Skip to main content
Log in

PFMT relevant strategies to prevent perineal trauma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Most women suffer from perineal trauma during childbirth, whether it is natural tears or episiotomy.

Objectives

To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of different PFMT relevant strategies in the prevention of perineal trauma.

Search strategy

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, CNKI, CBM, WANFANG DATABASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for citations published in any language from inception to 1 July 2021.

Selection criteria

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PFMT relevant prevention strategies for preventing perineal trauma during childbirth.

Data collection and analysis

Data were independently extracted by two reviewers. Relative treatment effects were estimated using network meta-analysis (NMA).

Main results

Of 12 632 citations searched, 21 RCTs were included. Comparing with usual care, “PFMT combine with perineal massage” and PFMT alone showed more superiority in intact perineum (RR = 5.37, 95% CI: 3.79 to 7.60, moderate certainty; RR = 2.58, 95% CI 1.34–4.97, moderate certainty, respectively), episiotomy (RR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.14–0.49, very low certainty; RR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.45–0.90, very low certainty, respectively), and OASIS (RR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.16–0.78, moderate certainty; RR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.28–0.85, high certainty, respectively). “PFMT combine with perineal massage” showed superiority in reducing perineal tear (RR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.20–0.85, moderate certainty).

Conclusions

In view of the results, antenatal “PFMT combine with perineal massage” and PFMT were effective strategies for the prevention of perineal trauma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics (2016) Practice bulletin No 165: prevention and management of obstetric lacerations at vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 128(1):e1-e15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001523.

  2. Queensland Health (2020). Mothers birthing in Queensland 2020. https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/1130491/6-labdel2020.pdf (Accessed 20 May 2022).

  3. World Health Organization (2016). Standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789241511216 (Accessed 20 May 2022).

  4. Queensland Health (2020). Queensland Clinical Guidelines: Perineal care. https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/142384/g-pericare.pdf (Accessed 20 May 2022).

  5. Waldman R (2019) ACOG practice bulletin no. 198: Prevention and management of obstetric lacerations at vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 133(1):185. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ducarme G, Pizzoferrato AC, de Tayrac R, Schantz C, Thubert T, Le Ray C et al (2019) Perineal prevention and protection in obstetrics: CNGOF clinical practice guidelines. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 48(7):455–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.12.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abdelhakim AM, Eldesouky E, Elmagd IA, Mohammed A, Farag EA, Mohammed AE et al (2020) Antenatal perineal massage benefits in reducing perineal trauma and postpartum morbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Urogynecol J 31(9):1735–1745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04302-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gomes Lopes L, Maia Dutra Balsells M, Teixeira Moreira Vasconcelos C, Leite de Araújo T, Teixeira Lima FE, de Souza AP (2022) Can pelvic floor muscle training prevent perineal laceration? A systematic review and meta- analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 157(2):248–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brito LG, Ferreira CH, Duarte G, Nogueira AA, Marcolin AC (2015) Antepartum use of Epi-No birth trainer for preventing perineal trauma: systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 26(10):1429–1436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2687-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Masoud AT, AbdelGawad MM, Elshamy NH, Mohamed OM, Hashem ZY, Abd Eltawab AK et al (2020) The effect of antenatal exercise on delivery outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 49(6):101736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C et al (2015) The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care strategies: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med 162(11):777–784. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-2385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cumpston MS, McKenzie JE, Welch VA, Brennan SE (2022). Strengthening systematic reviews in public health: guidance in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2nd edition. J Public Health (Oxf) 28:fdac036. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdac036.

  13. Rücker G (2012) Network meta-analysis, electrical networks and graph theory. Res Synth Methods 3(4):312–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chaimani A, Higgins JP, Mavridis D, Spyridonos P, Salanti G (2013) Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA. PLoS ONE 8(10):e76654. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076654

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Higgins JPT, Jackson D, Barrett JK, Lu G, Ades aE, White IR (2012) Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies. Res Synth Methods 3(2):98–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Dias S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Ades AE (2010) Checking consistency in mixed strategies comparison meta-analysis. Stat Med 29(7–8):932–944. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Krahn U, Binder H, König J (2013) A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta-analyses. BMC Med Res Methodol 13:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-35

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rücker G, Schwarzer G (2015) Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods. BMC Med Res Methodol 15:58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0060-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Brignardello-Petersen R, Bonner A, Alexander PE, Siemieniuk RA, Furukawa TA, Rochwerg B et al (2018) Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 93:36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brignardello-Petersen R, Florez ID, Izcovich A, Santesso N, Hazlewood G, Alhazanni W et al (2020) GRADE approach to drawing conclusions from a network meta-analysis using a minimally contextualized framework. BMJ 371:m3900. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Agur W, Steggles P, Waterfield M, Freeman R (2008) Does antenatal pelvic floor muscle training affect the outcome of labour? A randomised controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(1):85–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0391-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dias LA, Driusso P, Aita DL, Bø K, Ferreira CHJ (2011) Effect of pelvic floor muscle training on labour and newborn outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Rev Bras Fisioter 15(6):487–493. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-35552011005000011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dieb AS, Shoab AY, Nabil H, Gabr A, Abdallah AA, Shaban MM et al (2020) Perineal massage and training reduce perineal trauma in pregnant women older than 35 years: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J 31(3):613–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03937-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. HP Dietz,S Langer,K Atan,KL Shek,J Caudwell-Hall,RG Rojas (2014). Does the Epi-No birth trainer prevent vaginal birth-related pelvic floor trauma? A multicenter prospective randomised controlled trial. 44th Annual Meeting of the International-Continence-Society (ICS)Volume: 33

  25. Lekskulchai O, Wanichsetakul P (2014) Effect of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) during pregnancy on bladder neck descend and delivery. J Med Assoc Thai 97(Suppl 8):S156–S163

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kamisan Atan I, Shek KL, Langer S, Guzman Rojas R, Caudwell-Hall J, Daly JO, Dietz HP (2016) Does the Epi-No(®) birth trainer prevent vaginal birth-related pelvic floor trauma? A multicentre prospective randomised controlled trial. BJOG 123(6):995–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13924

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Leon-Larios F, Corrales-Gutierrez I, Casado-Mejía R, Suarez-Serrano C (2017) Influence of a pelvic floor training programme to prevent perineal trauma: a quasi-randomised controlled trial. Midwifery 50:72–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.03.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rodríguez-Díaz L, Ruiz-Frutos C, Vázquez-Lara JM, Ramírez-Rodrigo J, Villaverde-Gutiérrez C, Torres-Luque G (2017) Effectiveness of a physical activity programme based on the Pilates method in pregnancy and labour. Enferm Clin 27(5):271–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2017.05.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ruckhäberle E, Jundt K, Bäuerle M, Brisch KH, Ulm K, Dannecker C et al (2009) Prospective randomised multicentre trial with the birth trainer EPI-NO for the prevention of perineal trauma. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 49(5):478–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01044.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shek KL, Chantarasorn V, Langer S, Phipps H, Dietz HP (2011) Does the Epi-No Birth Trainer reduce levator trauma? A randomised controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J 22(12):1521–1528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1517-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Deng XP (2019) Significance of pelvic floor muscle function exercise guidance for primiparas who give birth naturally. Contemp Med Essays 17(10):9–11

    Google Scholar 

  32. Huang JL, Yan Q, Shen SW, You WH, Huang LX (2020) The effect of perineal massage combined with Kegel exercise during pregnancy on the delivery outcome of primipara. China Pract Med 15(21):35–37. https://doi.org/10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2020.21.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shi S (2018) The influence of yoga during pregnancy on pregnancy outcome of primipara. China Urban Rural Ent Health 33(06):46–48. https://doi.org/10.16286/j.1003-5052.2018.06.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Salvesen KA, Mørkved S (2004) Randomised controlled trial of pelvic floor muscle training during pregnancy. BMJ 329(7462):378–380. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38163.724306.3A

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang K (2015) Clinical research on PFMT behavior guidance for pregnant and lying-in women before and after childbirth. J Inn Mong Med Univ 37(S1):301–303. https://doi.org/10.16343/j.cnki.issn.2095-512x.2015.s1.076

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang Y, Zhou GL, Zou HY, Wang CX, Xiao SL, Pan JF et al (2015) Study on the effect of modified Kegel functional exercise nursing on the delivery method of pregnant women with pelvic floor dysfunction. Mod Diagnosis Treat 26(18):4294–4295

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cai HL (2019) The effect of antenatal perineal massage combined with Kegel exercise on the delivery outcome of primipara. Nurs Pract Res 16(17):87–89. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2019.17.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liang H (2020) The effect of antenatal perineal massage combined with Kegel exercise on the delivery outcome of primipara. Nurs Pract Res 17(18):101–103. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2020.18.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hu Z, Qi GH, Wu YH (2014) The effect of continuous guidance of pelvic floor muscle exercise on the maternal and infant delivery outcome of primipara. Hainan Medicine 25(09):1351–1352

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kovacs GT, Heath P, Heather C (2004) First Australian trial of the birth-training device Epi-No: a highly significantly increased chance of an intact perineum. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 44(4):347–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00265.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang M, Zhang HH (2017) The application effect of perineal massage combined with Kegel exercise in the natural delivery of primipara in the third trimester of pregnancy. Nurs Res 31(33):4243–4246. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2017.33.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research not supported by any institution or individual.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XC: the conception of the work, the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work, draft and revise the work. QYY: the conception of the work, the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work. QW: the conception of the work, the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work, revise the work. SH: the design of the work, the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work. LH: the conception of the work, the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work, revise the work. MS: the conception of the work, the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work. HL: the conception of the work, the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work, revise the work. CW: the conception of the work, the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work. YW: the conception of the work, the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work. LX: the design of the work, the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work, revise the work. XL: the design of the work, revise the manuscript, final approval of the version to be published. JT: the design of the work, revise the manuscript, final approval of the version to be published. LG: the conception and design of the work, revise the manuscript, final approval of the version to be published, coordinate the overall work. CL: t the conception and design of the work, revise the manuscript, final approval of the version to be published, coordinate the overall work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Long Ge or Chenling Luo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 2, 3 and Figs. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33.

Table 2 Search strategy
Table 3 Definitions of different prevention strategies
Fig. 5
figure 5

The risk of bias assessments for studies

Fig. 6
figure 6

The forest plot of the rate of intact perineum

Fig. 7
figure 7

The pairwise forest plot of the rate of intact perineum

Fig. 8
figure 8

The forest plot of the rate of episiotomy

Fig. 9
figure 9

The pairwise forest plot of the rate of episiotomy

Fig. 10
figure 10

The funnel plot of the rate of episiotomy

Fig. 11
figure 11

The forest plot of the rate of perineal tear

Fig. 12
figure 12

The pairwise forest plot of the rate of perineal tear

Fig. 13
figure 13

The funnel plot of the rate of perineal tear

Fig. 14
figure 14

The forest plot of the rate of OASIS

Fig. 15
figure 15

The pairwise forest plot of the rate of OASIS

Fig. 16
figure 16

The funnel plot of the rate of OASIS

Fig. 17
figure 17

The forest plot of the rate of slight perineal tear

Fig. 18
figure 18

The pairwise forest plot of the rate of slight perineal tear

Fig. 19
figure 19

The forest plot of the rate of assisted vaginal delivery

Fig. 20
figure 20

The pairwise forest plot of the rate of assisted vaginal delivery

Fig. 21
figure 21

The funnel plot of the rate of assisted vaginal delivery

Fig. 22
figure 22

The forest plot of the rate of natural childbirth

Fig. 23
figure 23

The pairwise forest plot of the rate of natural childbirth

Fig. 24
figure 24

The funnel plot of the rate of natural childbirth

Fig. 25
figure 25

The forest plot of the rate of caesarean section

Fig. 26
figure 26

The pairwise forest plot of the rate of caesarean section

Fig. 27
figure 27

The funnel plot of the rate of caesarean section

Fig. 28
figure 28

The forest plot of the rate of fetal distress

Fig. 29
figure 29

The pairwise forest plot of the rate of fetal distress

Fig. 30
figure 30

The funnel plot of the rate of fetal distress

Fig. 31
figure 31

The forest plot of the duration of the second stage of labor

Fig. 32
figure 32

The pairwise forest plot of the duration of the second stage of labor

Fig. 33
figure 33

The funnel plot of the duration of the second stage of labor

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, X., Yang, Q., Wang, Q. et al. PFMT relevant strategies to prevent perineal trauma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 308, 387–401 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06769-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06769-w

Keywords

Navigation