Skip to main content
Log in

Preparation of ultrathin membranes by layer-by-layer (LBL) deposition of oppositely charged inorganic colloids

  • Original contribution
  • Colloid
  • Published:
Colloid and Polymer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nanofilms were prepared by alternating deposition of Mg–Al (2:1) NO 3 layered double hydroxide (LDH), hectorite and silica particles present study. The charge density of the oppositely charged materials strongly affect film properties like thickness and ordering. The specific charge of the colloidal particles was measured with the particle charge detector. The sequential build up of the thin films was followed by spectrophotometry and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The surface morphology of the formed multilayers was characterized and film thickness determination was performed by atomic force microscopy. The influence of the charge density of hectorite and silica particles on the LDH/hectorite, LDH/silica film thickness was studied. The results reveal that the LDH concentration has a significant effect on the film thickness while the hectorite and silica concentration were not important. Films prepared from the different types of negatively charged inorganic particles in the same concentration range (0.25–1.0%) have similar thickness because of the much higher surface charge relative to the LDH lamellae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iler RK (1965) J Colloid Interf Sci 20:569–594

    Google Scholar 

  2. Decher G, Schlenhoff JB (2003) Multilayer thin films (sequential assembly of nanocomposite materials). Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis B, Anderson JC (1978) Nucleation and growth of thin films. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Decher G, Hong JD, Schmitt J (1992) Thin Solid Films 210:831–835

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lvov Y, Decher G, Möhwald H (1993) Langmuir 9:481–486

    Google Scholar 

  6. Decher G, Lvov Y, Schmitt J (1994) Thin Solid Films 244:772–777

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schmitt J, Grünewald T, Decher G, Kjaer K, Pershan PS, Lösche M (1993) Macromolecules 26:7058–7063

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sukhorukov GB, Möhwald H, Decher G, Lvov YM (1996) Thin Solid Films 284–285:220–223

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zang J, Wang Zhong-lin, Liu J, Chen S, Liu Ghang-yu (2003) Self-assembled nanostructures. Kluwer/Plenum, Dordrecht/New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crepaldi EL, Valim JB (1998) Quim Nova 21:300–311

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schlenoff JB, Dubas ST, Farhat T (2000) Langmuir 16:9968–9969

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cho J, Char K, Hong JD, Lee KB (2001) Adv Mater 13:1076–1078

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee SS, Hong JD, Kim CH, Kim K, Koo JP, Lee KB (2001) Macromolecules 34

  14. Chiarelli PA, Johal MS, Casson JL, Roberts JB, Robinson JM, Wang HL (2001) Adv Mater 13:1167–1171

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sukhorukov GB, Schmitt J, Decher G (1996) Bunsen-Ges Phys Chem 100:948–953

    Google Scholar 

  16. Joanny JF, Castelnovo M, Netz R (2000) Condens Matter 12:A1–A7

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huck WTS, Stroock AD, Whitesides GM (2000) Angew Chem Int End Engl 39:1058

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kalipcilar H, Gade SK, Noble RD, Falconer JL (2002) J Membr Sci 210:113–127

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tomita T, Nakayama K, Sakai H (2004) Micropor Mesopor Mater 68:70–75

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tuan VA, Li S, Falconer JL, Noble RD (2002) J Membr Sci 196:111–123

    Google Scholar 

  21. Arruebo M, Coronas J, Menéndez M, Santamaría J (2001) Sep Pur Tech 25:275–286

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kusakabe K, Kuroda T, Morooka S (1998) J Membr Sci 148:13–23

    Google Scholar 

  23. Menard D, Py X, Mazet N (2003) Carbon 41:1715–1727

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dékány I, Haraszti T (1997) Colloid Surf A 123–124:391–401

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kotov NA, Haraszti T, Túri L, Zavala G, Geer RE, Dékány I, Fendler JH (1997) J Amer Chem Soc 119:6821–6832

    Google Scholar 

  26. Haraszti T, Túri L, Dékány I, Fendler JH (1997) Models Chem 134:785–801

    Google Scholar 

  27. You Y, Zhao H, Vance GF (2002) Colloid Surf A 205:161–172

    Google Scholar 

  28. Prinetto F, Ghiotti G, Graffin P, Tichit D (2000) Micropor Mesopor Mater 39:229–247

    Google Scholar 

  29. Unnikrishnan R, Narayanan S (1999) J Mol Catal A 144:173–179

    Google Scholar 

  30. Malherbe F, Depège C, Forano C, Besse JP, Atkins MP, Sharma B, Wade SR (1998) Appl Clay Sci 13:451–466

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rives V (2002) Appl Clay Sci 22:75–76

    Google Scholar 

  32. Delcorte A, Bertrand P, Arys X, Jonas A, Wischerhoff E, Mayer B, Laschewsky A (1996) Surf Sci 366:149–165

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kam Sang-kyu, Gregory J (1999) Colloid Surf A 159:165–179

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schwarz S, Eichhorn K-J, Wischerhoff E, Laschewsky A (1999) Colloid Surf A 159:491–501

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schwarz S, Eichhorn KJ, Wischerhoff E, Laschewsky A (1999) Colloid Surf A 159:491–501

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish their thanks Prof. Dr. Gerhard Lagaly for the valuable discussions and for the finantial support of the Hungarian Scientific Fund (OTKA) T 043430, M 045609 and for the Ministry of Education NKFP 03/047/2001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Imre Dékány.

Appendix

Appendix

The spectra of applied materials were recorded to support that only the LDH determines the light absorbance of the films. The absorbance of hectorite dispersion and silica sol is negligible according to Fig. 10.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Absorbance versus wavelength spectra of LDH, silica and hectorite dispersions

In order to determine film thickness a calibration curve of absorbance of LDH-dispersion with different concentrations (1–3%) was recorded. The measurements were performed at λ=400 nm (Fig. 11). A calibration curve of this kind is acceptable in case of dispersions. In view of absorbance of films the amount of LDH on the glass surface can be determined on the basis of the calibration curve. This calculated value is called specific deposited amount and is in mg/m2 dimension. The film thickness was calculated from the deposited amount divided by the density of the film.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Absorbance as function of LDH concentration in aqueous suspension

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hornok, V., Erdőhelyi, A. & Dékány, I. Preparation of ultrathin membranes by layer-by-layer (LBL) deposition of oppositely charged inorganic colloids. Colloid Polym Sci 284, 611–619 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-005-1405-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-005-1405-3

Keywords

Navigation