Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Infrapatellar vs. suprapatellar approach to obtain an optimal insertion angle for intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

During intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures, the insertion angle of the nail is of great importance. When the nail impacts the posterior cortex due to a large insertion angle with a dorsal target course, higher insertion forces are needed, and the danger of iatrogenic fractures increases. Accordingly, the insertion direction should be as parallel as possible to the longitudinal axis of the tibia. We aimed to confirm the hypothesis that intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures can be performed with smaller insertion angles via a suprapatellar approach rather than infrapatellar approach.

Methods

In 19 human bodies of donors with intact tibiae, we performed intramedullary nailing by both a suprapatellar and an infrapatellar approach. The correct entry point was determined by fluoroscopy. Subsequently, the medullary canal was reamed up to a diameter of 10 mm, and a 9 mm polytetrafluorethylen tube was inserted instead of a tibia nail. The angle between the proximal aspect of the tube and the longitudinal axis of the tibia was measured using a computer-assisted surgery system.

Results

The angle between the proximal aspect of the inserted tube, simulating the tibial nail, and the longitudinal tibial axis was significantly larger when using the infrapatellar approach.

Conclusions

We achieved an insertion angle significantly more parallel to the longitudinal axis when using a suprapatellar approach for intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures. Thereby, both the risk of iatrogenic fracture of the posterior cortex and apex anterior angulation of the short proximal fragment can be reduced during intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahlers J, von Issendorff WD. Häufigkeit und Ursachen von Fehlstellungen nach Unterschenkelmarknagelung. Unfallchirurgie. 1992;18:31–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alms M. Medullary nailing for fracture of the shaft of the tibia. J B Jt Surg Br. 1962;44:328–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Attal R, Hansen M, Kirjavainen M, Bail H, Hammer O, Rosenberger R, et al. A multicenter case series of tibia fractures treated with the Expert Tibia Nail (ETN). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132:975–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beltran MJ, Collinge CA, Patzkowski JC, Masini BD, Blease RE, Hsu JR. Intraarticular risks of suprapatellar nailing. Am J Orthop. 2012;41:546–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhandari M, Audige L, Ellis T, Hanson B. Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group. Operative treatment of extra-articular proximal tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17:591–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bono CM, Levine RG, Rao JP, Behrens FF. Nonarticular proximal tibia fractures: treatment options and decision making. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001;9:176–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Buehler KC, Green J, Woll TS, Duwelius PJ. A technique for intramedullary nailing of proximal third tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:218–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Carr JB, Sobba DB, Bear LL. Biomechanics of rigid tibial nail insertion sites. Am J Orthop. 1996;25:553–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan DS, Serrano-Riera R, Griffing R, Steverson B, Infante A, Watson D, et al. Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar tibial nail insertion: a prospective randomized control pilot study. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30:130–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cole JD. Intramedullary fixation of proximal tibia fractures. Tech Orthop. 1998;13:27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Court-Brown CM. Reamed intramedullary tibial nailing: an overview and analysis of 1106 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:96–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eastman JG, Tseng SS, Lee MA, Yoo BJ. The retropatellar portal as an alternative site for tibial nail insertion: a cadaveric study. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:659–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eastman JG, Tseng SS, Lo E, Li CS, Yoo B, Lee M. Retropatellar technique for intramedullary nailing of proximal tibia fractures: a cadaveric assessment. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:672–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Franke J, Hohendorff B, Alt V, Thormann U, Schnettler R. Suprapatellar nailing of tibial fractures-Indications and technique. Injury. 2016;47:495–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Freedman EL, Johnson EE. Radiographic analysis of tibial fracture malalignment following intramedullary nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;315:25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Freeman AL, Craig MR, Schmidt AH. Biomechanical comparison of tibial nail stability in a proximal third fracture: do screw quantity and locked, interlocking screws make a difference? J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25:333–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gelbke MK, Coombs D, Powell S, DiPasquale TG. Suprapatellar versus infra-patellar intramedullary nail insertion of the tibia: a cadaveric model for comparison of patellofemoral contact pressures and forces. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:665–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hernigou P, Cohen D. Proximal entry for intramedullary nailing of the tibia. The risk of unrecognized articular damage. J B Jt Surg Br. 2000;82:33–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hiesterman TG, Shafiq BX, Cole PA. Intramedullary nailing of extra-articular proximal tibia fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19:690–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jones M, Parry M, Whitehouse M, Mitchell S. Radiologic outcome and patient-reported function after intramedullary nailing: a comparison of the retro- patellar and infrapatellar approach. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:256–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lang GJ, Cohen BE, Bosse MJ, Kellam JF. Proximal third tibial shaft fractures. Should they be nailed? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;315:64–74.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lottes JO. Medullary nailing of the tibia with the triflange nail. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1974;105:53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liporace FA, Stadler CM, Yoon RS. Problems, tricks, and pearls in intrame-dullary nailing of proximal third tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27:56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McConnell T, Tornetta P III, Tilzey J, Casey D. Tibial portal placement: The radiographic correlate of the anatomic safe zone. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15:207–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nork SE, Barei DP, Schildhauer TA, Agel J, Holt SK, Schrick JL, et al. Intrame-dullary nailing of proximal quarter tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:523–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pfister U, Frigg R. Locking of the intramedullary nail in the medullary cavity of the tibia. Aktuelle Traumatol. 1980;10:117–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ricci WM, O’Boyle M, Borrelli J, Bellabarba C, Sanders R. Fractures of the proximal third of the tibial shaft treated with intramedullary nails and blocking screws. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15:264–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Samuelson MA, McPherson EJ, Norris L. Anatomic assessment of the proper insertion site for a tibial intramedullary nail. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:23–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sanders RW, DiPasquale TG, Jordan CJ, Arrington JA, Sagi HC. Semiextended intramedullary nailing of the tibia using a suprapatellar approach: radiographic results and clinical outcomes at a minimum of 12 month follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:S29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schröder M, Gottschling H, Reimers N, Hauschild M, Burgkart R. Automated morphometric analysis of the femur on large anatomical databases with highly accurate correspondence detection. Open Med J. 2014;1:15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stinner DJ, Mir H. Techniques for intramedullary nailing of proximal tibia fractures. Orthop Clin N Am. 2014;45:33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sun Q, Nie XY, Gong JP, Wu JZ, Li RL, Ge W, et al. The outcome comparison of the suprapatellar approach and infrapatellar approach for tibia intramedullary nailing. Int Orthop. 2016;40:2611–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tornetta P, Collins E. Semiextended position of intramedullary nailing of the proximal tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;328:185–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tornetta P, Riina J, Geller J, Purban W. Intraarticular anatomic risks of tibial nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13:247–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tytherleigh-Strong GM, Keating JF, Court-Brown CM. Extra-articular fractures of the proximal tibia diaphysis: their epidemiology, management and out-come. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1997;42:334–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yasuda T, Obara S, Hayashi J, Arai M, Sato K. Semiextended approach for intramedullary nailing via a patellar eversion technique for tibial-shaft fractures: evaluation of the patellofemoral joint. Injury. 2017;48:1264–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yoo JH, Chang CB, Shin KS, Seong SC, Kim TK. Anatomical references to assess the posterior slope in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of 5 anatomical axes. J Arthroplast. 2008;23:586–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zamora R, Wright C, Short A, Seligson D. Comparison between suprapatellar and parapatellar approaches for intramedullary nailing of the tibia. Cadaveric study. Injury. 2016;47:2087–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Elbe Klinikum Stade, Bremervörder Strasse 111, 21682, Stade, Germany

    Joerg Franke, Sven Spät & Bernd Hohendorff

  2. Stryker Trauma GmbH, Prof.-Küntscher-Str. 1-5, 24232, Schönkirchen, Germany

    Annika Homeier & Lars Metz

  3. Centre of Clinical Anatomy, Institute of Anatomy, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, Otto-Hahn-Platz 8, 24118, Kiel, Germany

    Thilo Wedel

  4. Department of Traumatology, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Rudolf-Buchheim-Strasse 7, 35392, Giessen, Germany

    Volker Alt

  5. Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Rudolf-Buchheim-Strasse 7, 35392, Giessen, Germany

    Reinhard Schnettler

Authors
  1. Joerg Franke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Annika Homeier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lars Metz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thilo Wedel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Volker Alt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sven Spät
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bernd Hohendorff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Reinhard Schnettler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joerg Franke.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Franke, J., Homeier, A., Metz, L. et al. Infrapatellar vs. suprapatellar approach to obtain an optimal insertion angle for intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 44, 927–938 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-017-0881-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-017-0881-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation