Long-term nutrition trials may fail to respond to their original hypotheses if participants do not comply with the intended dietary intervention. We aimed to identify baseline factors associated with successful dietary changes towards an energy-reduced Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) in the PREDIMED-Plus randomized trial.
Longitudinal analysis of 2985 participants (Spanish overweight/obese older adults with metabolic syndrome) randomized to the active intervention arm of the PREDIMED-Plus trial. Dietary changes were assessed with a 17-item energy-reduced MedDiet questionnaire after 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Successful compliance was defined as dietary changes from baseline of ≥ 5 points for participants with baseline scores < 13 points or any increase if baseline score was ≥ 13 points. We conducted crude and adjusted multivariable logistic regression models to identify baseline factors related to compliance.
Consistent factors independently associated with successful dietary change at both 6 and 12 months were high baseline perceived self-efficacy in modifying diet (OR6-month: 1.51, 95% CI 1.25–1.83; OR12-month: 1.66, 95% CI 1.37–2.01), higher baseline fiber intake (OR6-month: 1.62, 95% CI 1.07–2.46; OR12-month: 1.62, 95% CI 1.07–2.45), having > 3 chronic conditions (OR6-month: 0.65, 95% CI 0.53–0.79; OR12-month: 0.76, 95% CI 0.62–0.93), and suffering depression (OR6-month: 0.80, 95% CI 0.64–0.99; OR12-month: 0.71, 95% CI 0.57–0.88).
Our results suggested that recruitment of individuals with high perceived self-efficacy to dietary change, and those who initially follow diets relatively richer in fiber may lead to greater changes in nutritional recommendations. Participants with multiple chronic conditions, specifically depression, should receive specific tailored interventions.
ISRCTN registry 89898870, 24th July 2014 retrospectively registered http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN89898870.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard for clinical nutrition research. They offer scientific evidence of the highest quality level to infer causality of the health effects of diet interventions . However, an important potential limitation in intervention trials occurs when participants do not comply with the intended dietary intervention, which may lead to worthless results .
In long-term randomized nutritional trials, participants require a high level of commitment to modify their diet. When participants do not sufficiently adherence to their assigned intervention, no substantial between-group contrast may be attained, and the magnitude of dietary effects can be considerably reduced. Consequently, the results of such trials render misleading results or null findings. As such, after 8 years of follow-up in the Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI), a low-fat dietary intervention did not significantly reduce the risk of breast cancer, total cancer, coronary heart disease, certain chronic diseases, and total mortality when compared with a usual high-fat diet [3, 4]. However, the trial failed to achieve the 14% intended fat difference between the intervention and control groups; in fact, only 8% of energy fat reduction was achieved. In addition, further challenges to compliance with interventions on low-carbohydrate diets have been reported . Lack of adherence was also reported in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT), an intervention that intended to obtain reductions in serum cholesterol (with diet), smoking cessation, and treatment of hypertension . Contrasts in dietary changes between the control and intervention groups in the MRFIT were insufficient as to observe significant differences on cardiovascular disease (CVD) . Even in the PREDIMED trial, which successfully demonstrated strong evidence on the role of the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) on primary prevention of CVD , stronger beneficial effects would have been expected if participants had greater adhered to the intervention diet and the low-fat diet as reported in complementary per-protocol analyses. In fact, the per-protocol analyses suggested a much stronger risk reduction in the MedDiet groups compared to the control group than the intention-to-treat analysis.
Total exclusion in advance of overall non-compliant participants in dietary interventions is unattainable as well as it is unrealistic to believe that the original standard during RCTs can be maintained in normal life. Moreover, it is well known that RCTs usually attain only a suboptimal external validity. However, RCTs represent the gold standard for causal inference and recruiting a population that theoretically may help to maximize compliance with the targeted dietary interventions will make the trial more feasible and will potentially ensure sufficient exposure contrast, contributing to make the RCT more informative from a causal inference point of view. Otherwise, costly, long-term trials may continue failing to respond to its original hypothesis. Determining which patients’ and which design components maximize compliance can help investigators identify the most appropriate candidates and modifiable study features that are amenable to be redesigned. Limited knowledge exists on participants’ characteristics which may predict compliance to an intervention fostering the adherence to a healthy dietary pattern such as the MedDiet [9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Most of this research has been limited to cross-sectional studies [11,12,13,14,15], with few longitudinal studies examining factors that predict dietary change in clinical trials [9, 10]. Thus, we aimed to identify factors of compliance to an energy-reduced MedDiet (erMedDiet) after 6 and 12 months of follow-up in the PREDIMED-Plus (PREvención con DIeta MEDiterránea Plus) randomized trial, a 6-year parallel-group, multicenter weight-loss lifestyle intervention program.
Study design and participants
The present study is a longitudinal analysis restricted only to the intervention group of the PREDIMED-Plus trial. The study design and procedures of PREDIMED-Plus have been described in detail [16, 17]. In brief, it assesses the effect of an intensive lifestyle weight-loss intervention on the primary prevention of hard cardiovascular events. The intervention consists of an erMedDiet together with physical activity promotion and behavioral support for specific weight-loss goals on primary prevention of CVD events. More specifically, participants in the intervention group (n = 3406) regularly received individual motivational interviews and monthly phone calls, and attended group sessions in which trained dietitians encourage them to adopt suitable dietary and lifestyle changes. The erMedDiet intervention targeted a reduction of approximately 30% of estimated energy requirements, which represented a reduction goal of approximately 600 kcal/day [16, 17]. Moreover, the erMedDiet aimed to promote a better overall quality of the diet through the limitation of certain foods such as sugar-sweetened beverages, red and processed meats, butter and cream, added sugars, sweets and pastries, and refined cereals, including white bread, in favor of whole grains. Physical activity promotion included a face-to-face educational program  aimed to gradually increase participants’ aerobic physical activity levels to meet, at least, the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines according to the participants’ age and health status . Recommendations of physical activities also included static exercises to improve resistance, strength, flexibility, and balance. On the other hand, participants in the control group (n = 3468) were encouraged to follow an unrestricted energy MedDiet, had biannual educational sessions on the traditional MedDiet with ad libitum caloric intake, and received usual care of general lifestyle recommendations.
Potential candidates to participate in the PREDIMED-Plus trial were overweight/obese [body mass index (BMI) 27–40 kg/m2] males (aged 55–75 years of age) and females (60–75 years of age), with metabolic syndrome , and free of CVD at enrollment. The recruitment of participants of the PREDIMED-Plus took place from September 2013 until October 2016 in 23 Spanish centers. After completing a 4-week run-in period after the initial screening visit, participants were allocated in a 1:1 ratio (either the intervention or control arm) using a computer-generated random allocation sequence stratified by sex, age (< 65, 65–70, > 70 years of age), and center, which was concealed to principal investigators and staff members. Couples in the same household were randomly assigned as a unit. The Institutional Review Boards approved the study protocol of the recruiting centers participating in the study, and the PREDIMED-Plus trial was retrospectively registered at the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial (ISRCTN 89898870; registration date, 24 July 2014), https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN89898870?q=ISRCTN89898870. All participants provided written informed consent.
A 17-item erMedDiet questionnaire  was used to assess dietary adherence to the intervention group (Additional File 1: Table s1). The 17-point scale of erMedDiet adherence is an adapted version of the previously validated 14-item questionnaire used in the PREDIMED trial . This modified version includes stricter cut-off points and additional items aimed to specifically capture the potential caloric restriction for existing weight-loss goals for the erMedDiet. Compliance with each of the 17 items of the questionnaire was scored with 1 point; otherwise, the score was 0 points. As such, the erMedDiet score ranged from 0 to 17, and the higher the score, the greater the adherence. Adherence to the erMedDiet was assessed by the PREDIMED-Plus trained dietitians at baseline and at each follow-up visit.
The outcome of the present study was to attain a successful response to the dietary intervention at 6- and 12-months of follow-up. Successful dietary response was defined as an increase in at least 5 points from baseline to follow-up in the erMedDiet score or any positive increase (≥ 1 point) for participants with 13 or higher scores at baseline. Participants, therefore, were classified as adherent and non-adherent based on their 17-item erMedDiet score change from baseline to 6-month and from baseline to 12-month follow-up visits (Additional File 1: Fig. s1).
Usual diet was ascertained at baseline and follow-up visits by trained dietitians throughout face-to-face interviews using the Spanish version of a previously validated 143-item semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire (SFFQ) [22, 23]. Food consumption frequencies were registered in nine categories ranging from “never or seldom” to “≥ 6 times/day” and food composition tables were used to calculate energy and nutrient intakes for each participant [24, 25]. An additional questionnaire was used to collect updated information in each visit about socio-demographics, personal and family history of disease, and lifestyles, including leisure-time physical activity, assessed by the Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaires (RAPA-1 and RAPA-2) , the validated Minnesota-REGICOR short physical activity questionnaire , and the validated Spanish version of the Nurses’ Health Study questionnaire . Weight and height were measured by registered dietitians with standardized procedures. Blood pressure was measured in triplicate by registered nurses using a validated semiautomatic oscillometer (Omron HEM 297 705C). Blood samples were collected after an overnight fast to determine levels of fasting blood glucose, among other determinations, with standard enzymatic methods.
Potential baseline factors of compliance to MedDiet were selected considering existing literature and preceding results of the PREDIMED trial [9, 10]. We categorized candidate factors in the following groups: socio-demographics, health-related characteristics, study design features, lifestyle behaviors, and baseline energy and nutrient intake. Sociodemographic characteristics included sex, age (< 65 years, and ≥ 65 years), marital status (married, single, widowed, and others/missing), highest attained educational level (college/university, secondary, primary or less), occupation (retired, working, unemployed/unable to work, housewife), and number of people living in the household (continuous). Health-related characteristics comprised family history of premature CVD (dichotomous), number of chronic conditions (≤ 3 and > 3), self-reported score of nervousness and/or aggressiveness behavior (quartiles), body weight (continuous, per 5 kg), waist circumference (continuous, per 5 cm), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (both continuous, per 5 mm Hg), and fasting blood glucose (continuous, per 10 mg/dL). Family history of premature CVD was defined as any immediate family member deceased by CVD younger than 55 years for men, and 65 years for women; for number of chronic conditions the following diagnoses were considered: hypertension, obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2), type 2 diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, cancer, and depression; self-reported measures of nervousness and/or aggressiveness behavior were self-reported on a scale from 1 (very low self-perception) to 10 (very high self-perception). Study design features included recruitment period (< 1st year, between 1st and 2nd year, between 2nd and 3rd year, and after 3rd year of recruitment), and total field center workload (below and above the median). Recruitment year was referred to the period (years) in which participants were recruited, from the date of the first recruited participant (Sep/05/2013) to the date of the last recruited participant (Oct/31/2016); total field center workload was quantified as the number of participants per center. Lifestyle behavior included leisure-time physical activity (METs-min/week, quartiles) and RAPA test (sedentary/under-active, under-active regular-activities, under-active regular, and active), 30-s chair test (number of repeats, quartiles), smoking status (never, current, former), alcohol intake other than wine (≤ 5 g/day and > 5 g/day), sleeping (hours, quartiles), and self-efficacy for diet modification (little/some and high). Self-efficacy for diet modification was defined as participants’ beliefs in their ability to achieve dietary change with three options (little, some, or high); given the scarce number of participants responding “little”, we merged the two lower categories. Energy and nutrient intake factors comprised baseline total energy intake (kcal/day, sex-specific quartiles), predefined limits of energy intake (within limits: 500–3500 kcal for women and 800–4000 for men, and beyond limits: < 500 or > 3500 kcal/day for women and < 800 or > 4000 kcal/day for men) were used to select the analytical sample , fruit + vegetable consumption (g/day, sex-specific quartiles), meat consumption (g/day, sex-specific quartiles), baseline dietary fat intake (%E, quartiles), fiber intake (g/day, sex-specific quartiles), carbohydrate quality index (CQI) (score, quartiles), and baseline 17-point erMedDiet adherence (score, quartiles). CQI referred to the quality of dietary carbohydrate intake and was constructed upon the following four carbohydrate quality domains: high total dietary fiber intake, low glycemic index, high whole-grain carbohydrate: total grain carbohydrate ratio, and high solid carbohydrate: total carbohydrate ratio .
Descriptive statistics, including means and standard deviations (SD) for quantitative variables and percentages for categorical variables, were used to describe baseline characteristics of participants categorized as non-adherent and adherent according to their 17-item erMedDiet score change from baseline to 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Chi-squared tests for categorical variables and Student’s t test (the assumption of normality was not violated given the large sample size) for continuous variables were used to assess differences between groups. We performed crude and adjusted multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate the probability of appropriate compliance according to the aforementioned baseline factors. Hence, odds ratios (OR) < 1 suggest poor compliance of dietary change, whereas ORs > 1 suggest successful compliance. For categorical variables, we used as reference the category which was expected a priori to show a greater odds of compliance, while the reference category for ordinal factors was considered the lowest category (usually, the first quartile). Tests of linear trend across categories of potential factors were run assigning the median to each category and treating the resulting variables as continuous. Participants with missing values in candidate factors were categorized as a separate group.
We conducted several sensitivity analyses using multivariable logistic regression models to corroborate the consistency of factors under different scenarios: excluding participants with any missing value; excluding participants with baseline score ≥ 13 points in the 17-item erMedDiet adherence questionnaire; and using an alternative definition of the outcome, especifically, scoring > 12 points at follow-up (instead of our original definition, Additional File 1: Fig. s1).
All analyses were performed using Stata software, version 16.0 (StataCorp LP) using the PREDIMED-Plus database updated in March 2019. A two-sided p value < 0.05 was deemed as statistically significant.
We excluded participants in the control group of the trial. Among the 3406 participants of the intervention arm of the PREDIMED-Plus trial, we excluded 409 (12%) individuals with missing data on the 17-item erMedDiet questionnaire either at baseline or during follow-up, and 12 (0.4%) participants with missing information of energy intake. The remaining 2985 individuals (1445 females and 1540 males) were included in our analyses. There were neither withdrawals nor losses to follow-up before the study completion (Fig. 1).
The mean (SD) age of the 2985 participants included in the study was 64.9 (4.9) years, 76% of them were married, 56% retired, 47% received primary education or less, and 45% never smoked. Baseline characteristics of participants according to their changes in the adherence to the 17-item erMedDiet from baseline to 6-month and 12-month follow-up period are shown in Table 1. At 6 months, nearly half of the participants (49.5%) successfully attained an adequate change, while the proportion of adherent participants at 12 months was slightly higher (52.4%).
Factors of dietary change (6 months)
Table 2 shows the main results for the crude and multivariable logistic regression analyses for the association between baseline characteristics and dietary compliance after 6 and 12 months of follow-up in the intervention group of the trial. Baseline characteristics significantly associated with better compliance at 6-month follow-up in multivariable analyses were: moderate level of physical activity (METs-min/week), high self-reported self-efficacy at baseline to change their diet, moderate consumption of fruit + vegetables, moderate meat consumption, and high fiber intake. On the other hand, being single (vs. married), having more than three chronic conditions, and being a current smoker (vs. never smoker) were associated with poorer compliance. Regarding study design features, high total field center workload was the only predictor associated with poorer compliance. Additionally, participants with a previous diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and depression were less likely to adhere to the intervention (Table 3). Noteworthy, when introducing in the model the predictor chronic conditions categorized by the number of conditions (≤ 1, 2, 3, 4, and ≥ 5) instead of as a dichotomous variable (≤ 3 and > 3 conditions), the odds of compliance monotonically decreased as the number of chronic conditions increased (OR: 0.77, 95% CI 0.56, 1,04 for 2 conditions; OR: 0.75, 95% CI 0.55, 1,01 for 3 conditions; OR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.37, 0.73 for 4 conditions; OR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.25, 0,68 for ≥ 5 conditions; ref.: ≤ 1 conditions; data not shown). Additionally, the likelihood of successful compliance decreased across successive quartiles of higher baseline adherence to the erMedDiet score, probably representing a ceiling effect (Additional File 1: Table s2). The factors independently associated with dietary compliance at 6-month follow-up are shown in Fig. 2.
Factors of dietary change (12 months)
The factors associated with compliance after 12 months of follow-up identified in the logistic regression models are displayed in Table 2. Greater levels of nervousness and/or aggressiveness, regular and active levels of physical activity, high self-reported self-efficacy to modify diet, and elevated fiber intake at baseline were associated with better compliance. In turn, older age (≥ 65 years), being working (vs. retired), unemployed or unable to work (vs. retired), having more than three chronic conditions, and being a current smoker (vs. never smoker) were associated with poorer compliance. For study design features, the odds of attaining compliance were significantly higher for participants recruited in the second and third years of the trial and participants belonging to field centers with a lower workload. Consistently with the results at 6-month follow-up, participants with depression less likely to comply with the intervention (Table 3). As expected because of a potential ceiling effect, participants with a higher baseline adherence to the erMedDiet showed a smaller dietary change (Additional File 1: Table s2). The factors independently associated with dietary compliance at 12-month follow-up are shown in Fig. 2.
We re-ran the models under different assumptions (Additional File 1: Tables s3, s4, and s5). The baseline potential factors which were consistently independently associated with successful compliance after 6 and 12 months of follow-up in all sensitivity analyses included high self-reported self-efficacy for diet modification at baseline and higher fiber intake. Consistent potential factors of poor compliance included the presence of chronic conditions (both dichotomized and categorized), depression, and higher baseline adherence to erMedDiet scale. High field center workload was the only design feature associated with poor adherence. This finding might be related to a suboptimal proportion of staff with respect to participants in the centers with a higher number of participants. Of note, the association between higher fiber intake and higher compliance became inverse when we no longer adjusted for baseline adherence to the 17-item erMedDiet score. This circumstance was also observed when conducting the main analysis.
The PREDIMED-Plus is an intensive nutritional intervention based on major long-term dietary behavioral change aimed to improve participants’ health outcomes, including their risk of cardiovascular events, which also includes regular physical activity and weight-loss goals . We longitudinally examined baseline characteristics related to the attainment of successful dietary behavior changes. The most consistent factors of successful compliance were high baseline perceived self-efficacy to modify diet and high baseline fiber intake. In contrast, the presence of depression and multiple chronic diseases were factors independently associated with poorer compliance.
Previous studies have reported inconclusive results regarding the association between adherence to the MedDiet and socio-demographic characteristics, including sex [9,10,11, 13, 15, 32,33,34], or working status [9, 10, 34, 35]. However, married individuals compared to single people seem to respond better to intended dietary changes in previous studies [11, 34], probably because the greater predominance of structured and routine dietary habits among married persons. In our study, we did not find any consistent pattern.
Individuals with multiple chronic conditions may benefit the most from adhering to a healthy dietary pattern. For instance, the MedDiet has demonstrated numerous positive effects on preventing chronic diseases and improving health outcomes, including type 2 diabetes and depression [8, 36]. Nevertheless, in our study, we found that participants with diabetes and those with a higher number of chronic conditions were less likely to attain high adherence. Prior findings in other studies showed similar results. For example, participants with obesity have been reported to show poorer MedDiet adherence , whereas having diabetes and suffering from a greater number of chronic conditions were independent factors of lower compliance [9, 10]. Additionally, our results suggested that a diagnosis of depression at baseline is a strong barrier to modify dietary behavior. Similar findings of poor behavior change among participants with depression have been observed in long-term dietary interventions , dietary weight-loss trials , and prevention programs for individuals with metabolic syndrome . Moreover, depression has been associated with poorer attendance and early drop-outs in behavioral trials . Potential explanations for these findings may rely on the inherent psychological characteristics of individuals with depression and on the established unhealthy dietary habits that may lead individuals with depression and other chronic conditions to their current health status; nutrition myths or misconceptions related to their diseases , and excessive nutritional information received from health care professionals and other sources such as family, friends, or websites , may additionally explain these findings. Based on these associations, future dietary behavioral RCTs should carefully collect information about participants’ psychological attributes at baseline, as this information is frequently sub-optimally collected . Exclusion of individuals with depression would allow to identify probable candidates for early drop-outs and low compliance, and ensure a significant contrast between the intervention and control arms of future trials. On the other hand, careful design of RCTs specifically targeting these participants with depression may be a desirable approach so that they could also beneficiate from tailored dietary interventions, but they will need very specific and particularly intensive intervention protocols. A more intense and specific dietary counseling with adapted information and personalized messages for individuals with chronic conditions is also highly warranted.
Lifestyle and behavior
In our study, high self-efficacy, a social cognitive theory component, was an important predictor of better compliance to the erMedDiet. According to Bandura et al. , an individual’s beliefs according to his/her abilities determine certain behaviors. In this case, participants’ beliefs regarding personal success on the desired outcome (dietary changes) may determine their effort level. Hence, participants with high perceived self-efficacy are expected to pursue dietary modifications until successful dietary change is achieved. Consistent with our findings, high self-efficacy has been a promising predictor in weight-loss interventions and physical activity among overweight/obese populations . Moreover, long-term maintenance of high self-efficacy has been associated with greater weight loss . This evidence emphasizes the importance of collecting this information at baseline and incorporating specific strategies to maintain a high self-efficacy level throughout the follow-up period of the interventions. Negotiated goal setting, continuous persuasion, permanent performance feedback, shared decision-making, alternatives to overcome struggles faced by participants to improve their diets, and problem-solving strategies are different approaches which may improve and maintain self-efficacy along the trial. These strategies have been key in previous RCTs, such as the PREDIMED, to successfully improve participants’ adherence to the MedDiet in the intervention groups .
Participants with a poorer baseline adherence to the erMedDiet score, had greater room for improvement whereas participants with higher adherence at baseline may face a ceiling effect. Therefore, it is not surprising to find better achievements among those with poorer scores at baseline. Interestingly, we found that higher fiber intake was a factor independently associated with better dietary changes. In previous studies, fiber intake resulted a robust predictor of weight loss and beneficial food-related behavioral changes [47, 48]. Participants with high fiber intake at baseline may be more health conscious and they may be more likely to better adapt to fiber-rich food patterns such, as the Mediterranean diet than individuals with poorer baseline fiber intake. This finding was observed after adjustment for the baseline adherence to the 17-item erMedDiet score. This is important, given that participants with poorer adherence to the MedDiet usually tend to have lower fiber intake, as it was the case in our study.
The current study has some limitations. First, information about the participants’ diet and health conditions was self-reported, and recall bias and misreporting may be present when using self-reported information. Nevertheless, their self-reported changes were paralleled by objective changes in cardiovascular risk factors as reported elsewhere [17, 30]. Second, the observational nature of the study limits causal inferences. Third, although we tested several characteristics to predict behavior change and adjusted for a wide array of potential confounding factors, failure to control for other factors may be possible and we cannot exclude residual confounding. Nevertheless, we examined multiple potential factors chosen according to the existing literature and some of our previous studies. And fourth, the PREDIMED-Plus includes an overweight/obese community-dwelling population with metabolic syndrome which is not representative of the general population. However, this population is becoming more predominant in developed and developing countries, increasing the actual practical interest of our findings. Despite the aforementioned limitations, the strength of our study relies on the evaluation of a high number of baseline candidate factors, the inclusion of several sensitivity analyses that corroborated our findings, and the use of high-quality prospective data with a very high retention rate from one of the largest nutritional trials, the PREDIMED-Plus trial.
The present study provides a better understanding of factors associated with successful compliance to a dietary intervention. Recruitment of individuals highly motivated to change their diet and of those who follow a fiber-rich dietary pattern but even so, they poorly adhere at baseline to the intended diet would potentially increase the needed contrast between the arms of a dietary intervention trial. Participants with multiple chronic conditions, particularly depression, should receive tailored protocols and specific attention, because they are not likely to respond to conventional interventions. Future studies should investigate strategies to promote better compliance among those individuals with features which predict poor compliance to the intended dietary behavior changes.
Availability of data and material
There are restrictions on the availability of data for the PREDIMED-Plus trial, due to the signed consent agreements around data sharing, which only allow access to external researchers for studies following the project purposes. Requestors wishing to access the PREDIMED-Plus trial data used in this study can make a request to the PREDIMED-Plus trial Steering Committee chair: firstname.lastname@example.org. The request will then be passed to members of the PREDIMED-Plus Steering Committee for deliberation.
Pan A, Lin X, Hemler E, Hu FB (2018) Diet and cardiovascular disease: advances and challenges in population-based studies. Cell Metab 27:489–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.02.017
Satija A, Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB et al (2018) Perspective: are large, simple trials the solution for nutrition research? Adv Nutr 9:378–387. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmy030
Howard BV, Van Horn L, Hsia J et al (2006) Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of cardiovascular disease: the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled dietary modification trial. JAMA 295:655–666. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.6.655
Prentice RL, Caan B, Chlebowski RT et al (2006) Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of invasive breast cancer: the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled dietary modification trial. JAMA 295:629–642. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.6.629
Orloff JN, Aronne LJ, Shukla AP (2018) The challenge of meeting prescribed carbohydrate intake goals in low-carbohydrate diet studies. Am J Clin Nutr 107:673–674. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqy023
Kjelsberg MO (1982) Multiple risk factor intervention trial: risk factor changes and mortality results. JAMA 248:1465–1477. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1982.03330120023025
Willett WC, Stampfer MJ (1990) Dietary fat and cancer: another view. Cancer Causes Control 1:103–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053190
Fernández-Lázaro CI, Ruiz-Canela M, Martínez-González MÁ (2021) Deep dive to the secrets of the PREDIMED trial. Curr Opin Lipidol 32:62–69. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOL.0000000000000731
Zazpe I, Estruch R, Toledo E et al (2010) Predictors of adherence to a Mediterranean-type diet in the PREDIMED trial. Eur J Nutr 49:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-009-0053-7
Downer MK, Gea A, Stampfer M et al (2016) Predictors of short- and long-term adherence with a Mediterranean-type diet intervention: the PREDIMED randomized trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13:67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0394-6
Hu EA, Toledo E, Diez-Espino J et al (2013) Lifestyles and risk factors associated with adherence to the mediterranean diet: a baseline assessment of the PREDIMED trial. PLoS ONE 8:e60166. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060166
Patino-Alonso MC, Recio-Rodríguez JI, Belio JFM et al (2014) Factors associated with adherence to the Mediterranean diet in the adult population. J Acad Nutr Diet 114:583–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2013.07.038
Ruggiero E, Di Castelnuovo A, Costanzo S et al (2019) Socioeconomic and psychosocial determinants of adherence to the Mediterranean diet in a general adult Italian population. Eur J Public Health 29:328–335. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky127
Peng W, Goldsmith R, Berry EM (2016) Demographic and lifestyle factors associated with adherence to the Mediterranean diet in relation to overweight/obesity among Israeli adolescents: findings from the Mabat Israeli national youth health and nutrition survey. Public Health Nutr 20:883–892. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980016002779
Grosso G, Marventano S, Buscemi S et al (2013) Factors associated with adherence to the Mediterranean diet among adolescents living in Sicily, southern Italy. Nutrients 5:4908–4923. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu5124908
Martínez-González MA, Buil-Cosiales P, Corella D et al (2019) Cohort Profile: Design and methods of the PREDIMED-Plus randomized trial. Int J Epidemiol 48:387–388o. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy225
Sayón-Orea C, Razquin C, Bulló M et al (2019) Effect of a Nutritional and Behavioral Intervention on energy-reduced mediterranean diet adherence among patients with metabolic syndrome: interim analysis of the PREDIMED-plus randomized clinical trial. JAMA 322:1486–1499. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.14630
Schröder H, Cárdenas-Fuentes G, Martínez-González MA et al (2018) Effectiveness of the physical activity intervention program in the PREDIMED-Plus study: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 15:110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0741-x
World Health Organization (2021) Physical activity and older adults. https://www.who.int/ncds/prevention/physical-activity/factsheet_olderadults/en. Accessed 1 Mar 2020
Alberti KGMM, Eckel RH, Grundy SM et al (2009) Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the international diabetes federation task force on epidemiology and prevention; National heart, lung, and blood institute; American heart association; World heart federation; International. Circulation 120:1640–1645. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644
Schröder H, Zomeño MD, Martínez-González MA et al (2021) Validity of the energy-restricted Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener. Clin Nutr 40:4971–4979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2021.06.030
de la Fuente-Arrillaga C, Vázquez Ruiz Z, Bes-Rastrollo M et al (2010) Reproducibility of an FFQ validated in Spain. Public Health Nutr 13:1364–1372. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980009993065
Fernández-Ballart JD, Piñol JL, Zazpe I et al (2010) Relative validity of a semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire in an elderly Mediterranean population of Spain. Br J Nutr 103:1808–1816. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114509993837
Moreiras O, Carbajal A, Cabrera L, Cuadrado C (2011) Tablas de Composición de Alimentos (Food Composition Tables), 15th edn. Pirámide, Madrid
Mataix-Verdú J, García-Diaz L, Manas M et al (2003) Tabla de Composición de Alimentos (Spanish Food Composition Tables), 4th edn. Universidad de Granada Press, Granada
Topolski TD, LoGerfo J, Patrick DL et al (2006) The rapid assessment of physical activity (RAPA) among older adults. Prev Chronic Dis 3:A118
Molina L, Sarmiento M, Peñafiel J et al (2017) Validation of the regicor short physical activity questionnaire for the adult population. PLoS ONE 12:e0168148. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168148
Martínez-González MA, López-Fontana C, Varo JJ et al (2005) Validation of the Spanish version of the physical activity questionnaire used in the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals’ Follow-up Study. Public Health Nutr 8:920–927. https://doi.org/10.1079/PHN2005745
Willet WC (2013) Nutritional epidemiology, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Martínez-González MA, Fernandez-Lazaro CI, Toledo E et al (2019) Carbohydrate quality changes and concurrent changes in cardiovascular risk factors: a longitudinal analysis in the PREDIMED-plus randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr 111:291–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqz298
Martínez-González MÁ, Corella D, Salas-Salvadó J et al (2012) Cohort profile: design and methods of the PREDIMED study. Int J Epidemiol 41:377–385. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq250
Sánchez-Villegas A, Martínez JA, De Irala J, Martínez-González MA (2002) Determinants of the adherence to an “a priori” defined Mediterranean dietary pattern. Eur J Nutr 41:249–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-002-0382-2
González CA, Argilaga S, Agudo A et al (2002) Diferencias sociodemográficas en la adhesión al patrón de dieta mediterránea en poblaciones de España (sociodemographic differences in adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern in Spanish populations). Gac Sanit 16:214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0213-9111(02)71664-6
Jurado D, Burgos-Garrido E, Diaz FJ et al (2012) Adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern and personality in patients attending a primary health center. J Acad Nutr Diet 112:887–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2012.02.026
Marventano S, Godos J, Platania A et al (2018) Mediterranean diet adherence in the Mediterranean healthy eating, aging and lifestyle (MEAL) study cohort. Int J Food Sci Nutr 69:100–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2017.1332170
Sánchez-Villegas A, Delgado-Rodríguez M, Alonso A et al (2009) Association of the Mediterranean dietary pattern with the incidence of depression: the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra/University of Navarra follow-up (SUN) Cohort. Arch Gen Psychiatry 66:1090–1098. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.129
Wang JB, Pierce JP, Ayala GX et al (2015) Baseline depressive symptoms, completion of study assessments, and behavior change in a long-term dietary intervention among breast cancer survivors. Ann Behav Med 49:819–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-015-9716-1
Somerset SM, Graham L, Markwell K (2011) Depression scores predict adherence in a dietary weight loss intervention trial. Clin Nutr 30:593–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2011.04.004
Susin N, De Melo BR, Ludwig MWB et al (2016) Predictors of adherence in a prevention program for patients with metabolic syndrome. J Health Psychol 21:2156–2167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105315572451
Moroshko I, Brennan L, O’Brien P (2011) Predictors of dropout in weight loss interventions: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev 12:912–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00915.x
Lesser LI, Mazza MC, Lucan SC (2015) Nutrition myths and healthy dietary advice in clinical practice. Am Fam Physician 91:634–638
Ball L, Davmor R, Leveritt M et al (2016) Understanding the nutrition care needs of patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a need for open communication and patient-focussed consultations. Aust J Prim Health 22:416–422. https://doi.org/10.1071/PY15063
Somerset SM, Markwell K, Al-Foraih M (2013) A systematic review of baseline psychosocial characterisation in dietary randomised controlled trials for weight loss. Eur J Clin Nutr 67:697–702. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2013.77
Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York
Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Marques MM et al (2015) Successful behavior change in obesity interventions in adults: a systematic review of self-regulation mediators. BMC Med 13:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-007-9135-2
Warziski MT, Sereika SM, Styn MA et al (2008) Changes in self-efficacy and dietary adherence: the impact on weight loss in the PREFER study. J Behav Med 31:81–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-007-9135-2
Miketinas DC, Bray GA, Beyl RA et al (2019) Fiber intake predicts weight loss and dietary adherence in adults consuming calorie-restricted diets: the POUNDS lost (Preventing Overweight Using Novel Dietary Strategies) study. J Nutr 149:1742–1748. https://doi.org/10.1093/JN/NXZ117
Hiel S, Bindels LB, Pachikian BD et al (2019) Effects of a diet based on inulin-rich vegetables on gut health and nutritional behavior in healthy humans. Am J Clin Nutr 109:1683–1695. https://doi.org/10.1093/AJCN/NQZ001
More extensive acknowledgments are included in the online Additional File 1.
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. The PREDIMED-Plus trial was supported by the European Research Council (advanced research grant 2014–2019, 340918 to MAM-G as PI) and by the official Spanish Institutions for funding scientific biomedical research, CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn) and Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), through the Fondo de Investigación en Salud (FIS), which is cofunded by the European Regional Development Fund coordinated by J.S.-S. and J.V., including the following projects: PI13/00673, PI13/00492, PI13/00272, PI13/01123, PI13/00462, PI13/00233, PI13/02184, PI13/00728, PI13/01090, PI13/01056, PI14/01722, PI14/00636, PI14/00618, PI14/00696, PI14/01206, PI14/01919, PI14/00853, PI14/01374, PI14/00972, PI14/00728, PI14/01471, PI16/00473, PI16/00662, PI16/01873, PI16/01094, PI16/00501, PI16/00533, PI16/00381, PI16/00366, PI16/01522, PI16/01120, PI17/00764, PI17/01183, PI17/00855, PI17/01347, PI17/00525, PI17/01827, PI17/00532, PI17/00215, PI17/01441, PI17/00508, PI17/01732, PI17/00926, PI19/00957, PI19/00386, PI19/00309, PI19/01032, PI19/00576, PI19/00017, PI19/01226, PI19/00781, PI19/01560, PI19/01332, PI20/01802, PI20/00138, PI20/01532, PI20/00456, PI20/00339, PI20/00557, PI20/00886, and PI20/01158); the Especial Action Project entitled Implementación y evaluación de una intervención intensiva sobre la actividad física Cohorte PREDIMED-Plus grant, the Recercaixa grant (2013ACUP00194), Grants from the Consejería de Salud de la Junta de Andalucía, a grant from the Generalitat Valenciana, a SEMERGEN grant, and funds from the European Regional Development Fund (CB06/03; CB12/03), The International Nut & Dried Fruit; and the AstraZeneca Young Investigators Award in Category of Obesity and T2D 2017 to DR. J.S.-S. is partially supported by ICREA under the ICREA Academia programme. None of the funding sources took part in the design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.
The research ethics committees of all centers approved the study protocol.
Consent to participate
All participants provided written informed consent.
Consent for publication
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Fernandez-Lazaro, C.I., Toledo, E., Buil-Cosiales, P. et al. Factors associated with successful dietary changes in an energy-reduced Mediterranean diet intervention: a longitudinal analysis in the PREDIMED-Plus trial. Eur J Nutr 61, 1457–1475 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-021-02697-8
- Dietary change
- Dietary adherence
- Mediterranean diet
- Randomized controlled trials