Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Operative treatment of displaced Pipkin type I and II femoral head fractures

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and purpose

The optimal surgical approach for the treatment of femoral head fracture remains controversial. We retrospectively reviewed patients with Pipkin type I and II femoral head fractures managed surgically through posterior Kocher–Langenbeck approach and Ganz trochanteric flip approach aiming to define the best approach with the least morbidity.

Patients and methods

Between May 1995 and November 2010, 23 patients (14 men and 9 women) with an average age of 39.1 years (range 27–62) were treated by open reduction and internal fixation of femoral head fractures (5, Pipkin type I; and 18, type II) through Kocher–Langenbeck approach in 11 patients and trochanteric flip (digastric) osteotomy in 12. The two approaches were compared regarding operative time, difficulty of reduction and fixation, amount of blood loss, occurrence of femoral head osteonecrosis or heterotopic ossification and the final functional outcome. The scale of Brooker was used to document heterotopic ossification. The modified Merle d’Aubigne and Postel as well as Thompson and Epstein scores were used for final evaluation.

Results

Trochanteric flip approach was associated with less operative time, less blood loss and improved visualization facilitating direct screw fixation compared with Kocher–Langenbeck approach. Non-union of the trochanteric osteotomy developed in one patient. Heterotopic ossification was seen more in trochanteric flip-approached cases. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head occurred in one patient (8.1 %) of trochanteric flip-approached group and two (18.1 %) of posterior approach group. All patients were followed up for an average of 31 months (range 24–84). Except for one patient, the final outcomes were equal in the two groups.

Conclusions

Despite the limited number of patients, we can conclude that good final outcome does not necessarily follow a specific approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Epstein HC, Wiss DA, Cozen L (1985) Posterior fracture-dislocation of the hip with fractures of the femoral head. Clin Orthop Relat Res 201:9–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hougaard K, Thomsen PB (1988) Traumatic posterior fracture-dislocation of the hip with fracture of the femoral head or neck, or both. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 70:233–239

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sahin V, Karakas ES, Aksu S, Atlihan D, Turk CY, Halici M (2003) Traumatic dislocation and fracture-dislocation of the hip: a long-term follow-up study. J Trauma 54:520–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pipkin G (1957) Treatment of grade IV fracture-dislocation of the hip. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 39:1027–1042

    Google Scholar 

  5. Birkett J (1869) Description of a dislocation of the head of the femur: with remarks. Med Chir Trains 52:133

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dreinhofer KE, Schwarzkopf SR, Haas NP, Tscherne H (1996) Femur head dislocation fractures. long-term outcome of conservative and surgical therapy. Unfallchirurg 99(6):400–409

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mowery C, Gershuni DH (1986) Fracture dislocation of the femoral head treated by open reduction and internal fixation. J Trauma 26(11):1041–1044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schonweiss T, Wagner S, Mayr E, Ruter A (1999) Late results after fracture of the femoral head. Unfalluchirurg 102(10):776–783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dowd GSF, Johnson R (1979) Successful conservative treatment of a fracture dislocation of the femoral head-a case report. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 16-A:1244–1246

    Google Scholar 

  10. Butler JE (1981) Pipkin type-II fractures of the femoral head. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 63:1292–1296

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lange RH, Engber WD, Clancy WG (1986) Expanding application for the herbert scaphoid screw. Orthopedics 9:1393–1397

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Swiontkowski MF, Thorpe M, Seiler JG, Hansen ST (1992) Operative management of displaced femoral head fractures: case matched comparison of anterior vesus posterior approaches for Pipkin I and Pipkin II fractures. J Orthop Trauma 6:437–442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mrchetti ME, Steinberg GG, Goumas JM (1996) Intermediate term experience of Pipkin fracture-dislocations of the hip. J Orthop Trauma 10:455–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E, Ganz K, Krugel N, Berlemann U (2001) Surgical dislocation of the adult hip: a technique with full acess to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Jt Surg (Br) 81:1119–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Henle P, Kloen P, Siebenrock KA (2007) Femoral head injuries: which treatment strategy can be recommended? Injury 38:478–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brooker AF, Browerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 55:1629–1632

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Matta JM, Mehne DK, Roffi R (1986) Fractures of the acetabulum. early results of a prospective study. Clin Orthop 205:241–250

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson VP, Epstein HC (1951) Traumatic dislocation of the hip: a survey of two hunderd and four cases covering a period of twenty-one years. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 33:746–778

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stannard JP, Harris HW, Volgas DA, Alonso JE (2000) Functional outcome of patients with femoral head fractures associated with hip dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 377:44–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Droll KP, Broekhuyse H, O’Brien P (2007) Fracture of the femoral head. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:716–727

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McMurtry IA, Quaile A (2001) Closed reduction of the traumatically dislocated hip: a new technique. Injury 32(2):162–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen ZW, Zahi WL, Ding ZQ, Lian KJ, Kang LQ, Guo LX, Liu H, Lin B (2011) Operative versus nonoperative management of Pipkin type II fractures associated with posterior hip dislocation. Orthopedics 34(5):350. doi:10.3928/01477447-20110317-09

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stockenhuber N, Schweighofer F, Seibert FJ (1994) Diagnosis, therapy and prognosis of Pipkin fractures (femur head dislocation fractures). Chirurg 65:976–982

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vermeiren JA, van Hoye M (1991) Three cases of femoral head fracture in a single care accident. J Trauma 31:579–581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ozcan M, Copuroglu C, Saridogan K (2011) Fractures of the femoral head: what are the reasons for poor outcome? Uls Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 17(1):51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kloen P, Siebenrock KA, Raaymaker ELFB, Marti RK, Ganz R (2002) Femoral head fractures revisited. Eur J Trauma 4:221–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dxion SM, Reddy RP, Williams D, Fern D, Norton (2010) Non-union following bilateral simultaneous ganz trochanteric osteotomy. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2(1):e1. doi:10.4081/or.2010.e1

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bastian JD, Wolf AT, wyss TF, Notzli HP (2009) Stepped osteotomy of the trochanter for stable, anatomic fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:732–738

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gautier E, Ganz K, Krugel N, Gill T, Ganz R (2000) Anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery and its surgical implications. J Bone Jt Surg (Br) 82:679–683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Khan A, Yates P, Lovering A, Bannister GC, Spencer RF (2007) The effect of surgical approach on blood flow to the femoral head during resurfacing. J Bone Jt Surg (Br) 89:21–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Moore KD, Gross K, Anglen JO (1998) Indomethacin versus radiation therapy for prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification in acetabular fractures: a randomised, prospective study. J Bone Jt Surg (Br) 80(2):259–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Burd TA, Hughes MS, Anglen JO (2003) Heterotopic ossification prophylaxis with indomethacin increases the risk of long-bone non-union. J Bone Jt Surg (Br) 85(5):700–705

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mansoura University Hospital, 36 Al-Gomhoria Street, P.O. Box 35516, Mansoura, Egypt

    Mohamed Fathy Mostafa, Wael El-Adl & Mostafa Abd-Elkalek El-Sayed

Authors
  1. Mohamed Fathy Mostafa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wael El-Adl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mostafa Abd-Elkalek El-Sayed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Fathy Mostafa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mostafa, M.F., El-Adl, W. & El-Sayed, M.AE. Operative treatment of displaced Pipkin type I and II femoral head fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134, 637–644 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-1960-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-1960-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation