Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Decrease surgery time by using an alternative lateral parapatellar approach for tibia shaft fracture nailing

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Medial parapatellar or transpatellar ligament approaches are commonly used for nail osteosynthesis in tibia shaft fractures. The lower leg is normally in a hanging position to allow guide wire insertion and reaming of the tibia. However, this position complicates fracture reduction and retention, as well as image intensification throughout the procedure. A lateral parapatellar approach with the lower leg in a semi-extended, horizontal position has been previously described for proximal tibial fracture fixation. The purpose of the presented study was to share the lateral parapatellar approach technique used in our institution and to analyse its feasibility for tibia shaft fracture fixation when compared to a medial parapatellar and transpatellar incision technique.

Materials and methods

All patients with tibial shaft fractures treated at our institution between 2009 and 2012 by intramedullary nailing through either a transpatellar, a medial parapatellar or a lateral parapatellar approach were reviewed. Demographics, injury pattern and the operative procedure, especially operation and fluoroscopy time, were analysed.

Results

73 patients were enrolled into the study. Twenty-six patients were treated by use of a lateral parapatellar approach, whilst a transpatellar or a medial parapatellar approach was chosen in 29 and 18 cases, respectively. Patients’ characteristics were similar regarding gender and body mass index. When compared to the transpatellar (126 ± 30 min) or the medial parapatellar approach (105 ± 29 min), surgical time was significantly shorter in the lateral parapatellar approach group (96 ± 29 min). Likewise, shorter image intensifier time was documented when a lateral parapatellar approach was chosen (211 ± 189 s) compared to the transpatellar (347 ± 204 s) or the medial parapatellar approach (241 ± 222 s).

Conclusion

The extra-articular semi-extended tibial nailing technique using a lateral parapatellar approach was associated with a significant decrease in time of surgery, while fluoroscopy time was shorter but not significantly different between the three groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bakhsh WR, Cherney SM, McAndrew CM et al (2016) Surgical approaches to intramedullary nailing of the tibia: comparative analysis of knee pain and functional outcomes. Injury 47:958–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.12.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wähnert D, Gehweiler D (2017) Complications of intramedullary nailing—evolution of treatment. Injury 48:59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Taki H, Memarzadeh A, Trompeter A, Hull P (2017) Closed fractures of the tibial shaft in adults. Orthop Trauma 31:116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MPORTH.2016.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rothberg DL, Stuart AR, Presson AP et al (2019) A comparison of the open semi-extended parapatellar versus standard entry tibial nailing techniques and knee pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Trauma 33:31–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang L, Sun Y, Li G (2018) Comparison of suprapatellar and infrapatellar intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 13:146. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0846-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang C, Chen E, Ye C, Pan Z (2018) Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approach for tibia intramedullary nailing: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg 51:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT (1976) Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Jt Surg Am 58:453–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tscherne H, Oestern HJ (1982) A new classification of soft-tissue damage in open and closed fractures. Unfallheilkunde 85:111–115

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Duan X, Al-Qwbani M, Zeng Y et al (2012) Intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD008241. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008241.pub2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weil YA, Gardner MJ, Boraiah S et al (2009) Anterior knee pain following the lateral parapatellar approach for tibial nailing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:773–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0678-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McAndrew CM, Ricci WM, Miller AN, Avery MC (2018) Distal tibial intramedullary nailing using an extraarticular, lateral parapatellar approach in the semiextended position. J Orthop Trauma 32 Suppl 1:34–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Courtney PM, Boniello A, Donegan D et al (2015) Functional knee outcomes in infrapatellar and suprapatellar tibial nailing: does approach matter? Am J Orthop 44:513–516

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chen X, Xu H-T, Zhang H-J, Chen J (2018) Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar intramedullary nailing for treatment of tibial shaft fractures in adults. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e11799. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Williamson M, Iliopoulos E, Williams R, Trompeter A (2018) Intra-operative fluoroscopy time and radiation dose during suprapatellar tibial nailing versus infrapatellar tibial nailing. Injury 49:1891–1894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.07.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kempf I, Grosse A, Beck G (1985) Closed locked intramedullary nailing. Its application to comminuted fractures of the femur. J Bone Jt Surg Am 67:709–720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Müller LP, Suffner J, Wenda K et al (1998) Radiation exposure to the hands and the thyroid of the surgeon during intramedullary nailing. Injury 29:461–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bishop JA, Campbell ST, Eno J-JT, Gardner MJ (2018) Knee pain after intramedullary nailing of tibia fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 26:381–387. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Strecker W, Suger G, Kinzl L (1996) Local complications of intramedullary nailing. Orthopade 25:274–291

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Court-Brown CM (2004) Reamed intramedullary tibial nailing: an overview and analysis of 1106 cases. J Orthop Trauma 18:96–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Say F, Bülbül M (2014) Findings related to rotational malalignment in tibial fractures treated with reamed intramedullary nailing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:1381–1386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2052-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Puloski S, Romano C, Buckley R, Powell J (2004) Rotational malalignment of the tibia following reamed intramedullary nail fixation. J Orthop Trauma 18:397–402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sanders RW, DiPasquale TG, Jordan CJ et al (2014) Semiextended intramedullary nailing of the tibia using a suprapatellar approach. J Orthop Trauma 28:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bot.0000452787.80923.ee

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Franke J, Hohendorff B, Alt V et al (2016) Suprapatellar nailing of tibial fractures—indications and technique. Injury 47:495–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Franke J, Homeier A, Metz L et al (2018) Infrapatellar vs. suprapatellar approach to obtain an optimal insertion angle for intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 44:927–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-017-0881-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Ladurner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics

This study was approved by the local research ethics committee.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ladurner, A., Acklin, Y.P., Mueller, T.S. et al. Decrease surgery time by using an alternative lateral parapatellar approach for tibia shaft fracture nailing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139, 943–949 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03154-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03154-2

Keywords

Navigation