic ovaries: is a revision of the rotterdam criteria needed? Hum Reprod 25:3117–3122. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Somunkiran A, Yavuz T, Yucel O, Ozdemir I (2007) Anti-Müllerian hormone levels during hormonal contraception in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 134.196–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.01.012

  12. Dewailly D, Lujan ME, Carmina E, Cedars MI, Laven J, Norman RJ, Escobar-Morreale HF (2014) Definition and significance of polycystic ovarian morphology: a task force report from the androgen excess and polycystic ovary syndrome society. Hum Reprod Update 20:334–352. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sahmay S, Aydin Y, Oncul M, Senturk L (2014) Diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome: AMH in combination with clinical symptoms. J Assist Reprod Genet 31:213–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-013-0149-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dumont A, Robin G, Catteau-Jonard S, Dewailly D (2015) Role of antimüllerian hormone in pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: a review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 13:137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0134-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Iliodromiti S, Kelsey TW, Anderson RA, Nelson SM (2013) Can anti-Mullerian hormone predict the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome?, a systematic review and meta-analysis of extracted data. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:3332–3340. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-1393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mohammad MB, Seghinsara MA (2017) Polycystic ovary syndrome (pcos) diagnostic criteria and amH. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 18:17–21. https://doi.org/10.2204/APJCP.2017.18.1.17

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Pigny P, Merlen E, Robert Y, Cortet-Rudelli C, Decanter C, Jonard S, Dewailly D (2002) Elevated serum level of AMH in patients with PCOS: relationship to the ovarian follicle excess and to the follicular arrest. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:5957–5962. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-030727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pigny P, Jonard S, Robert Y, Dewailly D (2006) Serum anti-müllerian hormone as a surrogate for antral follicle count for definition of the polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:941–945. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-2076

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Piouka A, Farmakiotis D, Katsikis I, Macut D, Gerou S, Panidis D (2009) Anti-mullerian hormone levels reflect severity of PCOS but are negatively influenced by obesity: relationship with increased luteinizing hormone levels. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 296:E238–E243. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.90684.2008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Laven JS, Mulders AG, Visser JA, Themmen AP, De Jong FH, Fauser BC (2004) Anti-müllerian hormone serum concentrations in normoovulatory and anovulatory women of reproductive age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:318–323. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-030932

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fraissinet A, Robin G, Pigny P, Tiphaine L, Catteau-Jonard S, Dewailly D (2017) Use of the serum anti-mullerian hormone assay as a surrogate for polycystic ovarian morphology: impact on diagnosis and phenotypic classification of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod 32:1716–1722. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh AK, Singh R (2015) Can anti-mullerian hormone replace ultrasonographic evaluation in polycystic ovary syndrome ? a review of current progress. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 19:731–743. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.167548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Pellatt L, Hanna L, Brincat M, Galea R, Brain H, Whitehead S, Mason H (2007) Granulosa cell production of anti-mullerian hormone is increased in polycystic ovaries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:240–245. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-1582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Abbara A, Eng PC, Phylactou M, Clarke SA, Hunjan T, Roberts R (2019) Anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) in the diagnosis of menstrual disturbance due to polycystic ovarian syndrome. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 10:656. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hart R, Doherty DA, Norman RJ, Franks S, Dickinson JE, Hickey M, Sloboda DM (2010) Serum anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) levels are elevated in adolescent girls with polycystic ovaries and the polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Fertil Steril 94:1118–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.11.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Woo HY, Kim KH, Rhee EJ, Park H, Lee MK (2012) Differences of the association of anti-mullerian hormone with clinical or biochemical characteristics between women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocr J 59:781–790. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.ej12-0055

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dewailly D, Gronier H, Poncelet E, Robin G, Leroy M, Pigny P, Duhamel A, Catteau-Jonard S (2011) Diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): Revisiting the threshold values of follicle count on ultrasound and of the serum AMH level for the definition of polycystic ovaries. Hum Reprod 26:3123–3129. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Li L, Chen X, Mo Y, Chen Y, Wenig M, Yang D (2010) Elevated serum anti-müllerian hormone in adolescent and young adult chinese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Wien Klin Wochenschr 122:519–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-010-1426-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Homburg R, Ray A, Bhide P, Gudi A, Shah A, Timms P, Grayson K (2013) The relationship of serum anti-mullerian hormone with polycystic ovarian morphology and polycystic ovary syndrome: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod 28:1077–1083. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lin YH, Chiu WC, Wu CH, Tzeng CR, Hsu CS, Hsu MI (2011) Antimullerian hormone and polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 96:230–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Eilertsen TB, Vanky E, Carlsen SM (2012) Anti-müllerian hormone in the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome: can morphologic description be replaced? Hum Reprod 27:2494–2502. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Li Y, Ma Y, Chen X, Wang W, Li Y, Zhang Q, Yang D (2012) Different diagnostic power of anti-Müllerian hormone in evaluating women with polycystic ovaries with and without hyperandrogenism. J Assist Reprod Genet 29:1147–1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9839-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Nelson SM, La Marca A (2011) The journey from the old to the new AMH assay: how to avoid getting lost in the values. Reprod Biomed Online 23:411–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.06.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Teede HJ, Misso ML, Costello MF, Dokras A, Laven J, Moran L, Piltonen T, Norman RJ, Network IPCOS (2018) Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 110:364–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed adequately to this study and approved its submission. FV: study design; concept; supervision of analyses; writing; read and approved the final version of the manuscript. BV: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; read and approved the final version of the manuscript. EK: Data curation, software, read and approved the final version of the manuscript. ADEC: Writing and editing; read and approved the final version of the manuscript. IY: Data curation; read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fisun Vural.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interests that are directly or indirectly related to the research including the following: research grants from funding agencies; honoraria for speaking at symposia; financial support for attending symposia; financial support for educational programs; employment or consultation; support from a project sponsor; position on advisory board or board of directors or other types of management relationships; multiple affiliations; financial relationships, for example equity ownership or investment interest; intellectual property rights (e.g., patents, copyrights and royalties from such rights); holdings of spouse and/or children that may have a financial interest in the work.

Ethical approval

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. Ethical approval was obtained from the local Ethics Committee (HNEAH-KAEK, 2021/293–3343).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vural, F., Vural, B., Kardaş, E. et al. The diagnostic performance of antimullerian hormone for polycystic ovarian syndrome and polycystic ovarian morphology. Arch Gynecol Obstet 307, 1083–1090 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06874-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06874-w

Keywords

Navigation