Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incidence of emergency peripartum hysterectomy in Ain-shams University Maternity Hospital, Egypt: a retrospective study

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To estimate the incidence of emergency peripartum hysterectomy over 6 years in Ain-shams University Maternity Hospital.

Methods

Detailed chart review of all cases of emergency peripartum hysterectomy, 2003–2008, including previous obstetric history, details of the index pregnancy, indications for emergency peripartum hysterectomy, outcome of the hysterectomy and infant morbidity.

Results

The overall rate of emergency peripartum hysterectomy was 149 of 66,306 or 2.24 per 1,000 deliveries. The primary indications for hysterectomies were placenta accreta/increta 59 (39.6 %), uterine atony 37 (24.8 %), uterine rupture 35 (23.5 %) and placenta previa without accreta 18 (12.1 %). After hysterectomy, 115 (77 %) women were admitted to the intensive care unit. Women were discharged home after a mean 11.2 day length of stay. Using multifactorial logistic regression analysis, we found that woman’s age, atonic uterus, placenta accreta/increta, previous cesarian section and ruptured uterus were independent predictors for peripartum hysterectomy

Conclusion

Abnormal placentation was the main indication for peripartum hysterectomy. The risk factors for peripartum hysterectomy were morbid adherence of placentae in scared uteri, uterine atony and uterine rupture. The most important step in prevention of major postpartum hemorrhage is recognizing and assessing women’s risk. The risk of peripartum hysterectomy seems to be significantly decreased by limiting the number of cesarean section deliveries, thus reducing the occurrence of abnormal placentation in the form of placenta accreta, increta or percreta.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

CI:

Confidence interval

DIC:

Disseminated intravascular coagulopathy

ICU:

Intensive care unit

OR:

Odds ratio

RR:

Relative risk

References

  1. Whiteman MK, Kuklina E, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Meikle SF, Posner SF et al (2006) Incidence and determinants of peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 108(6):1486–1492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kastner ES, Figueroa R, Garry D, Maulik D (2002) Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: experience at a community teaching hospital. Obstet Gynecol 99(6):971–975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zelop CM, Harlow BL, Frigoletto FD Jr, Safon LE, Saltzman DH (1993) Emergency peripartum hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168(5):1443–1448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller DA, Chollet JA, Goodwin TM (1997) Clinical risk factors for placenta previa-placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177(1):210–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kacmar J, Bhimani L, Boyd M, Shah-Hosseini R, Peipert J (2003) Route of delivery as a risk factor for emergent peripartum hysterectomy: a case–control study. Obstet Gynecol 102(1):141–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Langdana F, Geary M, Haw W, Keane D (2001) Peripartum hysterectomy in the 1990s: any new lessons? J Obstet Gynaecol 21(2):121–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kwame-Aryee R, Kwakye A, Seffah J (2007) Peripartum hysterectomies at the Korle-bu teaching hospital: a review of 182 consecutive cases. Ghana Med J 41(3):133

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Obiechina NJ, Eleje GU, Ezebialu IU, Okeke CA, Mbamara SU (2012) Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in Nnewi, Nigeria: a 10-years review. Niger J Clin Pract 15(2):168–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Omole-Ohonsi A, Olayinka HT (2012) Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in developing country. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 34(10):954–960

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wei Q, Zhang W, Chen M, Zhang L, He G, Liu X (2014) Peripartum hysterectomy in 38 hospitals in China: a population-based study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289(3):549–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sahin S, Guzin K, Eroğlu M, Kayabasoglu F, Yaşartekin MS (2014) Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: our 12-year experience.  Arch Gynecol Obstet 289(5):953–958. doi:10.1007/s00404-013-3079-2

  12. Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Bruinse HW (2006) Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a prospective study in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 124(2):187–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was funded by the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors reported no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ihab Serag Allam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allam, I.S., Gomaa, I.A., Fathi, H.M. et al. Incidence of emergency peripartum hysterectomy in Ain-shams University Maternity Hospital, Egypt: a retrospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290, 891–896 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3306-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3306-5

Keywords

Navigation