Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The cementless taper wedge vs. fit-and-fill stem in primary total hip arthroplasty: risk of stem-related complication differs across Dorr types

  • Hip Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The choice between a cementless taper wedge stem and a fit-and-fill stem in total Hip arthroplasty (THA) for various proximal femoral morphological types has not been thoroughly evaluated. This study aimed to compare the risk of stem-related complications between these two stem types in Dorr type A, B, and C femurs.

Materials and Methods

From January 2015 through April 2021, we retrospectively reviewed 1995 cementless THA procedures. We stratified all procedures into three groups: Dorr type A (N = 360, 18.0%), B (N = 1489, 74.7%) and C (N = 146, 7.3%). The primary outcome domain was stem-related complications, including stem subsidence ≥ 3 mm, intraoperative fracture, periprosthetic fracture and aseptic stem loosening. We performed multivariate regression analysis to compare the risk of stem-related complication between the two stem types. Other factors included age, sex, body mass index, diagnosis, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, stem alignment and canal fill ratio.

Results

The incidence of stem-related complications in the taper wedge and fit-and-fill stem groups was 4.4% (N = 15) and 6.5% (N = 107), respectively. Fit-and-fill stems showed an increased risk of stem-related complications (aOR: 9.903, 95% CI: 1.567–62.597) only in Dorr type C femurs. No significant difference in risk was observed in Dorr type A and B femurs. Furthermore, the canal fill ratio at the lesser trochanter, 2 cm and 7 cm below the lesser trochanter, did not exhibit an association with stem-related complications in any Dorr type.

Conclusions

Concerning the risk of stem-related complications, the taper wedge stem was a better choice in Dorr type C femurs. However, there was no difference in risk between the taper wedge stem and fit-and-fill stem in Dorr type A and B femurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data of this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH (1993) Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 14(3):231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilkerson J, Fernando ND (1939) Classifications in brief: the Dorr classification of femoral bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res 478(8):2020

    Google Scholar 

  3. Khanuja HS, Vakil JJ, Goddard MS, Mont MA (2011) Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(5):500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gromov K, Bersang A, Nielsen CS, Kallemose T, Husted H, Troelsen A (2017) Risk factors for post-operative periprosthetic fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally coated double-tapered cementless femoral component. Bone Joint J 99(4):451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ishii S, Homma Y, Baba T, Ozaki Y, Matsumoto M, Kaneko K (2016) Does the canal fill ratio and femoral morphology of asian females influence early radiographic outcomes of total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented proximally coated, tapered-wedge stem? J Arthroplasty 31(7):1524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao R, Cai H, Liu Y, Tian H, Zhang K, Liu Z (2017) Risk factors for intraoperative proximal femoral fracture during primary cementless THA. Orthopedics 40(2):e281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Park CW, Eun HJ, Oh SH, Kim HJ, Lim SJ, Park YS (2019) Femoral stem survivorship in Dorr type A femurs after total hip arthroplasty using a cementless tapered wedge stem: a matched comparative study with type B femurs. J Arthroplasty 34(3):527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ikemura S, Motomura G, Hamai S, Fujii M, Kawahara S, Sato T, Hara D, Shiomoto K, Nakashima Y (2022) Tapered wedge stems decrease early postoperative subsidence following cementless total hip arthroplasty in Dorr type C femurs compared to fit-and-fill stems. J Orthop Surg Res 17(1):223

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rattanaprichavej P, Laoruengthana A, Chotanaphuti T, Khuangsirikul S, Phreethanutt C, Pongpirul K (2011) Subsidence of hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem in Dorr type C proximal femoral morphology. J Arthroplasty 34(9):2019

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim JT, Jeong HJ, Lee SJ, Kim HJ, Yoo JJ (2019) Does proximally coated single-wedge cementless stem work well in Dorr type C femurs? minimum 10-year followup. Indian J Orthop 53(1):94

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bornes TD, Radomski LR, Bonello JP, Mortensen-Truscott L, Safir OA, Gross AE, Kuzyk PRT (2023) Subsidence of a single-taper femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty: characterization, associated factors, and sequelae. J Arthroplasty 38(7S):S174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsai SW, Chen CF, Wu PK, Chen TH, Liu CL, Chen WM (2015) Modified anterolateral approach in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 25(3):245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Najjim M, Khattak U, Sim J, Chambers I (2016) Differences in subsidence rate between alternative designs of a commonly used uncemented femoral stem. J Orthop 13(4):322

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Albers A, Aoude AA, Zukor DJ, Huk OL, Antoniou J, Tanzer M (2016) Favorable results of a short, tapered, highly porous, proximally coated cementless femoral stem at a minimum 4-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 31(4):824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim YH, Kim JS, Joo JH, Park JW (2012) A prospective short-term outcome study of a short metaphyseal fitting total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27(1):88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhen P, Chang Y, Yue H, Chen H, Zhou S, Liu J, He X (2021) Primary total hip arthroplasty using a short bone-conserving stem in young adult osteoporotic patients with Dorr type C femoral bone. J Orthop Surg Res 16(1):17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dalury DF, Kelley TC, Adams MJ (2012) Modern proximally tapered uncemented stems can be safely used in Dorr type C femoral bone. J Arthroplasty 27(6):1014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhen P, Liu J, Li X, Lu H, Zhou S (2019) Primary total hip arthroplasty using an uncemented Wagner SL stem in elderly patients with Dorr type C femoral bone. J Orthop Surg Res 14(1):377

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma HH, Chou TA, Tsai SW, Chen CF, Wu PK, Chen WM (2021) Uncemented femoral stem design might have an impact on postoperative periprosthetic femur fracture pattern: a comparison between flat-wedge and dual-wedge stems. Injury 52(11):3461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li M, Zeng Y, Wu Y, Liu Y, Wu L, Shen B (2022) Cementless femoral stems with lower canal fill ratio have similar mid-term to long-term outcomes to those with adequate fill ratio in Dorr type C femurs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142(6):1265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Delsmann MM, Strahl A, Muhlenfeld M, Jandl NM, Beil FT, Ries C, Rolvien T (2021) High prevalence and undertreatment of osteoporosis in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Osteoporos Int 32(8):1661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bottai V, Dell’Osso G, Celli F, Bugelli G, Cazzella N, Cei E, Guido G, Giannotti S (2015) Total hip replacement in osteoarthritis: the role of bone metabolism and its complications. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 12(3):247

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lindberg-Larsen M, Jorgensen CC, Solgaard S, Kjersgaard AG, Kehlet H, Lunbeck H, Knee R (2017) Increased risk of intraoperative and early postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture with uncemented stems. Acta Orthop 88(4):390

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu B, Ma W, Li H, Wu T, Huo J, Han Y (2019) Incidence, classification, and risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with a single stem: a retrospective study. J Arthroplasty 34(7):1400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maier GS, Kolbow K, Lazovic D, Maus U (2016) The importance of bone mineral density in hip arthroplasty: results of a survey asking orthopaedic surgeons about their opinions and attitudes concerning osteoporosis and hip arthroplasty. Adv Orthop 2016:8079354

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wagner ER, Kamath AF, Fruth KM, Harmsen WS, Berry DJ (2016) Effect of body mass index on complications and reoperations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98(3):169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Onggo JR, Onggo JD, de Steiger R, Hau R (2020) Greater risks of complications, infections, and revisions in the obese versus non-obese total hip arthroplasty population of 2,190,824 patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 28(1):31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jeschke E, Citak M, Gunster C, Halder AM, Heller KD, Malzahn J, Niethard FU, Schrader P, Zacher J, Gehrke T (2018) Obesity increases the risk of postoperative complications and revision rates following primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 131,576 total hip arthroplasty cases. J Arthroplasty 33(7):2287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Migliorini F, Maffulli N, Pilone M, Velaj E, Hofmann UK, Bell A (2024) Demographic characteristics influencing the stem subsidence in total hip arthroplasty: an imaging study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 144(2):887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stihsen C, Radl R, Keshmiri A, Rehak P, Windhager R (2012) Subsidence of a cementless femoral component influenced by body weight and body mass index. Int Orthop 36(5):941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shang-Wen Tsai.

Ethics declarations

Ethical standards

The ethics committee and institutional review board of Taipei Veterans General Hospital approved this study (2023–011-001BC). The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, KH., Hung, YT., Chang, CY. et al. The cementless taper wedge vs. fit-and-fill stem in primary total hip arthroplasty: risk of stem-related complication differs across Dorr types. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05361-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05361-y

Keywords

Navigation