Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Loss of correction after lateral closing wedge high tibial osteotomy – a human cadaver study

  • Current problem case
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 12 human cadaver tibiae, osteotomies were carried out at two levels (2 and 3 cm from the distal joint line) with three different wedges (5°, 10°, 15°) to evaluate the influence of displacement of the osteotomy fragments on areas of cortical contact. In undisplaced osteotomies (medical cortical edges superposed) cortical contact areas formed 28% (level 2 cm) and 40.5% (level 3 cm) of the cortical circumference of the proximal fragments (NS). Wedge angles and levels of osteotomy displayed no statistical differences. In displaced osteotomies cortical contact decreased significantly (P < 0.05). Displacing the distal fragment laterally, medial cortical contact is lost, and weight-bearing leads to revarisation as cancellous bone sustains only 3 MPa, and the measured compressive stresses at the medial edge amounted to 6 MPa on average. Displacing the distal fragment medially leads to a decrease of total cortical contact, too, but at the medial edge of the osteotomy cortical contact areas are still present. As a result of the study, postoperative weight-bearing without additional plaster cast fixation is recommended only in cases with undisplaced fragments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 29 December 1997

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Böhler, M., Fuss, F., Schachinger, W. et al. Loss of correction after lateral closing wedge high tibial osteotomy – a human cadaver study. Arch Orth Traum Surg 119, 232–235 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004020050399

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004020050399

Keywords

Navigation