Abbreviations
- VADs:
-
Vibratory anesthetic devices
- LAIs:
-
Local anesthetic injectors
References
Govas P, Kazi R, Slaugenhaupt RM, Carroll BT (2019) Effect of a vibratory anesthetic device on pain anticipation and subsequent pain perception among patients undergoing cutaneous cancer removal surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 21(6):480–486. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0733
Gresham KA, Carroll BT (2016) A simple elastomer-pad vibratory dampener to maximize pain control of injections in patients undergoing dermatological surgery. Dermatol Surg 42(6):788–790. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000718
Sharma P, Czyz CN, Wulc AE (2011) Investigating the efficacy of vibration anesthesia to reduce pain from cosmetic botulinum toxin injections. Aesthet Surg J 31(8):966–971. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X11422809
Smith KC, Comite SL, Balasubramanian S, Carver A, Liu JF (2004) Vibration anesthesia: a noninvasive method of reducing discomfort prior to dermatologic procedures. Dermatol Online J 10(2):1
Young Park K, Lee Y, Hong JY, Chung WS, Kim MN, Kim BJ (2017) Vibration anesthesia for pain reduction during intralesional steroid injection for keloid treatment. Dermatol Surg 43(5):724–727. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001040
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center for the receival of the Research Scholar Award funded by the Brian Werbel Memorial Fund; Dr. Jeremy Bordeaux, Dr. Christina Wong, and Ms. Susan McDicken from the University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Department of Dermatology.
Funding
This study was funded by the Brian Werbel Memorial Fund Research Scholar Award.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by CW. Data analysis was performed by CW, AM, and RK. CW prepared Tables 1, 2. The first draft of the manuscript was written by CW and all authors commented on subsequent versions of the manuscript. BC oversaw study conception and manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical approval
Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of University Hospitals. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilkowski, C.M., Maytin, A.K., Klatzky, R.L. et al. A pilot study comparing the user preference of different forms of mechanical vibration. Arch Dermatol Res 316, 69 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-023-02797-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-023-02797-x