Fruitflow^®: the first European Food Safety Authority-approved natural cardio-protective functional ingredient

Epidemiologic studies focused on tomato and tomato products associated their intake with a reduced risk of CVD [19, 21, 22]. However, tomatoes and tomato-based products are important dietary sources of lycopene in observational studies, and most human lycopene trials are performed using tomato-based interventions. Studies showed that increased plasma lycopene levels were associated with reductions in CVD risk factors [23, 24, 25]. The strongest population-based evidence for the beneficial effects of tomato lycopene came from a multi-centre case–control study [26]. However, a subsequent dietary intervention study observed that consumption of a carotenoid-rich diet did not have an effect on plasma antioxidant status or markers of oxidative stress [27]. Several [25, 28], but not all [28, 29, 30, 31, 32] prospective studies relating circulating lycopene concentrations and CVD risk have reported inverse associations, while studies based on dietary intake did not find any such significant associations [32, 33, 34, 35, 36]. Also, the focus on lycopene in tomatoes cannot explain the fact that, taking tomato consumption into account, individuals in the Mediterranean area have a lower risk of CVD when compared to their North American and other European counterparts [2, 37, 38]. Thus, it is difficult to separate out the potential lycopene contribution to cardiovascular health from the overall contribution from tomato products and other components present in tomatoes. The lack of coherence between available epidemiological data and dietary intervention data underscores the requirements for further studies to unravel other non-lycopene components in tomato and their roles in CVD risk reduction. Tomatoes contain several known and unknown compounds that might affect platelet function, lipid metabolism, blood pressure and endothelial function, important determinants of CVD [5, 39]. Lycopene or other antioxidants act through inhibition of LDL oxidation alone and so may only partly contribute to the CVD risk reduction. Recent studies showed that tomato also contains gamma-aminobutyric acid, 13-oxo-9,11-octadecadienoic acid and esculeoside A, which may provide heart and psychological health benefits [40]. 13-oxo-ODA is, however, found only in tomato juice [41]. Esculeoside A reduces plasma lipids and therefore may ameliorate atherosclerotic lesions in ApoE-deficient mice [42]. This indicates that other unidentified compounds (non-lycopene compounds) may also contribute to the cardio-protective effects of tomatoes as observed in epidemiological and interventional studies.

The antiaggregatory effects of different aqueous fruit extracts on human platelets in vitro have been published previously [13]. The maximum inhibitory effect (70–75 %) was found to be with tomato and kiwi fruit extracts, whereas apple and pear had very little activity (2–5 %). Grapefruit, melon and strawberry had intermediate activities on platelet aggregation (33–44 %). The antiplatelet potential of the fruits tested appeared to have no relationship with their antioxidant activity [13]. These antiplatelet compounds in tomato had a molecular mass less than 1000 Da and were highly water soluble and stable to boiling. The compounds of interest were concentrated into an aqueous extract produced by homogenizing fresh tomatoes, removing particulate matter and delipidating. The delipidated aqueous extract was then further fractioned by gel filtration using a Biogel P2 column [13]. Adenosine, a known antiplatelet factor, was identified in one fraction, but its removal from the whole extract did not substantially decrease the antiplatelet activity, indicating the presence of additional, different antiplatelet agents. Further work showed that the aqueous tomato extract consisted largely of soluble sugars (85–90 % of dry matter), which showed no in vitro antiplatelet activity [15]. The non-sugar material that was isolated (tomato total active fraction, tAF) accounted for 4 % of the aqueous tomato extract dry matter and showed strong inhibition of platelet aggregation in vitro. Isolation of many individual components from tAF followed, and it was found that most fell into one of three categories—nucleosides, simple phenolic derivatives and flavonoid derivatives. All showed antiplatelet activities consistent with their compound categories.

Proteomic experiments carried out to examine effects of tAF on platelet signalling pathways showed that tAF components altered a range of platelet functions including those regulating platelet structure, coagulation and redox status (Fig. 2). One of the most strongly affected proteins was protein disulphide isomerase (PDI), an oxidoreductase which catalyses the formation and the isomerization of disulphide bonds. In platelets, blocking PDI with inhibitory antibodies inhibits a number of platelet activation pathways, including aggregation, secretion and fibrinogen binding [61, 62]. Other investigators [63] have reported similar functional effects after blockage of cell surface thiol isomerases. Glycosides related to quercetin, of which several are present in tAF [O’Kennedy N. Fruit extracts. International Patent WO 2010/049707, May 06, 2010], have been shown to interact with PDI in this way [64, 65]. Interaction of polyphenols with PDI suggested a possible mechanism by which tomato extract components could inhibit different pathways of platelet aggregation.

Open image in new window

The functional effects of tAF components were therefore examined in a series of experiments. tAF and its sub-fractions F1, F2 and F3, prepared by semi-preparative reversed-phase HPLC as described by O’Kennedy et al 2006 [66], were observed to prevent activation of integrin αIIbß3 (ie, GPIIb/IIIa). Inhibition of the GPIIb/IIIa activation step—which is common to multiple aggregation pathways—could underlie the wide-ranging effects of tAF [15]. This is consistent with the observation that basal platelet cyclic AMP concentrations (controlled by phospholipase C enzyme family-mediated cascade reactions) are unaltered by tomato extract active components in vitro. In addition, tAF reduced the expression of P-selectin (CD62P) on the platelet surface in response to ADP-induced platelet activation in whole blood [15, 66]. In resting platelets, P-selectin is localized in the membranes of platelet α-granules. On platelet activation, it is redistributed to the platelet surface, where it initiates adhesion to leucocytes. Under conditions of blood flow and shear stress, this glycoprotein promotes platelet cohesion and stabilizes newly formed aggregates. Thus, tAF components can potentially affect the size and longevity of platelet aggregates. tAF components were also found to affect the binding of tissue factor (TF) to activated platelets, at least in part due to effects on P-selectin [O’Kennedy N and Song H-J. Therapeutic uses of tomato extracts. International Patent WO 2007/141495, December 13, 2007].

In summary, these results demonstrating the actions of tAF on different platelet functions were all consistent with potential effects mediated partly through polyphenols and PDI and partly through nucleosides elevating cAMP and cGMP levels in platelets [13, 67]. Effects on TF binding suggested that tAF components could have a larger effect on some aspects of the coagulatory response, such as thrombin generation, than previously imagined. Figure 3 summarizes the actions of different ingredients of Fruitflow^® on platelet activation pathway.

Open image in new window

To develop prototype plant-derived antiplatelet extracts in the laboratory requires understanding of the extract components and the structure–function relationships affecting their mechanism of action and potency. These details were largely established for aqueous tomato extracts during an exploratory research phase as discussed earlier. However, to move from the laboratory prototype to a standardized food ingredient required a change in focus to extract reproducibility, cost analysis and development of a rigorous quality assurance system capable of standardizing bioactivity and controlling raw material variation, processing-induced effects and multiple sites of manufacture. Focusing on these points developed the small-scale laboratory-grade aqueous tomato extract into a commercial food grade tomato extract, which was given the trade name Fruitflow^®.

Today, Fruitflow^® is made in two ingredient formats. The raw material for both formats is high grade, minimally processed tomato commodity products. Fruitflow^® 1 is a syrup of which more than 50 % w/w comprises tomato-derived carbohydrates, and ~3 % w/w comprises known bioactive compounds with measured antiplatelet activity. This ingredient format is especially suitable for use in drinks and foods with high water content. Fruitflow^® 2 is a low-carbohydrate powder, of which more than 55 % w/w comprises bioactive compounds, dried to produce a tablet-grade powder. Fruitflow^® 2 can be compressed into tablets and has flow properties which render it suitable for capsule formation or for use in dry-blend food processes. Both ingredient formats are lycopene- and fat-free, low in inorganic salts and low in organic acids. The potency of Fruitflow^® 1, in terms of bioactive compound content/g, is lower than that of Fruitflow^® 2, as a consequence of their different sugar content: relative potencies of the two ingredients when compared w/w are in an approximate ratio of 1:20. Thus, 3 g Fruitflow^® 1 gives an equivalent dose of bioactives (approximately 65 mg) to 150 mg Fruitflow^® 2. Of this quantity, 6–10 % (up to 9 mg) are known nucleoside derivatives (F1), 13–15 % (up to 10 mg) are known phenolic conjugates (F2), and 8–10 % (up to 7 mg) are known flavonoid derivatives (F3), including a minimum of 2.4 mg quercetin derivatives per dose. This amount of bioactive compounds, which comprises a single daily dose, is equivalent to that found in about 3 average servings of tinned tomato soup.

The development of a quality assurance system which allows such standardization began with the implementation of an analytical HPLC system simple enough to run on the factory floor, but precise enough to measure selected important antiplatelet compounds through each process step. The individual bioactivity profiles of compounds occurring in Fruitflow^® were examined, and three representative components, one from each of the three broad fractions F1, F2 and F3 (as discussed earlier, these fractions were originally defined by reverse-phase HPLC fractionation, described in [15]), were selected. These three compounds were adenosine, which represents a group of nucleosides/nucleotides found in F1, chlorogenic acid, which represents a group of phenolic derivatives found in F2, and rutin, which represents a group of flavonoid derivatives found in F3. The representative compounds were monitored throughout the developing process, from raw material to final product; losses in any one of them would reflect losses of the entire class of compounds each represented and could be quantified and assessed. In addition, total tAF content was quantified throughout. The data collected were mapped onto bioactivity (antiplatelet activity) and the validity of the measurements as a method of monitoring overall bioactivity established. The use of this bioactivity-led analysis then facilitated selection of suitable raw materials, control of raw material variability and investigation of the effects of thermal processing on bioactivity of extracts produced.

Fruitflow^® 2 is a low-sugar derivative of Fruitflow^® 1, deriving from the same raw material and using the same initial clarification processing steps. After removal of insoluble material, complex and simple sugars are extracted from the clarified tomato juice using an adsorption column process, in which the sugars which are the major constituents of tomato juice pass through a resin column without retention, while the remainder of the juice components are adsorbed from the juice and retained on the column. These retained components of interest—which can represent up to 2 % of the fresh weight of the tomato-derived starting material—are then recovered from the column, and the concentrate is dried to powder and standardized for moisture content. The resulting Fruitflow^® 2 powder contains almost no sugars (glucose, fructose, pectin, starch or derivatives). The bioactive components are present in concentrations between 28–32 times higher than in Fruitflow^® 1, due to the removal of the sugar and water matrix of the syrup ingredients. However, as the resin column used successfully retains the remainder of the tomato juice constituents, the relative occurrence of these components in Fruitflow^® 2 remains similar to that in Fruitflow^® 1 (i.e., the process does not significantly alter the relative proportions of the bioactive components).

The Fruitflow^® 1 and 2 ingredients are now incorporated into a range of different food products, ranging from drinks to tablets. Both ingredients are stable in a wide variety of matrices, with appropriate shelf life in all, tested to industry standard ICH levels.

Two studies have been undertaken focusing on the two different ingredient formats, Fruitflow^® 1 and Fruitflow^® 2, and the likelihood of matrix effects altering the acute antiplatelet response after consumption (Table 5, #4, #6). These studies, which involved 54 subjects, showed firstly that it was not possible to distinguish between the antiplatelet effects observed for the Fruitflow^® 1 and Fruitflow^® 2 ingredients, when consumed in doses of 3 g and 150 mg, respectively (Table 5, #4). No difference between the two ingredient formats could be detected three hours after consumption. Secondly, the studies showed that incorporation of WSTC into water-based drinks, yoghurts and capsules was all viable means of inducing an antiplatelet effect three hours after consumption (Table 5, #6). The antiplatelet effects observed in all matrices were similar to those seen in previous studies (Table 5).

Compounds found in Fruitflow^® have been shown to affect many aspects of platelet function, including (via effects on TF immobilization and signalling) thrombin generation. Therefore, during all human intervention studies, care was taken to incorporate specific safety-focused measures to examine whether any effects on the intrinsic or extrinsic clotting pathways could be detected alongside antiplatelet effects. An antiplatelet which also affected blood coagulation pathways could raise safety concerns. However, in all intervention studies undertaken, clotting time measurements showed no significant increases from baseline levels (Table 5). Fruitflow^® does not directly affect blood coagulation at any dose tested.

Even without affecting blood coagulation directly, many antiplatelet drugs, taken on a chronic basis, give rise to excessive platelet inhibition and are associated with internal bleeding. These potentially serious side effects mean that antiplatelet therapy, a fundamental aspect of CVD secondary prevention, is contraindicated for primary prevention as the benefit conferred (lowering risk of a first CVD event in relatively low risk groups) is outweighed by the increased risk of gastric or intracranial bleeding [49]. This judgement was recently revisited by the US FDA, in the context of increasing obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus levels in relatively young populations, but was upheld [69]. The known side effects of existing antiplatelet drugs related to internal bleeding were clearly pertinent for consideration during Fruitflow^® development. However, Fruitflow^® differs fundamentally from antiplatelet drugs in the reversibility of its action. The widely used antiplatelet drugs have irreversible mechanisms of action. Over the course of ten days, approximately 90 % of the circulating platelet population can be irreversibly affected for the lifetime of those platelets. This level of platelet inhibition is then maintained by daily drug treatment. Conversely, the antiplatelet effects of Fruitflow^® are not irreversible, or cumulative, and can be overcome by increased agonist concentrations. This very significant difference in mode of action renders Fruitflow^® suitable for use by the general population as a dietary functional ingredient, while antiplatelet drugs cannot be used.

As Fruitflow^® is designed as a food ingredient, with potential for incorporation into a variety of food products, a specific study was undertaken to examine the likely effects of overconsumption (Table 5, #5). As the amount of Fruitflow^® in any one food product serving is low, equivalent to approximately three bowls of tinned tomato soup, and as dose–response studies had shown that increasing the dose significantly would not result in a much bigger acute effect on platelets, no significant dangers were anticipated. The results of the study confirmed this position; drinking 1L of a drink containing four daily doses of Fruitflow^® did not dangerously reduce platelet aggregability compared to baseline. In fact, the reduction in platelet functionality observed was rather less than that observed for a single serving of the same product. This underlines again the effects of food volume on observable systemic antiplatelet effects.

A study comparing a single dose of Fruitflow^® with 75 mg aspirin, either as a single dose or taken continuously for one week, was undertaken in order to benchmark the effects of a dietary antiplatelet (Table 5, #7). A comparison of the effects of Fruitflow^® and aspirin on the platelet proteome was first carried out, to examine similarities and differences in mechanisms of action. This comparison showed that aspirin and Fruitflow^® affect broadly similar proteomic pathways, with aspirin affecting the signalling pathways more strongly than Fruitflow^®—assuming full metabolism of the entire ingested dose. Proteins affected by Fruitflow^® and aspirin are associated with platelet structure, platelet coagulation, platelet membrane trafficking and platelet secretion - actin-binding proteins, fibrinogen beta chain 5, Ras-related proteins, redox system proteins and HSP70s. Of the 26 proteins with altered expression after treatment, 11 were affected by both Fruitflow^® and aspirin, 14 by aspirin alone and one by Fruitflow^® alone. The single protein affected only by Fruitflow^® was identified as PDI, known to disrupt inside-out signalling as described earlier.

The intervention study which followed in 47 healthy subjects showed that the effects of a single dose of Fruitflow^® were similar, in terms of antiplatelet action, effects on thromboxane synthesis and time to form a primary haemostatic clot (PFA-100 closure time), to those of a single 75 mg dose of aspirin (Table 5, #7). When aspirin was taken daily for seven days, the associated increase in PFA-100 closure time was three times higher than that associated with a single aspirin dose. The cumulative antiplatelet effect of aspirin when taken daily is well known and reflects its irreversible disabling of platelet COX-1 and associated signalling. Fruitflow^®’s effects are not cumulative in this way, as its effects do not irreversibly disable platelet signalling pathways. Thus, taking the results for the study population as a whole, daily aspirin supplementation may be viewed as approximately three times as efficacious as daily Fruitflow^® supplementation, due to the irreversibility of its action. This overall result seemed to echo the proteomic data, but further examination showed that it masked some interesting behaviour in study subgroups. The antiplatelet effects of aspirin in healthy subjects are extremely heterogeneous, with some subjects experiencing a very large increase in time to form a primary haemostatic clot, while others respond poorly (Fig. 6). Approximately 50 % of aspirin responders had a response to the drug which was lower than the average response for the treatment group, in terms of time to form a primary haemostatic clot. This group of subjects had a residually strong response to collagen after 7 days of aspirin treatment, and over one-third of the group responded better to Fruitflow^® supplementation than to 7-day aspirin supplementation. At the other end of the spectrum, for 18 % of the study population, taking aspirin for 7 days more than trebled the time to clot. This underlines the reasons behind the known internal bleeding risks associated with aspirin and its unsuitability for use in primary prevention. While the response to Fruitflow^®, in terms of time to clot data, was also heterogeneous, it was markedly less so than the response to aspirin (Fig. 6). The majority of the subject group experienced increases in time to form a primary haemostatic clot of up to twofold, with less subjects at either extreme. It would appear that the proteomic predictions of stronger aspirin-led effects on platelet signalling may not be observed ex vivo, possibly due to wide variability in the extent of aspirin metabolism, but also possibly due to differences in the relative importance of platelet collagen signalling pathways between individuals. Fruitflow^®, with its wider range of antiplatelet compounds, may have a less variable metabolism and thus achieve its more moderate effects more widely. These more moderate effects, which can be related to the reversibility of the antiplatelet action of Fruitflow^® rather than its mode of action per se, render it a possible option for use in primary prevention of CVD, in contrast to aspirin at any dosage. However, outcomes-based studies on dietary supplements such as Fruitflow^® are needed before their true potential can be properly assessed.

Open image in new window

In 2006, the European Union (EU) adopted a regulation on the use of nutrition and health claims for foods which lays down harmonized EU-wide rules for the use of health or nutritional claims on foodstuffs (Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006). One of the key objectives of this regulation is to ensure that any claim made on a food label in the EU is clear and substantiated by scientific evidence. Different categories of claim are defined. Health claims are defined as pertaining to relationships between food and health either with regard to a function of the body (Article 13 claims), or with regard to reducing a risk factor for a disease (Article 14a claims), or with regard to children’s development (Article 14b claims). Nutrient claims are defined as pertaining to foods with particular nutritional properties with regard to either the energy, or the nutrients, they provide. Allowed nutrient claims are clearly defined within the regulation. However, companies wishing to associate their food or ingredient with a health claim must submit a dossier in support of the desired claim, which is then assessed by the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies. Key to the dossier is the inclusion of human intervention studies showing evidence of the health benefit claimed, for the food/ingredient of interest. More than 2,200 unique claims have been submitted for assessment to date, of which over 95 % have been Article 13 claims, with an overall approval rate of close to 10 %. The first Article 13 claim based on newly developed evidence or proprietary data [a special category under Article 13(5)] to be achieved, in December 2009, was for Fruitflow^®, when the EU Commission authorized the health claim “water-soluble tomato concentrate (WSTC) I and II helps maintain normal platelet aggregation, which contributes to healthy blood flow”. The authorized claim was based on the eight human studies (seven proprietary), and seven non-human studies (three proprietary), conducted with Fruitflow^®, which is given in Table 5.

Thus, Fruitflow^® is now authorized by EFSA for daily consumption, with the conditions that 3 g Fruitflow^® 1 or 150 mg Fruitflow^® 2 must be included in either foods (e.g. fruit juices, flavoured drinks or yoghurt drinks with a total volume up to 250 mL), or in powdered, tabletted or encapsulated food supplements (to be taken with up to 250 mL water).

Atherosclerosis is considered as a chronic inflammatory disease of the arterial vessel wall and is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in the world [70, 71, 72]. Inflammation plays a critical role in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis; it involves the recruitment of inflammatory cells from the circulation and their transmigration through the endothelial wall, resulting in vascular damage, narrowing and hardening of the arteries [71]. The intake of tomatoes and tomato products has been associated with a decreased risk of chronic inflammatory diseases such as atherosclerosis and is linked with a healthy Mediterranean diet [1, 33, 73]. Moreover, several in vitro animal and human studies have shown that tomato concentrates and phytochemicals from tomato have anti-inflammatory activities and may reduce the risk of CVD [73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78].

Activation of the inflammatory pathways in macrophages plays a critical role in the initiation and progression of endothelial dysfunction which eventually results in atherosclerosis. The influence of Fruitflow^® on the inflammatory response of macrophages and on endothelial dysfunction in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) has recently been investigated [18]. In this study, Fruitflow^® was able to regulate the production of cytokines and interleukins in LPS-stimulated macrophages. It decreased the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-12), while the production of the anti-inflammatory IL-10 was increased. Consequently, Fruitflow^® reduced the production of inflammatory mediators related to chronic inflammation. Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) is an important pro-inflammatory transcription factor, and its activation is involved in the pathology of vascular inflammatory diseases. Gene expression analysis indicated that Fruitflow^® reduced the expression levels of NF-κB, suggesting that Fruitflow^® regulated the gene expression of inflammatory mediators via the NF-κB pathway. The data are in agreement with the recent publication from Navarrete et al. [79] which investigated the effects of an aqueous extract of tomato (produced in a similar manner to the laboratory-scale aqueous extracts described here) on the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokine in LPS-activated monocyte-derived THP-1 macrophages. The Navarrete aqueous tomato extract was shown to inhibit the expression of cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β) and the activation of NF-κB in the LPS-stimulated macrophages. Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) are two critical adhesion molecules that are expressed on endothelial cells and mediate adhesion of leucocytes and their interactions with inflamed endothelial cells leading to endothelium damage [80]. Activation of the endothelial cells and the production of inflammatory mediators by atherosclerotic lesions results in the up-regulation of the adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, VCAM-1). Thus, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 are considered as early markers of endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis. In the Schwager et al study (2016), Fruitflow^® significantly decreased the production and the gene expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 in activated HUVEC. This suggests that Fruitflow^® may be capable of altering some of the pathologies typically seen in endothelial dysfunction. Tomato is a rich source of lipophilic and hydrophilic phytochemicals which could influence the inflammatory response [73]. Fruitflow^® is standardized using three “natural” constituents: adenosine, chlorogenic acid and rutin, which are representative of the three main groups of active constituents and have been shown to inhibit both platelet aggregation and inflammatory pathways. Adenosine has been suggested to play a role in immune and inflammatory processes and to improve various inflammatory diseases [81, 82, 83, 84]. Chlorogenic acid is a polyphenol with anti-inflammatory activity, which inhibits the LPS-triggered activation of NF-κB and the associated inflammatory response [85, 86]. In macrophages, rutin suppressed oxidative stress and modulated the gene expression of mediators involved in chronic inflammation [87, 88] [89]. Collectively, the data indicate that compounds contained in Fruitflow^® have the capacity to modulate signalling pathways which alter vascular function, the development of atherosclerotic lesions and consequently the risk of CVD by various mechanisms including anti-inflammatory effects. The extent to which such pathways can be affected in humans after ingestion of Fruitflow^® is not yet known and could form an interesting topic for future studies. Figure 7 summarizes the effects of Fruitflow^® on the endothelial response to inflammatory stimuli via different mechanisms such as activation of NF-κB and the up-regulation of adhesion molecules.

Open image in new window

Hypertension is another very important risk factor for CVD including coronary heart disease, stroke, congestive heart failure and peripheral vascular disease [90]. Clinically, hypertension is characterized by abnormally high blood pressure with the systolic reading greater than 140 mmHg and diastolic reading greater than 90 mmHg. Lowering blood pressure has been linked to 35 %–40 % reductions in the incidence of stroke, 20 %–25 % in myocardial infarction and up to 50 % in heart failure, making hypertension a strong target for therapeutic intervention. Because dietary changes are a first-line intervention for hypertension, food products themselves are increasingly under consideration for the specific effects they may have on blood pressure. In recent years, there has been considerable interest in the potential for using natural food components as functional foods to treat hypertension, especially for people with borderline to mild high blood pressure that does not warrant the prescription of antihypertensive drugs. Increasingly, nutraceuticals and food products have been investigated for their effects on hypertension. Polyphenols inhibit and down-regulate expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and renin. In addition, polyphenols have also been associated with the formation of endothelial nitric oxide leading to vasodilation and lowering of blood pressure. The renin–angiotensin system is a powerful mechanism for controlling blood pressure [91, 92]. In hypertensive patients with elevated plasma rennin–angiotensin activity, a fivefold increased incidence of myocardial infarction was demonstrated [93]. ACE (EC 3.4.15.1, dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase) is a glycoprotein peptidyldipeptide hydrolase that cleaves histidyl leucine dipeptide from angiotensin I forming the potent vasoconstrictor angiotensin II. Studies demonstrated that ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) significantly reduced the morbidity and mortality in patients with myocardial infarction and the incidence of ischaemic events in patients with CVD, even in the absence of their blood pressure-lowering effects [94, 95, 96]. The therapeutic administration of certain ACEIs has also been associated with positive health effects beyond the regulation of blood pressure [97]. Polyphenols inhibit and down-regulate expression of ACE and renin [98]. Tomato juice was earlier shown to lower blood pressure in human volunteers, and this effect was thought to be associated with its high antioxidant content [99, 100]. We therefore tested whether Fruitflow^® inhibited human serum ACE activity and rabbit lung ACE activity [17]. The IC₅₀ value of Fruitflow^® for ACE inhibition in serum was 1.91 ± 0.24 mg/ml (0.038 μg catechin equivalent(CE)/ml), whereas for captopril, the value was 0.56 ± 0.08 μg/ml. Fruitflow^® also inhibited rabbit lung ACE activity in a dose-dependent manner. Orange or banana extract had no such anti-ACE activity. Flavonoid-rich plant extracts have been demonstrated as natural competitive ACEIs where the ACE activity is identified as a critical factor in regulating high blood pressure. These compounds are known to be inhibitors of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase and TxA2 synthesis, two main determining factors in human blood platelet activation/aggregation processes. Consequently, it is possible that the consumption of these bioactive components of Fruitflow^® might reduce more than one CVD risk factor, such as platelet hyperactivity and hypertension. As yet, these data are based on in vitro experiments, and it is clear that further work is required to provide clear information on the metabolic fate of these compounds, and the dosage required for physiological benefits. While a functional food approach offers interesting possibilities for cardio-protection, the requirement for long-term randomized controlled trials remains. Advances in the knowledge of both platelet biology and the mechanism of action of Fruitflow^® bioactive compounds will provide new avenues to develop dietary strategies aimed at promoting cardiovascular health.

Nutritional modification of cellular functions by dietary lipids and other nutritive and non-nutritive factors offers an attractive avenue to correct, modify or prevent many pathophysiological processes including platelet hyperactivity [101]. The mediation of such effects is thought to be primarily achieved through alterations of cell membrane composition and other endogenous lipid stores, with a consequent reduction in AA-derived eicosanoid production and modification of the functional activity of various receptors on platelet membranes [101]. Eicosapentaenoic acid, 20:5n-3 (EPA) and DHA substitute biologically less potent eicosanoids, while the non-nutritive compounds act to reduce all eicosanoid formation specially TxA₂, an important platelet-aggregating agent. Numerous epidemiological studies and clinical trials have reported the health benefits of different omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), including a lower risk of coronary heart diseases [102]. There are several reviews available on the effects of alpha-linolenic (ALA), EPA and docosahexaenoic, 22:6n-3 (DHA) acids on some risk factors associated with atherothrombosis, including platelet activation, plasma lipid concentrations and oxidative modification of LDL [102, 103]. The role of platelets in haemostasis and thrombosis has been known for a long time and is well defined, but more recently a new concept has emerged stating that platelets play a central role in the atherothrombotic process [9, 10]. Dyerberg and Bang showed that Inuits had attenuated platelet reactivity [104] as they consumed omega 3 fatty acids. Platelet aggregation response was diminished with omega 3 fatty acids consumption [105, 106, 107]. A meta-analysis conducted by Gao et al. [108] has demonstrated that omega 3 PUFAs are associated with a significant reduction in platelet aggregation. In addition, low intake of EPA may reduce platelet aggregation, without changing the fatty acid platelet composition [109, 110]. In the same way, following supplementation with DHA [111] platelet function was reduced and a retroconversion of DHA into DPA and EPA was evidenced. More recently, a dose–response study with middle-aged healthy volunteers ingesting increasing amounts of DHA indicated that platelet reactivity was decreased after 400 and 800 mg DHA/day [112]. It is difficult to attribute precisely the effects to each fatty acid, and their beneficial and complementary effects could well be linked to formation or diminution of specific eicosanoids and/or docosanoids.

Combinations of antiplatelet drugs are known to have different physiological effects than single agents. Taking a similar strategy from a functional food perspective, a combination of tomato extract with antiplatelet activity [13] and n-3 fatty acids was investigated for effects on platelet aggregation in vitro. The combination of tomato extract and omega 3 fatty acids inhibited in vitro platelet aggregation to a greater extent than either alone, and this inhibition was correlated with intracellular platelet cAMP levels [113]. Such data indicate that combinations of Fruitflow^® and omega 3 fatty acids—and potentially other non-nutritive compounds such as resveratrol and other polyphenols—may be effective in improving platelet function. Further human intervention studies should be conducted in order to determine the scale of benefits which may arise following consumption of Fruitflow^® combined with other bioactive substances.