Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk factors and perinatal outcomes associated with latency in preterm premature rupture of membranes between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To identify risk factors and perinatal outcomes associated with the duration of latency period in women who experience preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM).

Methods

A retrospective study of women who experienced PPROM between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation was performed in a single tertiary center between 2009 and 2013. Patients were divided into two groups based on the duration of the latency period after PPROM: Group 1 ≤72 h and Group 2 >72 h. Risk factors and perinatal outcomes were compared according to latency period. Student’s t test and Chi-square test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively, between the two groups. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to control for potential confounding variables.

Results

In total, 3,257 patients presented with PPROM during the study period; of these, 204 (6.3 %) met the inclusion criteria. Higher gestational age upon admission (odds ratio [OR] = 0.83, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.79–0.87; p < 0.001), oligohydramnios (OR = 0.47, 95 % CI = 0.25–0.91; p = 0.018), and twin gestation (OR = 0.67, 95 % CI = 0.45–0.89; p = 0.032) were independently associated with a shortened latency period. In addition, prolonged latency significantly increased the occurrence of chorioamnionitis (OR = 2.23, 95 % CI = 1.48–3.14; p = 0.002), placental abruption (OR = 1.9, 95 % CI = 0.95–3.53; p = 0.033), and decreased the length of stay of neonates in the intensive care unit (OR = 0.85, 95 % CI = 0.39–1.79; p = 0.021).

Conclusion

Gestational age at PPROM, twin gestation, and oligohydramnios significantly affected the latency period. Although a latency period >72 h was associated with chorioamnionitis and placental abruption, adverse neonatal outcomes were not affected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Simhan HN, Canavan TP (2005) Preterm premature rupture of membranes: diagnosis, evaluation and management strategies. BJOG 112:32–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. ACOG Practice Bulletin (2013) No. 139: premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 122:918–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Park SH, Kim HJ, Yang JH, Choi JS, Lim JE, Oh MJ, Na JY (2006) Neonatal brain damage following prolonged latency after preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Korean Med Sci 21:485–489

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mercer BM (2003) Preterm premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 101:178–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Medina TM, Hill DA (2006) Preterm premature rupture of membranes: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Phys 73:659–664

    Google Scholar 

  6. Caughey AB, Robinson JN, Norwitz ER (2008) Contemporary diagnosis and management of preterm premature rupture of membranes. Rev Obstet Gynecol 1:11–22

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aziz N, Cheng YW, Caughey AB (2008) Factors and outcomes associated with longer latency in premature rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 21:821–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Phelan JP, Smith CV, Broussard P, Small M (1987) Amniotic fluid volume assessment with the four-quadrant technique at 36–42 weeks’ gestation. J Reprod Med 32:540–542

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis JM, Krew MA, Gill P, Nelson KM, Hopkins MP (2008) The role of continuous fetal monitoring in the management of preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 21:301–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Melamed N, Hadar E, Ben-Haroush A, Kaplan B, Yogev Y (2009) Factors affecting the duration of the latency period in preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 22:1051–1056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Savitz DA, Ananth CV, Luther ER, Thorp JM Jr (1997) Influence of gestational age on the time from spontaneous rupture of the chorioamniotic membranes to the onset of labor. Am J Perinatol 14:129–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dale PO, Tanbo T, Bendvold E, Moe N (1989) Duration of the latency period in preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Maternal and neonatal consequences of expectant management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 30:257–262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Atarjavdan L, Khazaeipour Z, Shahbazi F (2011) Correlation of myometrial thickness and the latency interval of women with preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284:1339–1343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Park JS, Yoon BH, Romero R, Moon JB, Oh SY, Kim JC, Jun JK (2001) The relationship between oligohydramnios and the onset of preterm labor in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:459–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vermillion ST, Kooba AM, Soper DE (2000) Amniotic fluid index values after preterm premature rupture of the membranes and subsequent perinatal infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:271–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacquemyn Y, Noelmans L, Mahieu L, Buytaert P (2003) Twin versus singleton pregnancy and preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 30:99–102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hsieh YY, Chang CC, Tsai HD, Yang TC, Lee CC, Tsai CH (1999) Twin vs. singleton pregnancy. Clinical characteristics and latency periods in preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Reprod Med 44:616–620

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pasquier JC, Rabilloud M, Picaud JC, Claris O, Ecochard R, Moret S, Mellier G (2008) Modeling the duration of the latency period after preterm premature rupture of the membranes according to maternal and pregnancy characteristics: DOMINOS study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 139:157–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bianco AT, Stone J, Lapinski R, Lockwood C, Lynch L, Berkowitz RL (1996) The clinical outcome of preterm premature rupture of membranes in twin versus singleton pregnancies. Am J Perinatol 13:135–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dagklis T, Petousis S, Margioula-Siarkou C, Mavromatidis G, Kalogiannidis I, Prapas N, Mamopoulos A, Rousso D (2013) Parameters affecting latency period in PPROM cases: a 10-year experience of a single institution. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 26:1455–1458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Test G, Levy A, Wiznitzer A, Mazor M, Holcberg G, Zlotnik A, Sheiner E (2011) Factors affecting the latency period in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283:707–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hnat MD, Mercer BM, Thurnau G, Goldenberg R, Thom EA, Meis PJ, Moawad AH, Iams JD, Van Dorsten JP, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (2005) Perinatal outcomes in women with preterm rupture of membranes between 24 and 32 weeks of gestation and a history of vaginal bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:164–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gomez R, Romero R, Edwin SS, David C (1997) Pathogenesis of preterm labor and preterm premature rupture of membranes associated with intraamniotic infection. Infect Dis Clin N Am 11(1):135–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Perrone G, Anceschi MM, Capri O, Galoppi P, Pizzulo S, Buccheri M, Pascone R, Nofroni I, Brunelli R (2012) Maternal C-reactive protein at hospital admission is a simple predictor of funisitis in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Gynecol Obstet Invest 74:95–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Soper DE, Mayhall CG, Dalton HP (1989) Risk factors for intraamniotic infection: a prospective epidemiologic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 161:562–566

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nayot D, Penava D, Da Silva O, Richardson BS, de Vrijer B (2012) Neonatal outcomes are associated with latency after preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Perinatol 32:970–977

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Frenette P, Dodds L, Armson BA, Jangaard K (2013) Preterm prelabour rupture of membranes: effect of latency on neonatal and maternal outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 35:710–717

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Buchanan SL, Crowther CA, Levett KM, Middleton P, Morris J (2010) Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks’ gestation for improving pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004735

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoon BH, Kim YA, Romero R, Kim JC, Park KH, Kim MH, Park JS (1999) Association of oligohydramnios in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes with an inflammatory response in fetal, amniotic, and maternal compartments. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:784–788

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Hadar A, Hallak M, Hackmon R, Mazor M (2002) Incidence, obstetric risk factors and pregnancy outcome of preterm placental abruption: a retrospective analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 11:34–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Blumenfeld YJ, Lee HC, Gould JB, Langen ES, Jafari A, El-Sayed YY (2010) The effect of preterm premature rupture of membranes on neonatal mortality rates. Obstet Gynecol 116:1381–1386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Manuck TA, Maclean CC, Silver RM, Varner MW (2009) Preterm premature rupture of membranes: does the duration of latency influence perinatal outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol 201(4):414.e1–414.e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hutzal CE, Boyle EM, Kenyon SL, Nash JV, Winsor S, Taylor DJ, Kirpalani H (2008) Use of antibiotics for the treatment of preterm parturition and prevention of neonatal morbidity: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(6):620.e1–620.e8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tanir HM, Sener T, Tekin N, Aksit A, Ardic N (2003) Preterm premature rupture of membranes and neonatal outcome prior to 34 weeks of gestation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 82:167–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atalay Ekin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ekin, A., Gezer, C., Taner, C.E. et al. Risk factors and perinatal outcomes associated with latency in preterm premature rupture of membranes between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290, 449–455 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3227-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3227-3

Keywords

Navigation