Skip to main content
Log in

Asymmetric polymers in bicontinuous microemulsions and their accretion to the bending of the membrane

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Colloid and Polymer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 15 February 2015

Abstract

After linear hydrophilic polymers with a short hydrophobic sticker have been proven to be highly suitable as efficiency boosters in microemulsions, a whole set of asymmetric polymers was studied in more detail. Sticker polymers with two hydrophilic polymeric arms, hydrophobic polymers with ionic stickers, and a Y-shaped tri-arm-polymer were studied for their high surface activity. While low asymmetry of the Y-shaped polymer resulted in very similar dependence as a diblock copolymer, the highly asymmetric polymers showed a renormalized behavior of the bending rigidity coming from preferential accretion of the polymer at the membrane. The experimental evidence for the accretion of the polymer according to the preferential membrane bending is reported here for the first time. Furthermore, the isolated, diffuse counter ion clouds of the ionic sticker polymers act in a way similar to that of a polymer anchored at the membrane. All asymmetric polymers are highly suitable as efficiency boosters in microemulsions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Scheme 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Scheme 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jakobs B, Sottmann T, Strey R, Allgaier J, Willner L, Richter D (1999) Amphiphilic block copolymers as efficiency boosters for microemulsions. Langmuir 15:6707–6711

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Endo H, Mihailescu M, Monkenbusch M, Allgaier J, Gompper G, Richter D, Jakobs B, Sottmann T, Strey R, Grillo I (2001) Effect of amphiphilic block copolymers on the structure and phase behavior of oil–water-surfactant mixtures. J Chem Phys 115:580–600

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maccarrone S, Byelov D, Auth T, Allgaier J, Frielinghaus H, Gompper G, Richter D (2013) Confinement effects in block copolymer modified bicontinuous microemulsions. J Phys Chem B 117:5623–5632

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Frank C, Frielinghaus H, Allgaier J, Richter D (2008) Hydrophilic alcohol ethoxylates as efficiency boosters for microemulsions. Langmuir 24:6036–6043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Helfrich WZ (1973) Elastic properties of lipid bilayers—theory and possible experiments. Naturforschung 28c:693–703

    Google Scholar 

  6. Peliti L, Leibler S (1985) Effects of thermal fluctuations on systems with small surface-tension. Phys Rev Lett 54:1690–1693

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hiergeist C, Lipowsky R (1996) Elastic properties of polymer-decorated membranes. J Phys II France 6:1465–1481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eisenriegler E, Hanke A, Dietrich S (1996) Polymers interacting with spherical and rodlike particles. Phys Rev E 54:1134–1152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Byelov D (2003) A SANS study of microemulsions with polymer additions. WestfälischeWilhelms-Universität, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kawaguchi S, Imai G, Suzuki J, Miyahara A, Kitano T, Ito K (1997) Aqueous solution properties of oligo-and poly (ethylene oxide) by static light scattering and intrinsic viscosity. Polymer 38:2885–2891

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fetters LJ, Lohse DJ, Colby RH (2007) Chain dimensions and entanglement spacings. In: Mark JE (ed) Physical properties of polymers handbook, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 447–454

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Gompper G, Kroll DM (1998) Membranes with fluctuating topology: Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Rev Lett 81:2284–2287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Strey R (1994) Microemulsion microstructure and interfacial curvature. Colloid Polym Sci 272:1005–1019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sottmann T, Strey R (1997) Ultralow interfacial tensions in water–n-alkane–surfactant systems. J Chem Phys 106:8606–8615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pedersen JS, Posselt D, Mortensen K (1990) Analytical treatment of the resolution function for small-angle scattering. J Appl Cryst 23:321–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Teubner M, Strey R (1987) Origin of the scattering peak in microemulsions. J Chem Phys 87:3195–3200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pieruschka P, Safran SA (1993) Random interfaces and the physics of microemulsions. Europhys Lett 22:625–630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pieruschka P, Safran SA (1995) Random interface model of sponge phases. Europhys Lett 31:207–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Peltomäki M, Gompper G, Kroll D (2012) Scattering intensity of bicontinuous microemulsions and sponge phases. J Chem Phys 136:134708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Holderer O, Frielinghaus H, Monkenbusch M, Klostermann M, Sottmann T, Richter D (2013) Experimental determination of bending rigidity and saddle splay modulus in bicontinuous microemulsions. Soft Matter 9:2308–2313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zilman AG, Granek R (1996) Undulations and dynamic structure factor of membranes. Phys Rev Lett 77:4788–4791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mihailescu M, Monkenbusch M, Endo H, Allgaier J, Gompper G, Stellbrink J, Richter D, Jakobs B, Sottmann T, Farago B (2001) Dynamics of bicontinuous microemulsion phases with and without amphiphilic block-copolymers. J Chem Phys 115:9563–9577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kahlweit M, Strey R (1985) Phase behavior of ternary systems of the type H2O-oil-nonionic amphiphile (microemulsions). Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 24:654–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kahlweit M, Strey R, Firman P (1986) Search for tricritical points in ternary systems: water–oil-nonionic amphiphile. J Phys Chem 90:671–677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lekkerkerker HNW, Kegel WK, Overbeek JTG (1996) Phase behavior of ionic microemulsions. Bunsenges Ber Phys Chem 100:206–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lekkerkerker HNW (1989) Contribution of the electric double layer to the curvature elasticity of charged amphiphilic monolayers. Phys A 159:319–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lipowsky R, Döbereiner H-G, Hiergeist C, Indrani V (1998) Membrane curvature induced by polymers and colloids V. Phys A 249:536–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gov N, Safran SA (2004) Pinning of fluid membranes by periodic harmonic potentials. Phys Rev E 69:011101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bickel T, Jeppesen C, Marques CM (2001) Local entropic effects of polymers grafted to soft interfaces. Eur Phys J E 4:33–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Breidenich M, Netz N, Lipowsky R (2000) The shape of polymer-decorated membranes. Europhys Lett 49:431–437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Auth T, Gompper G (2003) Self-avoiding linear and star polymers anchored to membranes. Phys Rev E 68:051801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Auth T, Gompper G (2005) Fluctuation spectrum of membranes with anchored linear and star polymers. Phys Rev E 72:031904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schwindeman, J. A. U.S. Patent 5,321,148 (1994)

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work utilized facilities supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Agreement No. DMR-0944772.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The identification of any commercial product or trade name does not imply endorsement or recommendation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simona Maccarrone.

Electronic supplementary material

Online Resource. Five figures to support the information about the synthesis of the Y-shaped polymer.

Figure S1a

(PDF 43 kb)

Figure S1b

(PDF 38 kb)

Figure S2

(PDF 47 kb)

Figure S3

(PDF 111 kb)

Figure S4

(PDF 81 kb)

Figure S5

(PDF 27 kb)

Appendix A

Appendix A

The PEP-(PEO)2 star-block copolymer was prepared by a five-step process. A detailed reaction scheme is presented in Online Resource 1. The first step of the synthesis includes the anionic polymerization of isoprene using t-butyllithium as initiator and benzene as polymerization solvent. The living polyisoprene (PI) chains were endcapped with trichloromethylsilane. Thereby, a large excess of the chlorosilane linking agent was used such that multiple substitution could be essentially avoided. Thus, the resulting PI polymer still carried two remaining chloro functions in terminal position, PI-Si(Me)-Cl2. In a subsequent second step the difunctional PI-Si(Me)-Cl2 was reacted with a small excess of the organolithium compound 3-(t-butyldimethylsilyloxy)-1-propyllithium. This material, usually used as an OH-protected functionalized initiator for anionic polymerization, was prepared according to a procedure described by Schwindeman [33]. The reaction with the difunctional PI-Si(Me)-Cl2 yielded the corresponding PI-Si(Me)-(3-(t-butyldimethylsilyloxy-1-propyl))2 which was isolated by precipitation in methanol. In the third step, the OH-functionalized PI was converted to poly(ethylene-alt-propylene) (PEP) by catalytic hydrogenation using an unreduced Pd on Bariumsulfate catalyst in heptane at 80 °C. In a fourth step, the difunctionalized PEP polymer was deprotected from the t-butyldimethylsilyloxy-groups. This was achieved by adding a slight stoichiometric excess of 1.25 m hydrochloric acid to a polymer solution in THF and stirring at room temperature for more than 4 h. The deprotected PI-Si(Me)-(3-hydroxy-1-propyl)2 was again isolated by precipitating in methanol. The polymer was dried in high vacuum for several days in order remove all volatile protic impurities. Finally, in the fifth step, the hydroxy groups of the functionalized PEP polymer were transformed to the corresponding potassium analog PI-Si(Me)-(3-(KO-1-propyl))2. This was achieved by titration with freshly prepared potassium naphthalenide solution in THF. The potassium compound was then taken as macroinitiator for the polymerization of ethylene oxide. The polymerization was performed at 50 °C for 24 h and then terminated with acetic acid yielding terminal OH groups. The resulting PEP-(PEO)2 star-block copolymer was precipitated in acetone at −20 °C and finally freeze-dried from benzene in high vacuum. The final PEP(PEO)2 star-block copolymer as well as the precursors were characterized by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and 1H-NMR. SEC-chromatograms were obtained with a PL GPC 220 from Polymer Labs equipped with a refractive index detector. Three Polypore (Polymer Labs) columns with a continuous pore size distribution were used with a 85/15 mixture of tetrahydrofuran and N,N-dimethylacetamide as eluent at 50 °C. Molecular weight distributions were calculated either from PEO-calibration (PEP(PEO)2) or PS-calibration (PI and PEP). 1H-NMR spectra were recorded with a Varian Inova 400-MHz spectrometer. All samples were measured at 295 K in CDCl3 with 5-mm PFG Auto X DB Probe. A small sample of the uncapped PI polymer was removed as reference material for separate characterization. The number average molecular weight, Mn = 5,240 g/mol, was calculated from the NMR spectrum taking the nine protons from the t-butyl initiator group as internal standard. The molecular weight distribution, M w/M n, was smaller than 1.03 as calculated from SEC data using PS calibration. SEC-chromatograms of functionalized and unfunctionalized PI are shown in Online Resource 2, corresponding 1H-NMR spectra in Online Resource 3. From the NMR spectra, by comparing the integrals of the t-butyl group of the initiator with those of the protecting group, one can conclude that the functionalization is close to 100 %. SEC data, however, reveal a small fraction of a polymer with higher molecular weight, most likely due to a double substitution of living PI chains to the crosslinking agent. The molecular weight is increased by the protecting group as can be seen from the slight shift of the SEC curve. The corresponding number average molecular weight is calculated to be Mn = 5630 g/mol. The completeness of the hydrogenation was verified by the disappearance of vinyl-protons in the 1H-NMR-spectrum, which further indicates that the functional groups remained unaffected by the saturation process (Online Resource 4). The deprotection from the t-butyldimethylsilyl-group was monitored by 1H-NMR by following the disappearance of the 12 protons for the four methyl-groups at 0.03 ppm (see Fig. S3). Complete deprotection was achieved after 4 h. SEC-data of the PEP precursor after deprotection ((3-hydroxy-1-propyl)2-Si(Me)-PEP) and of the final product (PEP(PEO)2) are shown in Online Resource 5. The SEC data of PEP-(PEO)2 revealed a narrow molecular weight distribution of M w/M n<1.06. Small fractions of high and low molecular weight byproducts (≈5 %) additionally appear in the chromatograms. For the purpose of this work, however, these small amounts of impurities were neglected and the origin not further explored. The 1H-NMR -spectrum of the final product is shown in Online Resource 6. Molecular weights of the PEO chains were calculated from the integrals of the PEO-methylene protons at ≈3.5 to 3.9 ppm relative to the aliphatic signals between 0.7 and 1.5 ppm of the PEP polymer with known molecular weight. Thus, the PEO number average molecular weight was determined to be Mn = 14250 g/mol (7125 g/mol/PEO-chain) which gives an overall M n of ≈19.8 kg/mol for the PEP(PEO)2 star-block copolymer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brodeck, M., Maccarrone, S., Saha, D. et al. Asymmetric polymers in bicontinuous microemulsions and their accretion to the bending of the membrane. Colloid Polym Sci 293, 1253–1265 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-014-3449-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-014-3449-8

Keywords

Navigation