Abstract
Background
With the increasing prevalence of total knee replacement (TKR) due to knee osteoarthritis, the absence of patient-reported outcome measures in Slovenia must be addressed.
Questions/purposes
(1) We cross-culturally adapted Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) questionnaires to the Slovenian-speaking community. (2) We evaluated OKS and LEFS psychometric characteristics.
Patients and methods
In the first assessment (Time 1) Slovenian versions of both questionnaires (OKS-Slo and LEFS-Slo), knee pain, timed-up to go (TUG) and sit to stand (STS) tests were completed by 123 subjects (55% females), of which 78 were patients scheduled for TKR and 45 were healthy age-matched controls. The questionnaires were assessed one week apart (Time 2) to investigate the test–retest reliability, with 121 subjects (98.4%) completing second measurements.
Results
Significant differences were observed between the two groups. Where patients had greater body mass index, they were slower in TUG, weaker in STS, had greater knee pain in both knees and scored lower on both questionnaires. Additionally, correlation analysis showed that OKS-Slo and LEFS-Slo correlated almost perfectly (correlation coefficient [CC] = .968, p < 0.001). Excellent negative correlations were observed with TUG (OKS-Slo/CC = − 0.679, p < 0.001; LEFS-Slo/CC = − 0.692, p < 0.001) and STS (OKS-Slo/CC = 0.790, p < 0.001; LEFS-Slo/CC = 0.815, p < 0.001) tests, while knee pain of affected leg correlated the most (OKS-Slo/CC = − 0.923, p < 0.001; LEFS-Slo/CC = − 0.915, p < 0.001). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for both the OKS-Slo and LEFS-Slo ranged between 0.87 and 0.99, while the interclass correlation coefficient was excellent; i.e., 0.99. Finally, both questionnaires proved to be unidimensional measures.
Conclusion
The Slovenian version of both questionnaires is feasible, valid and reliable for use in clinical studies including the older adult population in Slovenia.
Level of evidence
Level III, Diagnostic—case-control study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hunter DJ, Bierma-zeinstra S (2019) Osteoarthritis. Lancet 393:1745–1759
Woolf AD, Pfleger B (2003) Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 81(9):646–656
Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Nolte S, Ackerman I, Fransen M et al (2014) The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis 73:1323–1330
Srikanth VK, Fryer JL, Zhai G, Winzenberg TM, Hosmer D, Jones G (2005) A meta-analysis of sex differences prevalence, incidence and severity of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 13(9):769–781
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Jt Surg Ser A 89(4):780–785
Vogrin M, Naranđa J (2010) Artroza in Endorpotetika sklepov. In: Vogrin M, Kuhta M, Naranđa J (eds) Artroza in endoprotetika sklepov. Medicinska fakulteta Univerze v Mariboru, Maribor
Mizner PSC, Clements KE, Zeni JA, Irrgang JJ, Snyder-Mackler L (2011) Measuring functional improvement after total knee arthroplasty requires both performance-based and patient-report assessments. A longitudinal analysis of outcomes. J Arthroplasty 26(5):728–737
Paravlić, Pisot R, Simunic B (2020) Muscle-specific changes of lower extremities in the early period after total knee arthroplasty: Insight from tensiomyography. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. http://www.ismni.org/jmni/accepted/JMNI_19M-12-141.pdf
Ramkumar PN, Harris JD, Noble PC (2015) Patient-reported outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Bone Jt Res 4(7):120–127
Dowsey MM, Choong PFM (2013) The utility of outcome measures in total knee replacement surgery. Int J Rheumatol 2013:506518
Mehta S, Fulton A, Quach C, Thistle M, Toledo C, Evans N (2016) Measurement properties of the lower extremity functional scale: a systematic review. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 46(3):200–216
Liow MHL, Goh GS, Pang H-N, Tay DK-J, Chia S-L, Lo N-N, et al. (2020) Should patients aged 75 years or older undergo medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A propensity score-matched study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03440-4
Jessing IR, Mikkelsen M, Gromov K, Husted H, Kallemose T, Troelsen A (2020) Patients with anteromedial osteoarthritis achieve the greatest improvement in patient reported outcome after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140(4):517–525
Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, Riddle DL (1999) The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): Scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. Phys Ther 79(4):371–383
de Yébenes Prous MJG, Salvanés FR, Ortells LC (2009) Validation of questionnaires. Reumatol Clínica 5(4):171–177 (English Ed.)
Paravlić A, Pišot S, Mitić P (2018) Validation of the Slovenian version of motor imagery questionnaire 3 (MIQ-3): promising tool in modern comprehensive rehabilitation practice. Slov J Public Heal 57(4):201–210
Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K et al (1986) Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 29(8):1039–1049
Jenny JY, Diesinger Y (2012) The Oxford Knee Score: compared performance before and after knee replacement. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(4):409–412
Paravlic, Maffulli N, Kovac S, Pisot R. (2020). Home-based motor imagery intervention improves functional performance following total knee arthroplasty: randomized controlled trial. Manuscript submitted for publication
Paravlic PR, Marusic U (2019) Specific and general adaptations following motor imagery practice focused on muscle strength in total knee arthroplasty rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 14(8):1–19
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S (1991) The timed “up & go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39(2):142–148
Boonstra MC, De Waal Malefijt MC, Verdonschot N (2008) How to quantify knee function after total knee arthroplasty? Knee 15(5):390–395
Paravlić A, Marušič U, Gerževič M, Urzi F, Šimunič B (2016) The effects of different exercise-based interventions on functional fitness of older adults. Annales Kinesiologiae 7:117–137
Hopkins (2000) Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sport Med 30(1):1–15
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) Landis amd Koch1977_agreement of categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174
Tuğay BU, Tuğay N, Güney H, Kinikli GI, Yüksel I, Atilla B (2016) Oxford knee score: cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the turkish version in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 50(2):198–206
Xie F, Li SC, Lo NN, Yeo SJ, Yang KY, Yeo W et al (2007) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Singapore English and Chinese Versions of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) in knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing total knee replacement. Osteoarthr Cartil 15(9):1019–1024
Reito A, Järvistö A, Jämsen E, Skyttä E, Remes V, Huhtala H et al (2017) Translation and validation of the 12-item Oxford knee score for use in Finland. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18(1):1–6
Eun IS, Kim OG, Kim CK, Lee HS, Lee JS (2013) Validation of the korean version of the oxford knee score in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(2):600–605
Cruz-Díaz D, Lomas-Vega R, Osuna-Pérez MC, Hita-Contreras F, Fernández ÁD, Martínez-Amat A (2014) The Spanish lower extremity functional scale: a reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire to assess musculoskeletal disorders in the lower extremity. Disabil Rehabil 36(23):2005–2011
Jenny JY, Diesinger Y (2011) Validation of a French version of the Oxford knee questionnaire. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(3):267–271
Haverkamp D, Breugem SJM, Sierevelt IN, Blankevoort L, Van Dijk CN (2005) Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire for knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 76(3):347–352
Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Sieverding M, Loibl M, von Knoch F, Mannion AF et al (2009) The 12-item Oxford Knee Score: cross-cultural adaptation into German and assessment of its psychometric properties in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthr Cartil 17(1):49–52
Citaker S, Kafa N, Hazar Kanik Z, Ugurlu M, Kafa B, Tuna Z (2016) Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale on patients with knee injuries. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(3):389–395
Takeuchi R, Sawaguchi T, Nakamura N, Ishikawa H, Saito T, Goldhahn S (2011) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Oxford 12-item knee score in Japanese. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(2):247–254
Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L (2000) Translation and validation of the Oxford-12 Item Knee Score for use in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 71(3):268–274
Gonçalves RS, Tomás AM, Martins DI (2012) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Portuguese version of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Knee 19(4):344–347
Padua R, Zanoli G, Ceccarelli E, Romanini E, Bondì R, Campi A (2003) The Italian version of the Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire—cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Int Orthop 27(4):214–216
Brenninkmeijer V, Van Yperen N (2003) How to conduct research on burnout: advantages and disadvantages of a unidimensional approach in burnout research. Occup Environ Med 60(Suppl 1):i54–61
Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A (1996) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Jt Surg 78(5):856
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the participants in the study. The authors also thank orthopaedic surgeon Dr Simon Kovač for organising and managing the daily and initial screenings of the patients and all other involved orthopaedic specialists and staff of Valdoltra Orthopaedic Hospital.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors AHP, SP, MP and RP declare that they have no conflict of interest relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paravlic, A.H., Pisot, S., Mitic, P. et al. Validation of the Oxford Knee Score and Lower Extremity Functional Score questionnaires for use in Slovenia. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140, 1515–1522 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03498-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03498-0