Skip to main content
Log in

The mathematics of oscillatory recovery rheology with applications to experiments, the Cox-Merz rules, and the nonlinear modeling of common amplitude sweep behaviors

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Rheologica Acta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oscillatory shear tests are frequently used to determine viscoelastic properties of complex fluids. Both the amplitude and frequency of the input signal can be independently varied, allowing rheologists to probe a wide range of material responses. Historically, most oscillatory tests have focused on the measurement and application of the total strain. However, the total strain is a composite parameter consisting of recoverable and unrecoverable components. Use of only the total strain therefore provides an incomplete description of the rheology. In this work, we provide a mathematical derivation for the determination of the recoverable and unrecoverable components in steady-state linear viscoelastic oscillatory flows via a simple experimental procedure. The relationship between the total strain and its components is fully explored and challenged in the context of how rheologists define moduli and common rheological models. These relations are demonstrated via experimental measurements on model viscoelastic and viscoplastic materials: wormlike micelles and Carbopol 980. Additionally, we show how the derived mathematics fully details the conditions where the Cox-Merz rules are valid in terms of recovery rheology. Finally, we demonstrate how a thorough understanding of the strain components can be used to create a simple nonlinear model that reproduces all common amplitude sweep behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Anton Paar for the use of the MCR 702 through their academic partnership program.

Funding

We acknowledge the funding from the DuPont Fellowship from the University of Illinois Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon A. Rogers.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 66 KB)

Appendix

Appendix

Several different terms describing various stress, strain, phase, and moduli contributions were introduced in this work that are similar in notation and may be confusing to the reader. This appendix provides definitions for each symbol used in this work for reference and clarity.

A0—The amplitude of the total strain signal which consists of an arbitrary number of summed component waves.

An—The amplitude of the nth strain signal that comprises the total strain signal.

G′—The storage modulus. It is the sum of Gsolid and Gfluid.

Gsolid—The solid-like contribution to the storage modulus. It is equivalent to G′ when δun = π/2.

Gfluid—The fluid-like contribution to the storage modulus. It is zero when δun = π/2.

G″—The loss modulus. It is the sum of Gsolid and Gfluid.

Gsolid—The solid-like contribution to the loss modulus.

Gfluid—The fluid-like contribution to the loss modulus.

G*—The complex modulus.

|G*|—The magnitude of the complex modulus.

Gtot—The magnitude of the complex modulus.

Grec—The modulus describing the resistance to recoverable deformation.

Grec—The modulus describing the resistance to elastic recoverable deformation.

Grec—The modulus describing the resistance to viscous recoverable deformation.

Gun—The modulus describing the resistance to unrecoverable deformation.

Gel—The modulus describing the resistance to elastic deformation. It is equivalent to Grec when δun = π/2.

Gvis—The modulus describing the resistance to viscous deformation. It has contributions from Grec and Gun.

t—Time.

Ws(ω)avg—The average energy stored in a cycle of oscillation.

Wd(ω)avg—The average energy dissipated in a cycle of oscillation.

γ—The total strain, this is an oscillatory time-dependent signal. It is comprised of all the strain contributions and is what one measures directly on a rheometer.

γ0—The amplitude of the total strain signal.

γss—The strain shift, the non-zero value around which the steady state total strain signal oscillates. It is equivalent to the unrecoverable strain amplitude at steady state if the applied stress is σ(t) = σ0sin(ωt).

γ0—The amplitude of the total strain signal.

γrec—The recoverable strain, this is an oscillatory time-dependent signal. It is the amount of strain recovered upon instantaneously applying zero stress at time t.

γrec,0—The amplitude of the recoverable strain signal.

γun—The unrecoverable strain, this is an oscillatory time-dependent signal. It is the amount of strain that persists upon instantaneously applying zero stress at time t after the strain shift is subtracted.

γun,0—The amplitude of the unrecoverable strain signal. It is equivalent to the strain shift at steady state.

\(\dot{\upgamma }\)—The strain rate.

\({\dot{\upgamma }}_{un}\)—The unrecoverable strain rate. In a steady shear flow, this is equivalent to the strain rate.

\({\dot{\upgamma }}_{0}\)—The amplitude of the total strain rate signal, equivalent to ωγ0.

δ—The phase difference between the stress and total strain signals.

δ0—The phase difference between the stress and the total strain signal which consists of an arbitrary number of summed component waves.

δn—The phase difference between the stress and the nth strain signal that comprises the total strain signal.

δrec—The phase difference between the stress and recoverable strain signals.

δun—The phase difference between the stress and unrecoverable strain signals, assumed to be π/2.

\(\eta \left(\dot{\gamma }\right)\)—The viscosity measured from a steady shear flow.

\(\eta ^{\prime}\)—The dynamic viscosity.

\({\eta }_{{\text{c}}}\)—The consistency as defined by Cox and Merz.

\({\eta }_{{\text{un}}}\)—The viscosity describing the resistance to unrecoverable rate of deformation.

\(|{\eta }^{*}\left(\omega \right)|\)—The magnitude of the complex viscosity.

σ—The total stress, this is an oscillatory time-dependent signal. It is comprised of all the stress contributions and is what one measures directly on a rheometer.

σ0—The amplitude of the total stress signal.

σe—The elastic stress, this is an oscillatory time-dependent signal.

σv—The viscous stress, this is an oscillatory time-dependent signal.

ω—The angular frequency of oscillation.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burgeson, E.M., Rogers, S.A. The mathematics of oscillatory recovery rheology with applications to experiments, the Cox-Merz rules, and the nonlinear modeling of common amplitude sweep behaviors. Rheol Acta (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-024-01448-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-024-01448-w

Keywords

Navigation