Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pulley lesions in rotator cuff tears: prevalence, etiology, and concomitant pathologies

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to demonstrate the prevalence of lesions in the biceps pulley complex in a representative, consecutive series of rotator cuff tears and rotator cuff interval treatments. We also analyzed associated tear pattern of rotator cuff injuries and superior labrum anterior–posterior (SLAP) lesions. We evaluated the relationships of these lesions to traumatic genesis and the prevalence of pulley lesions in revision cases.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed all pre- and intra-operative documentation on arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstructions and isolated pulley lesion treatments performed by a single surgeon over 2 consecutive years. According to Habermeyer et al., we classified cases into four groups, based on the presence of additional or related complete or partial rotator cuff tears, SLAP lesions, trauma, and primary or revision surgery.

Results

Among 382 patients with rotator cuff tears, 345 (90.3%) had an injured pulley system; 151 (43.8%) had partial tears of the rotator cuff; out of these, 106 (30.6%) were articular-sided. All of these articular-sided partial tears showed extension into the pulley complex. In 154 cases (44.6%), history of shoulder trauma was associated with the beginning of symptoms. In addition, concomitant SLAP lesions occurred in 25–62% of pulley lesions, correlating with the severity of pulley lesions. Among the 345 cases, there have been 32 (9.3%) revision cases where a pulley lesion was intra-operatively identified and addressed.

Conclusions

Pulley complex lesions are present in 90.3% of surgically treated rotator cuff lesions, particularly in articular-sided injuries. In addition, we found a significant relationship between the incidence of SLAP lesions and the severity of pulley lesions. It seems reasonable to assume an important role of pulley system injuries in the pathogenesis of rotator cuff lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Le Huec JC et al (1996) Traumatic tear of the rotator interval. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 5(1):41–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Murthi AM, Vosburgh CL, Neviaser TJ (2000) The incidence of pathologic changes of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9(5):382–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Slatis P, Aalto K (1979) Medial dislocation of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii. Acta Orthop Scand 50(1):73–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Walch G et al (1998) Subluxations and dislocations of the tendon of the long head of the biceps. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 7(2):100–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Werner A et al (2003) Tendinitis of the long head of biceps tendon associated with lesions of the “biceps reflection pulley”. Sportverletz Sportschaden 17(2):75–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Walch G et al (1994) Tears of the supraspinatus tendon associated with “hidden” lesions of the rotator interval. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 3(6):353–360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Werner A et al (2000) The stabilizing sling for the long head of the biceps tendon in the rotator cuff interval. A histoanatomic study. Am J Sports Med 28(1):28–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gohlke F, Essigkrug B, Schmitz F (1994) The pattern of the collagen fiber bundles of the capsule of the glenohumeral joint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 3(3):111–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Habermeyer P et al (2004) Anterosuperior impingement of the shoulder as a result of pulley lesions: a prospective arthroscopic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13(1):5–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi CH et al (2004) Biceps pulley impingement. Arthroscopy 20(Suppl 2):80–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ellman H (1990) Diagnosis and treatment of incomplete rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:64–74

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gerber C (1992) Latissimus dorsi transfer for the treatment of irreparable tears of the rotator cuff. Clin Orthop Relat Res 275:152–160

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baumann B et al (2008) Arthroscopic prevalence of pulley lesions in 1007 consecutive patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(1):14–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Braun S et al (2011) Lesions of the biceps pulley. Am J Sports Med 39(4):790–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fox J, Romeo AA (2003) Subscapularis tendon tear: Fox and Romeo classification. Annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopeadic Surgeons 2003

  16. Scheibel M (2010) Pathologie und Pathomechanik des Subakromialraums und der Rotatorenmanschette (inkl. lange Bizepssehne). In: Habermeyer P, Lichtenberg S, Magosch P (eds) Schulterchirurgie. Elsevier, Urban & Fischer Verlag, München, pp 53–55

    Google Scholar 

  17. Snyder SJ (2003) Arthroscopic repair of partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsions: PASTA lesions of the rotator cuff tendon. In: Snyder SJ (ed) Shoulder arthroscopy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 219–229

    Google Scholar 

  18. Habermeyer P et al (2008) A new arthroscopic classification of articular-sided supraspinatus footprint lesions: a prospective comparison with Snyder’s and Ellman’s classification. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(6):909–913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bateman, J.E., The Shoulder and Neck. 1972

  20. Snyder SJ et al (1990) SLAP lesions of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 6(4):274–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Alpantaki K et al (2005) Sympathetic and sensory neural elements in the tendon of the long head of the biceps. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(7):1580–1583

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Szabo I, Boileau P, Walch G (2008) The proximal biceps as a pain generator and results of tenotomy. Sports Med Arthrosc 16(3):180–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Motley GS et al (2002) An arthroscopic technique for confirming intra-articular subluxation of the long head of the biceps tendon: the ramp test. Arthroscopy 18(9):E46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Donoghue DH (1982) Subluxing biceps tendon in the athlete. Clin Orthop Relat Res 164:26–29

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ozaki J et al (1989) Recalcitrant chronic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Role of contracture of the coracohumeral ligament and rotator interval in pathogenesis and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71(10):1511–1515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zanetti M, Pfirrmann CW (2004) Biceps tendon disorders: ultrasound, MR imaging and MR arthrography. Radiologe 44(6):591–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gaskill TR, Braun S, Millett PJ (2011) Multimedia article. The rotator interval: pathology and management. Arthroscopy 27(4):556–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Godeneche A et al (2016) Relationship between subscapularis tears and injuries to the biceps pulley. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bennett WF (2003) Arthroscopic repair of anterosuperior (supraspinatus/subscapularis) rotator cuff tears: a prospective cohort with 2- to 4-year follow-up, classification o biceps subluxation/instability. Arthroscopy 19(1):21–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Braun S et al (2010) Biomechanical evaluation of shear force vectors leading to injury of the biceps reflection pulley: a biplane fluoroscopy study on cadaveric shoulders. Am J Sports Med 38(5):1015–1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ko JY et al (2006) Pathogenesis of partial tear of the rotator cuff: a clinical and pathologic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15(3):271–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fukuda H, Hamada K, Yamanaka K (1990) Pathology and pathogenesis of bursal-side rotator cuff tears viewed from en bloc histologic sections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:75–80

    Google Scholar 

  33. Snyder SJ et al (1991) Partial thickness rotator cuff tears: results of arthroscopic treatment. Arthroscopy 7(1):1–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Karlsson J (2017) In reparable rotator cuff tears with lesions of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon, tenotomy did not differ from tenodesis in terms of function or pain. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99(4):351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kerschbaum M et al (2017) Arthroscopic tenodesis or tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon in preselected patients: does it make a difference? Orthopade 46(3):215–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. van Deurzen DF, Gurnani N, van den Bekerom MP (2016) Is there really a relevant difference between tenotomy and tenodesis for tendinopathy of the long head of the biceps? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(2):295–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Meraner D et al (2016) Arthroscopic tenodesis versus tenotomy of the long head of biceps tendon in simultaneous rotator cuff repair. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(1):101–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nael Hawi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors do not declare any conflict of interest related to the content of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hawi, N., Liodakis, E., Garving, C. et al. Pulley lesions in rotator cuff tears: prevalence, etiology, and concomitant pathologies. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137, 1097–1105 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2721-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2721-z

Keywords

Navigation