Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

High secondary displacement rate in the conservative treatment of impacted femoral neck fractures in 105 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the dislocation rate after the conservative treatment of impacted femoral neck fractures in four hospitals with the same treatment protocol of partial weight-bearing when tolerated.

Patients and methods

We reviewed the records of 105 patients (mean age 78 years) with an impacted femoral neck fracture, all primarily treated conservatively. Patient demographics, ASA classification and radiographic features were scored.

Results

Secondary displacement occurred in 48 patients (46%). There was no significant correlation (p>0.05) between gender, age, ASA classification or Pauwels angle and secondary displacement.

Conclusion

In our group of patients, secondary displacement was frequent and unpredictable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bentley G (1980) Treatment of nondisplaced fractures of the femoral neck. Clin Orthop 152:93–101

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bout CA, Cannegieter DM, Juttmann J (1996) Percutaneous cannulated screw fixation of femoral neck fractures: the three point principle. Injury 28:135–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bray TJ (1997) Femoral neck fractures: clinical decision making. Clin Orthop 339:20–31

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown JT, Abrami G (1964) Transcervical femoral fracture: a review of 195 patients treated by sliding nail fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43:648–663

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chiu FY, Lo WH (1996) Undisplaced femoral neck fracture in the elderly. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 115:90–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Colles A (1818) Fracture of the neck of the femur. Dublin Hospital Reports 2:334–355

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crawford HB (1960) Conservative treatment of impacted fractures of the femoral neck. A report of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 42:471–479

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cserhati P, Kazar G, Manninger J, Fekete K, Frenyo S (1996) Non-operative treatment for undisplaced fractures: a comparative study of 122 non-operative and 125 operatively treated cases. Injury 27:583–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Flatmark AL Tonsberg TL (1962) The prognosis of abduction fracture of the neck of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 44:324–327

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frandsen PA, Andersen E, Madsen F, Skjödt T (1988) Garden’s classification of femoral neck fractures: an assessment of interobserver variation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70:588–590

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garden RS (1961) Low-angle fixation in fractures of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43:647–663

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jeanneret B, Jakob RP (1985) Konservative versus operative Therapie der Abduktions-Schenkelhalsfrakturen. Unfallchirurg 88:270–273

    Google Scholar 

  13. Manninger J, Kazar G, Salacz T, Varga A (1990) Nondisplaced (impacted) femoral neck fracture: conservative or surgical treatment? Unfallchirurg 16:116–121

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maroske D,Stroh M, Thon K, Drews H (1983) Ender nailing of subcapital fractures of the femur neck (Garden 1). Zentralbl Chir 108:1095–1104

    Google Scholar 

  15. Otremski I, Katz A, Dekel S, Salama R, Newman RJ (1990) Natural history of impacted subcapital femoral fractures and its relevance to treatment options. Injury 21:379–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Parker MJ, Dynan Y (1998) Is Pauwels classification still valid? Injury 29:521–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pryor A (1992) Treatment of undisplaced subcapital fractures. J R Coll Surg Edinb 37:263–264

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pauwels F (1935) Der Schenkelhalsbruch ein mechanisches Problem. Thesis

  19. Raaymakers ELFB (1988) Functional treatment of impacted femoral neck fractures. Thesis

  20. Raaymakers ELFB, Marti RK (1991) Non-operative treatment of impacted femoral neck fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:950–954

    Google Scholar 

  21. Raaymakers ELFB (2002) The non-operative treatment of impacted femoral neck fractures. Injury 33 [Suppl 3]:C8–C14

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rzesacz EH, Weinberg AM, Reilmann H (1995) Gedeckte osteosynthese durch kanulierte Schrauben bei medialen Schenkelhalsfracturen Typ Garden 1 und 2. Unfallchirurg 98:478–482

    Google Scholar 

  23. Saklad M (1941) Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 2:281–284

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tanaka J, Seki N, Tokimura F, Hayashi Y (2002). Conservative treatment of Garden stage 1 femoral neck fracture in elderly patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:24–28

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thorngren KG, Hommel A, Norman PO, Thorngren J, Wingstrand H (2002) Epidemiology of femoral neck fractures. Injury 33 [Suppl 3]:C1-C7

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank R.D. van den Hoed, radiologist, for his evaluation of the radiographs; J.R. van Horn and P.H. Wiersma for permission to use their patient records and radiographs. This study is compliant with the current laws in the Netherlands. No funds have been received to support this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cees C. P. M. Verheyen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verheyen, C.C.P.M., Smulders, T.C. & van Walsum, A.D.P. High secondary displacement rate in the conservative treatment of impacted femoral neck fractures in 105 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125, 166–168 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0791-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0791-1

Keywords

Navigation