Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Arrhythmias and laboratory abnormalities after an electrical accident: a single-center, retrospective study of 333 cases

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Even though electrical injuries are common in the emergency room, guidelines, consensus, and general recommendations for the management of these patients do not exist in Europe. Documented cases of delayed arrhythmias are rare and their connection with electrical injury has not been fully confirmed. We also use cardio-specific markers for the risk stratification of myocardial injury, but there is no significant study referring to their utility in this clinical situation. These reasons led us to retrospectively analyze all cases of electrical injuries over 23 years to determine the prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias (mainly malignant arrhythmias and delayed arrhythmias).

Methods

We retrospectively searched all patients admitted to the University Hospital in Pilsen, CZ, with a diagnosis of electric injury (ICD diagnostic code T754) from 1997 to 2020. The hospital´s information system was used to research the injury; data were drawn from patient medical records.

Results

We identified 333 cases of electrical injury in our hospital. Men accounted for about two-thirds, and women one-third. Children accounted for about one-third of cases. Most were low-voltage injuries (< 1000 V, 91.6%). All participants had an initial ECG, and 77.5% of patients had continuous ECG monitoring, usually lasting 24 h. Cardiac arrhythmias were noticed in 39 patients (11.7%). The most frequent arrhythmias were: ventricular fibrillation, sinus tachycardia, bradycardia and arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation, and supraventricular tachycardia. The ECG showed cardiac conduction abnormalities in 28 patients (8.1%), and ten patients (3%) had supraventricular or ventricular extrasystoles. In ten cases (3%), we found changes in ST segments and T waves on the initial ECG. Thirty-one patients (9.3%) suffered a loss of consciousness and 50 patients (15.02%) reported paresthesia. The most frequent ion disbalances were hypokalemia (18%) and hypocalcemia (3.3%). Patients with an ion disbalance had significantly more arrhythmias and newly diagnosed cardiac conduction abnormalities. Troponin levels (cTnI or hs-cTnT) were measured in 258 cases (77.48%) and found to be elevated above the 99th percentile in 19 cases (5.7%). Almost one-third of patients had burns of various degrees of seriousness, and 41 patients (12.3%) had concomitant traumatic injuries. Eleven patients underwent pre-hospital resuscitation, three died in the hospital, and another died as result of intracranial hemorrhage.

Conclusion

All malignant arrhythmias occurred immediately after the electrical injury, delayed life-threatening arrhythmias were not observed, and no predictive factors of malignant arrhythmias were found. While elevations of cardiac troponins were observed sporadically, they did not appear helpful for risk stratification. In patients with arrhythmias, ion disbalance may be more critical. We concluded that asymptomatic, uninjured adult and pediatric patients with normal initial ECG findings do not need continuous ECG monitoring and may be discharged home. Recommendations for high-risk patients and patients with mild ECG abnormalities at admission are less obvious.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Waldmann V, Narayanan K, Combes N, Jost D, Jouven X, Marijon E (2018) Electrical cardiac injuries: current concepts and management. Eur Heart J 39(16):1459–1465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koumbourlis AC (2002) Electrical injuries. Crit Care Med 30(11 Suppl):S424–S430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pilecky D, Vamos M, Bogyi P et al (2019) Risk of cardiac arrhythmias after electrical accident: a single-center study of 480 patients. Clin Res Cardiol 108(8):901–908

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Geddes LA, Bourland JD, Ford G (1986) The mechanism underlying sudden death from electric shock. Med Instrum 20(6):303–315

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Akkaş M, Hocagil H, Ay D, Erbil B, Kunt MM, Ozmen MM (2012) Cardiac monitoring in patients with electrocution injury. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 18(4):301–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma BC, Patial RK, Pal LS, Saunkhla J, Thakur SS (1990) Electrocardiographic manifestations following household electric current injury. J Assoc Physicians India 38(12):938–939

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Karataş MB, Onuk T, Güngör B et al (2015) Assessment of electrocardiographic parameters in patients with electrocution injury. J Electrocardiol 48(5):809–814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Searle J, Slagman A, Maaß W, Möckel M (2013) Cardiac monitoring in patients with electrical injuries an analysis of 268 patients at the Charité Hospital. Dtsch Arztebl Int 110(50):847–853

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Bailey B, Gaudreault P, Thivierge RL (2007) Cardiac monitoring of high-risk patients after an electrical injury: a prospective multicentre study. Emerg Med J 24:348–352

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Jensen PJRN, Bloch E, Bagger JP, Nrgaard A, Baandrupt U (1987) Electrical injury causing ventricular arrhythmias. Br Heart J 57(3):279–283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bailey B, Forget S, Gaudreault P (2001) Prevalence of potential risk factors in victims of electrocution. Forensic Sci Int 123:58–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Orak M, Ustundag M, Guloglu C, Gokhan S, Alyan O (2010) Relation between serum pro-brain natriuretic peptide, myoglobin, CK levels and morbidity and mortality in high voltage electrical injuries. Intern Med 49(22):2439–2443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Housinger TA, Green L, Shahangian S, Saffle JR, Warden GD (1985) A prospective study of myocardial damage in electrical injuries. J Trauma 25(2):122–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McBride JW, Labrosse KR, McCoy HG, Ahrenholz DH, Solem LD, Goldenberg IF (1986) Is serum creatine kinase-MB in electrically injured patients predictive of myocardial injury? JAMA 255(6):764–768

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pawlik AM, Lampart A, Stephan FP, Bingisser R, Ummenhofer W, Nickel CH (2016) Outcomes of electrical injuries in the emergency department: a 10-year retrospective study. Eur J Emerg Med 23(6):448–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Truhlar A, Deakin CD, Soar J et al (2015) European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015. Section 4 Cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation 95:148–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Blackwell N, Hayllar J (2002) A three year prospective audit of 212 presentations to the emergency department after electrical injury with a management protocol. Postgrad Med J 78:283–285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Roberts S, Meltzer JA (2013) An evidence-based approach to electrical injuries in children. Pediatr Emerg Med Pract 10(9):1–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Arrowsmith J, Usgaocar RP, Dickson WA (1997) Electrical injury and the frequency of cardiac complications. Burns 23:576–578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Krämer C, Pfister R, Boekels T, Michels G (2016) Cardiac monitoring always required after electrical injuries? Medizinische Klin 111(8):708–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gille J, Schmidt T, Dragu A et al (2018) Electrical injury - a dual center analysis of patient characteristics, therapeutic specifics and outcome predictors. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 26(1):43

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bailey B, Gaudreault P, Thivierge RL, Turgeon JP (1995) Cardiac monitoring of children with household electrical injuries. Ann Emerg Med May 25:612–617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Claudet I, Marechal C, Debuisson C, Salanne S (2010) Risque de trouble du rythme et électrisation par courant domestique [Risk of arrhythmia and domestic low-voltage electrical injury]. Arch Pediatr 17:343–349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Freund Y, Chenevier-Gobeaux C, Bonnet P et al (2011) High-sensitivity versus conventional troponin in the emergency department for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Crit Care 15(3):R147

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by the Charles University Research program “Cooperatio—Cardiovascular Science “ and by the grant of Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic—Conceptual Development of Research Organization (Faculty Hospital in Pilsen—FNPl, 00669806).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic

    Miroslava Seyfrydova & Richard Rokyta

  2. Institute of Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic

    Daniel Rajdl

  3. Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic

    Michal Huml

Authors
  1. Miroslava Seyfrydova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard Rokyta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Rajdl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michal Huml
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miroslava Seyfrydova.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This retrospective study was performed in conformity with the Helsinki Declaration.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seyfrydova, M., Rokyta, R., Rajdl, D. et al. Arrhythmias and laboratory abnormalities after an electrical accident: a single-center, retrospective study of 333 cases. Clin Res Cardiol 112, 1835–1847 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02274-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02274-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation