Abstract
Background
Patients admitted to hospital with heart failure will have had a chest X-ray (CXR), but little is known about their prognostic significance. We aimed to report the prevalence and prognostic value of the initial chest radiograph findings in patients admitted to hospital with heart failure (acute heart failure, AHF).
Methods
The erect CXRs of all patients admitted with AHF between October 2012 and November 2016 were reviewed for pulmonary venous congestion, Kerley B lines, pleural effusions and alveolar oedema. Film projection (whether anterior–posterior [AP] or posterior–anterior [PA]) and cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) were also recorded. Trial registration: ISRCTN96643197
Results
Of 1145 patients enrolled, 975 [median (interquartile range) age 77 (68–83) years, 61% with moderate, or worse, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and median NT-proBNP 5047 (2337–10,945) ng/l] had an adequate initial radiograph, of which 691 (71%) were AP. The median CTR was 0.57 (IQR 0.53–0.61) in PA films and 0.60 (0.55–0.64) in AP films. Pulmonary venous congestion was present in 756 (78%) of films, Kerley B lines in 688 (71%), pleural effusions in 649 (67%) and alveolar oedema in 622 (64%).
A CXR score was constructed using the above features. Increasing score was associated with increasing age, urea, NT-proBNP, and decreasing systolic blood pressure, haemoglobin and albumin; and with all-cause mortality on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 1.10, 95% confidence intervals 1.07–1.13, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Radiographic evidence of congestion on a CXR is very common in patients with AHF and is associated with other clinical measures of worse prognosis.
Graphic abstract
![](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00392-021-01836-9/MediaObjects/392_2021_1836_Figa_HTML.png)
Signs of heart failure are highly prevalent in patients presenting to hospital with acute heart failure and when combined into a chest x-ray score, relate to a worse long term risk of death
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Heart failure (HF) is the leading cause of hospital admission in people aged 65 years or older in developed countries [1]. The chest X-ray (CXR) is one of the core investigations of breathless patients [2, 3]. In 1917, Danzer first identified cardiomegaly as a possible indicator of left ventricular dilation [4]. As hydrostatic pressure increases in the lungs, signs of pulmonary congestion start to appear—pulmonary venous congestion, interstitial oedema, alveolar oedema and pleural effusions—that are often used as entry criteria in trials of therapies for patients presenting with acute HF [5, 6].
The CXR is not a diagnostic test for HF. There is little relation between cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) and left ventricular systolic function [7]. Not all patients with acute HF have pulmonary congestion on their CXR [8]. However, amongst patients presenting to hospital with acute myocardial infarction, worsening features of HF on the CXR are related to increasing risk of death [9,10,11,12,13].
Fifty years ago, when rheumatic heart disease was common, acute pulmonary oedema was dramatic and life threatening [14]. Today, most patients admitted to hospital with HF no longer have new acute pulmonary oedema but instead present with decompensation of chronic underlying ventricular dysfunction, as a consequence of gradual but progressive increases in cardiac filling pressures [15, 16]. We, therefore, described the appearance of the initial CXR in a modern cohort of patients hospitalised for HF and assessed the relation between CXR appearance and outcome. We constructed a CXR scoring system and assessed the relation between the score and outcome in addition to clinical variables.
Methods
Study setting
The observational study to predict readmission for heart failure patients (OPERA-HF) is a prospective observational study which enrolled patients hospitalised for HF in the Hull University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK. Patients had to fulfil the following criteria to be included: age > 18 years; usual residence in the region served by the Hull University Hospitals NHS Trust; hospitalisation with HF; treatment with loop diuretics; and at least one of the following; left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%; left atrial dimension ≥ 4.0 cm [17], or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) > 400 pg/mL (if in sinus rhythm) or > 1200 pg/mL (if in atrial fibrillation—AF) [18]. Patients who were unable to understand and comply with the protocol or unable or unwilling to give informed consent were not included in the study.
Chest radiography
The flow of patients through the study is shown in Fig. 1. The position (supine or erect) and projection of each film is written physically on the X-ray. In the present analysis, we included all patients who had an erect chest radiograph. The patient’s first radiograph on admission was reviewed. We excluded patients who had had only a supine film (as fluid in the lungs and pleura might have been distributed differently) or in whom the film was too rotated for interpretation. One investigator (Daniel Pan, DP) retrospectively reviewed all CXRs, grading the presence and severity of potential features of HF, blind to all other clinical data.
The approach to grading the CXR is illustrated in Fig. 2. The following were recorded for each patient:
-
The film projection—whether posterior–anterior (PA) or anterior–posterior (AP);
-
Alveolar oedema—graded as absent, present (oedema covering any of the lungs, but not all zones in both lungs) or severe (oedema covering all zones in both lungs).
-
Kerley B lines—graded as the presence or absence of prominent interstitial fissure lines in and between the lung lobes.
-
Pleural effusions—graded as present or not present. Presence is when there are both costophrenic and cardiophrenic blunting of one lung field.
-
Pulmonary venous congestion—graded as present or absent. Presence is when there is an increase in the proportion of vessels in the upper lung zones compared to the lower lung zones.
-
Heart size—measured as CTR.
The CTR was calculated using the original method described by Danzer [4]. A single line is drawn dividing the cardiac silhouette vertically through the midline. Measurement ‘A’ is widest point from the right heart border to the line; measurement ‘B’ is the widest point from the left heart border to the line. Measurement ‘C’ is the widest measurement from the midline to the inner borders of the ribs. Thus, the CTR is defined as (A + B)/2C. An unmeasurable CTR was recorded where the cardiac borders were too obscure for accurate measurement. Although modern dictum suggests that accurate CTR interpretation is not possible in AP films, we considered a CTR of > 0.55 to be cardiomegaly regardless of projection, in keeping with the previous literature [19].
Signs related to other pathology as routinely reported by the radiologist were also recorded. To assess repeatability of findings, 25 CXRs were randomly selected and scored by a second investigator (Shirley Sze, SS).
Patients were followed until 1st of May 2017; the main outcome of interest was all-cause mortality.
The study had ethical approval from the South Yorkshire Research Ethics Committee (REC ref: 12/YH/0344) and is conducted in accordance with ICH-GCP, Declaration of Helsinki, the Data Protection Act 1998 and NHS Act 2006.
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables are expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR). Variables that were not normally distributed were log-transformed before analysis in further models. Categorical variables are expressed as numbers and percentages (%). Missing data were excluded from statistical analysis. Pearson’s Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact row test were used to compare categorical variables between groups. Student’s t test and the Kruskal–Wallis test were used to compare continuous variables between the groups depending on the normality of the distribution.
Several Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to investigate the relation between variables and all-cause mortality. A first model was used to assign a weighting to the CXR variables based on their relation to prognosis. Only CXR variables were included in this model. Those significantly related to mortality on univariable analysis (a liberal threshold of P < 0.10 was used) were chosen for the multivariable model. The assigned points of the CXR score were generated by the beta coefficient (log hazard ratio) for each variable from the multivariable analysis, multiplied by ten and rounded to the nearest whole number [20].
A base model was constructed to assess the incremental value of the new CXR score in addition to other important clinical variables in predicting mortality. The base model included variables which had few missing data (< 1%) and which were also significantly related to mortality on univariable Cox regression analysis (again, a liberal threshold of P < 0.10 was used).
The individual CXR variables and the CXR score were then added to the base model, separately and in combination, to the find the best model to predict mortality. The new models’ cumulative discrimination was measured using Harrell’s C statistic; its statistical significance in comparison to the base model was assessed with the likelihood ratio test. A 2-sided P value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Venn diagrams are used to illustrate the relation between different features of pulmonary congestion. Kaplan–Meier curves, censored at 4 years, with the log-rank statistic were used to illustrate outcome.
Repeatability of CXR findings was tested using weighted Cohen’s Kappa statistic and Bland–Altman plots [21].
All analyses were performed using STATA software (version 14.2, StataCorp, Texas, United States) and Excel version 2016 (Microsoft, Redmond, United States).
Results
Participants
Between October 2012 and November 2016, 1145 patients were enrolled into OPERA-HF. After excluding 70 patients because they did not have a CXR during admission and another 100 patients because the CXRs were inadequate for interpretation, 975 remained (Fig. 1).
Table 1 shows the clinical and laboratory findings of patients recruited into the study on admission to hospital. Most patients had been hospitalised for HF in the previous year (60%). A quarter (26%) of patients did not have NT-proBNP measured on admission. Half of patients (54%) presented with breathlessness on exertion; 26% with breathlessness at rest and in the remainder, a symptom other than breathlessness was the reason for admission. 11% of patients presented with HF associated with an acute coronary syndrome.
Chest radiography appearances
Table 2 shows the CXR appearances of patients in the study. Most patients had AP CXRs (71%,). There was a low prevalence of features on the CXR unrelated to HF, including: consolidation (N = 91); pulmonary fibrosis (N = 16); hiatus hernia (N = 3); tumours/nodules (N = 7); pulmonary infarction (N = 5); pulmonary plaques (N = 13) and pneumonectomy (N = 1).
Cardiomegaly was present in 67% and un-measureable in 6%. The median CTR (excluding those in whom a measurement was not possible, N = 55) was 0.57 (IQR 0.53–0.61) in those with PA films and 0.60 (IQR 0.55–0.64) in those with AP films. Pulmonary venous congestion was present in 78%, and a degree of alveolar oedema was present in 64% (although only 10% had severe alveolar oedema). Only one film had a pleural effusion that covered most of one lung field.
Figure 3 illustrates the percentage of patients with different features of pulmonary congestion. A third (33%) of patients had all four features of pulmonary congestion (Fig. 3); only 5% had none and 10% had only one. Features of pulmonary congestion were generally more common with increasing CTR and on AP compared to PA films as shown by the bar charts illustrating the proportion of patients with each feature of pulmonary congestion, by cardiothoracic ratio and chest X-ray projection in Fig. 4.
Generation of the CXR score, relation to clinical variables and relation to outcome
After a median follow-up of 671 days, 440 (45%) patients had died of which 41 died during the index admission. A fifth (19%) of the patients was readmitted with worsening HF within 30 days of discharge from their index hospitalisation.
Table 3 shows Cox regression analyses of chest X-ray variables and formation of the chest X-ray score; Fig. 5 shows Kaplan–Meier curves of all-cause mortality for chest X-ray projection, cardiothoracic ratio, pleural effusion, alveolar oedema. In univariable Cox regression analysis, each radiological abnormality, except pulmonary venous congestion, was associated with all-cause mortality. Consequently, a score was constructed using all CXR signs apart from pulmonary venous congestion.
Table 4 shows clinical and laboratory findings of patients recruited into the study and in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality and readmission to hospital within 30 days of discharge by increasing chest X-ray score. There was no relation between the CXR score and the presence (or absence) of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Although associated with all-cause mortality at 4 years, the CXR score was neither associated with in-hospital mortality, nor mortality or readmission within 30 days of discharge. A worsening CXR score was associated with older age, higher serum concentrations of potassium and urea and higher plasma NT-proBNP (especially if the patient was in AF), lower values for diastolic blood pressure, haemoglobin, and albumin, being a woman, prior CABG and presenting with breathlessness as the main symptom.
CXR scores were lower in the 5% of patients (n = 49) whose first radiograph was taken more than 24 h after admission than in those who had their CXR earlier [median score 3 (IQR 3–7) v 7 (5–9), P < 0.001].
Relation of the CXR score to prognosis in addition to other variables
Tables 5 and 6 show univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses of clinical and laboratory variables and the chest X-ray score On univariable Cox regression analysis, age, gender, hospitalisation for heart failure in the previous year, prior MI or CABG, malignancy, lower systolic and diastolic blood pressures, lower heart rate, lower sodium, haemoglobin, chloride and albumin and higher potassium, renal function, troponin, and NT-proBNP, and a higher CXR score was related to mortality. In a multivariable model, older age and higher serum concentrations of urea and sodium, lower systolic blood pressure, lower heart rate and lower serum concentrations of chloride and albumin were independent predictors of mortality. The CXR score was also independently associated with mortality (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.07–1.13 per point increase, P < 0.001). However, CXR score did not improve the model’s c-statistic for predicting mortality at different time-points as shown in Table 7.
Reproducibility
CXR variables varied in reliability, with alveolar oedema being the most reliable and CTR being the least, as shown in Table 7.
Discussion
There are three main findings from this study. First, radiological evidence of congestion is very common in patients presenting to hospital with HF. Second, patients presenting with breathlessness as their dominant symptom have a higher CXR score. Third, increasing pulmonary congestion on the CXR score is related to worsening HF as assessed by other clinical measures such as age, potassium, urea, NT-proBNP, haemoglobin and albumin, and is associated with increasing all-cause mortality, but not related to overall prognosis when these other variables are taken into account.
We found that the commonest abnormal feature on the chest X-ray was venous congestion, presumably representing a rise in left atrial pressure. As heart failure worsens, fluid can escape from pulmonary capillaries into the interstitial and pleural spaces resulting in Kerley B lines and pleural effusions, the next two most common features we found. Frank alveolar oedema was the least common finding, and represents the patient passing a ‘tipping point’ when the capacity of the lymphatics to remove fluid is exceeded and fluid starts to accumulate in the airspaces of the lungs [16].
Previous older studies have graded congestion in an incremental fashion based on the aforementioned sequence of events, with stage one being pulmonary venous congestion, stage two interstitial oedema and stage three alveolar oedema [11,12,13, 22]. We chose to grade all features separately and found that although many had pulmonary venous congestion and few had severe alveolar oedema, patients commonly have features of pulmonary congestion not in sequence. It may be that if pulmonary congestion happens very rapidly, the radiographic features might not occur in order.
Our study findings confirm that the CXR can identify pulmonary congestion as a potential cause of breathlessness in patients presenting to hospital. Since congestion on the CXR is still related to mortality in HF patients on univariable analysis, this should prompt clinicians to adequately diurese the patient when necessary.
Only a small proportion of patients (91/975, 9%) in our cohort had evidence of pneumonia on the CXR. Future studies should investigate whether the CXR can help to differentiate pulmonary congestion from other causes of breathlessness, and influence therapeutic decision making beyond HF, such as the initiation of antibiotics. The CXR remains a source of important clinical information and may be used within artificial intelligence algorithms, to help assist clinicians improve the diagnosis of AHF and guide management [23].
To our knowledge, this is the first study which has found a relation between CXR projection and all-cause mortality. If a patient is too unwell to stand, inhale and hold their breath, then an AP film in the sitting upright position is performed [24], and thus projection is a marker of a patient’s fitness during their acute illness.
Our findings agree with previous work, which found that cardiomegaly on the CXR, regardless of projection, was related to a worse prognosis in patients with acute and chronic HF [9, 10]. However, despite a high level of readmission to hospital within 30 days of discharge, in-hospital and 30-day mortality was low. None of these outcomes strongly related to the degree of congestion, consistent with the observation that early readmissions are often not for HF [25,26,27]. Our CXR score was strongly related to clinical variables that are related to the prognosis of patients with acute HF. Thus, it is not surprising that CXR features do not add much to the predictive power of models that included these variables.
One surprising finding was that a lower initial heart rate was related to higher mortality. Lourenco and colleagues had similar findings amongst 564 patients presenting with acute HF to a single centre [28]. In both studies, the first heart rate measurement was recorded on presentation to hospital. Although a higher resting heart rate predicts higher mortality in chronic HF, a faster initial heart rate in acute HF may be a marker of a preserved autonomic nervous response.
Limitations
This is a single centre study. Most patients were of Caucasian ethnicity. Notably, Kobayashi and colleagues recently examined pulmonary congestion on the CXR in 117 patients and found that a worsening congestion score index was associated with a composite of all-cause mortality or rehospitalisation for HF at 90 days [29]. The index was generated from dividing the chest X-ray into six zones, and grading the severity of congestion in each lung zone. Our method of grading the CXR is far more likely to be the way CXRs are routinely examined in the UK. We have also taken into account radiograph projection or CTR, both of which we have shown to relate to worse prognosis.
Our version of the CXR score need to be validated in another population. Although reports from radiologists were used, no radiologists were involved in the retrospective review of the films. This may account for some of the variation in reproducibility of CXR variables and possibly misinterpretation of films, such as pneumonia being mistaken for localised alveolar oedema. However, diagnosis and treatment of HF is started as soon as the patient is admitted to hospital and not usually after radiology consult. The Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology has published a position paper which recommends proper assessment of cardiomegaly, pulmonary venous congestion, pleural effusions, interstitial and alveolar oedema by all admitting physicians [30]. This study, therefore, reflects how CXRs would be interpreted by the majority of clinicians treating patients presenting with breathlessness.
Most CXRs were done within the first 24 h of admission but the CXR scores of those who had their first film after 24 h were lower. It is unknown which of these CXR appearances were influenced by diuretic administration. In another study, Kobayashi and colleagues found that residual pulmonary congestion on the CXR prior to discharge predicted a composite outcome of all-cause mortality or rehospitalisation for heart failure at 1 year [31].
Conclusions
In patients admitted to hospital for HF, there is a high prevalence of radiographic features of congestion. Worsening features of congestion are associated with variables related to worse prognosis. An increase in the CXR score is related to increasing all-cause mortality but is not an independent predictor of outcome when other variables are taken into account.
Availability of data and material
Available from corresponding author (DP) upon reasonable request.
References
Donkor A, McDonagh T, Hardman S (2017) National heart failure audit April 2015 to March 2016. National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR), London
Mebazaa A, Yilmaz MB, Levy P et al (2015) Recommendations on pre-hospital & early hospital management of acute heart failure: a consensus paper from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, the European Society of Emergency Medicine and the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine. Eur J Heart Fail 17:544–558. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.289
Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD et al (2016) 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 37:2129–2200m. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128
Danzer CS (1919) The cardio-thoracic ratio: an index of cardiac enlargement. Am J Med Sci 157:513–552
Gluecker T, Capasso P, Schnyder P et al (1999) Clinical and radiologic features of pulmonary edema. Radiographics 19:1507–1531. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.242035075
Gheorghiade M, Follath F, Ponikowski P et al (2010) Assessing and grading congestion in acute heart failure: a scientific statement from the Acute Heart Failure Committee of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Eur J Heart Fail 12:423–433. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfq045
Clark AL, Coats AJS (2000) Unreliability of cardiothoracic ratio as a marker of left ventricular impairment: Comparison with radionuclide ventriculography and echocardiography. Postgrad Med J 76:289–291. https://doi.org/10.1136/pmj.76.895.289
Allen CJ, Guha K, Sharma R (2015) How to improve time to diagnosis in acute heart failure—clinical signs and chest X-ray. Card Fail Rev 1(2):69–74. https://doi.org/10.15420/cfr.2015.1.2.69
Petrie MC, McMurray JJV (2003) It cannot be cardiac failure because the heart is not enlarged on the chest x-ray. Eur J Heart Fail 5:117–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-9842(02)00239-8
Roguin A, Behar D, Ben Ami H et al (2000) Long-term prognosis of acute pulmonary oedema—an ominous outcome. Eur J Hear Fail J Work Gr Hear Fail Eur Soc Cardiol 2:137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-9842(00)00069-6
Battler A, Karliner JS, Higgins C et al (1980) The initial chest X-ray in acute myocardial infarction prediction of early and late mortality and survival. Circ 61(5):1004-1009. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.61.5.1004
Brezins M, Benari B, Pap V, Cohen A, Bursztein S, Markiewicz W (1993) Left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction, acute pulmonary edema, and mechanical ventilation: relationship to prognosis. Crit Care Med 21:380–385
Lin M, Yang YF, Chiang HT et al (1995) Reappraisal of continuous positive airway pressure therapy in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: Short-term results and long-term follow-up. Chest 107:1379–1386. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.107.5.1379
Burch G, DePasquale N (1969) Congestive heart failure—acute pulmonary edema. JAMA 208:1895–1897
Packer M (2019) Why are physicians so confused about acute heart failure? N Engl J Med 381:774–776. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejme1909053
Clark AL, Cleland JGF (2013) Causes and treatment of oedema in patients with heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol 10:156–170. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2012.191
Nikitin NP, Witte KKA, Thackray SDR et al (2003) Effect of age and sex on left atrial morphology and function. Eur J Echocardiogr 4:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1053/euje.2002.0611
Shelton RJ, Clark AL, Goode K et al (2006) The diagnostic utility of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide for the detection of major structural heart disease in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 27:2353–2361. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl233
Kabala JE, Wilde P (1987) The measurement of heart size in the antero-posterior chest radiograph. Br J Radiol 60:981–986. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-60-718-981
Austin PC, Lee DS, D’Agostino RB, Fine JP (2016) Developing points-based risk-scoring systems in the presence of competing risks. Stat Med 35:4056–4072. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6994
Bartlett JW, Frost C (2008) Reliability, repeatability and reproducibility: analysis of measurement errors in continuous variables. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:466–475. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.5256
Melenovsky V, Andersen MJ, Andress K et al (2015) Lung congestion in chronic heart failure: haemodynamic, clinical, and prognostic implications. Eur J Heart Fail 17:1161–1171. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.417
Seah JCY, Tang JSN, Kitchen A et al (2019) Chest radiographs in congestive heart failure: visualizing neural network learning. Radiology 290:514–522. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018180887
European Commission (2021) European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Images. https://www.sprmn.pt/pdf/EuropeanGuidelineseur16260.pdf. Accessed 17 Mar 2021
Arora S, Patel P, Lahewala S et al (2017) Etiologies, Trends, and Predictors of 30-Day Readmission in Patients With Heart Failure. Am J Cardiol 119:760–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.022
Aggarwal S, Gupta V (2014) Demographic parameters related to 30-day readmission of patients with congestive heart failure: Analysis of 2,536,439 hospitalizations. Int J Cardiol 176:1343–1344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.07.140
Saito M, Negishi K, Marwick TH (2016) Meta-analysis of risks for short-term readmission in patients with heart failure. Am J Cardiol 117:626–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.11.048
Lourenço P, Ribeiro A, Cunha FM et al (2016) Is there a heart rate paradox in acute heart failure? Int J Cardiol 203:409–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.10.129
Kobayashi M, Bercker M, Huttin O et al (2019) Chest X-ray quantification of admission lung congestion as a prognostic factor in patients admitted for worsening heart failure from the ICALOR cohort study. Int J Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.06.062
Mullens W, Damman K, Harjola VP et al (2019) The use of diuretics in heart failure with congestion—a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail 21:137–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1369
Kobayashi M, Watanabe M, Coiro S et al (2019) Mid-term prognostic impact of residual pulmonary congestion assessed by radiographic scoring in patients admitted for worsening heart failure. Int J Cardiol 289:91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.091
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all patients who participated in this study, without which a deeper understand of what factors relate to outcomes in patients with acute heart failure would not be possible
Funding
DP, SS and OB are funded by the NIHR. Philips Research provided the income of two research nurses, co-authors KD and JB, for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DP, PP and ALC conceived and designed the study. DP, PP, KD, JB, AU, OB, SS and SK acquired the data. DP, PP, ALC and ARR analysed and interpreted the data. DP drafted the manuscript. All the authors critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. DP is the guarantor. The corresponding author attests that all the listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
IS and JR are employed by Philips Research. JGFC, ALC, KD and JB have received departmental research support from Philips. ALC has received department support from Novartis and payment for advisory boards from Novartis, Vifor and Pfizer.
Ethics approval
Ethical approval from the South Yorkshire Research Ethics Committee (REC ref: 12/YH/0344) and is conducted in accordance with ICH-GCP, Declaration of Helsinki, the Data Protection Act 1998 and NHS Act 2006.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pan, D., Pellicori, P., Dobbs, K. et al. Prognostic value of the chest X-ray in patients hospitalised for heart failure. Clin Res Cardiol 110, 1743–1756 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01836-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01836-9