Abstract
Purpose
We evaluated the clinical results of arthroscopic double-loaded single-row repair for chronic anterior shoulder dislocation.
Methods
From January 2007 to December 2008, of the 47 shoulders with chronic anterior shoulder dislocation that consecutively underwent arthroscopic double-loaded single-row repair using bio-absorbable suture anchors containing two non-absorbable braided sutures, 45 shoulders (95.7 %) had successful follow-up for a minimum of 2 years. The mean age of patients was 23.7 years, the mean frequency of dislocations before surgery was 6.8 events, and the mean interval between the initial dislocation and surgery was 47.9 months. Clinical results were evaluated using ASES, Rowe, VAS score, and range of motion before surgery and at the final follow-up.
Results
The mean number of suture anchors was 3.38 (range 2–6) and the mean number of stitches was 6.32 (range 4–10). Four of the 45 cases had recurrence (8.9 %). Of these four, three cases underwent re-operation using the same method and the other one case showed no specific discomfort except a one-time dislocation that underwent conservative treatment. The preoperative and the final follow-up ASES and Rowe scores were statistically significantly improved (P < 0.001, each) and instability VAS score was significantly decreased (P < 0.001). No significant difference in forward flexion, extension, abduction, or internal rotation was found (P > 0.05), but external rotation at the side was significantly decreased (P = 0.001).
Conclusions
Arthroscopic double-loaded single-row repair using suture anchors, containing two sutures in chronic anterior shoulder dislocation, is a reliable procedure with respect to recurrence rate, range of motion, and shoulder function.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boileau P, Bicknell RT, El Fegoun AB, Chuinard C (2007) Arthroscopic Bristow procedure for anterior instability in shoulders with a stretched or deficient capsule: the ‘‘belt-and-suspenders’’operative technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy 23(6):593–601
Boileau P, Villalba M, Héry JY, Balg F, Ahrens P, Neyton L (2006) Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(8):1755–1763. doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00817
Carreira DS, Mazzocca AD, Oryhon J, Brown FM, Hayden JK, Romeo AA (2006) A prospective outcome evaluation of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 34(5):771–777. doi:10.1177/0363546505283259
Castagna A, Markopoulos N, Conti M, Rose GD, Papadakou E, Garofalo R (2010) Arthroscopic Bankart suture-anchor repair: radiological and clinical outcome at minimum 10 years of follow-up. Am J Sports Med 38(10):2012–2016. doi:10.1177/0363546510372614
Cho NS, Hwang JC, Rhee YG (2006) Arthroscopic stabilization in anterior shoulder instability: collision athletes versus noncollision athletes. Arthroscopy 22(9):947–953. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2006.05.015
Cole BJ, L’Insalata J, Irrgang J, Warner JJ (2000) Comparison of arthroscopic and open anterior shoulder stabilization: a two- to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:1108–1114
Fabbriciani C, Milano G, Demontis A, Fadda S, Ziranu F, Mulas PD (2004) Arthroscopic versus open treatment of Bankart lesion of the shoulder: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy 20(5):456–462. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2004.03.001
Freedman KB, Smith AP, Romeo AA, Cole BJ, Bach BR (2004) Open Bankart repair versus arthroscopic repair with transglenoid sutures or bioabsorbable tacks for recurrent anterior instability of the shoulder: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 32:1520–1527. doi:10.1177/0363546504265188
Green MR, Christensen KP (1995) Arthroscopic Bankart procedure: two- to five-year followup with clinical correlation to severity of glenoid labral lesion. Am J Sports Med 23:276–281. doi:10.1177/036354659502300304
Hantes ME, Venouziou AI, Liantsis AK, Dailiana ZH, Malizos KN (2009) Arthroscopic repair for chronic anterior shoulder instability: a comparative study between patients with Bankart lesions and patients with combined Bankart and superior labral anterior posterior lesions. Am J Sports Med 37(6):1093–1098. doi:10.1177/0363546508331139
Hobby J, Griffin D, Dunbar M, Boileau P (2007) Is arthroscopic surgery for stabilisation of chronic shoulder instability as effective as open surgery? J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1188–1196. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.89B9.18467
Kim KC, Rhee KJ, Shin HD (2009) Arthroscopic three-point double-row repair for acute bony Bankart lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(1):102–106. doi:10.1007/s00167-008-0659-y
Kim KC, Rhee KJ, Shin HD, Kim YM (2008) Arthroscopic separate labral repair and capsular plication with a suture anchor. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128(5):535–538. doi:10.1007/s00402-007-0406-8
Kim SH, Ha KI, Cho YB, Ryu BD, Oh I (2003) Arthroscopic anterior stabilization of the shoulder: two to six-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(8):1511–1518
Kim SH, Ki Ha, Kim SH (2002) Bankart repair in traumatic anterior shoulder instability: open versus arthroscopic technique. Arthroscopy 18(7):755–763. doi:10.1053/jars.2002.31701
Marquardt B, Witt KA, Liem D, Steinbeck J, Pötzl W (2006) Arthroscopic Bankart repair in traumatic anterior shoulder instability using suture anchor technique. Arthroscopy 22(9):931–936. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.105
Mazzocca AD, Brown FM Jr, Carreira DS, Hayden J, Romeo AA (2005) Arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization of collision and contact athletes. Am J Sports Med 33(1):52–60. doi:10.1177/0363546504268037
Voos JE, Livermore RW, Feeley BT, Altchek DW, Williams RJ, Warren RF, Cordasco FA, Allen AA (2010) Prospective evaluation of arthroscopic Bankart repairs for anterior instability. Am J Sports Med 38(2):302–307. doi:10.1177/0363546509348049
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, K.C., Shin, H.D., Cha, S.M. et al. Arthroscopic double-loaded single-row repair in chronic traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132, 1515–1520 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1571-y
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1571-y