Skip to main content

Flexor tenodesis procedure in the treatment of lesser toe deformities

A Correction to this article was published on 14 July 2021

This article has been updated


In this technical report study, we describe the use of a flexor tenodesis procedure in the treatment of lesser toe deformities (LTD). Using a specific implant, both the flexor digitorum longus and brevis tendons are attached to the plantar aspect of the proximal phalanx, allowing dynamic correction of flexible deformities of metatarsophalangeal and interphalangeal joints. Good clinical results and absence of complications were observed in a series of 3 patients, with considerable correction of the LTD, and absence of substantial residual floating toe or metatarsophalangeal joint stiffness.

Level of evidence

V – Technical Report/Case Report/Expert Opinion.


Lesser toe deformities (LTD) and metatarsalgia are prevalent and challenging conditions that affect up to 60% of the adult population [1,2,3,4]. Associated pain and footwear-related problems frequently lead symptomatic patients to seek medical attention [5]. Many non-surgical options such as footwear modification, taping and bracing have been proposed. However, operative treatment is frequently needed particularly in the rigid deformities due to the progressive nature of the problem, footwear restrictions, development of callosities/sores/ulcerations in prominent areas of the toes, and incapacitating symptoms [6,7,8,9,10].

Several surgical techniques and surgical treatment algorithms have been proposed in the literature to address LTD, usually based on the type (hammer toe, claw toe, mallet toe), severity and stiffness of the deformities [9, 11,12,13]. Techniques can be broadly divided into soft-tissue release/rebalancing, osteotomies and arthrodesis, or a combination of them [9]. Most of the techniques carry a considerable rate of complications with only fair to good clinical results, and there are some risk factors for worse outcomes reported in the literature [14,15,16]. Distal lesser metatarsal shortening osteotomies (DMSO) are probably the most frequently performed procedure when the metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) is involved in the deformity, usually with increased dorsiflexion. The Weil osteotomy is perhaps the standard DMSO technique and consists of an intra-articular oblique osteotomy aligned parallel to the floor [17]. The reported complications of DMSO include recurrence of the sagittal plane component of the deformity, with floating toes presenting in up to 68% of the cases [18, 19], as well as frequent and considerable MTPJ stiffness. The intraarticular or intracapsular characteristic of these osteotomies, associated with the need for extensive dorsal soft tissue dissection, is deemed to be partially responsible for the prevalence of these complications [19]. Modifications of the technique such as the Maceira modification, an extra-articular MSO, and the percutaneous DMSO, popularized as the distal mini-invasive metatarsal osteotomy (DMMO), have also been proposed aiming to mitigate associated complications reported with the index procedure [20, 21].

Soft tissue procedures such as capsular and plantar plate repair/imbrication as well as tendon balancing techniques have also been utilized with the aim of minimizing some of these complications [22,23,24,25,26]. Flexor to extensor tendon transfers are frequently used soft tissue techniques that take the advantage of using a flexor digitorum longus (FDL) tenodesis into the base of the proximal phalanx, benefiting from the resultant dynamic effect of pulling the proximal phalanx plantarly, maintaining the toe in contact with the floor and avoiding the FDL deforming force on the distal phalanx [27, 28]. Even though the reported clinical outcomes of this procedure for the treatment of flexible LTD are good, reported complications are similar to the other techniques, with the stiffness of the toe and MTPJ being frequent [29, 30]. These complications are possibly explained by the relatively extensive plantar and dorsal dissection needed, as well as by the frequently performed temporary adjunctive K-wire fixation of the toe and MTPJ [31,32,33]. The use of provisional K-wire fixation to maintain the straight toe and the MTPJ in relative plantarflexion during the healing process, usually for 3–6 weeks, has been associated with morbidity and several complications including toe vascular insufficiency, wire loosening/bending/breakage, impaired toe perfusion, or pin tract infection [31,32,33]. New minimally invasive techniques have been gaining popularity, with the objective of minimizing surgical dissection and avoiding the need for K-wire fixation [34].

The aim of this study is to describe an alternative surgical technique of a minimally invasive flexor tenodesis procedure to correct LTD, particularly its MTPJ component, and fixation with a relatively new implant, as well as to report our early experience and clinical results in a small cohort of patients with LTD that were treated with this technique.


Design and Sample

This is an IRB-approved technical-tip and retrospective case report study. All patients that underwent flexor tenodesis as part of surgical treatment of LTD from January 2020 to December 2020 using the specific surgical technique and implant were included (three patients, three feet, 2 left and 1 right). All patients had failed at least 6 months of non-operative treatment. Procedures were performed by a single fellowship-trained orthopedic foot and ankle surgeon with over 10 years of experience.

Surgical Technique Flexor Tenodesis

The patients underwent general anesthesia and a peripheral popliteal block procedure. They were positioned supine on the operating table. Appropriate preparation and draping were performed. A 5 mm midline dorsal longitudinal approach was performed at the level of the proximal third of the proximal phalanx of the second toe. Blunt dissection was caried down to bone, retracting the extensor tendons laterally/medially. Under fluoroscopic guidance, a 0.9 mm guidewire was introduced from dorsal to plantar at the central aspect of the proximal metaphyseal area of the proximal phalanx of the second toe. A second guidewire can be utilized using the first one as a reference if the surgeon is not happy with the positioning (Fig. 1a, b and c). The sagittal plane positioning of the guidewire is such that the wire is perpendicular to the plantar surface of the proximal phalanx (Fig. 1d and e). A plantar longitudinal incision of 3 cm is then performed at the plantar exit point of the guidewire. Blunt dissection is performed through the subcutaneous tissue down to the level of the flexor tendons sheath. The sheath is sharply incised longitudinally exposing the flexor tendons. The guidewire is retracted dorsally and then pushed forward again under direct visualization of the flexor tendons, making sure that the trajectory of the wire is in between the two slips of the flexor digitorum longus tendon (Fig. 1f).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flexor Tenodesis Surgical Technique for the 2nd Toe. a Under fluoroscopic guidance, a K-wire is used to find the level of the base of the proximal phalanx so the dorsal small direct approach can be performed. Ideally, the K-wire should be positioned in the central aspect of metaphyseal area of the proximal phalanx. b-c A second K-wire can be inserted also under fluoroscopic guidance, using the first one as a landmark for ideal positioning. d On the lateral fluoroscopic view, the ideal positioning is so the K-wire should be perpendicular to the plantar aspect of the proximal phalanx. e Since during the first attempt the K-wire was aimed to proximally, it was repositioned and is now more perpendicular to the plantar surface of the proximal phalanx. f Once ideal K-wire positioning is achieved on anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopic views, the wire is advanced plantarly through the skin, and a plantar longitudinal approach is developed to expose the K-wire, opening the flexor tendon sheath and making sure the wire is positioned in between the two slips of the flexor digitorum longus tendon (FDL). g The manual reamer/drill bit is inserted over the guidewire from plantar to dorsal first, while an assistant retracts the flexor tendons. h The male implant is inserted from plantar to dorsal using the appropriate introducer. Under direct visualization, the spikes of the implant should be grasping both slips of the FDL and Flexor Digitorum Brevis Tendon. i The female component of the implant is inserted from dorsal to plantar through the tip of the introducer. j While keeping the interphalangeal joints in full extension, and the metatarsophalangeal joint in plantarflexion, the female component of the implant is tightened dorsally into the male implant

A manual 2.8 mm reamer is then used from plantar to dorsal over the guidewire to create a tunnel in the proximal phalanx while protecting the flexor tendons (Fig. 1g). The same reamer is then utilized to ream the same tunnel from dorsal to plantar, removing some possible extra bone on the dorsal aspect of the phalanx. Manual correction of the toe deformity is performed with the help of an assistant. The interphalangeal joints are supposed to be positioned in maximal dorsiflexion aiming to provide tensioning of the FDL and FDB tendons of the second toe, maximizing the dynamic effect of the correction. A 0.045 K-wire can be provisionally introduced from distal to proximal into the second toe, crossing the IP joints, maintaining the reduction and facilitating the introduction of the implant. This provisional fixation can be removed at the end of the procedure. The MTPJ should be manually reduced in the desired position, usually with slight plantarflexion. From the plantar approach, and under direct visualization of both slips of the FDL and FDB, a male track implant that contains a row of spikes to grab the tendons and push them towards the plantar aspect of the proximal phalanx is then inserted using the inserter for the male tack (Fig. 1h), grasping both slips of the FDL and the FDB. While keeping the reduction, the size of the female sleeve implant is measured from the dorsal approach and then the appropriately sized female implant is inserted dorsally and screwed into the male implant using the proper screwdriver (Fig. 1i and j), compressing the tendons and the spikes of the male implant into the plantar aspect of the base of the proximal phalanx.

Before inserting the female implant, additional axial tensioning of the tendons pulling them distally can be performed by an assistant using a hemostat to optimize correction. The medial and lateral slips of the FDL can also be pulled asymmetrically for correction of eventual axial plane deformities of the toe, for example applying more tension into the lateral slip of the tendons to correct a medial deviation of the lesser toe, and the medial slip for correction of a lateral deviation.

The amount of correction is checked clinically. If the desired correction was not achieved, the implants can be easily removed and the fixation procedure can be restarted, making sure that the IP joints are in full extension, that both slips of the FDL and FDB are grasped by the implant and that adequate tensioning of the flexor tendons and positioning of the MTPJ are secured. The ideal correction and tensioning of the flexor tendons are depicted in Fig. 2. Once the desired correction is achieved, copious irrigation is performed, and the wounds are closed with preferred sutures. Protection of the correction with a slightly compressive “sandwich-like” soft dressing is paramount, maintaining the correction of the MTPJ deformity by keeping it in plantarflexion (Fig. 3). The patient is placed in a flat post-operative shoe that has a stiffened sole. Heel weight-bearing is allowed during the first two weeks. After 2 weeks if wounds are healed, stitches are removed, and the patient can weight bear as tolerated in the post-operative shoe for an additional 3–4 weeks. After that time, patients can transition into regular shoes. Range of motion (ROM) exercises of the operated toe can be started after 2 weeks, with a passive and active plantarflexion and dorsiflexion of the MTPJ. ROM exercises are imperative for minimizing scar tissue formation, floating toe deformity and stiffness of the MTPJ. Formal physical therapy can be utilized as needed, focusing on neutral to the plantar range of motion and intrinsic muscle strengthening, and can be initiated as early as two weeks postoperatively. As in any other tendon transfer/tenodesis procedure, the dynamic component of the procedure is important for maintaining/improving correction. When patients fire their FDL/FDB tendons, a dynamic plantarflexion pull of the tenodesis at the plantar aspect base of the proximal phalanx will bring the toe down, maintaining correction and reducing the chances of development of dorsiflexion contracture and floating toe deformity.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Representative drawing of flexor tendons (Flexor Digitorum Longus, FDL, and Flexor Digitorum Brevis, FDB, Tendons) after flexor tenodesis to the plantar aspect of the proximal phalanx is finalized. With provisional K-wire fixation retaining the interphalangeal joints in extension, tenodesis implant was inserted in the proximal phalanx, maintaining the distal aspects of FDL and FDB relaxed, and the proximal aspect of the same tendons under tension, pulling the proximal phalanx plantarly

Fig. 3
figure 3

Dorsal (a) and distal (b) clinical views of an example of compressive “sandwich-like” soft dressing maintaining the relative positioning of the lesser toes, and the strapping of the 2nd toe with plantarflexion of the metatarsophalangeal joint

In cases where additional procedures are required, the osteotomies of the first toe/medial column procedures, lesser metatarsal shortening osteotomies, as well as the eventual PIP fusion/resection arthroplasty procedures should be performed before the final tensioning and fixation of the less toe tenodesis procedure takes place. This is due to the fact that LTD are usually complex deformities and are commonly rigid at the PIP joint or associated with hallux valgus deformity and/or central metatarsalgia, all of which demand surgical correction. Even though here we described the tenodesis procedure for the second toe, the same procedure can likewise be performed to correct deformities of the third and fourth toes.


Patients were assessed for complications, deformity correction, MTPJ ROM, and function through Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Foot Function Index (FFI-R), European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) and pain via Pain Catastrophic Scale (PCS).


Three patients (3 feet: 1 right, 2 left) were operated between January 2020 and January 2021, 2 females and 1 male, with a mean BMI of 29.58 (min 25.22; max 34.58). The mean follow-up was 6.3 months (min 5; max 8).

Case 1

Fifty-eight-year-old female patient with history of progressive and symptomatic deformity of the second toe. Symptoms were getting worse for the last one year. She had no history of symptoms or deformity in the first toe. She had tried conservative treatment for more than one year with taping, toe sleeves and footwear modification, that were all not enough anymore to control her symptoms. On preoperative physical exam the patient was found to have no hallux valgus deformity, but a moderate first ray instability with a neutral hindfoot alignment. Her LTD consisted of dynamic flexible dorsiflexion deformity of the 2nd MTPJ, and a rigid plantarflexion contracture of the PIPJ. She also had tenderness and thin callosities under the heads of the 2nd and 3rd metatarsals and over the PIPJ of the second toe. Patient underwent DMMO of the second and third metatarsals, PIPJ fusion of the 2nd toe, plantarflexion osteotomy of the medial cuneiform with a 6 mm allograft wedge and tenodesis of the flexor tendons to the plantar aspect of the proximal phalanx of the second toe using the TenoTac™ implant (Paragon 28®, Denver, CO, US).

Preoperative and postoperative weight bearing computed tomography (WBCT) images (3-months) and conventional radiographic (6-months) are presented in Figs. 4, 5, 6 and 7. Osteotomies and PIPJ fusion were completely healed after 3 months, with considerable clinical correction of the 2nd toe deformity and resolution of the central metatarsalgia and 2nd toe dorsal symptoms. Clinical correction was even better after 6 months (Fig. 8). Patient ROM of the 2nd MTPJ was almost completely restored, with a total passive dorsiflexion of 60°-70°. She developed no floating toe or dorsiflexion contracture and was extremely satisfied with the procedure. The total clinical follow-up time was 8 months. Patient demonstrated improved clinical outcomes in functional and pain domains, such as PROMIS Physical (29.6 to 44.9), EFAS scale (8 to 13), EFAS Sport Scale (1 to 16), FFI-R (37.5 to 27.2) and PCS (12 to 0).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Tree-dimensional surface soft tissue anatomy weight bearing CT reconstruction views of patient’s foot, demonstrating preoperative lesser 2nd toe deformity, and considerable correction 3-months postoperatively

Fig. 5
figure 5

Conventional weight bearing radiographic anteroposterior and lateral views of patient’s foot, demonstrating preoperative lesser 2nd toe deformity with subluxated 2nd metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ), and postoperative improved alignment after 6 weeks

Fig. 6
figure 6

Preoperative and 3-months postoperative wide sagittal weight bearing CT images of patient’s foot 1st and 2nd rays demonstrating preoperative mild collapse of the medial column (Left) as well as lesser 2nd toe deformity and dorsal subluxation of 2nd metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) (Right). Considerable correction of the medial column (Left) and the 2nd toe deformity and MTPJ reduction is postoperatively (Right)

Fig. 7
figure 7

Tree-dimensional surface bone anatomy weight bearing CT reconstruction views of patient’s foot, demonstrating preoperative lesser 2nd toe deformity, and considerable correction 3-months postoperatively

Fig. 8
figure 8

Bilateral forefoot clinical appearance of patient’s toes 6-months postoperatively, demonstrating considerable progressive improvement of the 2nd lesser toe deformity in the left foot, with no signs of the residual floating toe when compared to the right foot

Case 2

Seventy-one-year-old male patient with a history of long-term hallux valgus deformity in the right foot. He underwent surgical treatment about 25 years ago, with a distal first metatarsal osteotomy for the HV deformity, with adequate correction for several years. With time, he developed a recurrence of the HV deformity, that got worse progressively, in association with a progressive deformity of the second toe. For about 8 years, he describes a cross-over deformity of the 1st and 2nd toes, with pain symptoms over the medial eminence of the 1st metatarsal head and dorsal aspect of the second toe, as well as some plantar forefoot pain. On physical exam, patient presented with the described cross-over deformity, severe HV 2nd LTD, a rigid ROM of the 1st MTPJ (total ROM of 35–40°), with some pain during ROM. He also had a diffuse callosity over the heads of the 2nd and 3rd metatarsal heads that was painful to palpation, as well as an asymptomatic bunionette deformity. Patient had exhausted conservative treatment options and decided to proceed with surgical treatment. He underwent 1st MTPJ fusion, DMMO of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th metatarsals, and PIPJ fusion with flexor tenodesis of the 2nd toe.

Preoperative and postoperative clinical (3 months), weight bearing conventional radiographic (6 weeks) and WBCT images (3 months) are presented in Figs. 9, 10 and 11. WBCT demonstrated completely healed fusions of the 1st MTPJ and PIPJ, as well as the DMMOs. At latest follow-up (6 months), the patient was doing extremely well with a stable 1st MTP joint fusion, well-aligned first toe, and significantly improved sagittal plane alignment of the second toe. He still has residual medial displacement of the lesser toes that was not addressed in the surgical procedure He also is now slightly symptomatic in the bunionette deformity that was asymptomatic preoperatively, which led the patient to decide not to have it corrected at the time of the surgery. The ROM of the second MTPJ is almost completely preserved, with a total of 70o of passive dorsiflexion. There is no residual floating of the 2nd toe. Improvement in clinical outcomes was noted on as PROMIS Physical (42.3 to 47.7), EFAS scale (0 to 3), FFI-R (60.29 to 50) and PCS (4 to 2).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Conventional weight bearing radiographic anteroposterior and lateral views of patient’s foot demonstrating preoperative severe arthritic hallux valgus deformity, and cross-over deformity of the 2nd toe. Postoperative (6-weeks) demonstrating improved alignment of the fused first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ), and considerably improved alignment of the 2nd toe

Fig. 10
figure 10

Tree-dimensional surface soft tissue anatomy weight bearing CT reconstruction views of patient’s foot, demonstrating preoperative severe hallux valgus deformity and cross-over lesser 2nd toe deformity, and considerable correction 3-months postoperatively

Fig. 11
figure 11

Preoperative and 3-months postoperative clinical pictures of patient’s foot demonstrating preoperative severe hallux valgus deformity and cross-over lesser 2nd toe deformity, and considerable correction postoperatively

Case 3

Sixty-three-year-old female patient with a history of at least 10 years of progressive deformity of the first and second left toes. She had never had any surgical treatment. She was able to manage the deformities for a long time with footwear modifications and taping of the second toe, however, symptoms got significantly worse for the last several months. Symptoms are mostly located at the top of the 2nd toe, which has been rubbing on the shoe. On physical exam, the patient was tender on that location, had some mild pain over the medial aspect of the 1st MTPJ, painful callosities underneath the 2nd and 3rd metatarsal heads, a mild-moderate symptomatic bunionette deformity, and a severely unstable first ray. She had exhausted conservative treatment and was looking for surgical treatment options. Among other procedures, she was offered a 1st tarsometatarsal joint fusion to correct the hallux valgus deformity, but refused it, since she did not want any fusions other than a PIPJ fusion to correct her 2nd LTD deformity. She underwent double 1st metatarsal osteotomy to correct the HV, medial proximal opening wedge and distal biplanar chevron-type osteotomy, DMMO of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th metatarsals, PIPJ fusion and flexor tenodesis of the 2nd toe, as well as chevron-type osteotomy of the 5th metatarsal to correct the bunionette deformity.

Preoperative and postoperative clinical, conventional weight bearing radiographic and WBCT images are presented in Figs. 12, 13 and 14. At 6 weeks, incisions were completely healed, and patient resumed progressive weight bearing. At 3 months, WBCT demonstrated completely healed osteotomies and an adequately healing PIPJ. First, 2nd and 5th toes had considerably improved alignment, with mild stiffness of the 1st and 2nd MTPJ, and a minor residual 2nd floating toe. At the latest follow-up (5 months), the patient was doing better, with improved ROM of the 1st and 2nd MTPJ. The ROM of the second MTPJ is almost completely restored, with a total of 50o of passive dorsiflexion. There is mild residual floating of the 2nd toe, with no pain under the lesser metatarsal heads. Patient demonstrated improved clinical outcomes including PROMIS Physical (27.6 to 42.3), EFAS scale (1 to 4), FFI-R (77.94 to 64.7) and PCS (12 to 6).

Fig. 12
figure 12

Tree-dimensional surface soft tissue anatomy weight bearing CT reconstruction views of patient’s foot, demonstrating preoperative severe hallux valgus deformity and cross-over lesser 2nd toe deformity, and considerable correction 3-months postoperatively

Fig. 13
figure 13

Preoperative and 3-months postoperative clinical pictures of patient’s foot demonstrating severe hallux valgus deformity and cross-over lesser 2nd toe deformity preoperatively, and considerable correction postoperatively, with completely healed plantar and dorsal wounds on the second toe

Fig. 14
figure 14

Conventional preoperative and 6-weeks postoperative weight bearing radiographic (anteroposterior and lateral views) of patient’s foot (top), as well as preoperative and 3-months postoperative wide sagittal weight bearing CT images of patient’s foot 1st and 2nd rays (bottom). Demonstration of considerable correction of the hallux valgus and bunionette deformity as well as 2nd toe deformity


Surgical treatment of LTD is challenging and multiple surgical techniques have been described in the literature. Because of the variable reported rates of deformity correction, improvement of symptoms and complications, no technique is accepted as a gold-standard [34, 35]. In this technical-tip study, we described the use of an alternative technique to treat LTD, consisting of a flexor tenodesis procedure of both the FDL and FDB tendons to the plantar aspect of the proximal phalanx of the lesser toes, with a focus on the correction of the sagittal plane dorsiflexion deformity of the MTPJ. We also reported our short-term results utilizing the procedure in a series of three consecutive cases with different severities of 2nd toe deformity. In summary, we observed good clinical and radiographic correction of the LTD with no observed complications related to the surgical technique and implant utilized. Correction was maintained after a minimum clinical follow-up of 5 months and had no important residual floating toe deformity or MTPJ stiffness.

Girdlestone in 1947, followed by Taylor in 1951 were the first to describe tendon transfer procedures in the treatment LTD [36, 37]. Both authors transferred the FDL tendon to the extensors, inserting it dorsally at the level of the proximal phalanx. The main objective was to correct sagittal dorsiflexion contracture at the MTPJ by the tenodesis effect of the flexor-to-extensor transfer, as well as weakening the FDL pull at the tip of the toe. Other authors such as Parrish, Kuwada and Dockery later modified the original Girdlestone-Taylor technique in an attempt to optimize the direction of the transfer and increase its correction power [28, 38]. All of these techniques involve a relatively extensive dissection at the level of the proximal phalanx dorsally, to allow for the flexor-to-extensor tendon transfer. Even though multiple studies reported relatively high satisfaction rates with the procedures (60 to 90%), the rates of MTPJ stiffness (60%) and deformity recurrence (up to 16%) are substantial [36, 39] [40]. The flexor tenodesis procedure described here can be performed through a relatively small plantar approach with minimal tendon dissection, and an even smaller dorsal approach long enough to allow retraction of the extensor tendons and insertion of the implant. It also does not involve a flexor-to-extensor tendon transfer procedure, only a proximal tenodesis of the flexor tendons to the base of the proximal phalanx, what can be considered a less locally disturbing and more anatomical procedure. It is the author’s understanding that those differences could possibly explain the reasoning for less scar tissue formation and resultant less pronounced stiffness and relatively preserved MTPJ ROM observed with the flexor tenodesis technique.

Many authors have also relied on the combination of distal metatarsal shortening osteotomies and PIPJ resection arthroplasty/arthrodesis to correct rigid LTD and central metatarsalgia, with or without a flexor-to-extensor tendon transfer [41, 42]. Shortening the metatarsal and positioning the center of rotation of the metatarsal head slightly dorsal to the intrinsic musculature, it allows for a more anatomical vector with increased lever arm for the musculature to pull the proximal phalanx plantarly, correcting the MTPJ dorsiflexion deformity [43]. Fair to good functional results were reported, but a high percentage of complications have been associated with these procedures, particularly floating toes and MTPJ stiffness [18, 19, 44, 45]. Although biomechanically sound, the fact that the surgery is most commonly and traditionally performed open, and consists of an intraarticular osteotomy, it is inherently associated with increased scar tissue formation, dorsiflexion contracture (floating toes) and MTPJ stiffness [15]. The author’s preference in the setting of LTD and central metatarsalgia, with long 2nd, 3rd and 4th metatarsals, is to combine the flexor tenodesis technique with the percutaneous DMMO, an extra-articular and extra-capsular DMSO, potentially decreasing the incidence of floating toes and MTPJ stiffness. In the setting of a rigid contracture of the PIPJ, the authors would also recommend the use of PIPJ fusion technique, preferably avoiding the use of K-wire fixation to allow early weight bearing and MTPJ ROM exercises.

Several potential advantages with the use of the proposed technique and utilized implant can be highlighted. Relatively low invasive procedure with minimal surgical dissection and avoidance of a non-anatomical flexor to extensor tendon transfer; dynamic tenodesis effect of the flexor tendons in the base of the proximal phalanx, correcting the dorsiflexion deformity of the MTPJ; possibility of fine tuning the amount of tension applied in the flexor tendons, titrating the deformity correction; correction of flexible plantarflexion contraction of the interphalangeal joints by loosening the distal segment of the flexor tendons; possibility of resetting the tenodesis and fixation parts of the procedure if adequate/desired correction is not achieved; avoidance of K-wire fixation procedure and possible complications associated with it [31,32,33]; and apparently low incidence of floating toes and MTPJ stiffness, with maintained short-term deformity correction. However, no real conclusions can be drawn from our study, since only three patients were assessed during a short period of postoperative clinical follow-up. Additional data are needed to better define the success rate, safety and possible complications of the procedure, and must include the assessment of larger cohorts with longer postoperative follow-up. Prospective and comparatives studies with other used techniques are also needed.

In conclusion, in this surgical technical-tip study we described an alternative surgical technique to treat LTD, consisting of a flexor tenodesis procedure to the plantar aspect of the proximal phalanx, using a specific implant. The technique involves minimal surgical dissection, allows dynamic controlled correction of the sagittal plane MTPJ dorsiflexion deformity of the MTPJ, and can be performed in combination with other procedures such as DMSO and PIPJ fusions. Although adequate LTD correction and no complications were found in a case series of three patients, the lack of a larger sample, long-term evaluations and a comparative group limit the clinical applicability of the presented data. Additional long-term, prospective and comparative studies are needed.

Change history


  1. Jay RM, Malay DS, Landsman AS, Jennato N, Huish J, Younger M (2016) Dual-component intramedullary implant versus Kirschner wire for proximal interphalangeal joint fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Foot Ankle Surg 55:697–708

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Holewski JJ, Moss KM, Stess RM, Graf PM, Grunfeld C (1989) Prevalence of foot pathology and lower extremity complications in a diabetic outpatient clinic. J Rehabil Res Dev 26:35–44

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dunn JE, Link CL, Felson DT, Crincoli MG, Keysor JJ, McKinlay JB (2004) Prevalence of foot and ankle conditions in a multiethnic community sample of older adults. Am J Epidemiol 159:491–498

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lintz F, Beldame J, Kerhousse G, Bernasconi A, Brunel H, Darcel V, Helix-Giordanino M, Piclet-Legre B (2020) Intra- and inter-observer reliability of the AFCP classification for sagittal plane deformities of the second toe. Foot Ankle Surg 26:650–656

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen J, Devine A, Dick IM, Dhaliwal SS, Prince RL (2003) Prevalence of lower extremity pain and its association with functionality and quality of life in elderly women in Australia. J Rheumatol 30:2689–2693

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Doty JF, Feinblatt JS, Grebing BR, Cooper MT, Brigido SA, Cooper MT (2018) Small toes, huge problems: dealing with lesser toe deformities. Foot Ankle Spec 11:457–460

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frey-Ollivier S, Catena F, Helix-Giordanino M, Piclet-Legre B (2018) Treatment of flexible lesser toe deformities. Foot Ankle Clin 23:69–90

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goransson M, Constant D (2020) Hammertoe. In: StatPearls [Internet], Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021

    Google Scholar 

  9. Malhotra K, Davda K, Singh D (2016) The pathology and management of lesser toe deformities. EFORT Open Rev 1:409–419

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Redfern D, Perera AM (2014) Minimally invasive osteotomies. Foot Ankle Clin 19:181–189

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Solan MC, Davies MS (2011) Revision surgery of the lesser toes. Foot Ankle Clin 16:621–645

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shirzad K, Kiesau CD, DeOrio JK, Parekh SG (2011) Lesser toe deformities. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19:505–514

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Payo-Ollero J, Casajus-Ortega A, Llombart-Blanco R, Villas C, Alfonso M (2019) The efficacy of an intramedullary nitinol implant in the correction of claw toe or hammertoe deformities. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139:1681–1690

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mueller CM, Boden SA, Boden AL, Maidman SD, Cutler A, Mignemi D, Bariteau J (2018) Complication rates and short-term outcomes after operative Hammertoe correction in older patients. Foot Ankle Int 39:681–688

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Phisitkul P (2018) Managing complications of lesser toe and metatarsophalangeal joint surgery. Foot Ankle Clin 23:145–156

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Albright RH, Hassan M, Randich J, O’Keefe R, Klein EE, Weil L Jr, Weil L Sr, Fleischer AE (2020) Risk Factors for failure in Hammertoe surgery. Foot Ankle Int 41:562–571

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sorensen MD, Weil L Jr (2015) Lesser metatarsal osteotomy. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 32:275–290

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee LC, Charlton TP, Thordarson DB (2013) Flexor digitorum brevis transfer for floating toe prevention after Weil osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int 34:1724–1728

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hofstaetter SG, Hofstaetter JG, Petroutsas JA, Gruber F, Ritschl P, Trnka HJ (2005) The Weil osteotomy: a seven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1507–1511

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Monteagudo M, Maceira E (2019) Evolution of the Weil osteotomy: the triple osteotomy. Foot Ankle Clin 24:599–614

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Redfern D (2018) Treatment of metatarsalgia with distal osteotomies. Foot Ankle Clin 23:21–33

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Veljkovic A, Lansang E, Lau J (2014) Forefoot tendon transfers. Foot Ankle Clin 19:123–137

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Errichiello C, Marcarelli M, Pisani PC, Parino E (2012) Treatment of dynamic claw toe deformity flexor digitorum brevis tendon transfer to interosseous and lumbrical muscles: a literature survey. Foot Ankle Surg 18:229–232

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nery C, Baumfeld D (2018) Lesser metatarsophalangeal joint instability: treatment with tendon transfers. Foot Ankle Clin 23:103–126

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Coughlin MJ, Baumfeld DS, Nery C (2011) Second MTP joint instability: grading of the deformity and description of surgical repair of capsular insufficiency. Phys Sportsmed 39:132–141

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nery C, Coughlin MJ, Baumfeld D, Mann TS (2012) Lesser metatarsophalangeal joint instability: prospective evaluation and repair of plantar plate and capsular insufficiency. Foot Ankle Int 33:301–311

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nery C, Coughlin MJ, Baumfeld D, Raduan FC, Mann TS, Catena F (2014) Prospective evaluation of protocol for surgical treatment of lesser MTP joint plantar plate tears. Foot Ankle Int 35:876–885

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Parrish TF (1973) Dynamic correction of clawtoes. Orthop Clin North Am 4:97–102

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Boyer ML, DeOrio JK (2007) Transfer of the flexor digitorum longus for the correction of lesser-toe deformities. Foot Ankle Int 28:422–430

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Thompson FM, Deland JT (1993) Flexor tendon transfer for metatarsophalangeal instability of the second toe. Foot Ankle 14:385–388

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Klammer G, Baumann G, Moor BK, Farshad M, Espinosa N (2012) Early complications and recurrence rates after Kirschner wire transfixion in lesser toe surgery: a prospective randomized study. Foot Ankle Int 33:105–112

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kramer WC, Parman M, Marks RM (2015) Hammertoe correction with k-wire fixation. Foot Ankle Int 36:494–502

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McKenzie JC, Rogero RG, Khawam S, McDonald EL, Nicholson K, Shakked RJ, Fuchs D, Raikin SM (2019) Incidence and risk factors for pin site infection of exposed Kirschner wires following elective forefoot surgery. Foot Ankle Int 40:1154–1159

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cordier G, Nunes GA (2020) Minimally invasive advances: lesser toes deformities. Foot Ankle Clin 25:461–478

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Federer AE, Tainter DM, Adams SB, Schweitzer KM Jr (2018) Conservative management of metatarsalgia and lesser toe deformities. Foot Ankle Clin 23:9–20

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Barbari SG, Brevig K (1984) Correction of Clawtoes by the Girdlestone-Taylor flexor-extensor transfer procedure. Foot Ankle 5:67–73

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Taylor RG (1951) The treatment of claw toes by multiple transfers of flexor into extensor tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 33:539–542

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kuwada GT, Dockery GL (1980) Modification of the flexor tendon transfer procedure for the correction of flexible hammertoes. J Foot Surg 19:38–40

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cyphers SM, Feiwell E (1988) Review of the Girdlestone-Taylor procedure for clawtoes in myelodysplasia. Foot Ankle 8:229–233

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Arbab D, Frank D, Bouillon B (2017) Lüring C [Correction of flexible lesser toe deformity: transfer of the flexor digitorum longus tendon]. Oper Orthop Traumatol 29:452–458

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Klinge SA, McClure P, Fellars T, Digiovanni CW (2014) Modification of the Weil/Maceira metatarsal osteotomy for coronal plane malalignment during crossover toe correction. Foot Ankle Int 35:584–591

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gougoulias N, Sakellariou A (2014) Proximal closing wedge lesser metatarsal osteotomy for metatarsophalangeal joint transverse plane realignment. Surgical technique and outcome. Foot Ankle Surg 20:30–33

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Garg R, Thordarson DB, Schrumpf M, Castaneda D (2008) Sliding oblique versus segmental resection osteotomies for lesser metatarsophalangeal joint pathology. Foot Ankle Int 29:1009–1014

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Migues A, Slullitel G, Bilbao F, Carrasco M, Solari G (2004) Floating-toe deformity as a complication of the Weil osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int 25:609–613

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Reddy VB (2018) Metatarsal osteotomies: complications. Foot Ankle Clin 23:47–55

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


No funding was provided directly to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cesar de Cesar Netto .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors indicate that there is no financial support or other benefits from commercial sources for the work reported on in the manuscript or any other financial interests that any of the authors may have, which could create a potential conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest with regard to the work. This was an IRB-approved study and all patients included signed informed consent. The authors declare potential conflicts of interest with the study since the first author is a paid consultant for the company that produces the implants used in the described surgical technique.

Ethical approval

This study was excused from the need for an ethical/IRB-Approval.

Informed consent

All patients have signed written informed consent for publication of surgical results and clinical/imaging pictures.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised due to a retrospective Open Access order.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Cesar Netto , C., Schmidt, E.L., Lalevee, M. et al. Flexor tenodesis procedure in the treatment of lesser toe deformities. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Hammertoe
  • Hammertoe deformity
  • Toe deformity
  • Tenodesis
  • Tendon transfer