Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Isolated AL bundle reconstruction of the PCL

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic results after isolated reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) using the semitendinosus (ST) and gracilis (GR) tendons with the arthroscopic single-bundle technique.

Methods

All patients upon whom we had performed a single-bundle PCL reconstruction between 2002 and 2005 prospectively underwent a standardized follow-up examination after 2 years. Isolated PCL reconstruction was carried out on 41 patients during the observation period. Pre- and postoperative stress radiographs were taken using the Telos stress device in order to evaluate the dorsal translation. Knee joint function and degree of activity were recorded using the Tegner activity score, the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and the overall IKDC score.

Results

33 of 41 patients (80.4%, 17 men, 16 women) completed the study. The posterior tibial translation of −10.1 ± 1.8 mm had an overall average improvement to a postoperative value of −5.0 ± 2.5 mm (p < 0.001). The patients showed a significant improvement in the Tegner activity score from an average 2.8 ± 0.8 points to 5.9 ± 1.2 points (p < 0.001). Evaluation of the subjective IKDC showed a significant improvement from a preoperative score of 41.86 ± 11.49 points to a postoperative score of 69.54 ± 11.39 points (p < 0.001). In total, 24 patients (72.8%) exhibited a normal or nearly normal outcome.

Conclusion

The abovementioned reconstruction technique can achieve a stable knee function in patients with isolated PCL insufficiency. The isolated single-bundle PCL reconstruction offers an improvement regarding the activity level and stability of the knee joint.

Level of evidence

Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AL:

Anterolateral bundle

GR:

Gracilis

IKDC:

International Knee Documentation Committee

PCL:

Posterior cruciate ligament

ST:

Semitendinosus

References

  1. Anderson AF (1994) Rating scales. In: Fu F, Harner C, Vince K (eds) Knee surgery. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 275–296

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chan YS, Yang SC, Chang CH, Chen AC, Yuan LJ, HSU KY, Wang CJ (2006) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament with use of a quadruple hamstring tendon graft with 3- to 5-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 22:762–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen CH, Chuang TY, Wang KC, Chen WJ, Shih CH (2006) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: results with a minimum 4-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1045–1054

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Deehan DJ, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Pinczewski LA (2003) Endoscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results at minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 19:955–962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dowd GS (2004) Reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament: indication and results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:480–491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fanelli GC, Giannotti B, Edson CJ (1994) The posterior cruciate ligament arthroscopic evaluation and treatment. Arthroscopy 10:673–688

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fanelli GC, Edson CJ (2004) Combined posterior cruciate ligament-posterolateral reconstructions with Achilles tendon allograft and biceps femoris tenodesis: 2- to 10-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 20:339–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fowler PJ, Messieh SS (1987) Isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries in athletes. Am J Sports Med 15:553–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Harner CD, Hoher J (1998) Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 26:471–482

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harner CD, Janaushek MA, Kanamori A, Yagi M, Vogrin TM, Woo SL (2000) Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 28:144–151

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hatayama K, Higuchi H, Kimura M, Kobayashi Y, Asagumo H, Takagishi K (2006) A comparison of arthroscopic single-and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: review of 20 cases. Am J Orthopedics 35:568–571

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hermans S, Corten K, Bellemans J (2009) Long-term results of isolated anterolateral bundle reconstructions of the posterior cruciate ligament: a 6- to 12-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 37:1499–1507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hewett TE, Noyes FR, Lee MD (1997) Diagnosis of complete and partial posterior cruciate ligament ruptures. Stress radiography compared with KT-1000 arthrometer and posterior drawer testing. Am J Sports Med 25:648–655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Houe T, Jorgensen U (2004) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction one- vs. two-tunnel technique. Scand J Med Sci Sports 14:107–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobsen K (1976) Stress radiographical measurement of the anteroposterior, medial and lateral stability of the knee joint. Acta Orthop Scand 47:335–344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jung YB, Jung HJ, Tae SK, Lee YS, Yang DL (2006) Tensioning of remnat posterior cruciate ligament and reconstruction of anterolateral bundle in chronic posterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthroscopy 22:329–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Keller PM, Shelbourne KD, McCarroll JR, Rettig AC (1993) Non-operatively treated isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 13:132–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lenschow S, Zantop T, Weimann A, Lemburg T, Raschke StrobelM, Petersen W (2006) Joint kinematics and in situ forces after single bundle PCL reconstruction: a graft placed at the center of the femoral attachement does not restore normal posterior laxity. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126:253–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Margheritini F, Mancini L, Mauro CS, Mariani PP (2003) Stress radiography for quantifying posterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Arthroscopy 19:706–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Patel DV, Alleen AA, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL, Simonian PT (2007) The non-operative treatment of acute, isolated (partial or complete) posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees: an intermediate-term follow-up study. HSS J 3:137–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Petersen W, Lenschow S, Weidmann A, Strobel MJ, Raschke MJ, Zantop T (2006) Importance of femoral tunnel placement in double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: biomechanical analysis using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. Am J Sports Med 34:456–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Petersen W, Zantop T (2010) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterolateral bundle of the posterior cruciate ligament in single-bundle technique with autologous hamstring grafts. Oper Orthop Traumatol 22:354–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Race A, Amis AA (1998) PCL reconstruction: in vitro biomechanical comparison of ‘isometric’ versus single and double-bundled ‘anatomic’ grafts. J Bone Joint Surg 80:173–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sekiya JK, West RV, Ong BC, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH, Harner CD (2005) Clinical outcomes after isolated arthroscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 21:1045–1050

    Google Scholar 

  25. Seon JK, Song EK (2006) Reconstruction of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a clinical comparison of the transtibial and tibial inlay techniques. Arthroscopy 22:27–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stäubli HU, Jakob RP (1990) Posterior instability of the knee near extension. A clinical and stress radiographic analysis of acute injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:225–230

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Strobel MJ, Stedfeld H (1986) Stress radiography of knee joints: an evaluation. Unfallchirurg 89:272–279

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Strobel M, Stedtfeld HW (1990) Diagnostic evaluation of the knee. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Strobel MJ, Weiler A, Schulz MS (2002) Fixed posterior subluxation in posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees: diagnosis and treatment of a new clinical sign. Am J Sports Med 30:32–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Strobel MJ, Weiler A, Schulz MS, Russe K, Eichhorn HJ (2003) Arthroscopic evaluation of articular cartilage lesions in posterior-cruciate-ligament-deficient knees. Arthroscopy 19:262–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Strobel MJ, Schulz MS, Petersen WJ, Eichhorn HJ (2006) Combined anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, and posterolateral corner reconstruction with autogenous hamstring grafts in chronic instabilites. Arthroscopy 22:182–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Strobel MJ, Weiler A (2008) Hinteres Kreuzband. Endopress, Tuttlingen

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sun L, Ning ZJ, Zhang H, Tian M, Ning TM (2007) Arthroscopic single-bundle reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament with quadrupled hamstring tendon. Chin J Traumatol 10:23–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 198:43–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wu CH, Chen AC, Yuan LJ, Chang CH, Chan YS, Hsu KY, Wang CJ, Chen WJ (2007) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament by using a quadriceps tendon autograft: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 23:420–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zantop T, Lenschow S, Lemburg T, Weimann A, Petersen W (2004) Soft-tissue graft fixation in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of the effect of tibial insertion site on joint kinematics and in situ forces using a robotic/UFS testing system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:614–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Geistlich Surgery, Wolhusen, Switzerland for linguistic support. The authors thank Dr. Nina Scola for support in preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Josef-Hospital, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany

    Matthias Lahner, Tobias Vogel & Lars Victor von Engelhardt

  2. Center for Regenerative Medicine and Cartilage Surgery, Bochum, Germany

    Matthias Lahner & Tobias Vogel

  3. Orthopedic Clinic Markgröningen, Markgröningen, Germany

    Martin S. Schulz

  4. Sporthopaedicum Straubing, Straubing, Germany

    Matthias Lahner & Michael J. Strobel

Authors
  1. Matthias Lahner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tobias Vogel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lars Victor von Engelhardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Martin S. Schulz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael J. Strobel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Lahner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lahner, M., Vogel, T., von Engelhardt, L.V. et al. Isolated AL bundle reconstruction of the PCL. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132, 363–370 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1403-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1403-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation