Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The potential prognostic value of cathepsin D protein in serous ovarian cancer

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Overexpression of a ubiquitous lysosomal aspartyl protease cathepsin D (cath-D) is involved in the progression of certain cancer types. This study investigated the prognostic value of the cath-D expression and its association with other known clinicopathological parameters in serous ovarian carcinoma.

Materials and methods

Cath-D was detected by immunohistochemistry in 49 serous ovarian carcinomas and compared to 50 benign serous ovarian tumors. The results were correlated with clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes.

Results

In both cath-D positive benign and malignant serous ovarian tumors, a specific granular cytoplasmic staining was observed in both epithelial and stromal cells. Cath-D expression levels were higher in serous ovarian carcinomas than in benign tumors (P < 0.01). Cath-D expression in tumor epithelial cells correlated with mesenchymal cell expression (P < 0.001). The cath-D expression levels of tumor epithelial cells correlated with residual tumor size (P = 0.027) and was not related to other factors (P > 0.05). Patients with higher cath-D expression in epithelial cells had longer disease-free survival time (DFST; P = 0.025) and overall survival time (OST; P = 0.030). Through the Cox regression test, we found that the response to treatment (P < 0.001), pathological stage (P < 0.001), and peritoneal cytology results (P = 0.018) were independent effect factors for DFST. The expression level of cath-D in epithelial cells (P = 0.025), response to treatment (P < 0.001), pathological stage (P = 0.001), and peritoneal cytology results (P = 0.002) were independent effect factors for OST.

Conclusion

This showed that cath-D was an indicator of malignancy in serous ovarian carcinoma. It was expressed more highly in serous ovarian carcinoma than benign serous ovarian tumor. Additionally, our results suggested that high expression of cath-D in tumor epithelial cells was a favorable survival prognostic factor for serous ovarian carcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell DA (2005) Origins and molecular pathology of ovarian cancer. Mod Pathol 18(Suppl 2):S19–S32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nomura T, Katunuma N (2005) Involvement of cathepsins in the invasion, metastasis and proliferation of cancer cells. J Med Invest 52(1–2):1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Clinton GM, Hua W (1997) Estrogen action in human ovarian cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 25(1):1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berchem G, Glonda M, Gleizes M et al (2002) Cathepsin-D affects multiple tumor progression steps in vivo: proliferation, angiogenesis and apoptosis. Oncogene 21(38):5951–5955

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leto G, Tumminello FM, Crescimanno M et al (2004) Cathepsin D expression levels in nongynecological solid tumors: clinical and therapeutic implications. Clin Exp Metastasis 21(2):91–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rochefort H (1992) Cathepsin D in breast cancer: a tissue marker associated with metastasis. Eur J Cancer 28A(11):1780–1783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Foekens JA, Look MP, Bolt-de Vries J et al (1999) Cathepsin-D in primary breast cancer: prognostic evaluation involving 2810 patients. Br J Cancer 79(2):300–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Henzen-Logmans SC, Fieret EJ, Berns EM et al (1994) Ki-67 staining in benign, borderline, malignant primary and metastatic ovarian tumors: correlation with steroid receptors, epidermal growth factor receptor and cathepsin D. Int J Cancer 57(4):468–472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Baekelandt M, Holm R, Trope CG et al (1999) The significance of metastasis-related facts cathepsin-D and nm23 in advanced ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 10(11):1335–1341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Scambia G, Panici PB, Ferrandina G et al (1994) Clinical significance of cathepsin D in primary ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer 30A:935–940

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrandina G, Scambia G, Fagotti A et al (1998) Immunoradiometric and immunohistochemical analysis of cathepsin D in ovarian cancer: lack of association with clinical outcome. Br J Cancer 78(12):1645–1652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Athanassiadou P, Sakellariou V, Petrakakou E et al (1998) Cathepsin D immunoreactivity in ovarian cancer: correlation with prognostic factors. Pathol Oncol 4(2):103–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Losch A, Schindl M, Kohlberger P et al (2004) Cathepsin D in ovarian cancer: prognostic value and correlation with p53 expression and microvessel density. Gynecol Oncol 92(2):545–552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nisolle M, Casanas RF, Donnez J (1997) Immunohistochemical analysis of proliferative activity and steroid receptor expression in peritoneal and ovarian endometriosis. Fertil Steril 68(5):912–919

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dvalishvili I, Charkviani L, Charkviani T et al (2005) Clinical prognostic factors and expression of cathepsin D in endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Georgian Med News 126:27–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rodríguez J, Vázquez J, Corte MD et al (2005) Clinical significance of cathepsin D concentration in tumor cytosol of primary breast cancer. Int J Biol Markers 20(2):103–111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Abbott DE, Margaryan NV, Jeruss JS et al (2010) Reevaluating cathepsin D as a biomarker for breast cancer: serum activity levels versus histopathology. Cancer Biol Ther 9(1):23–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maygarden SJ, Novotny DB, Moul JW et al (1994) Evaluation of cathepsin D and epidermal growth factor receptor in prostate carcinoma. Mod Pathol 7(9):930–9366

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Holm R, Tanum G (1996) Evaluation of the prognostic significance of nm23/NDP kinase and cathepsin D in anal carcinomas. An immunohistochemical study. Virchows Arch 428(2):85–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Axel SM, Joerg H, Perikles S et al (2005) Translational research: from lab to clinic: cathepsin D expression in renal cell cancer clinical implications. Eur Urol 48:519–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article exists.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianhong Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chai, Y., Wu, W., Zhou, C. et al. The potential prognostic value of cathepsin D protein in serous ovarian cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286, 465–471 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2318-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2318-2

Keywords

Navigation