Abstract
Microencapsulation has received extensive attention because of its various applications. Since its inception in the 1940s, this technology has been used across several areas, including the chemical, food, and pharmaceutical industries. Over-the-counter skin products often contain ingredients that readily and unevenly degrade upon contact with the skin. Enclosing these substances within a silica shell can enhance their stability and better regulate their delivery onto and into the skin. Silica microencapsulation uses silica as the matrix material into which ingredients can be embedded to form microcapsules. The FDA recognizes amorphous silica as a safe inorganic excipient and recently approved two new topical therapies for the treatment of rosacea and acne. The first approved formulation uses a novel silica-based controlled vehicle delivery technology to improve the stability of two active ingredients that are normally not able to be used in the same formulation due to potential instability and drug degradation. The formulation contains 3.0% benzoyl peroxide (BPO) and 0.1% tretinoin topical cream to treat acne vulgaris in adults and pediatric patients. The second formulation contains silica microencapsulated 5.0% BPO topical cream to treat inflammatory rosacea lesions in adults. Both formulations use the same amorphous silica sol–gel microencapsulation technology to improve formulation stability and skin compatibility parameters.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The successful delivery of topical drugs and/or excipients can be influenced by various internal and external factors, including drug concentration [1], drug potency [1], oxidation [2], UV light exposure [3], physicochemical factors (drug molecule weight, lipophilicity, pH, size) [4], and the interaction and compatibility with other ingredients (i.e., combination products containing tretinoin and benzoyl peroxide) [5]. Encapsulating these ingredients in silica can improve their stability and control their release onto and into the skin [6, 7].
Since its introduction in the 1940s, microencapsulation has received widespread attention because of its diverse capabilities. Microencapsulation is the process of entrapping a microsized active ingredient particle (core material) within a shell (shell/wall material) [8]. Microencapsulation technologies are commonly used to provide cosmetically elegant [9] and nontoxic methods to protect, direct, and control the release of active ingredients [10], leading to improved stability, efficacy, and patient adherence [11]. Microencapsulation can also enhance the sensory properties of cosmetics, giving the product a more elegant look and feel [12]. In addition to protecting and stabilizing bioactive compounds [13], microencapsulation allows manufacturers to minimize medication doses while maintaining efficacy and reducing adverse effects [14].
The two most common microencapsulation techniques are chemical and physical, which can be further categorized into physicochemical and physicomechanical subtypes [15]. Silica-based microcapsules can be formed using the sol–gel process. In this process, amorphous silica is formed by interconnecting colloidal particles (the “sol”) under increasing viscosity until a rigid network, the silica shell (the “gel”), is formed [5]. Tetraalkoxysilanes undergo hydrolysis and polycondensation reactions to form amorphous silica [16]. This method results in sol–gel microcapsules with several valuable properties. The microcapsules range from 0.01 to 100 µm [17]. The solid form of the active ingredient [e.g., benzoyl peroxide (BPO) or tretinoin (all-trans retinoic acid)] functions as the core during the sol–gel reaction, and a silica shell forms around it [18].
Amorphous silica is listed in the inactive ingredient guide of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [17]. Excipients or inactive ingredients are a crucial component of drug formulations that are added intentionally to aid in the manufacturing process or to enhance the performance, stability, bioavailability, or acceptability of the topical drug product [19]. These substances are generally inert or nonreactive and include emollients, emulsifiers, gelling agents, surfactants, preservatives, buffering agents, or solvents [20, 21]. Excipients are considered safe and typically do not directly interfere with the therapeutic action of the drug [19, 22]. The use of excipients is essential in the formulation and delivery of pharmaceutical products, as they can impact the pharmacologic properties of the drug [22], as well as its appearance, color, odor, sensory properties, and shelf-life stability [23]. In this case, amorphous silica has no direct effect on the treatment of disease and exerts no effect on any structure or function of the human body [24]. In addition, silica is compatible with various active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), making it particularly useful in drug development [17].
Sol–gel microencapsulation has been successfully adapted to produce microencapsulated BPO and tretinoin. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and cryo-SEM images of sol–gel encapsulated all-trans-retinoic acid (E-ATRA) microcapsules indicate particle diameters ranging from 5 to 30 µm and a shell thickness of < 100 nm (Fig. 1) [25]. SEM images of sol–gel encapsulated benzoyl peroxide (E-BPO) microcapsules show particle sizes of < 30 µm, with the majority smaller than 10 µm. Shell thicknesses of the microcapsules in cryo-SEM images range from 250 to 750 nm [26]. These active ingredients are released from their microcapsules over time.
Applications of silicon and its derivatives
Silicon (Si) is the second most copious element on earth after oxygen [27]. It is a metalloid signifying that it has both metal and nonmetal properties [28]. Si rarely occurs in its pure form and is mainly combined with oxygen (O), halogens, aluminum-forming crystalline silica (SiO2, quartz), amorphous silica (opal), and silicates (talc, asbestos, and mica) [29]. Silica, also known as silicon dioxide, is a silicic acid anhydride of monomeric orthosilicic acid (H4SiO4) [28]. The silicic acid group, comprised of silicon, hydrogen, and oxygen, is a group of chemical compounds with the common formula [SiOx(OH)4−2x]n [30]. Metasilicic acid, orthosilicic acid, disilicic acid, trisilicic acid, and the hydrated equivalent, pyrosilicic acid, are a few simple forms identified in very dilute aqueous solutions [30]. These forms become unstable in the solid state and polymerize to form complex silicic acids [30].
Structural forms of the various silicic acids and silicone are shown in Fig. 2. Among these forms, orthosilicic acid is the most fundamental chemical form of water-soluble Si [29] and is also the natural form of Si in humans and animals [27, 29]. In the form of orthosilicic acid, Si is the third most abundant trace element in the human body [27]. Si also activates hydroxylation enzymes, enhancing skin strength and suppleness [31], and is present in 1–10 parts per million (ppm) in hair, hair epicuticle, nails, and cornified epidermis [27].
Crystalline and amorphous silica have different forms, or polymorphs, each with unique surface chemical properties. Crystalline silica is highly abrasive and used in grinding, sandblasting, and masonry projects [32]. In contrast, hydrated silica is only mildly abrasive, commonly used in toothpaste [33], and can quickly form gels that can be used in liquid foundation products [34]. Both crystalline and amorphous silica are forms of silicon dioxide which in turn is a silicic acid anhydride of monomeric orthosilicic acid.
The most common form of silica used in cosmetics and skin care products is amorphous silica [35], categorized as either natural amorphous silica or synthetic amorphous silica (SAS) [36]. Natural amorphous silica forms typically contain crystalline silica, while synthetic amorphous silica is free of crystalline silica contamination [37]. There are several forms of SAS, 2 of which include nonporous silica nanoparticles and mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) [36]. Nonporous silica nanoparticles have no particular shape or structure and have several applications due to their excellent biocompatibility. They are used in drug delivery, imaging, and enzyme encapsulation [38]. The reflective properties of synthetic amorphous silica nanoparticles (SASNs) make them excellent candidates for cosmetics and sunscreens [34, 39]. MSNs, on the other hand, have a specific structure and large surface area. Due to their well-regulated porosity and high thermal stability, MSNs are widely used in catalysis, bioimaging, and drug delivery [38]. The different silica forms can best be distinguished based on their size (Table 1) [36].
Amorphous silica is an inorganic inert excipient, and the FDA currently recognizes the use of silica in the food industry as an anticaking agent [40]. According to the recent Code of Federal Regulations 21, amorphous silica is generally recognized as a safe (GRAS) ingredient in human drugs and feeds [41, 42]. The addition of amorphous silica to topical formulations may be beneficial in reducing harmful skin effects, such as irritation and rashes caused by strong active ingredients [17]. Therefore, SAS is safe when used topically, but not all forms of silica are the same, and that there are several health risks associated with crystalline silica.
Finally, silicones, not to be confused with silica, are synthetic polymers made up of repeating units of siloxane [43], elemental Si, and O combined with other elements (typically carbon [C] and hydrogen [H]) with the molecular formula of [R2SiO]n (R = CH3, C2H5, or C6H5). Silicones have different functional uses than silica and are commonly used as gels or sheeting to treat and minimize scars resulting from surgery, burns, and other skin injuries [44, 45].
Uses of silica microencapsulation in topicals and sunscreens
In the current FDA inactive ingredient database (IID), which was last updated on January 2023, the maximum potency per unit dose limit for silicon dioxide used in topical creams is 3.4% w/w, and it is 0.25% w/w for topical gels [46]. Product tolerability may be improved by using sol–gel microencapsulation to coat the surface of drugs or active ingredients with a high irritation potential by reducing the contact with biological components and membranes in human skin. The FDA recently approved two new first-line topical therapies: a 5.0% microencapsulated benzoyl peroxide (E-BPO) for treating papulopustular rosacea and a fixed-dose combination of microencapsulated 3.0% BPO and 0.1% tretinoin (E-BPO/T) to treat acne [47, 48]. Despite its therapeutic properties, the use of BPO has traditionally been avoided in patients with rosacea due to the high irritation rates. E-BPO is a proprietary vehicle technology to create silica-encapsulated BPO using the sol–gel microencapsulation technique. This encapsulation forms a barrier between the drug and the skin, resulting in a gradual release and absorption of BPO, allowing for efficacy in rosacea treatment while reducing tolerability issues and adverse events [47]. The microencapsulation technology in E-BPO/T enables combining BPO and tretinoin into one product. The silica microcapsules segregate and envelop each of the active ingredients, protecting tretinoin from the oxidizing effects of BPO and releasing each active ingredient separately and gradually onto the skin [48]. Sol–gel topical products contain silica particles that are larger than typical SAS nanoparticles. The processes for encapsulating BPO and tretinoin have been described previously [5]. There is one sunscreen product that uses an advanced microencapsulation technology in which the sol–gel silica coating enhances avobenzone photostability [49]. The sol–gel-treated UV filters remain on the skin surface, and the coating provides soothing skin protection. Silica encapsulation prevents the UV filter from contacting the skin surface and, subsequently, reduces avobenzone cutaneous uptake and hypersensitivity potential [49].
Other topical applications for microencapsulation
The sol–gel technique is also used to synthesize wound-healing products [50]. Chitosan–silica (CTS–Si) materials produced through the sol–gel process have distinctive characteristics and can function as wound-dressing agents to speed up wound healing [50]. Because of their many beneficial properties, MSNs have a broad spectrum of practical features, including combating bacterial infections [51], however commercialization may be challenging. A gentamicin-loaded MSN construct with bacterial toxin-receptive lipid bilayer surface shells protecting the bacteria-targeting peptide, UBI29–41, effectively targeted Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) in vitro and in vivo and hindered S. aureus growth in mouse models [52]. Also, hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles (HMSNs) and nonporous MSNs are used to treat skin disorders [53]. An MSN assembly containing a small interfering RNA (siRNA) formulation can treat skin squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) [54]. The effectiveness of an MSN–siRNA formulation was investigated by administering siRNA topically to target the SCC transforming growth factor-beta receptor type 1 (TGFβR-1) gene in a mouse model. The results show that MSNPs comprising TGFβR-1 siRNA suppressed TGFβR-1 by twofolds compared with controls [54]. Further research is needed to test their efficacy and safety in humans.
Silica uses in the functional design of a controlled drug delivery system
Due to their ordered mesoporous structure, functional moieties can be appended to the surface of MSNs, regulating the delivery of bioactive agents in response to different stimuli, including light, temperature, pH, electric fields, and chemicals [55]. In one study, hollow silica particles were mixed with microgels to generate novel organic/inorganic systems called thermoresponsive hollow silica microgels (THSMGs) [56]. These showed sensitivity to stimuli and might function as sustained drug delivery agents [56]. Microparticles are a unique category of drug delivery systems in which the microencapsulation technique enhances the photostability of drugs that undergo photodegradation [57]. Microencapsulation increased pantoprazole’s photostability, making the drug acid resistant and extended its release for 9 h, making it more patient compatible.
Use of silica microencapsulation in oral medications
Oral drug delivery systems (ODDS) use silica-based materials due to their porous nature, minimal toxicity, and solubility in biological fluids [58]. The primary advantage of using silica-based drug materials in oral medications is when silica undergoes enzymatic breakdown, and the byproduct orthosilicic acid is formed, and it is then excreted by the kidneys into the urine and thought to be harmless [58, 59]. The four types of silica-based materials used in oral delivery systems are (a) nonporous silica nanoparticles (fumed or Stöber nanoparticles), (b) mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs), (c) mesoporous silica-based materials, and (d) biosilica [58]. A combination of 2 MSNs, mobile composition of factor no. 41 (MCM 41) and MCM 48 were used to encapsulate aprepitant [60]. Aprepitant is an oral capsule used to prevent chemotherapy-induced and postsurgical nausea and vomiting [60]. Due to its low solubility and absorptivity, it must be administered at high doses. Microencapsulation with MCM 41 and 48 may help increase the solubility and availability of the medication at lower doses [60].
Additional and future silica uses
Silica has many medical applications beyond the skin. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents take advantage of MSNs' biosensing abilities. A gadolinium (Gd), Gd3+ incorporated MSN (Gd2O3@MSN) had desirable MRI contrast-augmentation properties, making it suitable for developing more precise and possibly even more focused contrast agents for molecular MRI [61]. It could also provide a real-time response for treatment results, perhaps improving the clinical value of MRI. In addition, the MSN structure comprises silica and Si–OH groups wherein the Si–O–Si systems are relatively stable, and silica breakdown is difficult under physiological conditions. These particles likely enable good loading of Gd2O3 but prevent the release of free Gd3+, lowering its toxic effects [61]. Another use of amorphous silica is as an ODDS based on encapsulated ciprofloxacin used to target a Salmonella intracellular infection [62]. The beneficial properties of silica-based nanoparticles make them promising candidates for the percutaneous delivery of anticancer drugs. A dabrafenib and trametinib drug combination was encapsulated in organosilica nanoparticles to treat mutant melanoma [63]. MSNs may be potential drug delivery agents for treating malignant nervous system tumors and Alzheimer's. Dementia associated with Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease was treated using MSNs loaded with rivastigmine hydrogen tartrate [64]. Mo et al. demonstrated that tailored MSNs carrying anticancer drugs could circumvent the blood–brain barrier (BBB) in treating glioblastoma [65]. Another application of MSNs is in microneedle-mediated intradermal vaccination, wherein a microneedle array coated with a lipid–MSN nano construct served as an intradermal transport system for encapsulated protein antigens [66]. Silica nanoparticles can also simulate pathogen spread by contact transmission. A pilot study was performed in which silica nanoparticles in encapsulated DNA (SPED) served as a surrogate tracer to study microbial spread [67]. The pilot study results show that SPED could be a valuable and safe tool for studying pathogen propagation [67].
Conclusion
The versatile use of amorphous silica as an excipient in healthcare and medicine has demonstrated remarkable potential in the field of drug discovery. This review has shed light on the various forms of silica and the benefits of silica microencapsulation. The use of sol–gel microencapsulation technology has enabled the development of innovative dermatological products, offering new treatments for patients suffering from conditions such as rosacea and acne. The creation of a protective silica shell between the medication and the skin has resulted in a more controlled delivery, increasing the efficiency of treatments while minimizing the adverse side effects. The continuing advancements in microencapsulation techniques have opened up new possibilities for the future of drug delivery and offer exciting opportunities for the development of novel medical treatment applications. In summary, the potential for amorphous silica and sol–gel microencapsulation technology in healthcare is enormous and requires continued research and development to explore its full capabilities.
References
Trottet L, Maibach H (2017). Key factors affecting the efficacy of a topical drug candidate: learnings from past topical drug development. In: Dermal drug selection and development. Springer, Cham, pp 29–38
Casanova F, Santos L (2016) Encapsulation of cosmetic active ingredients for topical application––a review. J Microencapsul 33(1):1–17
Ruszkiewicz JA, Pinkas A, Ferrer B et al (2017) Neurotoxic effect of active ingredients in sunscreen products, a contemporary review. Toxicol Rep 4:245–259
Law RM, Ngo MA, Maibach HI (2020) Twenty clinically pertinent factors/observations for percutaneous absorption in humans. Am J Clin Dermatol 21(1):85–95
Erlich M, Arie T, Koifman N, Talmon Y (2020) Structure elucidation of silica-based core-shell microencapsulated drugs for topical applications by cryogenic scanning electron microscopy. J Colloid Interface Sci 579:778–785
Ashraf MA, Khan AM, Ahmad M, Sarfraz M (2015) Effectiveness of silica based sol-gel microencapsulation method for odorants and flavors leading to sustainable environment. Front Chem 3:42
Ciriminna R, Sciortino M, Alonzo G, Schrijver A, Pagliaro M (2011) From molecules to systems: sol-gel microencapsulation in silica-based materials. Chem Rev 111(2):765–789
Ghosh SK (2006) Functional coatings and microencapsulation: a general perspective. In: Functional coatings, pp 1–28
Lidert Z (2005) 8—Microencapsulation: an overview of the technology landscape. In: Rosen MR (ed) Delivery system handbook for personal care and cosmetic products. William Andrew Publishing, Norwich, pp 181–190
Elder T, Bell A (2005) Phase-change materials: a novel microencapsulation technique for personal care. In: Rosen MR (ed) Delivery system handbook for personal acre and cosmetic products. William Andrew Publishing, Norwich, pp 259–272
Kvitnitsky E, Lerner N, Shapiro YE (2005) Tagravit™ microcapsules as controlled drug delivery devices and their formulations. In: Rosen MR (ed) Delivery system handbook for personal care and cosmetic products. William Andrew Publishing, Norwich, pp 215–258
van Soest JJG (2007) Encapsulation of fragrances and flavours: a way to control odour and aroma in consumer products. In: Berger RG (ed) Flavours and fragrances: chemistry, bioprocessing and sustainability. Springer, Berlin, pp 439–455
Maresca D, De Prisco A, La Storia A et al (2016) Microencapsulation of nisin in alginate beads by vibrating technology: preliminary investigation. LWT Food Sci Technol 66:436–443
Morais EC, Correa GG, Brambilla R et al (2013) The interaction of encapsulated pharmaceutical drugs with a silica matrix. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 103:422–429
Bastos F, Santos L (2015) Encapsulation of cosmetic active ingredients for topical application—a review. J Microencapsul 33:1–17
Schubert U (2015) Chemistry and fundamentals of the sol–gel process. In: Levy D, Zayat M (eds) The sol-gel handbook, 1st edn. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 1–28
Fireman S, Toledano O, Neimann K, Loboda N, Dayan N (2011) A look at emerging delivery systems for topical drug products. Dermatol Ther 24(5):477–488
Levy Hacham O, Toledano O (2020) Characterization of microencapsulated benzoyl peroxide (E-BPO) for the treatment of papulopustular rosacea. dd08da6e-032b-448f-85a2-cc552a22fad9 (sol-gel.com). Accessed 11 Apr 2023
Abrantes CG, Duarte D, Reis CP (2016) An overview of pharmaceutical excipients: safe or not safe? J Pharm Sci 105(7):2019–2026
United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary. <1059> EXCIPIENT PERFORMANCE (triphasepharmasolutions.com). Accessed 11 Apr 2023
Rao VA, Kim JJ, Patel DS, Rains K, Estoll CR (2020) A comprehensive scientific survey of excipients used in currently marketed, therapeutic biological drug products. Pharm Res 37(10):200
Ren X, Mao X, Si L et al (2008) Pharmaceutical excipients inhibit cytochrome P450 activity in cell free systems and after systemic administration. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 70(1):279–288
Narasimha Murthy S, Repka MA (2018) Excipient stability: a critical aspect in stability of pharmaceuticals. AAPS PharmSciTech 19(1):11
Reker D, Blum SM, Steiger C et al (2019) “Inactive” ingredients in oral medications. Sci Transl Med. 11(483):eaau6753
Data on file, Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. Number 03-10-65-122
Data on file, Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. Number 03-10-00-38
Jurkić LM, Cepanec I, Pavelić SK, Pavelić K (2013) Biological and therapeutic effects of ortho-silicic acid and some ortho-silicic acid-releasing compounds: new perspectives for therapy. Nutr Metab (Lond) 10(1):2
Martin KR (2013) Silicon: the health benefits of a metalloid. Met Ions Life Sci 13:451–473
Ferreira AO, Freire ÉS, Polonini HC et al (2018) Anti-aging effects of monomethylsilanetriol and maltodextrin-stabilized orthosilicic acid on nails, skin and hair. Cosmetics 5(3):41
Ropp RC (2013) Chapter 5-Group 14 (C, Si, Ge, Sn, and Pb) alkaline earth compounds. In: Ropp RC (ed) Encyclopedia of the alkaline earth compounds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 351–480
Araújo LA, Addor F, Campos PM (2016) Use of silicon for skin and hair care: an approach of chemical forms available and efficacy. An Bras Dermatol 91(3):331–335
United States Department of Labor (2023) Crystalline silica, overview. https://www.osha.gov/silica-crystalline. Accessed 6 Apr 2023
Sarembe S, Ufer C, Kiesow A et al (2022) Influence of the amount of toothpaste on cleaning efficacy: an in vitro study. Eur J Dent. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1747953
Nabeshi H, Yoshikawa T, Matsuyama K et al (2011) Amorphous nanosilica induce endocytosis-dependent ROS generation and DNA damage in human keratinocytes. Part Fibre Toxicol 8:1
Kusaka T, Nakayama M, Nakamura K et al (2014) Effect of silica particle size on macrophage inflammatory responses. PLoS ONE 9(3):e92634
Nafisi S, Schäfer-Korting M, Maibach HI (2015) Perspectives on percutaneous penetration: Silica nanoparticles. Nanotoxicol 9(5):643–657
Merget R, Bauer T, Küpper HU et al (2002) Health hazards due to the inhalation of amorphous silica. Arch Toxicol 75(11–12):625–634
Huang Y, Li P, Zhao R et al (2022) Silica nanoparticles: biomedical applications and toxicity. Biomed Pharmacother 151:113053
Choi JK, Park JY, Lee S et al (2022) Greater plasma protein adsorption on mesoporous silica nanoparticles aggravates atopic dermatitis. Int J Nanomed 17:4599–4617
United States Food and Drug Administration (2023) CFR—Code of Federal Regulations Title 21. Sec 172.480 silicon dioxide. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=172.480. Accessed 6 Apr 2023
United States Food and Drug Administration (2023) CFR—Code of Federal Regulations Title 21. Sec 584.700 Hydrophobic Silicas. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=584.700. Accessed 6 Apr 2023
National Archives (2023) Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21. § 172.480 silicon dioxide. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-172/subpart-E/section-172.480. Accessed 6 Apr 2023
De Paepe K, Sieg A, Le Meur M, Rogiers V (2014) Silicones as nonocclusive topical agents. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 27(3):164–171
Perkins K, Davey RB, Wallis KA (1983) Silicone gel: a new treatment for burn scars and contractures. Burns Incl Therm Inj 9(3):201–204
Bleasdale B, Finnegan S, Murray K, Kelly S, Percival SL (2015) The use of silicone adhesives for scar reduction. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 4(7):422–430
United States Food and Drug Administration (2023) Inactive ingredient search for approved drug products. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/iig/index.cfm?event=BasicSearch.page. Accessed 6 Apr 2023
Galderma Launches EPSOLAY® Cream (2022) A medical advance to treat bumps and blemishes of Rosacea. https://ir.sol-gel.com/news-releases/news-release-details/galderma-launches-epsolayr-cream-medical-advance-treat-bumps-and. Accessed 6 Apr 2023
Sol-Gel Technologies Announces the Commercial Availability of TWYNEO® 2022. https://ir.sol-gel.com/news-releases/news-release-details/sol-gel-technologies-announces-commercial-availability-twyneor. Accessed 6 Apr 2023
The Next Generation in Sun Protection. https://www.emdgroup.com/en/brands/pm/eusolex/eusolex-uv-pearls.html. Accessed 6 Apr 2023
Park JU, Jung HD, Song EH et al (2017) The accelerating effect of chitosan-silica hybrid dressing materials on the early phase of wound healing. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 105(7):1828–1839
Şen Karaman D, Pamukçu A, Karakaplan MB, Kocaoglu O, Rosenholm JM (2021) Recent advances in the use of mesoporous silica nanoparticles for the diagnosis of bacterial infections. Int J Nanomed 16:6575–6591
Yang S, Han X, Yang Y et al (2018) Bacteria-targeting nanoparticles with microenvironment-responsive antibiotic release to eliminate intracellular Staphylococcus aureus and associated infection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(17):14299–14311
Trinh HT, Mohanan S, Radhakrishnan D et al (2021) Silica-based nanomaterials as drug delivery tools for skin cancer (melanoma) treatment. Emerg Mater 4(5):1067–1092
Lio DCS, Liu C, Oo MMS et al (2019) Transdermal delivery of small interfering RNAs with topically applied mesoporous silica nanoparticles for facile skin cancer treatment. Nanoscale 11(36):17041–17051
Ugazio E, Gastaldi L, Brunella V et al (2016) Thermoresponsive mesoporous silica nanoparticles as a carrier for skin delivery of quercetin. Int J Pharm 511(1):446–454
Liu G, Zhu C, Xu J et al (2013) Thermo-responsive hollow silica microgels with controlled drug release properties. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 111:7–14
Dhurke R, Kushwaha I, Desai BG (2013) Improvement in photostability of pantoprazole sodium by microencapsulation. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol 67(1):43–52
Diab R, Canilho N, Pavel IA et al (2017) Silica-based systems for oral delivery of drugs, macromolecules and cells. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 249:346–362
Reffitt DM, Jugdaohsingh R, Thompson RP, Powell JJ (1999) Silicic acid: its gastrointestinal uptake and urinary excretion in man and effects on aluminium excretion. J Inorg Biochem 76(2):141–147
Christoforidou T, Giasafaki D, Andriotis EG et al (2021) Oral drug delivery systems based on ordered mesoporous silica nanoparticles for modulating the release of aprepitant. Int J Mol Sci 22(4):1896
Li Z, Guo J, Zhang M, Li G, Hao L (2022) Gadolinium-coated mesoporous silica nanoparticle for magnetic resonance imaging. Front Chem 10:837032
Mudakavi RJ, Raichur AM, Chakravortty D (2014) Lipid coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles as an oral delivery system for targeting and treatment of intravacuolar Salmonella infections. RSC Adv 4(105):61160–61166
Tham HP, Xu K, Lim WQ et al (2018) Microneedle-assisted topical delivery of photodynamically active mesoporous formulation for combination therapy of deep-seated melanoma. ACS Nano 12(12):11936–11948
Karimzadeh M, Rashidi L, Ganji F (2017) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for efficient rivastigmine hydrogen tartrate delivery into SY5Y cells. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 43(4):628–636
Mo J, He L, Ma B, Chen T (2016) Tailoring particle size of mesoporous silica nanosystem to antagonize glioblastoma and overcome blood–brain barrier. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(11):6811–6825
Tu J, Du G, Reza Nejadnik M et al (2017) Mesoporous silica nanoparticle-coated microneedle arrays for intradermal antigen delivery. Pharm Res 34(8):1693–1706
Scotoni M, Koch J, Julian TR et al (2020) Silica nanoparticles with encapsulated DNA (SPED)—a novel surrogate tracer for microbial transmission in healthcare. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 9(1):152
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Kalpana Shankar, Ph.D., and Alyssa Theodore, Ph.D., of Simpson Healthcare, for their assistance in medical writing and editorial support. Writing and editorial support was provided by Galderma Laboratories, L.P.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
This article was conceptualized by NDB, OT, ME, and JPY. LJG, NDB, OF, ME, AS, BCG, JPY, and JJ drafted and critically revised the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
LJG is an investigator, speaker, or consultant to: Abbvie, Alumis, Arcutis, Amgen, BMS, Cara, Dermavant, DermTech, Highlittl, Janssen, Lilly, Novan, OrthoDerm, SunPharma, Takeda, UCB, Ventyx, Verrica. NDB is an advisor, consultant, and investigator for Galderma and Sol-Gel Technologies. OT and ME are employees of Sol-Gel Technologies. AS is a speaker for Diversity in Dermatology and the American Osteopathic College of Dermatology; had employment or consultation with Amgen, Ortho Dermatologics, Galderma, Regeneron/Sanofi, BMS, Arcutis, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, CeraVe, Verrica; and had a position on advisory board or board of directors or other type of management relationships with: Amgen, Ortho Dermatologics, Galderma, Regeneron/Sanofi, BMS, Arcutis, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, CeraVe, and Verrica. BCG and JPY are employees of Galderma Laboratories. JJ is an investigator in Galderma clinical trials unrelated to the subject matter of this manuscript. She is an investigator and speaker for other companies, none of which represent a conflict of interest for this publication.
Conflict of interest
LJG is an investigator, speaker, or consultant to: Abbvie, Alumis, Arcutis, Amgen, BMS, Cara, Dermavant, DermTech, Highlittl, Janssen, Lilly, Novan, OrthoDerm, SunPharma, Takeda, UCB, Ventyx, Verrica. NDB is an advisor, consultant, and investigator for Galderma and Sol–Gel Technologies. OT and ME are employees of Sol–Gel Technologies. AS is a speaker for Diversity in Dermatology and the American Osteopathic College of Dermatology; had employment or consultation with Amgen, Ortho Dermatologics, Galderma, Regeneron/Sanofi, BMS, Arcutis, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, CeraVe, Verrica; and had a position on advisory board or board of directors or other type of management relationships with: Amgen, Ortho Dermatologics, Galderma, Regeneron/Sanofi, BMS, Arcutis, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, CeraVe, and Verrica. BCG and JPY are employees of Galderma Laboratories. JJ is an investigator in Galderma clinical trials unrelated to the subject matter of this manuscript. She is an investigator and speaker for other companies, none of which represent a conflict of interest for this publication.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Green, L.J., Bhatia, N.D., Toledano, O. et al. Silica-based microencapsulation used in topical dermatologic applications. Arch Dermatol Res 315, 2787–2793 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-023-02725-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-023-02725-z