Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of patient position on measurement of patellar height ratio

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Patient position is an important factor which can affect the accuracy of patellar height ratio measurement. Varying degree of knee flexion angles and action of quadriceps muscle while supine or standing positions are the most concerning factors.

Methods

Forty healthy subjects had radiographs taken of their knees at 0°, 30°, and 60° of flexion in the supine (non-weight-bearing) and standing (weight-bearing) positions. Patellar height was assessed by five different measurement methods including Insall-Salvati (IS), Modified Insall-Salvati (MIS), Caton-Deschamps (CD), Blackburne-Peel (BP), and Knee triangular ratio (KT).

Results

The mean and standard deviation (SD) in the supine/standing position of each method were IS 1.0 (0.1)/1.05 (0.1), MIS 1.6 (0.2)/1.8 (0.3), CD 1.0 (0.2)/1.2 (0.2), BP 0.9 (0.2)/1.0(0.2), and KT 1(0.1)/1(0.1). Significant differences were found between supine and standing positions using all of the methods except for KT ratio. Comparisons between the various knee flexion angles were found to be statistically significant by most of the measurement methods, although the differences between the means were less than their SD.

Conclusion

Quadriceps action had a significant influence on the mean values obtained by the MIS, CD, and BP methods. In clinical practice, interpretation for patella alta or patella baja of these measurement methods should be normalized according to the patient position. Varying the degree of knee flexion did not produce clinically important effects in any of the five patellar height measurement methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krevolin JL, Pandy MG, Pearce JC (2004) Moment arm of the patellar tendon in the human knee. J Biomech 37:785–788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wahrenberg H, Lindbeck L, Ekholm J (1978) Knee muscular moment, tendon tensionforce and EMG during a vigorous movement in man. Scand J Rehabil Med 10:99–106

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. William R (2005) Anterior knee pain: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13:534–543

  4. Grana WA, Kriegshauser LA (1985) Scientific basis of extensor mechanism disorders. Clin Sports Med 4:247–257

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ward SR, Powers CM (2004) The influence of patella alta on patellofemoral joint stress during normal and fast walking. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 19:1040–1047

  6. Ward SR, Terk MR, Powers CM ( 2007) Patella alta: association with patellofemoral alignment and changes in contact area during weight-bearing. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 89-A:1749–1755

  7. Blumensaat C (1938) Die lageabweichungen und verrenkungen der kniescheibe. Ergeb Chir Orthop 31:149

    Google Scholar 

  8. Insall J, Salvati E (1971) Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology 101:101–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grelsamer RP, Meadows S (1992) The modified Insall-Salvati ratio for assessment of patellar height. Clin Orthop 282:170–176

  10. Caton J, Deschamps G, Chambat P et al (1982) Patella infera: a propos of 128 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 68:317–325 (in French)

  11. Blackburne JS, Peel TE (1977) A new method of measuring patellar height. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 59-B:241–242

  12. Bernageau J, Goutallier D, Debeyre J, Ferrané J (1975) New exploration technic of the patellofemoral joint: relaxed axial quadriceps and contracted quadriceps. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 61(Suppl 2):286–290 (in French)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Biedert RM, Albrecht S (2006) The patellotrochlear index: a new index for assessing patellar height. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:707–712

  14. de Carvalho A, Holst Andersen A, Topp S, Jurik AG (1985) A method for assessing the height of the patella. Int Orthop 9:195–197

  15. Ellington M, Robin B, Jupiter D, Allen B (2014) Plateau-patella angle in evaluation of patellar height in osteoarthritis. Knee 21(3):699–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yiannakopoulos CK, Mataragas E, Antonogiannakis E ( 2008) The effect of quadriceps contraction during weight-bearing on four patellar height indices. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 90-B:870–873

  17. Chareancholvanich K, Narkbunnam R (2012) Novel method of measuring patellar height ratio using a distal femoral reference point. Int Orthop 36(4):749–753

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pal S, Besier TF, Beaupre GS, Fredericson M, Delp SL, Gold GE (2013) Patellar maltracking is prevalent among patellofemoral pain subjects with patella alta: an upright, weightbearing MRI study. J Orthop Res 31(3):448–457

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Aparicio G, Abril JC, Calvo E, Alvarez L (1997) Radiologic study of patellar height in Osgood-Schlatter disease. J Pediatr Orthop 17:63–66

  20. Neogi DS, Bae JH, Seok CW, Lim HC (2014) Impact of patellar height on unicompartment knee arthroplasty: does patella baja lead to an inferior outcome? J Orthop Traumatol. 15(1):47–54

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen AF, Tetreault MW, Levicoff EA, Fedorka CJ, Rothenberg AC, Klatt BA (2014) Increased incidence of patella baja after total knee arthroplasty revision for infection. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 43(12):562–566

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Seil R, Muller B, Georg T, Kohn D, Rupp S (2000) Reliability and interobserver variability in radiological patellar height ratios. Knee Surg Sports TraumatolArthrosc 8:231–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Carson WG Jr, James SL, Larson RL, Singer KM, Winternitz WW (1984) Patellofemoral disorders: physical and radiographic evaluation. Part II: radiographic examination. Clin Orthop Relat Res 185:178–186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Math KR, Ghelman B, Potte HG (1995) Imaging of the patellofemoral joint. In: Scuderi GR (ed) The patella. Springer, New York, pp 83–125

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Berg EE, Mason SL, Lucas MJ (1996) Patellar height ratios. A comparison of four measurement methods. Am J Sports Med 24:218–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Egund N, Lundin A, Wallengren NO (1988) The vertical position of the patella. A new radiographic method for routine use. Acta Radiol 29:555–558

  27. Phillips CL, Silver DAT, Schranz PJ, Mandalia V (2010) The measurement of patellar height: a review of the methods of imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92-B:1045–1053

  28. Roger BA, Thornton-Bott P, Cannon SR, Briggs TWR (2006) Interobserver variation in measurement of patellar height after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 88-B(4):484–488

  29. Seil R, Muller B, Georg T, Kohn D, Rupp S (2000) Reliability and interobserver variabilityin radiological patellar height ratios. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:231–236

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Miss. Siranart Kumpravat for her assistance in data record and statistical analysis, and staff of the Orthopaedic Research Unit is also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rapeepat Narkbunnam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval

Ethics committee approvals were obtained.

Additional information

K. Charoencholvanich is the Co-author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Narkbunnam, R., Chareancholvanich, K. Effect of patient position on measurement of patellar height ratio. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135, 1151–1156 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2268-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2268-9

Keywords

Navigation