Correction to: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (2017) 137:367–373 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2638-6

The original version of this article contained an error. The values for the FAOS scores within the registry were wrong. The statistical recalculation with the corrected values thus revealed corrected p values according to the FAOS scores. Thereby, among the total population patient age correlated significantly with the FAOS category Activities daily living (p = 0.04). Further substantial changes regarding the results of the study according to the corrected FAOS values and p values were not found.

No significant association with the FAAM and FAOS scores was registered for the three lesion localizations (medial, central, lateral) among the 100 patients with a solitary treated talus lesion, i.e. there was no significant difference between the groups of patients with medial, central or lateral localization of the lesion with regard to the two scores (p ≥ 0.34).

Among both the entire population of 112 patients and the group of 100 patients with a solitary treated talus lesion, no significant correlation was found between defective area and FAAM as well as FAOS scores (p ≥ 0.11).

No significant association was identified between the lesion stage according to the ICRS classification and FAAM as well as FAOS scores among the entire population of 112 patients (p ≥ 0.10). A higher lesion stage according to the Berndt–Harty–Loomer classification was found to be significantly associated with higher values of the FAOS score categories Pain (p = 0.04) and Sports (p < 0.01).

No significant associations were identified between age, gender and BMI on one hand, and FAAM and FAOS scores on the other (p ≥ 0.14).

Below you find the corrected version of Table 2 with the corrected FAOS score values and p values.

Table 2 FAAM and FAOS scores for patients with traumatic/posttraumatic lesions (group 1, n = 60) and idiopathic lesions (group 2, n = 52) together with p values for their comparisons between the two groups
Full size table