Abstract
Background
Patient position is an important factor which can affect the accuracy of patellar height ratio measurement. Varying degree of knee flexion angles and action of quadriceps muscle while supine or standing positions are the most concerning factors.
Methods
Forty healthy subjects had radiographs taken of their knees at 0°, 30°, and 60° of flexion in the supine (non-weight-bearing) and standing (weight-bearing) positions. Patellar height was assessed by five different measurement methods including Insall-Salvati (IS), Modified Insall-Salvati (MIS), Caton-Deschamps (CD), Blackburne-Peel (BP), and Knee triangular ratio (KT).
Results
The mean and standard deviation (SD) in the supine/standing position of each method were IS 1.0 (0.1)/1.05 (0.1), MIS 1.6 (0.2)/1.8 (0.3), CD 1.0 (0.2)/1.2 (0.2), BP 0.9 (0.2)/1.0(0.2), and KT 1(0.1)/1(0.1). Significant differences were found between supine and standing positions using all of the methods except for KT ratio. Comparisons between the various knee flexion angles were found to be statistically significant by most of the measurement methods, although the differences between the means were less than their SD.
Conclusion
Quadriceps action had a significant influence on the mean values obtained by the MIS, CD, and BP methods. In clinical practice, interpretation for patella alta or patella baja of these measurement methods should be normalized according to the patient position. Varying the degree of knee flexion did not produce clinically important effects in any of the five patellar height measurement methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Krevolin JL, Pandy MG, Pearce JC (2004) Moment arm of the patellar tendon in the human knee. J Biomech 37:785–788
Wahrenberg H, Lindbeck L, Ekholm J (1978) Knee muscular moment, tendon tensionforce and EMG during a vigorous movement in man. Scand J Rehabil Med 10:99–106
William R (2005) Anterior knee pain: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13:534–543
Grana WA, Kriegshauser LA (1985) Scientific basis of extensor mechanism disorders. Clin Sports Med 4:247–257
Ward SR, Powers CM (2004) The influence of patella alta on patellofemoral joint stress during normal and fast walking. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 19:1040–1047
Ward SR, Terk MR, Powers CM ( 2007) Patella alta: association with patellofemoral alignment and changes in contact area during weight-bearing. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 89-A:1749–1755
Blumensaat C (1938) Die lageabweichungen und verrenkungen der kniescheibe. Ergeb Chir Orthop 31:149
Insall J, Salvati E (1971) Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology 101:101–104
Grelsamer RP, Meadows S (1992) The modified Insall-Salvati ratio for assessment of patellar height. Clin Orthop 282:170–176
Caton J, Deschamps G, Chambat P et al (1982) Patella infera: a propos of 128 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 68:317–325 (in French)
Blackburne JS, Peel TE (1977) A new method of measuring patellar height. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 59-B:241–242
Bernageau J, Goutallier D, Debeyre J, Ferrané J (1975) New exploration technic of the patellofemoral joint: relaxed axial quadriceps and contracted quadriceps. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 61(Suppl 2):286–290 (in French)
Biedert RM, Albrecht S (2006) The patellotrochlear index: a new index for assessing patellar height. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:707–712
de Carvalho A, Holst Andersen A, Topp S, Jurik AG (1985) A method for assessing the height of the patella. Int Orthop 9:195–197
Ellington M, Robin B, Jupiter D, Allen B (2014) Plateau-patella angle in evaluation of patellar height in osteoarthritis. Knee 21(3):699–702
Yiannakopoulos CK, Mataragas E, Antonogiannakis E ( 2008) The effect of quadriceps contraction during weight-bearing on four patellar height indices. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 90-B:870–873
Chareancholvanich K, Narkbunnam R (2012) Novel method of measuring patellar height ratio using a distal femoral reference point. Int Orthop 36(4):749–753
Pal S, Besier TF, Beaupre GS, Fredericson M, Delp SL, Gold GE (2013) Patellar maltracking is prevalent among patellofemoral pain subjects with patella alta: an upright, weightbearing MRI study. J Orthop Res 31(3):448–457
Aparicio G, Abril JC, Calvo E, Alvarez L (1997) Radiologic study of patellar height in Osgood-Schlatter disease. J Pediatr Orthop 17:63–66
Neogi DS, Bae JH, Seok CW, Lim HC (2014) Impact of patellar height on unicompartment knee arthroplasty: does patella baja lead to an inferior outcome? J Orthop Traumatol. 15(1):47–54
Chen AF, Tetreault MW, Levicoff EA, Fedorka CJ, Rothenberg AC, Klatt BA (2014) Increased incidence of patella baja after total knee arthroplasty revision for infection. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 43(12):562–566
Seil R, Muller B, Georg T, Kohn D, Rupp S (2000) Reliability and interobserver variability in radiological patellar height ratios. Knee Surg Sports TraumatolArthrosc 8:231–236
Carson WG Jr, James SL, Larson RL, Singer KM, Winternitz WW (1984) Patellofemoral disorders: physical and radiographic evaluation. Part II: radiographic examination. Clin Orthop Relat Res 185:178–186
Math KR, Ghelman B, Potte HG (1995) Imaging of the patellofemoral joint. In: Scuderi GR (ed) The patella. Springer, New York, pp 83–125
Berg EE, Mason SL, Lucas MJ (1996) Patellar height ratios. A comparison of four measurement methods. Am J Sports Med 24:218–221
Egund N, Lundin A, Wallengren NO (1988) The vertical position of the patella. A new radiographic method for routine use. Acta Radiol 29:555–558
Phillips CL, Silver DAT, Schranz PJ, Mandalia V (2010) The measurement of patellar height: a review of the methods of imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92-B:1045–1053
Roger BA, Thornton-Bott P, Cannon SR, Briggs TWR (2006) Interobserver variation in measurement of patellar height after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 88-B(4):484–488
Seil R, Muller B, Georg T, Kohn D, Rupp S (2000) Reliability and interobserver variabilityin radiological patellar height ratios. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:231–236
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Miss. Siranart Kumpravat for her assistance in data record and statistical analysis, and staff of the Orthopaedic Research Unit is also gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethics approval
Ethics committee approvals were obtained.
Additional information
K. Charoencholvanich is the Co-author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Narkbunnam, R., Chareancholvanich, K. Effect of patient position on measurement of patellar height ratio. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135, 1151–1156 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2268-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2268-9