Abstract
Oscillatory shear tests are frequently used to determine viscoelastic properties of complex fluids. Both the amplitude and frequency of the input signal can be independently varied, allowing rheologists to probe a wide range of material responses. Historically, most oscillatory tests have focused on the measurement and application of the total strain. However, the total strain is a composite parameter consisting of recoverable and unrecoverable components. Use of only the total strain therefore provides an incomplete description of the rheology. In this work, we provide a mathematical derivation for the determination of the recoverable and unrecoverable components in steady-state linear viscoelastic oscillatory flows via a simple experimental procedure. The relationship between the total strain and its components is fully explored and challenged in the context of how rheologists define moduli and common rheological models. These relations are demonstrated via experimental measurements on model viscoelastic and viscoplastic materials: wormlike micelles and Carbopol 980. Additionally, we show how the derived mathematics fully details the conditions where the Cox-Merz rules are valid in terms of recovery rheology. Finally, we demonstrate how a thorough understanding of the strain components can be used to create a simple nonlinear model that reproduces all common amplitude sweep behaviors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Ad Hoc Committee on Official Nomenclature and Symbols (2013) Official symbols and nomenclature of The Society of Rheology. J Rheol 57:1047–1055. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.4811184
Alfrey T, Doty P (1945) The methods of specifying the properties of viscoelastic materials. J Appl Phys 16(11):700–713. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1707524
Berg RF (2004) Fluids near a critical point obey a generalized Cox-Merz rule. J Rheol 48(6):1365–1373. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.1807843
Bingham EC (1922) Fluidity and plasticity. McGraw-Hill. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL7204671M/Fluidity_and_plasticity
Cates ME, and SM Fielding 2006 Rheology of giant micelles. Adv Phys 55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00018730601082029.
Cates ME, Candau SJ (1990) Statics and dynamics of worm-like surfactant micelles. J Phys: Condens Matter 2(33):6869–6892. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/2/33/001
Chen LB, Chow MK, Ackerson BJ, Zukoski CF (1994) Rheological and microstructural transitions in colloidal crystals. Langmuir 10:2817–2829. https://doi.org/10.1021/la00020a052
Choi J, Rogers SA (2020) Optimal conditions for pre-shearing thixotropic or aging soft materials. Rheol Acta 59(12):921–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-020-01250-4
Chow MK, Zukoski CF (1995) Nonequilibrium behavior of dense suspensions of uniform particles: volume fraction and size dependence of rheology and microstructure. J Rheol 39:33–59. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.550687
Cox WP, Merz EH (1958) Correlation of dynamic and steady flow viscosities. J Polym Sci 28(118):619–622. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1958.1202811812
Dealy John M, and Kurt F Wissbrun 1990 Melt rheology and its role in plastics processing: theory and applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9738-4.
Donley GJ, Singh PK, Shetty A, Rogers SA (2020) Elucidating the G″ overshoot in soft materials with a yield transition via a time-resolved experimental strain decomposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117(36):21945–21952. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2003869117
Donley Gavin J, Suresh Narayanan, Matthew A Wade, Jun Dong Park, Robert L Leheny, James L Harden, and Simon A Rogers 2023. “Investigation of the yielding transition in concentrated colloidal systems via Rheo-XPCS.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 120 (18). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2215517120.
Ferry JD (1948) Viscoelastic properties of polymer solutions. J Res Natl Bur Stand 41:53–62
Fruh SM, Rodriguez F (1970) Recoverable shear measurements in a parallel plate rheometer. AIChE J 16(6):907–910. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690160609
Gleissle W, Hochstein B (2003) Validity of the Cox-Merz rule for concentrated suspensions. J Rheol 47(4):897–910. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.1574020
Griebler JJ, Rogers SA (2022) The nonlinear rheology of complex yield stress foods. Phys Fluids 34(2):023107. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0083974
Hassager O (2020) Stress-controlled oscillatory flow initiated at time zero: a linear viscoelastic analysis. J Rheol 64(3):545–550. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.5127827
Hyun K, Kim SH, Ahn KH, Lee SJ (2002) Large amplitude oscillatory shear as a way to classify the complex fluids. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 107:51–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0257(02)00141-6
Jeffreys H (1924) The Earth, its origin, history and physical constitution. Cambridge University Press
Jogun S, Zukoski CF (1996) Rheology of dense suspensions of platelike particles. J Rheol 40:1211–1232. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.550798
Kamani KM, Donley GJ, Rekha Rao J, Soc A, Grillet AM, Roberts C, Shetty A, Rogers SA (2023) Understanding the transient large amplitude oscillatory shear behavior of yield stress fluids. J Rheol 67:331–352. https://doi.org/10.1122/8.0000583
Larson RG, Mead DW (1989) Time and shear-rate scaling laws for liquid crystal polymers. J Rheol 33(8):1251–1281. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.550072
Laun HM 1986 “Prediction of elastic strains of polymer melts in shear and elongation prediction of elastic strains of polymer melts in shear and elongation” 459 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1122/1.549855.
Le Grand A, Petekidis G (2008) Effects of particle softness on the rheology and yielding of colloidal glasses. Rheol Acta 47:579–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-007-0254-z
Lee JCW, Porcar L, Rogers SA (2019a) Recovery rheology via Rheo-SANS: application to step strains under out-of-equilibrium conditions. AIChE J 65(12):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16797
Lee J-W, Hong Y-T, Weigandt KM, Kelley EG, Kong H, Rogers SA (2019b) Strain shifts under stress-controlled oscillatory shearing in theoretical, experimental, and structural perspectives: application to probing zero-shear viscosity. J Rheol 63(6):863–881. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.5111358
Lee Johnny Ching-Wei, Weigandt Katie M, Kelley Elizabeth G, Rogers Simon A (2019) Structure-property relationships via recovery rheology in viscoelastic materials. Phys Rev Lett 122(24):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.248003
Lodge AS (1958) A network theory of constrained elastic recovery in concentrated polymer solutions. Rheol Acta 1(2–3):158–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01968859
Mackay ME, Kaffashi B (1995) Stress jumps of charged colloidal suspensions, measurement of the elastic-like and viscous-like stress components. J Colloid Interface Sci 174:117–123. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1995.1372
Maxwell B, Nguyen My (1979) Measurement of the elastic properties of polymer melts. Polym Eng Sci 19(16):1140–1150. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760191603
Mendes S, de Paulo R, Thompson RL, Alicke AA, Leite RT (2014) The quasilinear large-amplitude viscoelastic regime and its significance in the rheological characterization of soft matter. J Rheol 58(2):537–561. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.4865695
Oldroyd JG (1947) A rational formulation of the equations of plastic flow for a Bingham solid. Math Proc Cambridge Philos Soc 43(1):100–105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100023239
Petekidis G, Vlassopoulos D, Pusey PN (2003) Yielding and flow of colloidal glasses. Faraday Discuss. https://doi.org/10.1039/b207343a
Reiner M (1958) Rheology. In: Flügge S (ed) Elasticity and Plasticity/Elastizität und Plastizität. Encyclopedia of Physics/Handbuch der Physik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43081-1_4
Rogers Simon A, Michelle A Calabrese, and Norman J Wagner. 2014. “Rheology of branched wormlike micelles.” https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2014.10.006.
Schofield RK, Scott Blair GW (1932) The relationship between viscosity, elasticity, and plastic strength of soft materials as illustrated by some mechanical properties of flour doughs, I. Proc Royal Soc : Mathematical, Phys Eng Sci 138:707–718. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1932.0211
Sharma V, McKinley GH (2012) An intriguing empirical rule for computing the first normal stress differencefrom steady shear viscosity data for polymer solutions and melts. Rheol Acta 51:487–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-011-0612-8
Shi Jiachun, and Simon A Rogers. 2023. “The benefits of a formalism built on recovery: theory, experiments, and modeling.” J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics 321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2023.105113.
Shim YH, Rogers SA (2023) Understanding the yielding behavior of graphene oxide colloids via experimental strain decomposition. Phys Fluids 35:63117. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0156022
Singh PK, Lee C-W, Patankar KA, Rogers SA (2021) Revisiting the basis of transient rheological material functions : insights from recoverable strain measurements. J Rheol 129(2):129–144. https://doi.org/10.1122/8.0000154
Smith TL, Tschoegl NW (1970) Rheological properties of wheat flour doughs IV. Creep and creep recovery in simple tension. Rheol Acta 9:339–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01975400
Snijkers F, Vlassopoulos D (2014) Appraisal of the Cox-Merz rule for well-characterized entangled linear and branched polymers. Rheol Acta 53(12):935–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-014-0799-6
Tariq S, Jeffrey Giacomin A, Gunasekaran S (1998) Nonlinear viscoelasticity of cheese. Biorheology 35(3):171–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-355X(99)80006-7
Thompson RL, Alicke AA, de Souza PR, Mendes. (2014) Model-based material functions for SAOS and LAOS analyses. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 215:19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.10.013
Tschoegl NW (1989) The phenomenological theory of linear viscoelastic behavior. Springer-Verlag https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73602-5
Wagner MH, Laun HM (1978) Nonlinear shear creep and constrained elastic recovery of a LDPE melt. Rheol Acta 17(2):138–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01517704
Wang S-Q, Wang Y, Cheng S, Li X, Zhu X, Sun H (2013) New experiments for improved theoretical description of nonlinear rheology of entangled polymers. Macromolecules 46(8):3147–3159. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma300398x
Weissenberg K (1947) A continuum theory of rheological phenomena. Nature 159:310–311. https://doi.org/10.1038/159310a0
Xiong W, Wang X (2018) Linear-nonlinear dichotomy of rheological responses in particle-filled polymer melts. J Rheol 62:171–181. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.4999105
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Anton Paar for the use of the MCR 702 through their academic partnership program.
Funding
We acknowledge the funding from the DuPont Fellowship from the University of Illinois Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix
Appendix
Several different terms describing various stress, strain, phase, and moduli contributions were introduced in this work that are similar in notation and may be confusing to the reader. This appendix provides definitions for each symbol used in this work for reference and clarity.
A0—The amplitude of the total strain signal which consists of an arbitrary number of summed component waves.
An—The amplitude of the nth strain signal that comprises the total strain signal.
G′—The storage modulus. It is the sum of G′solid and G′fluid.
G′solid—The solid-like contribution to the storage modulus. It is equivalent to G′ when δun = π/2.
G′fluid—The fluid-like contribution to the storage modulus. It is zero when δun = π/2.
G″—The loss modulus. It is the sum of G″solid and G″fluid.
G″solid—The solid-like contribution to the loss modulus.
G″fluid—The fluid-like contribution to the loss modulus.
G*—The complex modulus.
|G*|—The magnitude of the complex modulus.
Gtot—The magnitude of the complex modulus.
Grec—The modulus describing the resistance to recoverable deformation.
G′rec—The modulus describing the resistance to elastic recoverable deformation.
G″rec—The modulus describing the resistance to viscous recoverable deformation.
Gun—The modulus describing the resistance to unrecoverable deformation.
Gel—The modulus describing the resistance to elastic deformation. It is equivalent to G′rec when δun = π/2.
Gvis—The modulus describing the resistance to viscous deformation. It has contributions from G″rec and Gun.
t—Time.
Ws(ω)avg—The average energy stored in a cycle of oscillation.
Wd(ω)avg—The average energy dissipated in a cycle of oscillation.
γ—The total strain, this is an oscillatory time-dependent signal. It is comprised of all the strain contributions and is what one measures directly on a rheometer.
γ0—The amplitude of the total strain signal.
γss—The strain shift, the non-zero value around which the steady state total strain signal oscillates. It is equivalent to the unrecoverable strain amplitude at steady state if the applied stress is σ(t) = σ0sin(ωt).
γ0—The amplitude of the total strain signal.
γrec—The recoverable strain, this is an oscillatory time-dependent signal. It is the amount of strain recovered upon instantaneously applying zero stress at time t.
γrec,0—The amplitude of the recoverable strain signal.
γun—The unrecoverable strain, this is an oscillatory time-dependent signal. It is the amount of strain that persists upon instantaneously applying zero stress at time t after the strain shift is subtracted.
γun,0—The amplitude of the unrecoverable strain signal. It is equivalent to the strain shift at steady state.
\(\dot{\upgamma }\)—The strain rate.
\({\dot{\upgamma }}_{un}\)—The unrecoverable strain rate. In a steady shear flow, this is equivalent to the strain rate.
\({\dot{\upgamma }}_{0}\)—The amplitude of the total strain rate signal, equivalent to ωγ0.
δ—The phase difference between the stress and total strain signals.
δ0—The phase difference between the stress and the total strain signal which consists of an arbitrary number of summed component waves.
δn—The phase difference between the stress and the nth strain signal that comprises the total strain signal.
δrec—The phase difference between the stress and recoverable strain signals.
δun—The phase difference between the stress and unrecoverable strain signals, assumed to be π/2.
\(\eta \left(\dot{\gamma }\right)\)—The viscosity measured from a steady shear flow.
\(\eta ^{\prime}\)—The dynamic viscosity.
\({\eta }_{{\text{c}}}\)—The consistency as defined by Cox and Merz.
\({\eta }_{{\text{un}}}\)—The viscosity describing the resistance to unrecoverable rate of deformation.
\(|{\eta }^{*}\left(\omega \right)|\)—The magnitude of the complex viscosity.
σ—The total stress, this is an oscillatory time-dependent signal. It is comprised of all the stress contributions and is what one measures directly on a rheometer.
σ0—The amplitude of the total stress signal.
σe—The elastic stress, this is an oscillatory time-dependent signal.
σv—The viscous stress, this is an oscillatory time-dependent signal.
ω—The angular frequency of oscillation.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Burgeson, E.M., Rogers, S.A. The mathematics of oscillatory recovery rheology with applications to experiments, the Cox-Merz rules, and the nonlinear modeling of common amplitude sweep behaviors. Rheol Acta (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-024-01448-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-024-01448-w