Zusammenfassung
Die Endoprothetik des oberen Sprunggelenks hat sich zu einer bewährten Behandlungsoption für Patienten mit fortgeschrittener Arthrose des oberen Sprunggelenks entwickelt. Entscheidend für langfristig gute klinische Resultate und Standzeiten ist die sorgfältige Patientenauswahl unter Berücksichtigung von Indikationen, Kontraindikationen und definierten Prognosefaktoren. Trotz moderner Prothesendesigns bleibt die endoprothetische Versorgung am oberen Sprunggelenk ein komplexes operatives Verfahren, das eines präzisen chirurgischen Vorgehens in einem spezialisierten Zentrum bedarf. Verschiedene Limitierungen sind existent, wie z. B. die Implantationstechnik und Erfahrung des Operateurs, perioperative Komplikationen durch Begleitmedikationen etc. Gegenstand aktueller Forschung ist die Optimierung der Implantatdesigns, Entwicklung personalisierter Operationstechniken, die Verbesserung der Langzeitperformance und die Minimierung perioperativer Komplikationen. Zukünftige Entwicklungen wie die Einführung robotergestützter Chirurgiesysteme und die Integration biologischer Verfahren werden als technologische Perspektiven diskutiert.
Abstract
Total arthroplasty of the ankle joint (TAA) has become an established treatment option for patients with advanced osteoarthritis of the ankle joint. A crucial factor for good long-term clinical results and standing times is careful patient selection, taking the indications, contraindications, and defined prognostic factors into account. Despite modern prosthetic designs, TAA remains a complex surgical procedure that requires precise surgical techniques in a specialized center. Various limitations exist, such as the implantation technique and experience of the surgeon and perioperative complications due to concomitant medications. Current research focuses on the optimization of implant designs, development of personalized surgical techniques, improvement of the long-term performance and minimization of perioperative complications. Future developments, such as the introduction of robot-assisted surgical systems and the integration of biological procedures are also discussed as technological perspectives.
Literatur
Barg A, Elsner A, Chuckpaiwong B, Hintermann B (2010) Insert position in three-component total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 31(9):754–759. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2010.0754
Hermus JPS, van Kuijk SMJ, Spekenbrink-Spooren A, Witlox MA, Poeze M, van Rhijn LW, Arts JJC (2022) Risk factors for total ankle arthroplasty failure: a Dutch arthroplasty register study. Foot Ankle Surg 28(7):883–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2021.12.001
Jaakkola JI, Mann RA (2004) A review of rheumatoid arthritis affecting the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Int 25(12):866–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070402501205
Undén A, Jehpsson L, Kamrad I, Carlsson Å, Henricson A, Karlsson MK, Rosengren BE (2020) Better implant survival with modern ankle prosthetic designs: 1,226 total ankle prostheses followed for up to 20 years in the Swedish ankle registry. Acta Orthop 91(2):191–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1709312
van Heiningen J, Vliet Vlieland TP, van der Heide HJ (2013) The mid-term outcome of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle fusion in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:306. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-306
van der Plaat LW, Haverkamp D (2017) Patient selection for total ankle arthroplasty. Orthop Res Rev 9:63–73. https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S115411
Watts DT, Moosa A, Elahi Z, Palmer AJR, Rodriguez-Merchan EC (2022) Comparing the results of total ankle arthroplasty vs tibiotalar fusion (ankle arthrodesis) in patients with ankle osteoarthritis since 2006 to 2020—a systematic review. Arch Bone Jt Surg 10(6):470–479. https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2021.55790.2778
van der Woude D, van der Helm-van Mil AHM (2018) Update on the epidemiology, risk factors, and disease outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 32(2):174–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2018.10.005
Reina-Bueno M, Munuera-Martínez PV, Pérez-García S, Vázquez-Bautista MDC, Domínguez-Maldonado G, Palomo-Toucedo IC (2021) Foot pain and morphofunctional foot disorders in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(9):5042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18095042
Ng SY, Crevoisier X, Assal M (2012) Total ankle replacement for rheumatoid arthritis of the ankle. Foot Ankle Clin 17(4):555–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2012.08.004 (Erratum in: Foot Ankle Clin. 2013 Mar;18(1):xiii)
Anastasio AT, Patel PS, Farley KX, Kadakia R, Adams SB (2021) Total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis in rheumatic disease patients: an analysis of outcomes and complications using the national inpatient sample (NIS) database. Foot Ankle Surg 27(3):321–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2020.07.006
Raikin SM, Sandrowski K, Kane JM, Beck D, Winters BS (2017) Midterm outcome of the agility total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 38(6):662–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100717701232
Stadler C, Stöbich M, Ruhs B, Kaufmann C, Pisecky L, Stevoska S, Gotterbarm T, Klotz MC (2022) Intermediate to long-term clinical outcomes and survival analysis of the Salto Mobile Bearing total ankle prothesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142(12):3697–3704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03946-5
Clough TM, Ring J (2021) Total ankle arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 103(4):696–703. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-0758.R1
Mann JA, Mann RA, Horton E (2011) STARTM ankle: long-term results. Foot Ankle Int 32(5):473–484. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2011.0473
SooHoo NF, Zingmond DS, Ko CY (2007) Comparison of reoperation rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(10):2143–2149. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.01611
Dekker TJ, Walton D, Vinson EN, Hamid KS, Federer AE, Easley ME, DeOrio JK, Nunley JA, Adams SB Jr. (2017) Hindfoot arthritis progression and arthrodesis risk after total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 38(11):1183–1187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100717723130
Cardoso DV, Veljkovic A (2022) General considerations about foot and ankle arthrodesis. Any way to improve our results? Foot Ankle Clin 27(4):701–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2022.08.007
Walley KC, Arena CB, Juliano PJ, Aynardi MC (2019) Diagnostic criteria and treatment of acute and chronic periprosthetic joint infection of total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Orthop 4(2):2473011419841000. https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011419841000
Ting NT, Della Valle CJ (2017) Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection—an algorithm-based approach. J Arthroplasty 32(7):2047–2050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.070
Krenn V, Morawietz L, Kienapfel H, Ascherl R, Matziolis G, Hassenpflug J, Thomsen M, Thomas P, Huber M, Schuh C, Kendoff D, Baumhoer D, Krukemeyer MG, Perino G, Zustin J, Berger I, Rüther W, Poremba C, Gehrke T (2013) Erweiterte Konsensusklassifikation. Histopathologische Klassifikation von Gelenkendoprothesen-assoziierten Erkrankungen. Z Rheumatol 72(4):383–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-012-1099-0
Steck JK, Schuberth JM, Christensen JC, Luu CA (2017) Revision total ankle arthroplasty. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 34(4):541–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2017.05.010
Albrecht K, Poddubnyy D, Leipe J et al (2022) Perioperativer Umgang mit der Therapie von Patienten mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen. Z Rheumatol 81:212–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-021-01140-x
Adams SB Jr, Spritzer CE, Hofstaetter SG, Jakoi AM, Pietrobon R, Nunley JA 2nd, Easley ME (2007) Computer-assisted tibia preparation for total ankle arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. Int J Med Robot 3(4):336–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.163 (Int J Med Robot. 2008 Jun;4(2):19)
Stauffer TP, Kim BI, Grant C, Adams SB, Anastasio AT (2023) Robotic technology in foot and ankle surgery: a comprehensive review. Sensors 23(2):686. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23020686
Hsu AR, Davis WH, Cohen BE, Jones CP, Ellington JK, Anderson RB (2015) Radiographic outcomes of preoperative CT scan-derived patient-specific total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 36(10):1163–1169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100715585561
Umbel BD, Hockman T, Myers D, Sharpe BD, Berlet GC (2022) Accuracy of CT-derived patient-specific instrumentation for total ankle arthroplasty: the impact of the severity of preoperative varus ankle deformity. Foot Ankle Spec. https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400211068262
Sagherian BH, Claridge RJ (2019) The use of tantalum metal in foot and ankle surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 50(1):119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2018.08.006
Wąsik J, Stołtny T, Pasek J, Szyluk K, Pyda M, Ostałowska A, Kasperczyk S, Koczy B (2019) Effect of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis for ankle osteoarthritis: a comparative study. Med Sci Monit 25:6797–6804. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.915574
https://dgrh.de/Start/Publikationen/Empfehlungen/Therapie-bei-besonderen-Situationen/Perioperatives-Management.html. Zugegriffen: 21. Juli 2023
Weiterführende Literatur
Barg A, Wimmer MD, Wiewiorski M, Wirtz DC, Pagenstert GI, Valderrabano V (2015) Total ankle replacement. Dtsch Ärztebl Int 112(11):177–184. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2015.0177
Foran IM, Vafek EC, Bohl DD, Lee S, Hamid KS (2022) Quality assessment of modern total ankle arthroplasty clinical outcomes research. J Foot Ankle Surg 61(1):7–11. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2021.05.011
Lawton CD, Butler BA, Dekker RG 2nd, Prescott A, Kadakia AR (2017) Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis—a comparison of outcomes over the last decade. J Orthop Surg Res 12(1):76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0576-1
Mazzotti A, Arceri A, Zielli S, Bonelli S, Viglione V, Faldini C (2022) Patient-specific instrumentation in total ankle arthroplasty. World J Orthop 13(3):230–237. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i3.230
Park JS, Mroczek KJ (2011) Total ankle arthroplasty. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 69(1):27–35
Kraal T, van der Heide HJ, van Poppel BJ, Fiocco M, Nelissen RG, Doets HC (2013) Long-term follow-up of mobile-bearing total ankle replacement in patients with inflammatory joint disease. Bone Joint J 95(12):1656–1661. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B12.32146
Adams SB, Steele JR, Demetracopoulos CA, Nunley JA, Easley ME, DeOrio JK (2020) Results of tibia and fibula osteotomies performed concomitant to total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 41(3):259–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100719892221
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
A. Sandomirski, J. Johanshon, C. Lohmann und J. Lietz geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autor/-innen keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien. Für Bildmaterial oder anderweitige Angaben innerhalb des Manuskripts, über die Patient/-innen zu identifizieren sind, liegt von ihnen und/oder ihren gesetzlichen Vertretern/Vertreterinnen eine schriftliche Einwilligung vor.
Additional information
Redaktion
Joachim Grifka, Bad Abbach
QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sandomirski, A., Johanshon, J., Lohmann, C. et al. Endoprothetik des oberen Sprunggelenks. Z Rheumatol 82, 852–858 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-023-01422-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-023-01422-6
Schlüsselwörter
- Fortgeschrittene Arthrose
- Spezialisiertes Zentrum
- Implantatdesign
- Implantationstechnik
- Robotergestützte Chirurgiesysteme