Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Iatrogenic open humeral shaft fractures following functional bracing

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures tends to be successful with functional bracing. Treatment failure due to iatrogenic conversion to an open fracture has not been described in the literature. We present a case series of patients that experienced open humeral shaft fractures after initially being treated with functional bracing for closed humeral shaft fractures and describe what factors are associated with this complication.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective case series performed at three level 1 trauma centers across North America. All nonoperatively treated humeral shaft fractures were reviewed from 2001 to 2023. Patients were included if they sustained a humeral shaft fracture, > 18 years old, were initially treated non-operatively with functional bracing which subsequently converted to an open fracture. Eight patients met inclusion criteria. All included patients were eventually treated with irrigation, debridement, and open reduction and internal fixation. Outcomes assessed included mortality rate, time until the fracture converted from closed to open, need for further surgery, and bony union. Descriptive statistics were used in analysis.

Results

The eight included patients on average were 65 ± 21.4 years old and had a body mass index (BMI) of 25.6 ± 5.2. Six patients were initially injured due to a fall. Time until the fractures became open on average was 5.2 ± 3.6 weeks. Three patients (37.5%) died within 1.8 ± 0.6 years after initial injury. The average Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score was 4.5 ± 3.4. Three patients (37.5%) had dementia. Common characteristics among this cohort included a history of visual disturbances (50.0%), cerebrovascular accident (50.0%), smoking (50.0%), and alcohol abuse (50.0%).

Conclusion

Conversion from a closed to open humeral shaft fracture after functional bracing is a potentially devastating complication. Physicians should be especially cognizant of patients with a low BMI, history of falling or visual disturbance, dementia, age ≥ 65, decreased sensorimotor protection, and significant smoking or alcohol history when choosing to use functional bracing as the final treatment modality.

Level of Evidence: IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data is not available in a repository. All data used in analysis can be found in this manuscript.

References

  1. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B (2006) Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 37(8):691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ekholm R, Adami J, Tidermark J, Hansson K, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S (2006) Fractures of the shaft of the humerus: an epidemiological study of 401 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(11):1469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim SH, Szabo RM, Marder RA (2012) Epidemiology of humerus fractures in the United States: nationwide emergency department sample, 2008. Arthritis Care Res 64(3):407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Holm L (1970) 15 management of humeral shaft fractures: fundamental nonoperative technics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 71:132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarmiento A, Kinman P, Galvin E, Schmitt R, Phillips J (1977) Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59(5):596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Walker M, Palumbo B, Badman B, Brooks J, Van Gelderen J, Mighell M (2011) Humeral shaft fractures: a review. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20(5):833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarmiento A, Zagorski JB, Zych GA, Latta LL, Capps CA (2000) Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82(4):478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sarmiento A, Waddell JP, Latta LL (2002) Diaphyseal humeral fractures: treatment options. Instr Course Lect 51:257

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brien WW, Gellman H, Becker V, Garland D, Waters R, Wiss D (1990) Management of fractures of the humerus in patients who have an injury of the ipsilateral brachial plexus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(8):1208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Toivanen J, Nieminen J, Laine H-J, Honkonen S, Järvinen M (2005) Functional treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures. Int Orthop 29:10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rutgers M, Ring D (2006) Treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus using a functional brace. J Orthop Trauma 20(9):597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Serrano R, Mir HR, Sagi HC, Horwitz DS, Ketz JP, Kistler BJ, Quade JH, Beebe MJ, Au BK, Sanders RW (2020) Modern results of functional bracing of humeral shaft fractures: a multicenter retrospective analysis. J Orthop Trauma 34(4):206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rogers JF, Bennett JB, Tullos H (1984) Management of concomitant ipsilateral fractures of the humerus and forearm. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(4):552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eisenberg G, Otremski H, Segev E, Sherman H, Steinberg EL, Tordjman D, Pritsch T, Rosenblatt Y, Atlan F (2022) Re-thinking conservative treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures in elderly patients with dementia. J Orthop Trauma. 10.1097

  15. Court-Brown CM, Biant L, Clement N, Bugler K, Duckworth A, McQueen M (2015) Open fractures in the elderly. The importance of skin ageing. Injury 46(2):189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoneda PP, Biancolin SE, Gomes MSM, Miot HA (2011) Association between skin thickness and bone density in adult women. An Bras Dermatol 86:878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Neuhaus V, Menendez M, Kurylo JC, Dyer GS, Jawa A, Ring D (2014) Risk factors for fracture mobility six weeks after initiation of brace treatment of mid-diaphyseal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(5):403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ehrlich JR, Hassan SE, Stagg BC (2019) Prevalence of falls and fall-related outcomes in older adults with self‐reported vision impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 67(2):239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gillespie LD, Robertson MC, Gillespie WJ, Sherrington C, Gates S, Clemson L, Lamb SE (2012) Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (9)

Download references

Funding

No funding was provided for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors included on this manuscript have made significant contributions to this manuscript. Stephen A. Doxey contributed to conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, data curation, writing of the original draft and reviewing/editing and visualization. Megan M. Sorich contributed to conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, data curation, writing of the original draft and reviewing/editing and visualization. Sarah C. Abraham contributed to investigation, data curation, writing of the original draft and reviewing/editing the draft. Julie A. Switzer contributed to conceptualization, validation, data curation, writing of the original draft and reviewing/editing the draft. Brian P. Cunningham contributed to conceptualization, methodology, writing of the original draft and reviewing/editing, visualization, supervision and project administration. Michael D. McKee contributed to conceptualization, methodology, validation, data curation, writing of the original draft and reviewing/editing visualization, supervision and project administration. Chad M. Myeroff contributed to conceptualization, methodology, validation, data curation, writing of the original draft and reviewing/editing visualization, supervision and project administration.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian P. Cunningham.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Prior to data collection, the local institutional review board determined this study to be exempt from ethical approval.

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Cunningham’s spouse is the CEO and founder of CODE Technology. Dr. Cunningham is a member of the AAOS Health Care Systems and Patient-reported Outcome Measures Committees as well as the chair of the OTA Practice Management Committee. He is also a member of the editorial board for the Journal of Orthopaedic Business. Dr. Switzer is committee member for AAOS and AOA. She is also on the editorial board for GOS&R, and a committee member for IGFS. Dr. McKee is a paid consultant for Acumed, Bioventus, Exactech, ITS, MY01 Inc., and Stryker. He is a board member for the Canadian Orthopaedic Association, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and Orthopedics Today. Additionally, he receives royalties from Elsevier Inc, Springer, and Wolters Kluwer Health. For the remaining authors none were declared.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Doxey, S.A., Sorich, M.M., Abraham, S.C. et al. Iatrogenic open humeral shaft fractures following functional bracing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05369-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05369-4

Keywords

Navigation